Are You Ready To Start Catching Bigger Fish?

Florida
Joined August 2009
Who is getting bait?
1
3
23
807
The Person Who Taught You to Fish Might Have Taught You Everything Wrong 🎣 Your dad, grandpa, uncle, or longtime fishing buddy might be the reason you fell in love with fishing. They taught you how to tie a knot, bait a hook, cast a line, and maybe even land your first fish. But here's a thought that might ruffle some feathers: what if some of the fishing advice they passed down was completely wrong? Fishing traditions run deep. Some anglers swear by one bait, one knot, or one secret technique because that's how they've always done it. They caught fish that way for decades, so why question it? Because fishing changes, conditions vary, and what works in one situation doesn't necessarily work in every situation. Maybe you were taught to use heavy line for everything, even when cautious fish might respond better to a lighter presentation. Maybe you were told fish only bite at sunrise, despite plenty of opportunities later in the day. Or perhaps you learned to keep casting the same lure instead of adjusting when conditions change. That doesn't mean the people who taught you were bad fishermen. They shared what worked for them, often based on years of experience. But even experienced anglers can develop habits that stop them from learning new approaches. Modern equipment, better understanding of fish behavior, and changing fishing conditions have given anglers more ways to experiment. Sometimes an old-school method is still the best choice. Other times, trying something different makes all the difference. The smartest fishermen aren't necessarily the ones with the most years on the water. They're the ones willing to question what they know, test new ideas, and admit when another angler has a better approach. Respect the person who taught you, but don't assume every lesson has to last forever. What's one fishing tip you learned growing up that you later discovered wasn't always true? 🎣
2
2
167
Artificial-only guys, if a live-bait fisherman catches more fish, bigger fish, and goes home with dinner, which part of his fishing experience are you claiming is inferior?
1
94
🎣😎 The Mullet Run retweeted
Replying to @TheMulletRun
If you want to know who the serious fisherman is, look for the guy with the beat up old boat and a new motor.
1
1
1
24
If you've been throwing the same lure for two hours without a bite, at what point does “I'm working the pattern” become “I'm too stubborn to admit this isn't working”?
1
1
134
Just Because You Own a Boat Doesn't Make You a Good Fisherman 🎣 There's something impressive about a shiny fishing boat loaded with expensive electronics, high-end rods, and enough tackle to stock a bait shop. But here's a question worth asking: does owning all that equipment actually make someone a better fisherman? Not necessarily. A boat gives you access to more water, a fish finder helps locate underwater structure, and quality tackle can make fighting fish easier. Those are real advantages. But none of them guarantees you'll catch anything. We've all seen anglers spend thousands of dollars on equipment only to come home empty-handed. Meanwhile, someone fishing from a cheap kayak, an old aluminum boat, or the shoreline might be catching fish consistently. What's the difference? Often, it's knowledge and experience. Good anglers learn to read the water, understand tides, recognize changing weather conditions, and figure out where fish are likely to feed. They know when to change locations, switch presentations, or slow down instead of blindly casting all day. Owning a boat can actually create a false sense of confidence. Having the ability to reach deep water or remote fishing spots doesn't mean you understand what happens beneath the surface. Sometimes, more equipment simply gives you more ways to spend money without improving your results. That doesn't mean boat owners aren't skilled. Plenty of excellent fishermen use their boats and electronics to their advantage. The point is that the equipment supports the angler's ability; it doesn't replace it. At the end of the day, fish don't care how much your boat costs, what brand of rods you own, or how many screens are m
1
1
133
Why do artificial guys call live bait “cheating” but have absolutely no problem using $3,000 fish finders to locate fish that someone else has to find with their eyeballs?
2
4
293
Half the People Posting Trophy Fish Couldn't Catch One Without Their Fish Finder 🎣 Scroll through fishing social media, and you'll see plenty of anglers showing off trophy catches. But here's a question that might stir things up: how many could find those fish if their electronics suddenly went dark? Modern fish finders are incredible. They reveal underwater structure, locate schools of bait, identify depth changes, and help anglers find fish that might otherwise take hours to locate. There's nothing wrong with using technology. The question is whether we're using it as a tool or depending on it to do all the thinking. Could you still find fish by reading the water, watching bait activity, understanding tides, and recognizing promising structure? Or would you be lost without a screen telling you where to cast? A fish finder can show you what's below the boat, but it can't guarantee a bite. You still need the right presentation, timing, patience, and ability to adapt when conditions change. Seeing fish on a screen doesn't automatically make you a skilled angler. Some of the best fishermen learned by studying the water, experimenting with different techniques, and getting plenty of fishless days under their belts. Those lessons still matter, even with the latest technology. Electronics can absolutely make fishing more productive. But if your entire strategy depends on a screen, what happens when the battery dies? Here's the challenge: Could you catch fish without your fish finder, or has technology become a crutch? Be honest! 🎣
1
92
If the guy next to you catches a 30-inch fish on a frozen shrimp while you're working a $20 lure like you're auditioning for a fishing show, who won that round?
