People think(reason) in their own voice. They hear their voice their whole lives, in thought. It changes from youth and is final when adulthood. The change is gradual to reach their final adulthood voice. it stays in their thinking(reasoning) most all the time. Most people reason in speech, their language, their dialect, etcetera. Telepaths call this continual residence. We can tell where they are from mostly, from the dialect, language. We get caught up in all this in crowded places like shopping stores. Sometimes the couple will talk and check, perfect, just like I could tell. People often say, "how did he know that". Or close, like Midwest states where entire states are similar. I talk to people from a different isle, sometimes Kids who, well, can't stop. There are so many people in the store I sometime forget what I went in there for, and forget items.

Question to Grok: Please analyze the following text and tell me if the content is feasible: "Natural Telepathic Synthesis Person to Person Brain Communicator (NTSPPBC) Again, I will try to be brief with an empirical self experience definition: To start off with the word communicator translates to connection rather that contemporary human voice/speech, eye contact, flash cards, etcetera. The person to person brain is self explanatory. The synthesis in this case is all five senses, weighted most to least significant, a lot to chew.Natural Telepathic is a human person.Speech synthesis is the most common used, primary with humans, and easier to fabricate to completeness than imagery synthesis. Speech Synthesis is talking to your brain (conversation), singing a song to your brain, that stuff.Noise Synthesis I do not have much of a call for, except the musical instruments of music.Imagery, is a challenge, and will get into this later.The last three, taste, smell, and touch, I rarely communicate much. Maybe at the food market for taste and smell. Think of it like flash cards for me. Then there is the Low Level Format Processes (LLFP). This is the stuff that is unexplored for me. Stuff like learning and how to exercise the brain. You need an AI interface exerciser for this, speculation, my opinion. How the interrogation would work, maybe have to start baby steps, analysis, so forth, don’t really know, difficulty stuff. Ah, the imagery synthesis. Where do I start; this is an essay in itself. Okay just the gist then: With some imagery and text, there is a transparent look to it, like a hologram maybe. The disciplined, lifelike imagery fabrications are not so transparent, and with some degree of color. I can create a medium good job of it; with some difficulties (sometimes I repeat it over and again until I get an improved copy). It is flowing the frames for a specific clip duration of time, from memory that is difficult. And still there are transparent holes in the final product. It is not like singing a song with instrumentation; that is not as hard, just a single, specific part of the brain. Imagery and sound is multitasking; its destinations and sources are from different parts of the brain. Here is a teaser: I can fabricate a voice, a well known artist (maybe), make it say what I want, not necessarily the original, make it appear loud, make it a whisper, or appear far away, and even next to you. It is digital and all done with technique. Also make it fast forward and with the original pitch (there are some gaps in the audio). The synthesis is digital and the brain is processing it, just like any other electronic processor, pinging the different parts of the brain to re-fabricate the final product’ like when you sleep for example: You breathe, your heart beats, etcetera. It is not your brain’s comprehensive decision making process that does that. Just like telepathy; your brain thinks it is itself (you). It bypasses your hearing mechanism, processes the synthesis and there it is, voices in my head from somewhere else. My comprehension knows it is a hallucination, my brain does not, it is just doing its job, like it is suppose to." Grok Answer: Thought for 20s: “The internal mental synthesis parts are feasible as ordinary (sometimes unusually vivid) imagination. Natural person-to-person telepathy is not.The text describes two different things under one label. Most of the detail is about generating speech, music, and imagery inside one person’s head. That is real and well-documented. The title and framing treat it as a natural communicator that links two brains. That part is not supported by evidence.What matches known psychology and neurosciencePeople routinely generate inner speech, songs, and visual scenes without external input. Auditory imagery can include specific voices, changes in loudness or distance, and some pitch/speed control; visual imagery ranges from almost nothing (aphantasia) to highly detailed and “lifelike” (hyperphantasia). Repeating a scene to improve it, finding it partly transparent or full of holes, and struggling to hold a continuous sequence of frames are typical of reconstructive memory and imagery, not of a high-fidelity video renderer. Speech