More on Epstein: Peter Thiel is a co-founder of Palantir Technologies. To understand why this matters, it is important to understand what Palantir does and where its origins lie. In its earliest conceptual phase, Palantir’s mission closely resembled a post-9/11 government program known as Total Information Awareness, which operated under DARPA. This program was designed to collect, integrate, and analyze massive amounts of data to identify threats in advance. This was precursor of Palatier. The context matters. In the 1970s, Senator Frank Church led what became known as the Church Committee, which exposed widespread illegal and criminal behavior by the CIA and other intelligence agencies, both domestically and abroad, it shows the world who the real terrorist of the world was. These revelations imposed real constraints on intelligence agencies and introduced a level of oversight and transparency that deeply angered those in charge. They understood that continued transparency would expose not just isolated abuses, but a systemic pattern of criminal behavior, and they were determined to reverse that trend. 9/11 became the perfect excuse. As you likely know by now, 9/11 was an inside job, in the sense that those responsible knew what was going to happen and chose not to stop it. I believe they may have actively aided it and ensured the destruction was as extensive as possible. In the aftermath, the CIA and the broader intelligence community were prepared with a ready-made justification: this tragedy occurred because they had been restrained, and the gloves needed to come off again, Church Committee clean up needed to be reversed. And they did just that. Using 9/11 as an excuse intelligence agencies reclaimed sweeping powers and dramatically expanded surveillance. One of the most troubling aspects of Total Information Awareness program was the man chosen to run it: John Poindexter. Poindexter had a documented history of criminal conduct and was a central figure in the Iran-Contra scandal, where he was indicted on multiple felony counts that were later overturned on technical grounds rather than exoneration. Despite this background, he was placed in charge of a program that amounted to total surveillance of Americans and foreigners, with Americans being the primary focus. Congress attempted to defund the program after public backlash, but the operations continued under different labels and only grew larger and more sophisticated. This is where Peter Thiel enters the picture. Thiel emerged as a co-founder of what became Palantir, a private company that effectively carried forward the core objectives of Total information awareness. Another important figure here is Richard Perle. Perle had extensive ties to Israel and was once caught passing classified information to the Israeli embassy, yet he was never charged or jailed. I believe Perle played a key role in connecting Thiel to Poindexter. Palantir then goes on and partners up with In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture capital arm, and for many years Palantir’s largest and most important client was the CIA. This is documented and not speculative. Palantir did not arise purely from market demand, it emerged from and was nurtured by the intelligence ecosystem. The evidence suggests that Jeffrey Epstein made a deliberate and strategic effort to gain access to Peter Thiel once he recognized that U.S. intelligence, particularly the CIA was moving toward building or aligning with a private-sector surveillance and data-analysis infrastructure. Thiel, through Palantir, effectively represented the emerging nexus between state intelligence, big data, and private capital. The emails show that Epstein did not approach Thiel casually. Instead, he leveraged elite social and financial connections to position himself as a credible intermediary. His statement was “As you know, I represent the Rothschilds,” especially revealing isn’t it. The intent is clear: Epstein was signaling access to entrenched global financial power in order to establish relevance and authority in Thiel’s world. The key question is why Epstein wanted Thiel on his board at all. The answer I think is - influence. If intelligence agencies were increasingly outsourcing surveillance, data aggregation, and predictive analytics to private firms, then controlling or at least embedding oneself within those firms would be strategically invaluable. When you are a global Financial cabal operative you can control many but not all of them and seems to me Thiel was one of those outsiders at first, but eventually Epstein got to him too. In my opinion Epstein functions less as an isolated financier or an agent and more as a broker for entrenched financial interests seeking to ensure that new centers of technological power did not develop independently but under their control. Large-scale capital historically resists open competition when control is at stake. If a transformative technology is going to dominate a sector especially one tied to intelligence and surveillance, the logic becomes simple - better it’s aligned with us than operating outside our influence. The CIA, meanwhile, operates as a power center of its own that is why they need to be constantly infiltrated by the global cabal(in cabals mind). Now, returning to Epstein personally, the key question is his true role and motivation. I do not believe Jeffrey Epstein was a Mossad agent, nor was he a CIA officer or MI6. Instead, Epstein functioned as an intelligence asset for what can best be described as a transnational financial power structure, the financial deep state. This structure overlaps with, influences, and at times stirs intelligence agencies in a certain direction, but it is not loyal to any single nation. Agencies