6
10
617
Stop Calling Yourself an Expert Because You Had One Good Fishing Day 🎣 We've all met that angler. He goes fishing once, catches a pile of fish, and suddenly he's an expert. He's explaining the best lures, giving advice about tides, and telling everyone how to catch fish like he has spent decades on the water. But ask him to repeat that performance next weekend, and the story might change. Here's the truth: one good fishing day doesn't make you an expert. Consistency does. Sometimes the fish are feeding aggressively, the weather is perfect, and everything seems to fall into place. You can throw almost anything in the water and get a bite. Even a complete beginner can stumble into a feeding frenzy and have the trip of a lifetime. But what happens when the conditions change? The tide turns, the wind picks up, the water temperature shifts, and suddenly those same fish won't touch your favorite lure. That's when fishing knowledge really gets tested. Can you adjust your presentation, find a new location, recognize changing conditions, and figure out what the fish want? Or do you keep doing the same thing while blaming the weather? Experienced anglers understand that fishing isn't always predictable. They know how to learn from a slow day, recognize patterns over time, and admit when they don't have the answer. They don't need to pretend they know everything because they understand there's always something new to learn. And let's be honest: even the best fishermen get skunked. A bad day doesn't erase years of experience, just as one incredible day doesn't create it. The real experts are often the ones willing to listen, experiment, and learn from other anglers. They're more interested in improving their skills than proving they're the smartest person at the boat ramp. So enjoy that big catch. Celebrate the great day. Just remember that the next trip might humble you. What's your take? Does catching a limit once make someone a good angler, or should consistency be the real measure of fishing skill? 🎣
2
3
230
Had to ask a tourist to hold the camera for this big beach MONSTER #mulletrun
4
178
Half the People Posting Trophy Fish Couldn't Catch One Without Their Fish Finder 🎣 Scroll through fishing social media, and you'll see plenty of anglers holding up trophy fish with captions about skill, patience, and knowing the water. But here's a question that might ruffle a few feathers: how many of those fish would have been caught if the fish finder suddenly stopped working? Modern fishing electronics are incredible. Today's sonar can reveal underwater structure, locate schools of baitfish, show individual fish, and help anglers find depths that once took years of experience to understand. There's no denying that technology can make fishing more efficient. But has it also made some anglers too dependent? Think about it. If your electronics suddenly went dark, would you know where to start? Could you identify a promising drop-off, recognize a current break, or figure out where fish might be holding based on water temperature and conditions? Or would you spend the rest of the day staring at a blank screen and wondering where the fish went? There's nothing wrong with using technology. Fishing has always evolved, from better rods and reels to improved line and more effective lures. A fish finder is simply another tool, and experienced anglers can use it to make smarter decisions. The problem starts when the tool replaces the knowledge instead of improving it. Finding fish on a screen doesn't automatically mean you understand their behavior, and seeing a target doesn't guarantee you'll get it to bite. Presentation, timing, lure selection, and patience still matter. Some of the best fishing lessons come from figuring things out without electronic assistance. Watching birds, reading the current, noticing bait activity, and understanding underwater structure can make you a more adaptable angler. Here's the real test: could you still put fish in the boat if every screen went black tomorrow? Technology can help you catch more fish, but true skill means knowing what to do when technology can't help. So, are fish finders making anglers better, or are they creating a generation that can't catch fish without them? 🎣
2
128
Let's settle this: If two fishermen stand next to each other all day, one uses live bait and catches 15 fish, and the other throws artificials and catches 2, who is actually the better fisherman? And don't come in here changing the rules halfway through the argument. 👇😂
3
1
3
448
