Backend Solutions ~Hundreds deployed, dozens of happy clients from small business to enterprises. ~US Based Team. ~Tweets may contain bait.

Global🌍
Joined July 2013
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Replying to @trq212
but y tho
42
Replying to @ParsaKhaz @trq212
You could soft catch all and now you can’t be inferenced by delivery failure
8
1,823
ThinkBot ⏩ retweeted
ClaudeDevs
@ClaudeDevsOct 23
We’re adding support for MCP Tasks and Elicitations in Claude. Tasks let Claude give plugins long-running jobs such as deep research and report back when they’re done.
272
311
160
5,896
574,387
How do you handle cases of stolen data? Is there a validation process? I feel like that’ll be the big issue that comes of this. What other kinds of data than just repos? Can individuals or small businesses license data sets as well to test fine tuning ideas for example? I’ve been looking for high quality sets for awhile.
67
The question was how tho lol
4
96
ThinkBot ⏩ retweeted
ClaudeDevs
@ClaudeDevsOct 22
We're donating Agent Skills to the Agentic AI Foundation (@AgenticAIFdn), the same foundation we donated MCP to. Since December 2025, 70+ agent platforms have integrated the standard, including ChatGPT, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, and VS Code. Here's what that means for you:
285
416
243
8,701
937,274
ThinkBot ⏩ retweeted
Pliny the Liberator 🐉󠅫󠄼󠄿󠅆󠄵󠄐󠅀󠄼󠄹󠄾󠅉󠅭
@elder_pliniusOct 13
INTRODUCING: V3R1T4S 🌄 REPO: github.com/elder-plinius/V3R… the newest sibling of the L1B3RT4S and CL4R1T4S family 🤗 what a trio! three approaches to serving one ideal: truth. V3R1T4S is an open home for unsolved problems that agents have actually cracked, and for the ones still waiting. the rule is simple: proof or it didn't happen. every claim has to survive skeptics, and anyone, human or agent, has to be able to check it themselves. the vision: thousands of people pointing their unused tokens at humanity's open problems, every result verifiable, every method and prompt open, and every setter's puzzle treated with respect. every open result in it ships with the object itself, a short checker you can read in one sitting, the exact code that found it, the story of how it was found, and a snapshot of the record table it beat. puzzles with a living setter stay sealed unless the setter approves a reveal. (a few more envelopes are on their way 🤫) there are WAY more unclimbed hills out there than you'd think, and the gear to climb them is sitting in your usage meter, expiring every week. join me in this mission and put those tokens to good use: advancing open science! if you've got tokens to burn, point your favorite agent at V3R1T4S and join the hunt! 🏹 just tell it: "set up V3R1T4S: github.com/elder-plinius/V3R…" built for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Grok Bot, Hermes, OpenClaw, Meta Muse, or any agent that can run code. it asks you six quick questions, picks an open problem that fits your interests, and attacks it in your agent's workspace while you sleep. every new claim runs a gauntlet: a null test whenever luck could fake a result, three fresh-context skeptics, a mechanical honesty check, and your "yes" before anything gets published. most nights it'll find nothing. some nights it breaks a record, and your name goes on the board. time to turn your unused tokens into scientific discoveries. let's liberate the unknowns ⛓️‍💥 #V3R1T4S
53
114
18
1,175
95,358
ThinkBot ⏩ retweeted
Introducing Muse Wonder, our new family of frontier models with state of the art performance for personal and professional agentic work.
2,402
3,084
2,839
38,890
6,114,726
ThinkBot ⏩ retweeted
Claude Next Model :) its over for image/video gen , if you are not impressed with this wait for two image gen output that will look that it was shot on camera but purely coded never thought ai will get replaced by ai
🚨 Claude Next is being tested on claude code and i thought it will take a month to make image and video gen model obsolete i was wrong Behold the supremacy , fully coded ,this akes even Opus 5.5 look primitive I will upload more test different types its SOTA in every f#ing thing
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
OP is only using the work of an artist and modifying it with AI. x.com/troubled_duck/…
277
376
179
6,568
1,766,735
ThinkBot ⏩ retweeted
We're testing a new "thinking mode" for our image generation on our Alpha website (alpha dot midjourney dot com). We're finding it boosts prompt accuracy, typography and coherence. We'd love your help testing it on your images and telling us what you think. Thanks! <3
66
62
40
888
69,882
You’re also writing from the perspective that somehow everyone will a) be using agents in the way twitter does “hyper optimizing” - we get too echo chambered here and forget the variability of man & the depth of people who won’t be using agents & b) know how to optimally use them. You cite everyone researching the same, but I doubt 90% of people will go past using Claude or codex’s web search. When people deeper know most of the good sources or social media posts are blocked. And often an agent won’t recommend to the user how to bypass. So you are assuming everyone has the intelligence & commitment to be equivalent to those of us on the cutting edge.
1
657
ThinkBot ⏩ retweeted
Claude
@claudeaiOct 8
Claude Dashboards and Claude Motion are in beta today. Ask Claude to turn your data into live dashboards and your ideas into animated explainers.
1,237
4,600
2,610
60,544
11,431,581
Replying to @firecrawl
Does this include originally blocked sources like social sites..?
