Pinned Tweet
Most traders want the same things:
→ AI that sharpens their trading
→ An automated trading journal that does the work
→ Data-driven decisions
→ A way to optimize how they trade
→ A path to keep learning
TradeZella does all of it. The AI trading partner behind the best traders 👇
108 trades. +31.49R.
One strategy, tracked in TradeZella.
Love seeing traders build confidence from actual execution data 🔥
Replying to @ETT_Trades
Live testing results YTD 📊
Based on one of my funded accounts:
- 108 trades taken
- +31.49R
- 62% win rate
- 62.62% daily win rate
- 1.80 profit factor
- 1.09 average win/loss ratio
This is why I focus on live testing and collecting data.
The goal is to keep executing my edge, refining where the data supports it, and letting the sample size grow.
Less guessing. More data. Consistent execution.
Process > outcome.
Why does price sometimes drop on good news?
Because news tells you which way the first push goes. Levels tell you where that push stalls.
Say NQ topped out yesterday and sold off hard from one exact price. That high is on almost every trader’s chart.
8:30 this morning, inflation prints 2.8% against a 3.0% forecast. Good news. NQ jumps 80 points in four minutes, straight into yesterday’s high.
That’s where it gets crowded. Traders who bought lower have targets there. Traders who shorted that high yesterday are selling it again. By 8:40 the sellers win, and NQ gives back 60 of the 80 points.
Anyone who bought the headline at 8:34 is down $1,200 on one contract. The news is still good.
To someone watching only the headline, the market ignored good news. It didn’t. Price ran into a level where a lot of orders were waiting.
It works the other way too. A bad number pushes price down into a level where buyers have been stepping in for days, and it bounces instead of collapsing.
The levels don’t need to be fancy. Yesterday’s high and low, the overnight high and low, and the open cover most of what a day trader needs.
Before big news, mark the levels above and below price. The news picks the direction. The levels decide how far it gets.
No plan → you improvise.
No journal → you repeat mistakes.
No stats → you defend a losing setup.
No review → all three happen again next month.
0.5R lost.
1-star execution.
Already knows exactly what he doesn't want to repeat 👏
Graded this trade a 1 star. I try to be as honest as possible in my daily reviews because that's what will make me a better trader
This second trade on MES was purely emotional, longing a falling knife here and honestly kinda mad at myself for taking this
Risked 0.5R on this so it was proper risk management, but these are the exact trades I want to avoid at all costs
Today's learning lesson cost 0.5R 👍
$2.25K so far in October.
Mostly one trade a day.
Love seeing this kind of consistency 🔥
Other than my issue with Lucid this week, October is looking solid on my other accounts.
Hopefully I can keep this momentum into the end of the month.
As for the Lucid update, haven’t heard from them yet ever since AJ replied to my post on Thursday morning. Waiting patiently since that’s all I can do.
We go next. 🫡
$43,900 on the month so far trading $NQ
3 wins 0 losing days this week
My main goal is to follow my process, and be as mechanical as possible
3 years ago I was losing thousands of dollars in the markets
Ask me anything
Memorize these 18 numbers before your next trade.
You think you need to jump strategies.
But actually you need to know the math you’re actually up against 👇
You can memorize these. But the only numbers that move your account are your own.
TradeZella pulls your real win rate, average R, and trade count so you stop guessing which of these is costing you 👇
tradezella.com/?utm_source=t…
October TradeZella dashboards have been looking a little too good lately 😮💨🔥
How’s everyone’s October going?
They say “Gaps always fill.”
So we tested 487 of them on Nasdaq futures. Same-day fills only.
Verdict: 6 in 10 didn’t fill.
Here's what we found 👇
8/
What to do with this:
Gap under 0.5%: it’ll probably fill. It probably won’t pay.
Gap over 1%: it probably won’t fill. If you fade it anyway, the R:R is doing the work, not the win rate.
Still open at 10:30: the odds just got cut in half.
9/
“Gaps always fill” lasted this long because nobody counted.
This was one strategy, typed in plain English, run on 487 trades. Every number above came out of the log.
That’s what the TradeZella backtester is for. Test the rule before it tests you.
tradezella.com?utm_source=tw…

















