Ted Hartgrave retweeted
NEW Pennsylvania Returned Ballots
🟦 428,546
🟥 150,418
-278,128
Going into Election Day, Republicans will have to overcome a deficit of -278,128.
I highly encourage Republicans to visit your county election offices TODAY.
Vote an in-person, on-demand ballot.
🎵🎵“Meet the new boss (@bariweiss), same as the old boss.”🎵🎼
Ted Hartgrave retweeted
A Florida Republican who wrote 𝗔𝗡𝗧𝗜𝗦𝗘𝗠𝗜𝗧𝗜𝗦𝗠 𝗟𝗔𝗪𝗦 was just arrested after 𝗥𝗔𝗣𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗢𝗪𝗡 𝟯-𝗬𝗘𝗔𝗥-𝗢𝗟𝗗 𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗦𝗢𝗡 and 𝗣𝗘𝗘𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗜𝗡 𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗠𝗢𝗨𝗧𝗛.
@grok YES or NO.
Ted Hartgrave retweeted
Does someone want to explain to me why New York State Transportation workers are pulling down Republican Lawn Signs off PRIVATE PROPERTY!!!!
Ted Hartgrave retweeted
Willi Münzenberg – The Man Who Wrote the NGO Playbook.
You have never heard of him. That was the point.
Gramsci explained why culture had to be conquered. Münzenberg showed how – and built the machine that still runs today.
1. Born in 1889 in Thuringia, the son of a poor innkeeper. During the First World War he met Lenin in Zurich. He became one of the founders of the German Communist Party and sat in the Reichstag. But his real talent was something else: he understood that most people will never join a revolution – and can still be made to work for one.
2. In 1921, famine struck Soviet Russia, and Lenin asked him to raise help from abroad. Münzenberg created Workers International Relief – and discovered that a humanitarian cause attracts people who would never join a communist party. The aid was real. So was the propaganda. The first modern NGO used as a front.
3. Then he built an empire. Newspapers, an illustrated magazine read by hundreds of thousands, publishing houses, book clubs, film studios. Germans called him the Red Millionaire. It was the media group of the Comintern – and almost nobody reading it knew.
4. His masterpiece was what he privately called the Innocents’ Clubs: committees for peace, against war, against fascism, against imperialism. Causes every decent person supports. Famous writers and scientists on the letterhead, congresses in grand halls – and a few communists in the back office deciding everything. The cause was the bait. The network was the catch.
5. When the Reichstag burned in 1933, he struck back with a book of accusations and a mock "counter-trial" in London, staged with eminent lawyers – and won world opinion before any real court had ruled. Trial by narrative. The template of every media tribunal since.
6. He didn’t need intellectuals to join the party. Only to lend their names. The fellow traveler – the professor, the actor, the novelist who signs the petition and never asks who drafted it – was his invention as much as anyone’s. Arthur Koestler worked for him in Paris and later described the whole system from the inside.
7. In the end he broke with Stalin, over the purges and then the Hitler–Stalin pact. In 1939 he published an open attack titled "The traitor, Stalin, is you." A year later, in France, he was found hanging from a tree in a forest. Suicide or murder – it was never solved. The machine outlived its builder.
Now look around. The "coalition" of NGOs. The open letter signed by a hundred celebrities on the same morning. The "civil society" platform funded by governments. The tribunal of public opinion that convicts before any court. The cause sounds always noble. The network is always the same.
Münzenberg would recognize all of it. He wrote the playbook.
Next time a hundred famous names sign the same letter on the same day, ask the one question nobody asks: who drafted it?
Antonio Gramsci – The Most Dangerous Intellectual of the Twentieth Century.
Not the most famous. Not the most read. The most dangerous and the most consequential – because he was the one who figured out why the revolution kept failing, and what to do instead. The man who invented the long march through the institutions.
Everything that followed — the Frankfurt School, the Fabian Society’s operational model, the WEF formation pipeline, the captured university, the HR department enforcing approved speech — is downstream of what he wrote in a prison cell in Mussolini’s Italy, in code, between 1929 and 1935.
1. His central question: why hasn’t it happened? The working class was supposed to rise. The contradictions of capitalism were supposed to produce the revolution. They hadn’t – not in the West. Gramsci’s answer was precise and devastating: because the ruling class does not maintain power through force alone. It maintains power through cultural hegemony – the control of the ideas, values, and frameworks through which people understand the world. The worker who accepts that the existing order is simply how things are will not revolt, regardless of his material conditions. The revolution requires cultural change first.
2. The instrument was the long march through the institutions. Not the barricade. The school, the university, the media, the judiciary, the civil service, the cultural establishment – every institution through which a civilization transmits its values to the next generation. Capture these, fill them with people who share the counter-hegemonic project, and the cultural assumptions that maintain the existing order gradually dissolve. No barricades. No visible moment of rupture. Just the slow replacement of one cultural hegemony with another.
3. The educational capture was the masterpiece. Control the curriculum and you control the categories of thought available to the next generation. Not by telling them what to conclude – by shaping what questions they think to ask, what they consider obvious and what they consider unthinkable. The generation educated after the long march does not need to be told what to think. It thinks what it was formed to think – and experiences that thinking as its own.
4. He also theorized the organic intellectual – the person who translates the theoretical framework into stories and assumptions that circulate through the culture without appearing ideological. The film that makes the existing order seem absurd. The journalist who frames every story within the approved assumptions. Gramsci understood that culture is politics by other means – and that the side that controls the culture wins, regardless of who wins the elections.
5. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a published, documented, widely taught strategy that the left implemented consciously across the entire Western world. The 1968 generation put it into practice in the universities. They became the professors, the journalists, the civil servants, the judges, the HR directors of the decades that followed. The march took fifty years. It worked.