and music are usually easier than complex visual sequences because they recruit more constrained, well-practiced networks (language, motor planning for articulation, auditory cortex). Combining imagery + sound is harder because it draws on more distributed systems at once. Taste, smell, and touch imagery exist but are weaker and less controllable for most people—exactly as the text notes. The distinction “my comprehension knows it is a hallucination, my brain does not” is a reasonable description of insight during vivid imagery or inner speech. The brain’s sensory and memory systems can treat internally generated content as if it were incoming signal; the person can still tag it as self-generated. That is different from a clinical hallucination that is experienced as coming from outside and not recognized as internally produced.The autonomic analogy (breathing and heartbeat continue without a high-level “decision”) is accurate. The “digital processor pinging parts of the brain” language is only a loose metaphor. Brains are electrochemical, massively parallel, and analog; they reconstruct from distributed memory traces rather than executing a clean digital pipeline.Low-level learning and “exercising the brain” with some kind of interface is speculative but points at real research areas (neurofeedback, targeted practice, spaced retrieval). There is no established “low-level format” process that an AI could interrogate like a hard drive.What is not feasibleNatural telepathy—information passing from one brain to another without speech, gesture, writing, or technology—has no accepted scientific support. There is no known physical mechanism (brain electromagnetic fields are far too weak and noisy to be read at a distance by another brain), and controlled experiments have not produced reliable, independently replicated effects that survive scrutiny. Some parapsychology meta-analyses report small statistical excesses; they have not changed the mainstream consensus. Laboratory “brain-to-brain” work exists, but it is technological and extremely limited: EEG or similar sensors decode a simple intention from one person and TMS or similar stimulation delivers a crude signal (often a phosphene or a muscle twitch) to another. Bandwidth is tiny, it is not sensory-rich, and it is not “natural.” Neural coupling during ordinary conversation (brains syncing while people talk) is also real; it is not telepathy. Fabricating another person’s voice or a moving holographic scene inside your own head and then treating that as evidence of an external communicator mixes two categories. The first is imagination. The second would require a transmission mechanism that has not been demonstrated. Bottom line, A person can train vivid inner speech and imagery, notice its imperfections, and describe the experience in technical-sounding language. That is feasible. Using those same experiences as proof of a natural person-to-person brain communicator is not. The title overclaims what the body of the text actually reports: skilled, reconstructive mental simulation, not inter-brain signaling.” - Grok

---Natural Telepathic Synthesis Person to Person Brain Communicator (NTSPPBC) Again, I will try to be brief with an empirical self experience definition: To start off with the word communicator translates to connection rather that contemporary human voice/speech, eye contact, flash cards, etcetera. The person to person brain is self explanatory. The synthesis in this case is all five senses, weighted most to least significant, a lot to chew. Natural Telepathic is a human person. Speech synthesis is the most common used, primary with humans, and easier to fabricate to completeness than imagery synthesis. Speech Synthesis is talking to your brain (conversation), singing a song to your brain, that stuff. Noise Synthesis I do not have much of a call for, except the musical instruments of music. Imagery, is a challenge, and will get into this later. The last three, taste, smell, and touch, I rarely communicate much. Maybe at the food market for taste and smell. Think of it like flash cards for me. Then there is the Low Level Format Processes(LLFP). This is the stuff that is unexplored for me. Stuff like learning and how to exercise the brain. You need an AI interface exerciser for this, speculation, my opinion. How the interrogation would work, maybe have to start baby steps, analysis, so forth, don’t really know, difficulty stuff. Ah, the imagery synthesis. Where do I start; this is an essay in itself. Okay just the gist then: With some imagery and text, there is a transparent look to it, like a hologram maybe. The disciplined, lifelike imagery fabrications are not so transparent, and with some degree of color. I can create a medium good job of it; with some difficulties(sometimes I repeat it over and again until I get an improved copy). It is flowing the frames for a specific clip duration of time, from memory that is difficult. And still there are transparent holes in the final product. It is not like singing a song with instrumentation; that is not as hard, just