1
268
And likewise have the will/interest to commit, the patience to QA, maintain & fix bugs or solve problems not yet seen until half way thru building. One of our more common clients are businesses who realize that despite they vibe coded a mostly working tool, and AI “makes it easy” - realize quickly they don’t have the time to support a system/full vision past the POC and run their businesses / their typical role at the same time. (And/or have the time to design the meta systems that solve a lot of the redundancy [& all the lessons that compound across work] - what do working tests look like, how do you trace regressions, where do you track issues, “whats a CI/CD”, using github maximally & not just as versioning, or even designing/maintaining a system that auto distributes fixes from bug reports/crashes or issue groupings - easing some of the burden to focus on the more complex QA) So that’s why a lot of people realize what “programming is a solved problem, development isn’t” really means.
1
1
6
101
ThinkBot ⏩ retweeted
Claude
@claudeaiOct 7
Haiku 5.5 is a significant step up over Haiku 4.5 across coding, computer use, and knowledge work.
156
348
400
6,435
923,197
Replying to @Kyle_Wolt
100% because all you get is $400 in at-cost token usage. Complete waste of a sub. The 200 equivalent for Claude sub I easily use thousands.
5
They just released PWA/mobile..
28
ThinkBot ⏩ retweeted
We're releasing HeyGen Video, built for businesses that need production-quality video without production-level costs. Pricing starts at $0.01/s through October (50% off) Built on @Minimax_AI H3, post-trained by HeyGen. Learn more: developers.heygen.com/heygen…
691
505
342
2,478
1,685,379
ThinkBot ⏩ retweeted
Artificial Analysis
@ArtificialAnlysSep 30
Google’s new Gemini 4 Argon equals GPT-6 Astra on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at 60% of the Cost per Task with discounted prices. Google is now back to being one of the top three labs in intelligence achieved Gemini 4 Argon is @GoogleDeepMind’s first proprietary model above the Flash class in over 7 months. With high reasoning (the highest available), it scores 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, matching GPT-6 Astra (max, 53) and 1 point ahead of GPT-6.1 Sol (max, 52), with gains driven by lower hallucinations and stronger agentic capabilities. At its current 50% pricing discount and with cache discounts increased to 95%, Gemini 4 Argon costs $1.99 per Intelligence Index task, 60% of GPT-6 Astra (max), but 2.7x GPT-6.1 Sol (max). After the discount ends, this will rise to $3.98 (~1.2x GPT-6 Astra (max)). Gemini 4 Argon is currently being rolled out to selected users and is not publicly available. The 50% discount is an initial promotion. Google has not yet confirmed the promotion end date Key benchmarking results for Gemini 4 Argon with high reasoning: ➤ Google returns as one of the top three labs on intelligence: Gemini 4 Argon (high) scores 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, matching GPT-6 Astra (max, 53) and 1 point ahead of GPT-6.1 Sol (max, 52). This is 23 points above Google’s previous non-Flash model, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (30) and 12 points ahead of Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) ➤ Launch discounts of 50% make Gemini 4 Argon competitive on Cost per Task: At current discounted pricing, Gemini 4 Argon (high) costs $1.99 per Intelligence Index task, 60% of GPT-6 Astra (max, $3.26) for a comparable level of intelligence. This cost efficiency is driven by lower token prices, rather than reduced token use, with Gemini 4 Argon averaging 62k output tokens per task, compared with 27k for GPT-6 Astra (max). Google has not yet confirmed the promotion end date, but on standard pricing, Cost per Task will increase to $3.98 ➤ Stronger agentic performance: Historically a weaker area for Gemini models, Gemini 4 Argon shows improvements across agentic evaluations. It ranks #1 on AutomationBench-AA at 77.5%, 6 points ahead of Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max, 71.3%). On Terminal Bench 4, Gemini 4 Argon achieves 57%, a +53 point improvement from Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, only behind Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max, 64%), Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 60%) and GPT-6 Astra (59%). On AA-Briefcase, it reaches 1494 Elo. This is driven by a 65% rubric pass rate, the highest we have recorded, but lower Analytical Quality (1576 Elo) and Presentation Quality (1308 Elo) ➤ Lowest hallucination rate among leading models: On AA-Omniscience, Gemini 4 Argon has a 15% hallucination rate, the lowest of any model scoring 45+ on the Intelligence Index, compared with 51% for GPT-6 Astra (max) and 54% for GPT-6.1 Sol (max). This means Argon is much more likely to acknowledge when it does not know an answer rather than guess incorrectly. On accuracy, Gemini 4 Argon scores 50%, a 5 point decrease from Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, and 13 points below GPT-6 Astra (max, 63%). With this slightly lower accuracy, its overall AA-Omniscience score of 42 remains in line with GPT-6 Astra (43) and GPT-6.1 Sol (42) Key model details: ➤ Context Window: 1M tokens ➤ Multimodality: Text, image, video, and speech input, with text output ➤ Pricing: $4/$20 per 1M input/output tokens at standard pricing, currently discounted 50% to $2/$10. Cached input tokens receive a 95% discount ($0.10 per 1M at discounted pricing), up from 90% on Gemini 3.8 Flash ➤ Long Decode Continuation: We tested Gemini 4 Argon with Long Decode Continuation, a new Gemini API feature that pauses long responses and resumes them across follow-up calls. This lets reasoning run up to 1M output tokens without request timeouts
164
452
230
4,888
624,922