
CTO/Cofounder @intro Backed by @a16z & @sevensevensix
Los Angeles, CA
Joined February 2009
- Tweets1.4K
- Following800
- Followers5.9K
- Likes1.3K
Tim Watson retweeted
Flying on a plane with no Starlink is now painful.
Driving a car with no FSD is now painful.
Without Elon I think it would have been years or decades before humanity could have had these things otherwise. Pretty inspiring.
Tim Watson retweeted
On some of my group text threads it’s like “eek people disagree about this political topic, don’t bring it up” (echo chamber culture). On others it’s like “ooh fun disagreement!” (idea lab culture). When you get used to the latter culture, the former seems so juvenile.
Tim Watson retweeted
Aalo was founded 3 years ago. On July 4th, we turned on our first nuclear reactor.
Today, we're issuing an open call to technical and non-technical talent: help us unlock global energy abundance.
Over the coming years, we will scale assembly-line manufacturing of modular power plants, starting with powering data centers and ending with energy abundance.
View over 50 open roles spanning engineering, regulatory, manufacturing, software, and more at aalo.com/careers
Tim Watson retweeted
BREAKING: FAA officially announced the rulemaking to legalize supersonic flight, including the Boomless Cruise ("Mach cutoff") approach we demonstrated on XB-1.
This is a major step toward the supersonic renaissance.
Tim Watson retweeted
As a scientist, AI has made me feel the most intellectually alive and excited I have felt since I was a graduate student and postdoc more than 20 years ago. Every day I can start with an idea in the morning, and by lunchtime, I see a testable, rational, well-thought-out hypothesis forming in front of my eyes. And every day, the possibilities seem endless, like mountains beyond mountains. What a time to be alive.
Here's a case in point. I'm collaborating with a professor, an experimentalist, who is trying to solve a thorny problem in his field. There's one particular molecule that he is using in his experiments that seems to result in radically different crystal structures compared to similar molecules. What's happening here? He has come up with a few different hypotheses that could explain the differences but is not a theoretician and needs to tease them apart.
On Thursday, I started an investigation using AI at his bequest. The AI immediately confirmed the hypotheses that he had in mind and added a few of its own.
Then it started its exploration. The investigation was carried out in three different phases, each of increasing difficulty; the first one using classical physics, and the second and third using quantum mechanical techniques of increasing rigor. This tiered strategy is the right one.
By Thursday evening, I had the glimpse of an answer. Most of the hypotheses had been examined and rejected. Two stood out, although the AI identified one as more a mechanism through which the other one operated rather than a root cause. It immediately pivoted to the higher-level, more rigorous calculation.
Every time I interacted with the AI, it was more like a dialogue between a professor and a bright student or scientific collaborator than a mandate issued to a tool. The feeling was very much of a process where the AI and I were solving a problem together. I steered the conversation several times, pushed back, suggested course-corrections, acknowledged my own wrong ideas as well as the AI's and went back and forth. The AI was successful in keeping multiple requests in its memory, stacking them by priority while never losing the conversation thread.
By late Friday morning, there had collected enough data from the more rigorous calculation to corroborate the suspicion that it was really just one hypothesis that was the root cause. It then moved on to the next step, which was to come up with a distinct set of novel molecules that would confirm the hypothesis beyond any reasonable doubt. In addition, it launched an even more rigorous calculation at a higher level of theory.
By the end of Friday, roughly 48 hours later, using this multi-layered approach of increasing rigor, backed up by references, and made useful and actionable by testable experiments, the AI had arrived at a solid, rigorous conclusion.
Now imagine doing this every day, about any topic under the scientific sun, in any scientific field, so that your intellectual labor is multiplied a million-fold.
Mountains beyond mountains. What a time to be alive.
Tim Watson retweeted
The fix everything button is literally just to arrest criminals and keep them in jail
Bukele was able to do this in a matter of months
When you see the crime and rot in western cities and feel unsafe letting your wife walk around, know that it is a choice.
Tim Watson retweeted
Met 31 new bio companies just this week.
The new bio wave powered by AI is 🤯
To my fellow comic book nerds: we're going to get SUPERPOWERS in our lifetime 🦸
Tim Watson retweeted

Dirty Texas Hedge@HedgeDirtyJun 12
United States
United StatesConnected via WebAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Over 4000 workers just became millionaires by owning the means of production and the socialists are pissed
Tim Watson retweeted
Under capitalism, socialists are free to build socialism.
Under socialism, capitalists aren’t free to build anything.
Nothing stops a group of socialists pooling their money, forming a company, and splitting every wage and every pound of profit perfectly equally.... Or to donate all profit to the government.
It’s legal. It’s easy. Owning the means of production is as simple as setting up a company.
