
An absolute Johannes Factotum. I’m @thejeditor everywhere it matters and some places it doesn’t.
Joined March 2011
- Tweets1.6K
- Following220
- Followers1.3K
- Likes9.3K
Seen some chatter about Driscoll making the rounds. Here’s your periodic reminder that he paid a team of researchers and sermon writers to do the vast majority of his work, then packaged it all as if he did it all himself.
I know because I was one of them.
Most conversations about the “story of the Bible” can’t break free from the gravity of framing that story in expressly theological terms or along a theological outline.
The key to escape velocity is approaching the literary story that the Bible itself tells.
I wrote a thing. Product of over a decade of research, synthesizing, and teaching on the literary narrative of Yahweh. Coming May 9.
Pre-order the Kindle version now, or wait for paperback to drop on Friday.
Pre-order the eBook here: amazon.com/dp/B0F791M9FS
Come back Friday, May 9 for the paperback.
New video! Five things I’ve seen over the years that stop people from reading the Bible the way it was mean to be read—and what to do about it.
youtube.com/watch?v=OKwW1xpl…
Inductive Bible study—for all its goals of contextual and grammatical analysis—reduces interpretation to an atomistic level. As such it struggles to ever actually grasp the significance of the very words it aims to interpret.
There’s lots of talk about discourse analysis at the moment, but the irony is that it’s the intuitive way we read most everything naturally.
What happens when an author puts a word in God’s mouth that makes us really, really uncomfortable?
youtube.com/watch?v=BdK5Zjrz…



