@TabooGodi
iAccount based inIndia
About this account
- Account based in
- India
- Connected via
- India Android App
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Love CRPGs, Souls like and co-op Shooters with friends. Also an old anime/manga nerd.
Joined November 2017
- Tweets1.8K
- Following43
- Followers25
- Likes35.7K
This is some epic piece of website... hope it becomes one of the major ones.
Hey folks,
I'm launching a website today: videogamescritic.com
It started as a little database I built for myself. I use Metacritic and OpenCritic a lot and they're clearly useful, but to me as a designer the user experience always felt a bit lacking.
Then the thing kept growing, and at some point I realized it had become genuinely useful for any gamer, not just me. So here it is, for everyone.
My main problem with the existing aggregators: Their scores tell you how the press felt about a game, not how players did.
That made sense 20 years ago. I cared a lot what GameSpot gave a game back then. But today we can actually measure how players felt, and to me that will always matter more than how the press did. On videogamescritic.com, players hold at least two-thirds of every score, by rule. Press still counts, it just can't outvote the people who bought the game.
The other big problem: Those sites rate a game once, at launch, and then never really touch it again.
But that's not how games work anymore. A game can launch rough and get patched shortly after, but on Metacritic and OpenCritic it carries that scarlet letter forever.
No Man's Sky is the obvious example: Famously rocky launch, and Hello Games has spent the years since relentlessly improving it. Its Metacritic score has never moved. On videogamescritic.com it launched at 50 and sits at 82 today, because scores here are LIVE: launch-era reviews fade out over time, and reviews written after a significant patch count the most. When player sentiment changes, the number changes. Simple.
And since press does still count, I ended up reviewing the reviewers too. Every outlet and creator gets a trust score based on one question: When they reviewed a game, did players end up agreeing? You can see who consistently calls games the way players see them, and who doesn't. Again, simple and fair.
And everything is transparent. Every game page shows exactly how its score was computed, and the full methodology is public. No editorial opinion, no magic number.
Anyway, I hope you get a kick out of it! Even just as a way to see the best games on each platform, find something you missed, or browse a site that isn't wallpapered in ads, I think it's already pretty useful.
Enjoy!👍❤️
Knock Knock retweeted
Hey folks,
I'm launching a website today: videogamescritic.com
It started as a little database I built for myself. I use Metacritic and OpenCritic a lot and they're clearly useful, but to me as a designer the user experience always felt a bit lacking.
Then the thing kept growing, and at some point I realized it had become genuinely useful for any gamer, not just me. So here it is, for everyone.
My main problem with the existing aggregators: Their scores tell you how the press felt about a game, not how players did.
That made sense 20 years ago. I cared a lot what GameSpot gave a game back then. But today we can actually measure how players felt, and to me that will always matter more than how the press did. On videogamescritic.com, players hold at least two-thirds of every score, by rule. Press still counts, it just can't outvote the people who bought the game.
The other big problem: Those sites rate a game once, at launch, and then never really touch it again.
But that's not how games work anymore. A game can launch rough and get patched shortly after, but on Metacritic and OpenCritic it carries that scarlet letter forever.
No Man's Sky is the obvious example: Famously rocky launch, and Hello Games has spent the years since relentlessly improving it. Its Metacritic score has never moved. On videogamescritic.com it launched at 50 and sits at 82 today, because scores here are LIVE: launch-era reviews fade out over time, and reviews written after a significant patch count the most. When player sentiment changes, the number changes. Simple.
And since press does still count, I ended up reviewing the reviewers too. Every outlet and creator gets a trust score based on one question: When they reviewed a game, did players end up agreeing? You can see who consistently calls games the way players see them, and who doesn't. Again, simple and fair.
And everything is transparent. Every game page shows exactly how its score was computed, and the full methodology is public. No editorial opinion, no magic number.
Anyway, I hope you get a kick out of it! Even just as a way to see the best games on each platform, find something you missed, or browse a site that isn't wallpapered in ads, I think it's already pretty useful.
Enjoy!👍❤️
Don't make me want to watch this shitty rehash, I don't want to... but if it makes troons angry, I will be forced to to do it.
>Mentally ill(The gendered version)
Jew's are the reason you can only have this in a shitty video game.
This is what first-person gameplay will look like in GTA 6
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This image is fan-made, not official GTA 6 gameplay. The account is not affiliated with Rockstar Games. x.com/_GTAVI_ rockstargames.com/newswire
Knock Knock retweeted
This is a Lower Caste Shang Neighbourhood in the Capital Region of China!!
But wasn’t China the most developed place on earth?
Reminds me of this. youtube.com/watch?v=s1fzQ9PJ…
The developers of the Steam game Final Sentence posted an honest announcement on the game’s page.
They titled it “DON’T BUY THIS GAME” and urged players not to buy it at full price right now.
Instead, they recommend waiting for the upcoming sale.
The devs wrote: “Save a couple bucks for a coffee or a compressed air duster for your keyboard. Seriously, that thing is worth buying.”
The game has gathered nearly 350,000 wishlists on Steam.
We need more honest devs like this
Ah yes a probable jew trying to teach others about their religion and filling it with lies. You guys really never stop doing it and then wonder why everyone hates you.
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
And certain Indians want this kind of food to enter our market. We already got detergent Paneer some other shit. Don't bring even more cancer to simple vegetables.