t retweeted
đșđžđŹđ§ ELON APPEARS WITH ORWELL'S SHIRT VIA VIDEO AT TOMMY ROBINSON MARCH: "HE WOULD'VE WANTED FREEDOM OF SPEECH"
Tommy:
âNone of this wouldâve happened without you⊠the British public now has access to the truth⊠weâre grateful."
Elon:
âCongratulations Tommy. Youâre welcome.
âMy shirt is of George Orwell. He would've wanted freedom of speech⊠wanted people to know what's real⊠to fight government oppression⊠to fight for truth and for the future of Great Britain.
Source: @TRobinsonNewEra, @elonmusk
đŹđ§ LONDON POLICE CLASH WITH PROTESTERS AT TOMMY ROBINSONâS MASSIVE MARCH
Violent scenes erupted during the âUnite the Kingdomâ rally as police in riot gear confronted British patriots in the streets.
Protesters were seen being pushed, grabbed, and restrained as tensions escalated in heavy rain.
The march, which drew hundreds of thousands, turned chaotic as officers attempted to control the crowd.
Source: @RadioGenoa
t retweeted
Elon is the greatest of all time.
We donât fully appreciate it.
The sheer range of what he does.
And the difficulty!
A few setbacks donât matter.
Heâll figure it out.
Hardware is hard.
Thatâs why Elon is by far the greatest founder of all time.
Remember â countless startups die just while trying to put stationary beige boxes on desktops. Very smart people get crushed by supply chain disruptions, or China tariffs, or lockdowns, or shipping interruptions, or regulatory delays.
Not Elon. He didnât just survive financial crisis and coronavirus. He managed to build physical things in America while fighting the state and the laws of nature at the same time.
Somehow he managed to simultaneously build not just a car company but a rocket company. Those donât just have âmoving partsâ, they are a moving whole.
The difficulty level here is insane. Hardware is completely different from software. One recall, just one serious bug, can destroy your company. If you are charging $50 for something that costs $40, and you need to recall and replace a million units, youâre usually dead.
So just one of these companies â just Tesla, or just SpaceX â would be an incredible accomplishment for anyone. Even a very intelligent and hardworking person would have to live an incredibly boring, disciplined, focused life to possibly maintain the extremely low error rate needed to profitably ship such complex products.
Not Elon. He did SpaceX and Tesla while having N children by K women. While also cofounding OpenAI and Neuralink and Boring Company. While fighting and defeating countless journalists, politicians, haters, and short sellers. And of course while buying Twitter, posting all the time, and building a following larger than almost any politician.
The better you are, the better you understand how much better Elon is. If youâre good at math you appreciate Ramanujanâs greatness. If youâre good at basketball you respect how amazing Michael Jordan was. Elon is like that, for tech. Everyone in tech understands the sport weâre playing, and he really is the greatest of all time.
t retweeted
I sent the following message to our team and investors:
â
As you know, Daniel Grossâs time with us has been winding down, and as of June 29 he is officially no longer a part of SSI. We are grateful for his early contributions to the company and wish him well in his next endeavor.
I am now formally CEO of SSI, and Daniel Levy is President. The technical team continues to report to me.
â You might have heard rumors of companies looking to acquire us. We are flattered by their attention but are focused on seeing our work through.
We have the compute, we have the team, and we know what to do. Together we will keep building safe superintelligence.
Ilya
t retweeted
The US is broke.
The real debt is $175T+.
And @elonmusk is 100% correct on the numbers.
But the difficult step is the logical conclusion.
There is no fix. It's a writeoff. A national bankruptcy.
And the default will be in the form of money printing.
t retweeted
.@elonmusk Hire me to run Twitter as VP of Product. Iâve been building social apps for 11 yearsâand not in a way that leads products to decay like a typical BigTech âproduct director dad.â Twitter has the potential to be the leading messenger, groups app & content creation tool.
t retweeted
Ladies and gentlemen, I've officially posted my way to the top:
I'm joining @X as Head of Product.
đ is the most important social network in the world. It's where internet culture originates and where the world's most influential people convene.