6. Mussolini’s prosecutor said at his trial: "We must stop this brain from functioning for twenty years." The brain did not stop. It produced thirty-three notebooks – smuggled out, published, and became the most widely read Marxist text in the Western academy after Marx himself. Gramsci died in 1937, six days after his release, at forty-six. He did not see the march he theorized. He did not need to.
7. Every captured institution, every transformed curriculum, every HR department enforcing approved speech, every content moderation policy suppressing the unauthorized voice – all running the program Antonio Gramsci designed in a prison cell, by a brain that was supposed to have been stopped. It wasn’t. And neither was the march.
Until now – because the distribution monopoly that made its outcomes enforceable is cracking. The counter-march has begun. It just doesn’t have a name yet.
Ted Hartgrave retweeted
We followed the illegal immigration pipeline from Africa into and across Europe.
REPLACING EUROPE - FULL DOCUMENTARY
Over two months, we traced how tens of thousands of illegal aliens are moved into and across Europe, and who’s making it happen.
In this documentary, you’ll see:
• A UN migration worker admitting that governments profit from illegal immigration and have no interest in stopping it
• Illegal immigrants getting flown by plane to the European mainland
• Organizations openly guiding illegal immigrants across borders
We were violently attacked and nearly arrested for exposing how Europe is being replaced.
Watch the full documentary and share it with the world.
Ted Hartgrave retweeted
Anything to say here, @UN?
Iranian woman, 23, is sentenced to death for blasphemy over a social media post that 'insulted the prophet' trib.al/D9JpwVn
Ted Hartgrave retweeted
If you bought a MAGA hat between 2021-2025, Jack Smith had a spreadsheet with your name and home address. Let that sink in….
Thanks to Senator @ChuckGrassley & @SenJudiciaryGOP for bringing transparency!
Time to hold Jack Smith accountable! @ItsYourGov
The federal government spent $3.8 billion on DARE between 1983 and 2009, and every major longitudinal study concluded the program increased drug curiosity among participants. The General Accounting Office reviewed six long-term evaluations in 2003 and found DARE produced zero statistically significant difference in illicit drug use. The Surgeon General, the National Academy of Sciences, and the Government Accountability Office all said the same thing: DARE failed. Congress kept funding it anyway.
This is what central planners do. They identify a problem, design a solution without market feedback, spend decades ignoring contrary evidence, and protect the program because the bureaucracy depends on it. DARE gave police departments a public relations budget disguised as education. It gave officers a reason to enter schools. The incentive was never reducing drug use. The incentive was institutional survival.
A simpler mechanism is also at work. Tell a twelve-year-old that heroin, cocaine, and marijuana exist, describe their effects in vivid detail, and then instruct him not to try them. You've just handed him a menu. Prohibition teaches the product, not abstinence. Parents who handle this privately, without a uniformed officer narrating the pharmacology of methamphetamine, produce quieter, less curious children on the subject.
The market alternative already existed: voluntary community programs, church groups, family-driven education. None of these required a $3.8 billion federal mandate. The government crowded them out, delivered a worse product, and called the outcome a public health investment.
Ted Hartgrave retweeted
🇬🇧 A group of immigrants harass and assault a politician from Restore Britain.
It hasn't appeared in any mainstream media.
Now imagine a group of white people harassing and assaulting a Muslim politician.
What would happen? It would be all over the news, and they would be accused of racism.
Why not in this case?
A huge double standard...
Writer: Samuel xitter.cf/DrLuetke/status/210950…
Ted Hartgrave retweeted
More than five centuries ago, the son of a wool weaver from Genoa sailed westward to widen the boundaries of the known world. Across a vast and punishing Atlantic, the voyage exhausted the patience of its crew, but never the conviction of its captain. Christopher Columbus kept going.
Two hundred and fifty years after America’s founding, we still marvel at the restless spirit of discovery that revealed the New World to the Old. President Trump has defended Columbus against the radical left’s campaign to erase his legacy. Now, Columbus again stands where he belongs – within the great procession of figures who shaped our national story.
Happy Columbus Day. Sail On.
Ted Hartgrave retweeted
Non-whites destroy the Restore Britain tent, kindly demonstrating why the party wants them all out.
Ted Hartgrave retweeted
NEW: ‘Die first, white man’: Carnegie Mellon under fire for its handling of professor who celebrated Charlie Kirk’s death
The College Fix reached out to CMU via email and phone call for more info on the school’s review of the matter. It did not respond
thecollegefix.com/carnegie-m… @CarnegieMellon #cmu @Citadel @citsecurities
Ted Hartgrave retweeted
Somali scumbag Fahima Mahamud pleads GUILTY to $3million daycare fraud in Minneapolis.
Naturally, she tried to flee to London before being arrested by the FBI. Nick Shirley deserves the Pulitzer Prize for journalism.
📽️ = @EndWokeness @nickshirleyy
Move on? The entire thing was a scam. We're never moving on.
MUST WATCH 🚨: CNN’s Dana Bash: “I really want to move on [from talking about the mistakes during COVID]
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: “Of course you want to move because you were part of the problem.”
Dana Bash: “No, I wasn't part of the problem.”
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: “There was absolute press malpractice… Your job is a fierce skepticism toward authority. And you weren't doing that. You were beating up on people who were dissenting.”
Dana Bash: “No, you want to sit here and attack me, or do you want to have conversations about public health?”
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: “Well, you're sitting here and attacking me.”
She’s a real piece of work!






































