
pioneering livetrading @avantisfi, building enterprise ethereum bridges @entethalliance · Prev @sturdyfinance @autonomysnet · Member @safaryclub
Toronto
Joined April 2013
- Tweets1.1K
- Following537
- Followers632
- Likes4K
Pinned Tweet
Incredibly excited to share that @avantisfi has raised $8 million in Series A! 🎉🐆
There's a long roadmap ahead of us, and we're beyond excited for what's to come. Grateful to be a part of a team that's pushing boundaries of what trading and real PMF looks like.
theblock.co/post/356775/pete…
We've been putting a lot of work into Ethereum Intelligence at the EEA, and I'm incredibly excited about where it's heading.
The goal is to make it easier for institutions to keep up with what's changing on Ethereum, understand what actually matters to their business, and have a voice in those discussions.
Looking forward to more conversations like these in NYC at @DAF_Global 🗽
What will it take for digital assets to work at institutional scale?
EEA Executive Director @RedwanMeslem is joining @DAF_Global New York on November 13th to discuss the future of institutional digital assets.
See you in NYC, at the heart of institutional finance!🗽
Radha Mathur retweeted
Carney doesn't mince words here: "any large technological change mercilessly destroys jobs, and therefore identities."
We should be concerned whether this is about to happen again with machine learning, AI and robotics — but on a much greater scale and faster.
generating attention and building a brand are not necessarily the same thing.
one can generate attention, but the market can't file or place you into their minds. it's easy to mistake something going viral as brand-success.
in this accelerated AI world, one can be seen by 1M+ and placed by no one
probably one of the better decision frameworks to keep coming back to:
“don’t fall in love with the solution before you’ve spent enough time with the problem”
Radha Mathur retweeted
Talked to a Linkedin ads agency recently
The interesting part was what they don't do.
No creative production. No audience list building. They do research and run campaigns, and that's it.
At first that sounded like a gap. Then I thought about it, and it's actually the most honest scoping I've seen from an agency.
Creative and target lists are a huge lift, and they never feel good enough to a client.
An agency can produce assets and lists that look reasonable, but neither one nails the buyer the way someone in-house does.
So the campaigns hit their numbers and the client churns anyway, because every review turns into a debate about the creative and the targeting.
Every team I've seen perform well with paid had the same thing going for them. They knew their ICP in extreme detail.
That's the part teams AI-ing their entire GTM are missing right now.
You can produce a good enough version of anything. Good enough creative, good enough copy, good enough list.
Good enough is free now. Knowing your buyer isn't.
Radha Mathur retweeted
fwiw i never got into YC. exited my first company for a $15 mil cash/stock deal. now i run @bankrbot, have 11 people on the team, and we do whatever we want because we don't need to answer to anyone.
re: on hiring PR firms
Send them a one-pager of your positioning and narrative in advance.
Take the meeting and say: name three reporters (or podcasters) you'd call first for our story, and tell me what each of them covers right now. If they can answer (90% of them can't), ask when's the last time they texted that reporter.
The answer reveals the only thing that matters: rapport with the people who move your story. media trust takes years to earn and can't be faked. If the PR person you're working with is not on texting terms with the reporters/outlets you want, end the call.
Scope out a one-month trial to place your flagship story. Scale up or down from there.
beware of a bait and switch with personnel. firms often send their most connected person to the pitch, then hand your account to a junior. Demand the person you want stays on it.
V2 has been a HUGE push for the team!
more assets, cleaner trading flows, zero fees on RWAs, and a lot more coming for advanced traders as well as agents.
big updates incoming..
This quoted post is unavailable.
Radha Mathur retweeted
Policy Friday: 2026-08-13 🟡
41 docs · 17 agencies · net signal seems to be mixed.
Two key updates on Enterprise Ethereum ⬇️
Radha Mathur retweeted
Jesse Pollak says a scaled perps venue is one of @Base biggest missing pieces.
“One of the places where there’s definitely the most opportunity for growth on Base is around perps.”
“We have perps venues like Avantis that have been growing really nicely on Base.”
“But there’s a lot more that we can do.”
“The lack of a scaled perps venue bringing billions of dollars of volume is a missing piece.”
“That’s a big priority.”
Radha Mathur retweeted
Replying to @sama @huggingface
TLDR: During a test, an OpenAI model hacked out of its container to reach the internet THEN hacked into Hugging Face (!) to steal the test's answers
Radha Mathur retweeted
Excited to launch Opening Print brought to you by @avantisfi.
We will go over the key things to watch at each of the session opening and occasionally be joined by special guest.
This week checkout our first broadcasts on Sunday 6:00pm EST and Monday 9:00AM EST
Radha Mathur retweeted
lots of conversations about base over the last week. wanted to share my candid take after a week of listening and a lot of reflection over the last 6 months.
first off - in case it’s not obvious, the first quarter of 2026 was a punch in the face. I spent 2024 and 2025 making a two pronged bet to bring base to the world: (1) builders would unlock the next wave of crypto adoption; (2) adoption would be driven by new onchain-native social experiences - creators, content, messaging. imo we made the right bet on builders, but obviously the wrong bet on social. builders did drive the next wave of crypto adoption - prediction markets, perpetuals, stablecoins - but social was not at the center of it. in fact, the entire social side of the market that many of us had been building towards - farcaster, zora, miniapps, and yes, creator coins - disintegrated completely. I was wrong - whether it was timing wrong (is $ansem a creator coin?) or fully wrong, only time will tell, but regardless, i was definitively wrong.
the collateral damage was pretty bad! and this year has been an exercise in eating shit. we realized how our focus on social had meant that base had fallen behind in key areas that were now increasingly critical - we had perps (shoutout avantis!) and prediction markets (shoutout limitless!), but both were well behind scaled competitors. and we had a lot of room to improve in unlocking base as a platform for tokenization and payments that really worked for enterprises. people lost confidence, and CT spectators reminded me weekly of all of my mistakes as often as they could. it felt bad man, still feels bad.
but if there’s one thing i’ve learned from the last decade of building in this space, it’s that when things feel the worst, the best thing to do is just put your head down and build. so that’s what i’m doing. I refocused my time and attention back to the chain away from the app, started writing code again, shipped a bunch of stuff (azul, beryl, b20, privacy, ledgers) and questioned a bunch of my assumptions: does crypto need social to grow? does base need an app? can base be bigger than coinbase?
