If the NCAA can't fix this, the government needs to step in. This a recipe for hearing damage, especially for the stadium workers.

Things Elon Musk could do with $1Tn dollars: - End world hunger - Solve climate change - Provide schooling for every child - Reduce housing crisis What Elon Musk does: - Build a stupid car-toy with no practícal use, just to impress a bunch of idiots. Tesla Roadster should be the last straw. #EatTheRich

Man who drugged and raped dead NYC college student texted nude pics of her instead of calling 911: feds trib.al/pAEqBDj

Over the last 20 seasons, Big 12 teams not named Oklahoma or Texas are 1-11 vs Top 10 Power 4 teams in the regular season. The lone win being Oklahoma State’s upset over Oregon earlier this year...

Here is my Week 7 College Football Top 25. What do you think of my ranking?

This is bad….

Adrien Broner PRESSES Blueface over $1,000 pool bet and they both argue over the the meaning of "Double or Nothing" 😳 "You really gonna screw up our relationship over $1,000"

MSM isn't the second coming of Tyler Loop or anything, but he has to deal with the effects of the dreadful longsnapping that FG unit has had all season long. He definitely makes a couple of those misses if the snapper could hit the broad side of a barn once in a while.

If you watched this the Lindsay Clancy and you’re certain the Commonwealth proved she was criminally responsible, let’s look at the law. The jury did not have to decide whether she killed her children. The question was whether the Commonwealth (the government) proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, that she was criminally responsible when she did it. Not “probably.” Not “most likely.” Beyond a reasonable doubt. Our justice system is meant to hold people accountable while protecting citizens from unjust conviction. That is why the burden, and the risk of failing to meet it, belongs to the government. That isn’t a loophole. That is how our founders designed the system. The Constitution places a jury between the accused and the power of the state. A prosecutor brings the charge. The government presents its case. But citizens make the final decision: not the prosecutor, not social media and not those of us watching from outside the jury room. If reasonable doubt remained about Lindsay Clancy’s criminal responsibility, the law required a verdict of not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility, even if you personally believe she is guilty. If you are struggling with this concept, fine. That simply means you could not serve as a juror.

I am surprised by the amount of lawyers who apparently are ok with a situation in which a juror would convict while acknowledging the existence of reasonable doubt. If we, as lawyers and stewards of the criminal justice system, are willing to make a mockery of basic due process and the right to a fair trial, how can we expect anyone else to respect these rights in every case, irrespective of how awful a defendant’s conduct is? Moving goalposts in a criminal case based upon how awful the case is should not be normalized.

1000 IQ play here by Joe Mack