a single, specific part of the brain. Imagery and sound is multitasking; its destinations and sources are from different parts of the brain. Here is a teaser: I can fabricate a voice, a well known artist (maybe), make it say what I want, not necessarily the original, make it appear loud, make it a whisper, or appear far away, and even next to you. It is digital and all done with technique. Also make it fast forward and with the original pitch (there are some gaps in the audio). The synthesis is digital and the brain is processing it, just like any other electronic processor, pinging the different parts of the brain to re-fabricate the final product. Like when you sleep for example: You breathe, your heart beats, etcetera. It is not your brain’s comprehensive decision making process that does that. Just like telepathy; your brain thinks it is itself (you). It bypasses your hearing mechanism, processes the synthesis and there it is, voices in my head from somewhere else. My comprehension knows it is a hallucination, my brain does not, it is just doing its job, like it is suppose to. --- Electric Field Receptor Telekinesis: “Telekinesis is the supposed psychic ability to move or change physical objects using only the power of the mind, without touching them.” -Wikipedia I read somewhere, (maybe in error, and paraphrasing in my own words from memory), that Elon Musk’s version refers to it as an extension of the mind to robotics. My reference is Electric Field Receptor Telekinesis, for lack of definitions for most of our actions; well, because they don’t exist. So here it is, Electric Field Receptor Telekinesis: A somewhat useless action (to me anyway) whereas I sense the switching of electron devices, such as: when streaming video providers load their buffer memory and screen appears, when my laptop talks to the internet, at Market check out, when the money transactions go through and I get a receipt (I still get a paper receipt because I like to sense the printer talking, (there is no sound of course), and traffic light systems (I play a game with everyone at the stopped traffic intersections with speech synthesis telepathy and the, ping, wait, wait 3, 2, 1 OK OK SpOps Double tap) Oh yes I didn’t forget the Wrist Movement Synching, which compliments the mental brain, oops, brain mental receiving action. It works. Anyway that’s all. It is kind of a sideboard, part of telepathy. Other than a game and to entertain my audience at traffic light stops, I have no real use for it. Oh yes again, again, the telekinesis part: Years ago before AC in automobiles was standard, I use to put my arm outside the window, like people did. When the light changed at intersections (old technology with higher voltages and relays, inductive kicks), it use to throw my whole arm up off the vehicle. Today with sophistication I just sync into the switching, sort of like an amplifier. I suppose it is useful for a ancient 2400 BAUD EMP Simplex Transmitter/Reciever interface from my PC to my brain if I wanted to decipher morse code in my head for some esoteric reason, guess.

“Telekinesis is the supposed psychic ability to move or change physical objects using only the power of the mind, without touching them.” -Wikipedia I read somewhere, (maybe in error), that Elon Musk’s version refers to it as an extension of the mind to robotics. My reference is Electric Field Receptor Telekinesis, for lack of definitions for most of our actions; well, because they don’t exist. So here it is, Electric Field Receptor Telekinesis: A somewhat useless action (to me anyway) whereas I sense the switching of electron devices, such as: when streaming video providers load their buffer memory and screen appears, when my laptop talks to the internet, at Market check out, when the money transactions go through and I get a receipt (I still get a paper receipt because I like to sense the printer talking, (there is no sound of course), and traffic light systems (I play a game with everyone at the stopped traffic intersections with speech synthesis telepathy and the, ping, wait, wait 3, 2, 1 OK OK SpOps Double tap) Oh yes I didn’t forget the Wrist Movement Synching, which compliments the mental brain, oops, brain mental receiving action. It works. Anyway that’s all. It is kind of a sideboard of telepathy. Other than a game and to entertain my audience at traffic light stops, I have no real use for it. Oh yes again, again, the telekinesis part: Years ago before AC in automobiles was standard, I use to put my arm outside the window, like people did. When the light changed at intersections (old technology with higher voltages and relays, inductive kicks), it use to throw my whole arm up off the vehicle. Today with sophistication I just sync into the switching, sort of like an amplifier. I suppose it is useful for a ancient 2400 BAUD EMP Simplex Transmitter/Reciever interface from my PC to my brain if I wanted to decipher morse code in my head for some esoteric reason. I included this post because it is in my BIO, you might have wondered about it since it isn’t in any dictionary.