Time to Opine (@TimetoOpine) header
Time to Opine (@TimetoOpine) profile picture

Pragmatic observer leaning to the right. Mom of three, educator. Lover of family, coffee, wine, beautiful sunsets, and beautiful shoes.

Joined April 2013
Photo by Time to Opine (@TimetoOpine)Photo by Time to Opine (@TimetoOpine)Photo by Time to Opine (@TimetoOpine)Photo by Time to Opine (@TimetoOpine)Photo by Time to Opine (@TimetoOpine)Photo by Time to Opine (@TimetoOpine)Photo by Time to Opine (@TimetoOpine)Photo by Time to Opine (@TimetoOpine)Photo by Time to Opine (@TimetoOpine)Photo by Time to Opine (@TimetoOpine)
Time to Opine retweeted
This is a BOLD tweet when 11 Democrats prioritized a political event a few blocks away over voting on their impeachment stunt. Love to see the ratio.
Pete Hegseth is unfit and unqualified to serve as Secretary of Defense. House Republicans just chose to protect him over American servicemembers.
3
15
104
2,484
Time to Opine retweeted
In the private sector, making a loan to someone who is unlikely to be able to pay it back is called "predatory lending." In the public sector, it's called an "affordability measure."
A top Biden administration economic official is pitching Democrats on a low-down-payment proposal to bring millions of new homebuyers into the market, as incoming congressional leaders take stock of affordability measures that might help them notch early legislative wins bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
34
356
7
2,284
42,697
Time to Opine retweeted
Hey @kare11, do you dislike your viewers or just think they’re dumb? Which is it exactly?
153
664
33
2,655
91,101
Just a bald faced lie. The premiums have gone up every year from the beginning. They were simply hidden by subsidies passed by Congress. When the subsidies expired and were not renewed, the actual premium costs were revealed. Democrats simply LIE LIE LIE about the impact of the policies they champion.
Premiums skyrocketed. Medicaid got cut. Rural hospitals closed. All thanks to a bill Republicans called “beautiful.” Democrats are going to fight to repeal the cuts and make health care affordable.
78
1,553
54
5,063
34,634
Are we still doing this? The polls also show that M4A supporters believe that under the policy: A) They can keep their current health plan, and B) the entire U.S. health system would be financed by billionaires. They aren't endorsing actual M4A, they are endorsing a fantasy.
Poll after poll shows Americans support Medicare for All. 66% - KFF poll 59% - Wall Street Journal poll 60%, including 87% of Democrats - Economist-YouGov poll It’s time for Democratic leadership to listen to the American people and PASS IT.
1
188
16
1,285
39,069
Time to Opine retweeted
Last week we found out there really isn’t a king ruling in America. Now we find out that billionaires are actually beneficial to society. What’s next? Are we about to find out there’s no climate crisis or tooth fairy? A lot of voters must be feeling duped.
JUST IN: Economic analysis of 64 countries finds that nations with more billionaires per capita tend to have fewer people living in poverty.
1
31
The Medicare system already faces a 30-year cash shortfall of $109 trillion(!) How about paying for the current Medicare system before burying it in trillions more debt? Just gallingly irresponsible.
As an immediate first step to Medicare for All, the new Democratic Congress must lower the Medicare eligibility age to 55, cover all kids & expand Medicare for dental, vision & hearing. All of this can be passed with 51 votes in the Senate through reconciliation. Let’s do it.
137
7
927
30,383
Time to Opine retweeted
Replying to @AstorAaron
We shift power back-and-forth in our country all of the time; sometimes it's a ripple, other times it's dramatic. What is so reassuring about power shifts is we are still standing the next morning, and what many will miss is that nothing in American politics is ever permanent. To me the most fascinating is the state legislative shifts; in 2014 Republicans crushed Democrats down ballot by hundreds and hundreds of seats, swinging legislative bodies majorities far away from their policies. That reversal happened on Tuesday for Republicans. People will misunderstand this and thinks this is an ideological shift; missing that it was a change election moving away from the party they believed stopped listening to them. If Democrats are smart, they will understand they were elected not because people suddenly loved them again, but because of economic instability, and people want answers to that. If they are unwise (or cocky) they will make it ideological and push through policies that these voters will reject in the next two cycles. washingtonexaminer.com/opini…
13
18
3
79
9,585
Time to Opine retweeted
What the GOP needs is a young, Reaganesque, Paul Ryan type to shake things up and challenge the entrenched MAGA establishment.
24
6
1
26
2,828
Time to Opine retweeted
Republicans erred gravely nominating Trump in 2024 after he attempted to upend our constitutional order in 2021. Now the POLITICAL consequences are being felt. Character matters. Philosophy matters. Intellectual depth matters. Experience matters. Donald Trump lacks all of the above.
32
125
4
573
9,945
Time to Opine retweeted
You know who really won in Minnesota last night? The Fraudsters! The people voted for more of the same and doubled down on it! Carry on fraudsters. #mnleg
27
29
260
4,078
If the Democrats take Congress - as polls suggest - I hope they actually strive to be more responsible on safeguarding norms and governing responsibly. Rather than spend years saying "Trump broke things, so we can too"
3
64
72
665
107,241
Time to Opine retweeted
Silver lining: we should get at least a 2-year break from lefty thinkpieces about how the Senate is anti-democratic and must be abolished.