such as the CIA, MI6, and Mossad are powerful operational arms, but they do not sit at the top of the hierarchy. Above them exists a financial network that funds operations, sets priorities, and ultimately benefits from intelligence activity. This network is loyal only to itself. While intelligence agencies must still answer, at least formally, to governments, this financial power structure operates beyond national accountability. This is who Epstein was working for. If the goal is global dominance as figures like George H. W. Bush openly told us, then controlling governments is essential. And if intelligence agencies answer to governments, the logical strategy is to compromise and control both the governments and the intelligence services beneath them because one can always influence another. Epstein’s role fits within this framework, not as a national spy, but as a functionary 'spy' for a global system seeking leverage, influence, and consolidation of power. Historically, this includes figures such as Prescott Bush, Averell Harriman, and Allen Dulles, as well as powerful banking dynasties like the Rothschilds and Morgans. These actors were instrumental in shaping the modern American intelligence apparatus and continue to exert influence over global politics and finance. Epstein did not formally belong to any intelligence service, yet he worked with all of them, that is a fact that he worked with all of them. In previous posts and articles, I published emails showing direct connections between Epstein and the CIA. We have seen him advising and influencing Ehud Barak a spy does not talk to his boss like that, in that conversation Epstein was the boss! The emails demonstrating ties to Israeli intelligence while at the same time cultivating relationships with British aristocracy and claiming strong connections to MI6, as well as others, this is further strengthening my suspicion that he works for the global financial elites, not a certain country or an intelligence agency. Epstein operated globally, but when examined closely, he did not display the traits of a financial mastermind. His market predictions were often poor, and when left alone to speak with financiers, he did not come across as particularly sophisticated, he wrote like a 5 years old. Yet he consistently made financial decisions and exited positions at exactly the right time and somehow always came out ahead. This suggests to me that Epstein was receiving instructions and financial guidance from far more powerful actors like the Rothschilds, family he admittedly represents. He was not the strategist, he was the operator, what I call a high level functionary. This network uses blackmail and financial leverage to control political leaders. Once leaders are compromised, entire countries fall into line. This same structure may be connected to historical events such as the assassination of John F. Kennedy and the documented Business Plot, in which bankers and financiers attempted to overthrow the U.S. government and install a fascist dictatorship. Today, this same power structure is pushing for centralized financial control systems such as CBDCs and digital currencies like the Digital Euro. Let me explain. Since at least the late 1990s, federal financial management laws have been systematically violated. Trillions of dollars in undocumented adjustments have accumulated across federal agencies, most notably within the Departments of defense and housing and urban Development. This is not a result of inadequate legislation. The legal framework governing federal finance is, by historical standards, robust and well-designed. The failure lies in enforcement. When laws exist but are routinely ignored, corruption becomes structure itself. Administrative measures such as federal accounting standards advisory board Statement 56 effectively codified secrecy, allowing significant portions of federal financial activity to be removed from public scrutiny through classified processes. Once secrecy replaces accountability, governance collapses regardless of constitutional form. It becomes a corrupt elite financial rule. Digital technology is often presented as better or inherently beneficial way to go. In truth, technology amplifies the intent of those who wield it, and that is not you, and in many case not even elected officials. The current trajectory of financial innovation, particularly central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) represents not merely a change in payment systems but a fundamental shift in power. Unlike cash, programmable digital money allows central authorities to define, monitor, and enforce how currency is used, by whom, and for what purposes. Whatever their purpose is which may not be your purpose. This transforms money from a medium of exchange into a control mechanism. In an all digital system, fiscal policy can be centralized entirely. Compliance is no longer debated, it is automated. The result is not efficiency, but total administrative control over economic life. The danger is real. Senior figures within global financial institutions have openly acknowledged that programmable money enables targeted spending, usage restrictions, and real-time enforcement. In such a system, dissent is not punished politically, It is disabled economically. If they want to de-bank you tomorrow (for telling the trust)they will do so. There is nothing you can do about it. No population would willingly consent to this level of control. So consent must be bypassed. That requires compromised leaders. For that task, you do not need a brilliant or charismatic spy. You need someone unassuming, not particularly impressive, not flashy, someone who can operate in the shadows without drawing attention like Jeffrey Epstein.