Your Favorite Fishing Lure Is Probably Catching More Fishermen Than Fish 🎣 Every angler has that one lure they swear by. Maybe it's a flashy hard bait, a soft plastic they've used for years, or an expensive lure that promises to catch the biggest fish in the water. They carry it everywhere, recommend it to everyone, and blame the fish when it doesn't work. But here's a question worth asking: Is your favorite lure catching more fish, or has the marketing caught you? The fishing industry knows how to sell confidence. Bright colors, realistic designs, lifelike swimming action, and professional anglers holding giant fish make almost any lure look irresistible. Before long, fishermen are convinced they need the newest model or a special color to get bites. Meanwhile, fish don't care about brand names, price tags, or how popular a lure is on social media. They're responding to things like feeding behavior, water temperature, visibility, current, and how the bait moves through their environment. That doesn't mean lure selection is unimportant. The right size, color, and action can absolutely make a difference. A lure that matches local baitfish or gets down to where fish are holding may outperform one that's poorly suited to the conditions. But even the best lure won't save a presentation that looks unnatural or is being fished in the wrong place. Confidence matters, too. When you trust a lure, you tend to fish it longer, pay closer attention, and learn how to work it properly. Sometimes that confidence produces results, but it doesn't necessarily mean the lure itself is magical. Here's a simple experiment: next time you're fishing, leave the newest, most expensive lure in the tackle box. Tie on a basic, proven option and focus on location, depth, retrieve speed, and timing. You might discover that technique beats hype more often than you expected. After all, the best lure isn't always the one with the biggest advertising budget. It's the one that works under the conditions you're fishing. So, are you loyal to a favorite lure because it consistently catches fish, or because you believe in the story behind it? 🎣
120
🎣😎 The Mullet Run retweeted
Replying to @TheMulletRun
Water Taxi are like the cockroaches of our waterways
2
3
46
Very interesting.
If you have ever wondered if the CHICKEN and the MULLET have the same GIZZARD we brought in a real chef to determine if it’s really true. #mulletrun
3
292
🎣😎 The Mullet Run retweeted
The Water Taxi operation in general is so trash. The Fort Lauderdale canals are not Time Square but you can’t convince their captains that it’s not. They break every rule.
3
3
1
19
16,820
If You Could Ban One Thing From Fishing Forever, What Would It Be? 🎣 Every fisherman has an opinion about what is wrong with fishing today. Some want stricter regulations, others want fewer restrictions, and plenty of anglers have a piece of equipment or a fishing habit they'd happily see disappear forever. But if you could ban just one thing from fishing, what would make your list? For me, the first thing worth banning would be littering on the water. Nothing ruins a beautiful fishing spot faster than discarded fishing line, plastic bait packages, empty containers, and tangled hooks left behind by careless anglers. That trash doesn't just make the shoreline look terrible. It can injure birds, fish, turtles, and other wildlife. If you bring it in, take it out. It's not complicated. But I know plenty of fishermen would choose something completely different. Some would ban certain fishing technologies, arguing that modern electronics make finding fish too easy and take away the challenge of learning the water. Others would outlaw specific fishing methods they believe give anglers an unfair advantage. Then there are those who would ban tournament fishing, arguing that competition, sponsorships, and social media have turned a relaxing outdoor pastime into a business. And let's not forget fishing etiquette. Maybe the real answer is banning anglers who crowd someone else's spot, cut across their lines, or leave a mess for the next person to clean up. Of course, every fishing method and piece of equipment has supporters. What's unfair to one angler might be perfectly acceptable to another. That's why this question could start a serious debate at any bait shop. The challenge is choosing just one thing. Would you sacrifice a favorite technique, give up a piece of technology, or focus on changing how people treat the environment and each other? Fishing has changed dramatically over the years, but protecting the resource and respecting fellow anglers should always matter. So, if you had the power to ban one thing from fishing forever, what would it be—and why? Don't hold back. Let's hear those opinions! 🎣
2
1
300
👇 ARTIFICIAL OR LIVE BAIT — WHICH ONE ACTUALLY MAKES YOU A BETTER ANGLER? Defend your answer. No fence-sitting, and no "it depends." Let's hear it. 😂🎣
3
150
We wanted to know if the CHICKEN and the MULLET had the same GIZZARD. We enlisted the help of a world famous chef. #mulletrun
1
3
287
The Water Taxi operation in general is so trash. The Fort Lauderdale canals are not Time Square but you can’t convince their captains that it’s not. They break every rule.
3
3
1
19
16,820