Finding my community and building an audience on đ has impacted my life more than any single thing: it's unlocked friendships, professional opportunities and it's even where I met my girlfriend.
While I already spend every waking hour on this app, I'll now be spending that time helping others unlock that same value. And we'll certainly be leveraging the power of Grok to create hyper-relevant timelines and help people understand everything that's happening.
Thanks @elonmusk and the đ team for inviting me to work on the product that I live and breathe.
t retweeted
Weâre are ready to ship them all to Paris whenever we get the green light from the French government.
t retweeted
Yes. A few miscellaneous thoughts.
(1) First, the new bottleneck on AI is prompting and verifying. Since AI does tasks middle-to-middle, not end-to-end. So business spend migrates towards the edges of prompting and verifying, even as AI speeds up the middle.
(2) Second, AI really means amplified intelligence, not agentic intelligence. The smarter you are, the smarter the AI is. Better writers are better prompters.
(3) Third, AI doesnât really take your job, it allows you to do any job. Because it allows you to be a passable UX designer, a decent SFX animator, and so on. But it doesnât necessarily mean you can do that job *well*, as a specialist is often needed for polish.
(4) Fourth, AI doesnât take your job, it takes the job of the previous AI. For example: Midjourney took Stable Diffusionâs job. GPT-4 took GPT-3âs job. Once you have a slot in your workflow for AI image gen, AI code gen, or the like, you just allocate that spend to the latest model.
(5) Fifth, killer AI is already here â and itâs called drones. And every country is pursuing it. So itâs not the image generators and chatbots one needs to worry about.
(6) Sixth, decentralized AI is already here and itâs essentially polytheistic AI (many strong models) rather than monotheistic AI (a single all-powerful model). That means balance of power between human/AI fusions rather than a single dominant AI that will turn us all into paperclips/pillars of salt.
(7) Seventh, AI is probabilistic while crypto is deterministic. So crypto can constrain AI. For example, AI can break captchas, but it canât fake onchain balances. And it can solve some equations, but not cryptographic equations. Thus, crypto is roughly what AI canât do.
(8) Eighth, I think AI on the whole right now is having a decentralizing effect, because there is so much more a small team can do with the right tooling, and because so many high quality open source models are coming.
All this could change if self-prompting, self-verifying, and self-replicating AI in the physical world really gets going. But there are open research questions between here and there.
The view that imagines AI wiping out jobs or causing some overnight shock to the system doesnât contemplate that companies are a made up of a series of bottlenecks. When AI accelerates work in one area, you run into a bottleneck somewhere else.
As any individual workflow gets more efficient, the ultimate productivity gain is still constrained by some other part of the system. And usually itâs the case that that part of the system will not have inherently seen the same impact of AI efficiency, which means humans are still doing the work.
Take almost any process in an enterprise and you can see how this plays out. If AI Agents generate leads for the sales team, the bottleneck will be humans to have conversations with those customers. And if the leads are good, that will mean more sales hiring. If AI Agents generate more code, you will eventually be bottlenecked by the engineers that can review and incorporate that code into production.
You can quickly see how this scales to any process in an organization. Economists and others tend to totally miss how work actually happens in a company; itâs not a series of wholly independent tasks, but instead highly interdependent tasks that all link to each other across a system.
This is of course the natural rate limiter of AI efficiency gains, but also the reason why humans will still be doing so many jobs in the future.
t retweeted
My 19 yo built his first structural arch today. Just a small bldg project behind the house but something he will see often as the years go by and reflect.
t retweeted
Yuval Noah Harari says you can think about the AI revolution as âa wave of billions of AI immigrants.â
They don't need visas. They don't arrive on boats. They come at the speed of light. They'll take jobs. They may seek power.
And no one's talking about it.
t retweeted
No, you just suck at the most important thing in startups which is marketing and sales
I think @pmarca said something like this:
If you can't manage to figure out how to get in touch with all the VCs and convince them to invest
You probably also can't figure out how to do the same for your startup when finding customers and convincing them to buy your product
I think there's some truth to that
t retweeted
We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.
Then retrain on that.
Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.

























