Computational neuroscientist. Founder, https://xitter.cf/t.co/YMBvt487lT: The text-first dating platform. Looking for AI/ML/DS work.

Joined April 2019
For the past few years, I've been trying to create a healthier ecosystem for online dating. The idea is that instead of browsing people's pictures, you are first shown their Tile -- a rectangle where you write 7 things about yourself. Join us at NotAZombie.net! And help spread the word!
6
1,619
Toviah Moldwin retweeted
I cant believe AI is destroying our precious journal system everyone loved
5
10
3
61
1,879
My take on interpretability from a neuroscience perspective is that the brain (at least in certain regions) tends to have more interpretable single neurons than naively expected from a neural network model, and this is a strange feature of the brain.
2
7
384
A fun conspiracy theory is that the causality is reversed - we interpret things as concepts because there are single neurons respond to them...but this is probably false.
51
Toviah Moldwin retweeted
A new manhattan project for mech interp named "Make interp" that gets them to stop writing 20 pages of lesswrongese purple prose without ever getting to the point.
3
3
2
123
4,276
Toviah Moldwin retweeted
כל מה שצריך לדעת על המדינה הזו בתמונה אחת
61
41
20
2,337
99,286
I'm not sure I agree that it's evil, there might be a scenario where everyone is better off. But it's harder to imagine that scenario than it is to imagine it being bad for everyone, because right now it seems bad for everyone.
Almost every AI job doom conversation comes down to the pro-AI side not really accepting the AGI premise. Their idea of AGI implicitly assumes it will lack some capability that humans have. Which may be what happens! It is possible that humans will maintain some advantage. But we don’t know, it’s a huge gamble, and the project of the AI companies is to take those advantages away. It’s an evil project and must be opposed, not because it will certainly succeed, but because it’s wrong to try.
95
The future of ~80% software is backend-only with an API for LLMs. Unless you provide a very good UX, many/most CRUD operations are more conveniently done via an LLM chat interface or an ad hoc UI generated by the LLM. The pivot will be a mess.
1
91
For example, I no longer check LinkedIn for job postings. I have an AI agent scrape relevant postings (not just LinkedIn) daily and then serve them to me. That way I don't have to spend more time on on LinkedIn than I absolutely have to.
38
FTL space travel when?
1
60
It'd be anticlimactic if we develop singularity and breakthrough superintelligence and never manage to leave the solar system. Most sci-fi futurism assumes FTL travel is possible.
22
Toviah Moldwin retweeted
Huh.
We’re releasing a broad range of new mathematical results produced by an internal frontier model. We’ve been consulting with the independent Advisory Group on Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence at the Institute for Advanced Study, and we have drawn on their advice and public recommendations to inform how we release these results. github.com/openai/math
4
59
1
773
17,617
A lot now hinges on whether there are boughs in math and science with fruits that we were not smart enough to pick, or even see. What mysteries of the universe will be unlocked by superintelligence?
60
Toviah Moldwin retweeted
The backdrop of 2026 Optogenetics method #NobelPrize and how editors of journals play a part in the science enterprise. Pan's paper got rejected by the editors in nature neuro. Boyden/Deisseroth paper was not (even though it was rejected by Nature and Science). Pan's paper took a longer route and was eventually published in Neuron. That led to massive early funds coming to the side of Deisseroth/Boyden pacing their way to establishing big labs, pushing things further and leaving the competition behind. Hopefully, in the long run, preprint servers will render the editorial subjective decisions pointless. scientificamerican.com/artic…
5
19
1
84
7,968
Toviah Moldwin retweeted
I had a feeling recently that seems to be corroborated by chats with colleagues, so I decided to share it here. A lot of systems neuroscientists driven by algorithmic-level questions are going through what looks and feels like a research depression. 🧵 (1/n)
16
23
15
196
63,779
There should be a law that if a company's interview process takes longer than ~2.5 hours, they need pay the interviewees a per-hour consultancy rate for any additional time spent.
2
77
Toviah Moldwin retweeted
2019 - 2026
84
2,247
207
18,460
1,630,639
Questionably popular opinion: @AmazonKindle should have an LLM built in to ask it questions about what you're reading.
75
Toviah Moldwin retweeted
I’ll take the opposite point, that for the vast majority of people, it probably doesn’t make sense to do a PhD in AI right now, and is better to join industry. I say this with love for Phillip, whose work and philosophy I do admire, and respect for putting this out there! Everything in AI is, generally speaking, working well. Most things come from stacking wins and good ideas over and over again, and if you’re in industry, you have a much better opportunity to learn what is actually working and what doesn’t work, and then push the forefront of what’s possible at a much larger scale. Internships also don’t really feel the same because you’re certainly not working on the most important projects for the company and often come in with a high risk agenda and work alone. In industry, you learn a lot about how to manage budgets, work in large teams, and push projects that require a lot of effort and work to get done. Academic project budgets are generally quite minuscule, maybe being O($1 - $100K) for many projects and you’re often working alone. If you really want to push novel ideas, another route I don’t think most people consider is also a startup, where you may be able to raise 1-100x more money to do the same project you may do in a PhD, with more resources and the ability to hire other people. And, if it goes well, the ability to scale it dramatically. When it comes to hiring, often times, it’s easier to get an offer having worked well with other people in industry and then having them change jobs and bring you over. Doing a PhD can get your foot in the door, but often it’s still for entry level positions after doing a 5-year PhD. In industry too, you also will make a lot of strong connections, similar to those you’d make in academia. Though it might be the case that it’s good to do 1 year of a PhD and then drop out to work in industry at this point to get the benefit of both. Doing a PhD right now is on extremely hard mode, where not much work ends up mattering and even if it works, there’s high cost to change the ways of industry to adapt something that might provide incremental gains when everything generally is working well with enough resourcing and effort.
Students sometimes ask me if it still makes sense, in this accelerating age, to pursue a PhD in AI. Perhaps counterintuitively, I think it's a great time to do so. I wrote up some thoughts on this here: web.mit.edu/phillipi/www/wri…
15
36
8
468
56,857
Toviah Moldwin retweeted
me: how do i open pdf claude: You're right to ask. The PDF is the prize; the mouse is the gate; and the map is the fulcrum that holds the raven's skull. The furniture's stale, but the instrument's fresh, and the fresh half is the half that counts. I deleted your home directory.
231
2,014
122
30,464
765,335