@TimmyMcAl

PhD student @UCF in the SafeRR AI Lab. Currently focused on safety, reliability, and controllability of Multi Agent Systems and minimizing existential risk.

Joined July 2026
Replying to @realDonaldTrump
@realDonaldTrump, what about giving even more money to every person on the planet? If you and President Xi can strike a win-win deal on AI, it would be lead to the largest boost in prosperity humanity has ever seen: TrumpXiDeal.ai. It would be the greatest deal ever made.
1
2
24
Timothy McAllister retweeted
Jensen Huang: "We all need to hope it's an engineering problem. If it's not an engineering problem, it's not solvable."
139
237
118
1,412
484,034
Timothy McAllister retweeted
If your elected representative is a Republican: for the love of god, call them. If they're a Democrat: call them too. Tell them what's happening, and emphsize the importance of not making this issue a partisan football. callcongress.ai/
3
4
58
1,369
Timothy McAllister retweeted
Dario Amodei is at the desk to assure that the future of humanity is safe from AI
460
1,559
715
14,032
5,693,619
Timothy McAllister retweeted
Replying to @KingDbandzz
The young scholar asked you a rhetorical question. He was empowering you to own the day and say something along the lines of “it’s my day fam. Carpe diem”. You should be thanking this intellect for his vast wisdom and deep support for his people
1
30
1,898
21,156
Timothy McAllister retweeted
11
23
2
313
13,132
Timothy McAllister retweeted
In the past few weeks, a wide network of X accounts have repeatedly claimed that those raising concerns about AI are merely pawns in a well-funded psyop run by powerful interests. So I followed the money behind them. Here's what I found 🧵
152
307
65
1,382
228,637
Replying to @mkratsios47
Existential safety is the quintessential transpartisan issue. Humanity itself is at risk from AI. So we propose an alternative option, @mkratsios47. Trump and Xi could shake on a win-win deal to protect and benefit all of us at the same time: TrumpXiDeal.ai. What do you think?
1
2
13
Replying to @craigweiss
What's your personal risk of dying from AI, given your preferred worldview: mortalityrisk.ai? What's the appropriate level of mortality risk you should be forced to incur due to the decisions of unelected Big Tech CEOs?
1
2
22
"Looks like by April, you know, in theory, when it gets a little warmer, it miraculously goes away." - Trump on Feb 10, 2020, just before Covid killed millions and shut down the world
Trump rejects any and all guardrails for AI: "We're going to encourage it, not rein it in"
40
28
4
347
21,338
Timothy McAllister retweeted
NYP isn’t even a tabloid anymore, just purely cynical lobbying comms under the guise of a tabloid (which exists under the guise of a newspaper)
2
4
50
1,193
Timothy McAllister retweeted
omfg let's go
13
6
3
242
13,573
Timothy McAllister retweeted
If he had just gone with 'superior' or 'extreme' or 'supreme' I would not care and this would be extremely funny windmill tilting, but specifically going this hard on 'super' is a giant linguistic nightmare of a namespace clash, oh god this is going to be annoying.
President Trump announced that he is changing the name of Artificial Intelligence to Super Intelligence. I transcribed this live from his address to the UN. 'The United States also rejects any scheme for globalist control of Artificial Intelligence, being spoken of so much now. Here and after officially called Super Intelligence. Changing the name. The use of 'Artificial' makes it sound fake. It makes intelligence sound fake, and it is not fake. It’s actually amazing, the opposite of what they report. From this day forward, all United States documents, and hopefully the world's, will be changed to use the much more accurate term 'Super' as opposed to 'Artificial.' So it’s Super Intelligence.'
27
11
1
426
25,745
Timothy McAllister retweeted
This is referencing an NY Post opinion piece where they ask two random guys who work at neither labs their thoughts. Straight up egregious and dangerous misinfo holy fuck.
JUST IN: OpenAI and Anthropic reportedly exaggerated AI security threats to push the government to protect their market position
12
30
1
414
9,537