I thought for a long time that social was the only thing that could drive the sort of viral growth to get crypto to a billion people. unsurprisingly, I now believe that’s wrong. It’s clear that better money is more than enough - we are seeing this live with stablecoins, predictions, perpetuals, tokenization and i only expect it to accelerate. I am now focused on bringing a billion people onchain just by making global finance actually work.
on the app, my focus is on building base into the blockchain for global finance. to that end, i’ve handed the base app back to the coinbase mothership, where my now good friend @cobie will be taking it from here to make it the best damn app for onchain you’ve ever seen, including expanding beyond the base ecosystem in ways that tbh i won’t love as the leader of base.
it’s incredibly hard to grow a decentralized network inside of a big public corporation. and i feel like much of the discourse on CT over the last week is downstream of this. the following things can be true: (1) base (and i) love memes and (2) brian probably won’t ever bullpost memes on the tl (this activity is illegal once you’re over 40 years of age). it’s weird and we’re working through it as we continue to decentralize base, which has been our commitment from the beginning.
we’re going to build base into the blockchain for global finance and do everything we can to be the place that the world’s money settles over the next century. we will surely have formidable competitors (welcome robinhood and stripe!) and people may abandon our cause, but we welcome the competition and believe it’s our duty to win the respect and commitment of those who rally to our banner.
in 2026, this concretely means three things: winning trading, payments, and agents.
[continued in the reply]
Radha Mathur retweeted
some people didn't fully read this: i'm handing the @baseapp to @cobie so i can focus fully on the @base.
building base into the blockchain for global finance is the biggest opportunity in the world
if you're building on base, this means i'm now 100% focused on you. day one.
lots of conversations about base over the last week. wanted to share my candid take after a week of listening and a lot of reflection over the last 6 months.
first off - in case it’s not obvious, the first quarter of 2026 was a punch in the face. I spent 2024 and 2025 making a two pronged bet to bring base to the world: (1) builders would unlock the next wave of crypto adoption; (2) adoption would be driven by new onchain-native social experiences - creators, content, messaging. imo we made the right bet on builders, but obviously the wrong bet on social. builders did drive the next wave of crypto adoption - prediction markets, perpetuals, stablecoins - but social was not at the center of it. in fact, the entire social side of the market that many of us had been building towards - farcaster, zora, miniapps, and yes, creator coins - disintegrated completely. I was wrong - whether it was timing wrong (is $ansem a creator coin?) or fully wrong, only time will tell, but regardless, i was definitively wrong.
the collateral damage was pretty bad! and this year has been an exercise in eating shit. we realized how our focus on social had meant that base had fallen behind in key areas that were now increasingly critical - we had perps (shoutout avantis!) and prediction markets (shoutout limitless!), but both were well behind scaled competitors. and we had a lot of room to improve in unlocking base as a platform for tokenization and payments that really worked for enterprises. people lost confidence, and CT spectators reminded me weekly of all of my mistakes as often as they could. it felt bad man, still feels bad.
but if there’s one thing i’ve learned from the last decade of building in this space, it’s that when things feel the worst, the best thing to do is just put your head down and build. so that’s what i’m doing. I refocused my time and attention back to the chain away from the app, started writing code again, shipped a bunch of stuff (azul, beryl, b20, privacy, ledgers) and questioned a bunch of my assumptions: does crypto need social to grow? does base need an app? can base be bigger than coinbase?
I thought for a long time that social was the only thing that could drive the sort of viral growth to get crypto to a billion people. unsurprisingly, I now believe that’s wrong. It’s clear that better money is more than enough - we are seeing this live with stablecoins, predictions, perpetuals, tokenization and i only expect it to accelerate. I am now focused on bringing a billion people onchain just by making global finance actually work.
on the app, my focus is on building base into the blockchain for global finance. to that end, i’ve handed the base app back to the coinbase mothership, where my now good friend @cobie will be taking it from here to make it the best damn app for onchain you’ve ever seen, including expanding beyond the base ecosystem in ways that tbh i won’t love as the leader of base.
it’s incredibly hard to grow a decentralized network inside of a big public corporation. and i feel like much of the discourse on CT over the last week is downstream of this. the following things can be true: (1) base (and i) love memes and (2) brian probably won’t ever bullpost memes on the tl (this activity is illegal once you’re over 40 years of age). it’s weird and we’re working through it as we continue to decentralize base, which has been our commitment from the beginning.
we’re going to build base into the blockchain for global finance and do everything we can to be the place that the world’s money settles over the next century. we will surely have formidable competitors (welcome robinhood and stripe!) and people may abandon our cause, but we welcome the competition and believe it’s our duty to win the respect and commitment of those who rally to our banner.
in 2026, this concretely means three things: winning trading, payments, and agents.
[continued in the reply]
Radha Mathur retweeted
Traders Talk #22: The Bounce will have to prove itself xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1MJgNNXEp…



