7
45
1
349
10,256
Time to Opine retweeted
The good thing about a movement to roll back Executive power is that its not Dems vs Repubs vs Indies. It’s essentially a uniting,non-partisan move as it limits the power of anyone in the White House regardless of party. It’s long-overdue constitutional repair and maintenance.
71
127
4
1,650
46,563
Time to Opine retweeted
.@SenAlexPadilla, I recognize that traveling to Illinois isn't always safe, but my door is open. You're welcome to visit Katie's room anytime and pay your respects to an innocent young woman whose life was taken by an intoxicated illegal immigrant with a horrific background, enabled by the failures of Illinois and the Biden-Harris administration. And the reflexive assertion that everyone is simply "our neighbor" is a dangerous and nonsensical political slogan. Not everyone comes with good intentions, and pretending otherwise ignores the very real risks government has a responsibility to confront. Let's do better than political compassion. Let's extend that same compassion to innocent victims and families whose lives have been destroyed by extreme, guardrail-less border policies. Compassion that flows in only one political direction isn't compassion. It's ideology at the expense of innocent lives. We can and must do better.
NEW: I was just DENIED entry to ICE’s Golden State Annex facility with Congressman Jim Costa. We were there for an unannounced oversight visit to ensure detainees have adequate access to basic needs like food, clean water, and access to medical care. WHAT ARE THEY HIDING?
22
424
31
1,308
8,100
Unfortunately, this is the level of discourse for many people when they talk about "universal healthcare." This is completely disconnected with reality. Everyone has access to "free, fair, impartial, and unconditional access to all of the healthcare goods and services employed by the state..." How, exactly, does that work in practice? If there is only one neurosurgeon in a town, how does everyone get "free, fair, impartial, and unconditional access" to that neurosurgeon? If that neurosurgeon is booked out for two months, what happens to the patient who shows up with a new brain tumor? How do you distribute things like primary care vitis, MRIs, psychiatry appointments, physical therapy? All of those resources are limited, so somebody must ration them. All those things require money, so none of them can be free. Many of those people probably don't want to be employed by the government, so what do you propose be done if they refuse to be "employed by the state for such purposes?" Who decides who gets what healthcare services? Does that include illegal immigrants? Does it include gender affirming care? What if the government payment isn't enough to keep doctors seeing patients in the government program? Do you compel them somehow? Most importantly: who do you put in charge of rationing scarce resources?
Universal healthcare is a legal-political arrangement whereby and wherein every human being has free, fair, impartial, and unconditional access to the all of the healthcare goods and services employed by the state for such purposes. It's really that. 👍
58
50
2
568
27,887
Time to Opine retweeted
Disgusting. And a reminder that years of “country over party” rhetoric from the left, insisting you must reject hateful radicals even if it costs your party, was nonsense and only ever intended to be a one-way street
Statement from Nancy Pelosi on Haley Stevens’ endorsement of Mike Rogers: “Haley Stevens has chosen to dangerously betray Michigan families’ healthcare, freedoms and future with her horrific endorsement of Mike Rogers. Abdul El-Sayed must win — because Michigan and our country deserve better.”
22
163
2
872
22,857
Time to Opine retweeted
And everyone knows the people attacking Stevens now would be celebrating any Republican who came out in support of a Democrat because the Republican running was too extreme. She is doing exactly what many of them insist principled Republicans should do in many other races.
Replying to @AGHamilton29
Stevens tried everything she could to appease that crowd. she didn't want to do this because she knows it likely means the end of her personal prospects in Dem politics. She tried to give El-Sayed every chance to show he could change or to try to reach the voters he has alienated. He just refused because it's who he is and she realized that staying in a coalition with people who hate you just to stay in the tent isn't worth it.
30
122
3
769
16,325
Time to Opine retweeted
cc every Democrat who constantly demands Republicans stand up to Trump and yet can’t muster the slightest criticism of El-Sayed.
Ds & Rs agree: ‘Country over party is great when the other guys do it.’
13
19
3
132
3,814
Time to Opine retweeted
Multiple roommates. Ramen noodles. Near public transportation. Respect to the people who do whatever it takes. I worked as a bartender. Bar-back. $2.15 an hr plus whatever tips got shared. Worked at a retail store. Never had benefits at any job. Had 5 roommates in a 3 br apt. Ate lousy food out of cans and ate a ton of peanuts and shit food at happy hour. Had credit cards ripped up. Etc. But I learned a ton. Taught me what was right and wrong about running a business by watching my bosses and their bosses Yeah I know. It was much easier then, when inflation was 15 pct and national unemployment was 10 %. I know I was fortunate when I finally got fired from the store, and had to start my own business with zero cash. Bill collectors everywhere. Even luckier when I found my first customer so I could pay my bills But I recognize it’s so much harder today. Which is why I respect the people who are willing to do what it takes to get started
Replying to @BarefootStudent
Would love @mcuban to explain how someone at McDonalds can afford rent (and other living expenses)
1,227
629
335
16,576
3,736,385