Marx wrote his manifesto before the invention of limited liability companies. Back then “seize the factory” meant seizing it from the handful of families who could afford one.
That argument expired the day anyone could start a company with limited liability, raise investment and hire who they want.
Socialists are free to lead by example and demonstrate their system works. They can out-recruit, out-motivate, out-build and out innovate based on their ideas if they like. It would prove the philosophy works. Capitalism will happily host their experiment.
The fact that nobody does this tells you a lot.
Tim Watson retweeted
Replying to @RtrnSanity
I like Spencer’s style. He just says “hey, that’s not good. let’s fix that”—instead of “MSM is lying to you! Where is Hunter’s Laptop? It’s all rigged.”
I really don’t care about the Political Crusades.
I just want the homeless people off the sidewalk.
People at major AI labs (using internal models) 3-4 months ahead of startup silicon valley engineers
SV founders/eng 3-6 months ahead of NY
NY founders/eng 6-12 months ahead of rest of world
Most people have no idea how fast AI shifting as 1-2 years behind SOTA
"The future is here, just not equally distributed" - Robert Heinlein
Tim Watson retweeted
People are still underestimating the impact this will have on space tech. We’re gonna have a Cambrian explosion here soon.
It’s actually insane what SpaceX is doing to the space industry right now
In 1981, it cost ~$65,000 to put 1 kg into orbit
For 50 years, the industry accepted this as the standard. Reusable rockets were "impossible"
Then one company - led by a man obsessed with getting humanity to Mars, decided that $65,000/kg was unacceptable
Right now, Elon and the SpaceX team are building Starship to hit $10–$20/kg
That is a massive ~4,000x price collapse
It’s actually wild that we get to watch this happen in real time
Tim Watson retweeted
Worries that software developer jobs are going away are backwards. There is SO MUCH software to build right now, that previously wasn't possible (uses AI directly) or wasn't cost-effective (too niche). We're going to have more developers, and orders of magnitude more software.
Tim Watson retweeted
It is very clear that we are not in any kind of AI bubble.
If coding is anything to go by, the amount output that will be produced is going up by 100-1000x.
We are vastly under-prepared in terms of the electricity, compute, memory and token requirements for the coming years.
This is going to happen to every domain that knowledge workers operate in.
Tim Watson retweeted
california doesn’t make talented, productive people wealthy. talented, productive people make california wealthy.
Tim Watson retweeted
We have the highest gas tax yet drive over the deepest potholes. We spend the most on homelessness yet have the most homeless. We spend the most on social services yet have the worst poverty. We're 1st in education spending growth yet 1st in illiteracy. Our government is broken.
Larry and Sergey can’t stay in California since the wealth tax as written would confiscate 50% of their Alphabet shares.
Each own ~3% of Alphabet's stock, worth about $120 billion each at today's ~$4 trillion market cap.
But because their shares have 10x voting power, the SEIU-UHW California billionaire tax would treat them as owning 30% of Alphabet (3% × 10 = 30%). That means each founder's taxable wealth would be $1.2 trillion.
A 5% wealth tax on $1.2 trillion = $60 billion tax bill, each.
That's 50% of their actual Alphabet holdings—wiped out by a "5%" tax.
Section 50303(c)(3)(C) of the 2026 Billionaire Tax Act states: "For any interests that confer voting or other direct control rights, the percentage of the business entity owned by the taxpayer shall be presumed to be not less than the taxpayer's percentage of the overall voting or other direct control rights."
This means if a founder holds shares representing only 3% of economic interest but 30% of voting control (through Class B supervoting shares), the tax would presume their ownership stake is at least 30% for valuation purposes, not 3%.
The wealth tax is poorly defined and designed to drive tech innovation out of California.
Tim Watson retweeted
This isn’t understood by enough people
Try to be useful to your fellow man, by creating some product or service, and we all win.
"Capitalism created the possibility of the win win win. It used to be a zero sum game where somebody won, somebody else lost.
The biggest mistake people make, intellectuals in particular, they still think we're in a zero sum world. They're obsessed with some billionaires because Bernie Sanders thinks that Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk somehow stole the money from the people.
They don't understand that it's this prosperity machine that's creating more, not just for those billionaires, but for everything that they're touching. They're creating value for their customers, they're creating value for their employees. Their suppliers are flourishing, their investors are seeing their capital go up. It can be reinvested and compound.
All philanthropy ultimately comes from business. That's where the profits are.
Where does all the taxes come from? It ultimately comes from business as well.
This is the engine that's lifting humanity out. The entrepreneurs are the drivers of that engine. Somebody like Elon Musk, he gets a very, very, very tiny sliver of the value that he creates for the whole world."
—@iamjohnmackey






























