You become more fiscally conservative as you get older because you’ve had more time to watch your federal government fail to solve any problems despite taking in trillions of dollars in revenues per year. You’ve watched the private markets deliver life-changing technologies that bring the entire tide up, all while these hypocrites and fools bark the same nonsense year after year, and somehow cannot manage to deliver anything but massive deficits, finger pointing, and divisive rhetoric. In this post, Warren transfers nonsense from her brain to her thumbs, and through the magic touch-screen slab to tell you that she’d be able to do something with a few billion more dollars that her and her colleagues haven’t been able to do with a multi-thousand-billion dollar annual budget for years and years. What is the meaning of her post here? There is no meaning. It is meaningless. The intention? To stir emotions in anyone who isn’t aware of the obvious things I’ve written here. To manipulate and gain the support of sheep. If you actually think revenue is the bottleneck for government output, you lack basic financial literacy and are being conned by con artists.

• You and your friends would steal 80% of it • you’d come in 300% over budget and still spend 3x what you taxed • you’d start 2 useless departments that soak up billions yearly forever going forward • the entire mess would be riddled with bribes, fraud, and fake daycares • you’d be proposing a 2nd, 3rd, 4th and then permanent wealth tax to deal with the “gross underfunding” of your corrupt “childcare for everyone” empire. The icing on the cake? Childcare costs in the US would increase by 40% in 2 years.

Kyle Kulinski: “Tax every penny in net worth somebody has over $999M at 100%. It’s a no billionaires tax, no trillionaires tax. We’ll send you a fucking plaque in the mail that says I won at capitalism. We already have Gilded Age level income and wealth inequality. I’m surprised people aren’t breaking out the motherfucking guillotines already”

The Second Amendment has been revoked by technology. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to preserve democracy. If the government were to seize authoritarian power, the people would be able to overthrow it, having the right to bear arms. Drones have now made small arms obsolete. Your collection of hundreds of handguns and rifles won't save you when a drone can spot you from 1,000 feet and dive to attack at 100 mph. The war in Ukraine has shown the effectiveness of drones and the ineffectiveness of rifles and shotguns against them. Autonomous drones will be even more aggressive. They will be able to make effective use of cover and concealment, as well as speed and maneuver, making them almost impossible to hit. Your gun collection will be worthless.

> Discord gets a new CEO > Starts requiring your biometric data > The CEO is literally from Israel Bro you can’t make this up

how many of you have been in a 60+ Million coin in single millies?