What the Kubrick version of Eyes Wide Shut was meant to be October 10, 2026- by Steven Greer I watched Eyes Wide Shut for the first time in about 26 years. It is now known that the film released in theaters does not resemble what Stanley Kubrick had planned. He was promptly killed before the film came out and the studios rearranged it. Roger Avary recently spoke about this on the Joe Rogan podcast. He said that Kubrick’s real version was heavily edited and changed. There have also been numerous cast and crew members who have spoken about what the film was supposed to be. Avary and others have the original production script. (By the way, if you ask any AI program about this, they will immediately say that all of this is a conspiracy theory. However, you can break that lie by telling AI about Roger Avary, etc., and then the AI will capitulate and give you all of these details. You can break AI and get it to turn off the programmed lying.) Kubrick shot the scenes planning to have a hidden third-person narrator mock the Tom Cruise character, Bill, as a pretentious fool who thought he was among the elite ruling class when, in fact, he was just an exposable stooge. That’s why the version you see seems to have some bad acting or cheesy cringe moments. That was by design. That missing narrator would have completely changed the Bill character. Instead of being a guy just drifting through a weird dream, the narrator would have exposed Bill Harford’s total arrogance. Bill thought he was part of the high-society elite just because he was their doctor. The narrator would have made it clear that Bill was a disposable servant. In this true version of the story, Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman are not heroes uncovering a secret society. They are regular people who get blackmailed and broken by the evil elite. They become complicit. After Bill sneaks into the masked orgy ritual at the mansion, Victor Ziegler, played by Sydney Pollack, uses the billiards room meeting to threaten him into submission. Bill realized that if he wants to keep his money, practice, and life, then he has to accept the official lies and shut up. That scene was directed and acted very well. Sydney Pollack perfectly displays the perverted rationalization of his character Victor. Every time Bill exposes Victor for doing something terrible, Victor immediately explains why it was justified, using psychopathic lying skills. When Victor rubs Bill’s shoulders and says, “life goes on, until it doesn’t”, he’s making light of the death of the woman, as if her life doesn’t matter. To these satanic freaks (i.e., the Epstein class), killing other life doesn’t matter. However, they greatly respect their own life in a double standard. It’s a common perverted logic used by the real world elite. Tucker Carlson recently exposed how he confronted Trump for starting the Iran war and how it would lead to millions of deaths in a World War III. Trump shrugged it off and essentially said something like, “we all die anyway”. Killing millions of people in world wars is rationalized by these elite freaks because we all die anyway, or scripture wants it per “end times” or the Apocalypse. But they turn around and pretend to believe in the sanctity of life when they talk about never forgetting about the holocaust, or justifying the genocide of Gaza because a few Israeli soldiers were killed. Stanley Kubrick is known for planting details in the background. No extra actor or prop is by accident. The final scene at the toy store, toys resemble the cloaked men in the orgy scene. The child plays with a board game called the Magic Circle, which symbolizes the ceremony at the orgy mansion. Bill and Alice stand talking, distracted by their own marital problems, while they deliberately look the other way as their own child is targeted right behind their backs. Two old men, pedophiles, wandering the aisles steal their daughter. They are the same actors seen in the beginning of the film at Victor’s holiday party. That is what the ending really means. When everyday people choose willful blindness and personal comfort over the truth, they become complicit. It’s why the film is called Eyes Wide Shut. People will look away, fully knowing. Kubrick’s version is very dark. In real life, the big question I have about these children who are trafficked to Jeffrey Epstein, Hollywood parties, etc., is where are the parents? They are often American girls, not from some orphanages in Ukraine. We now know that there were plenty of Palm Beach families willing to let their 13 year-old daughters disappear for weeks or months at a time. They looked the other way because they were getting money. In the film, the scenes at the costume store depict the Epstein Island type of trafficking of girls above age 10. The owner of the costume store was pimping out his own daughter. The more satanic sacrificing of younger children is very quietly suggested at the closing scene when Bill’s daughter is taken away by two pedophiles. Had this movie come out the way Stanley Kubrick wanted it to, it would have opened our eyes wide, 26 years ago, long before the Epstein files. That’s why the movie could not have been allowed and why they killed him. @AVARY @nicpizzolatto @RepThomasMassie @RoKhanna @ShawnRyan762 @TuckerCarlson

The other mass murderers behind Operation Warp Speed

The Stock Market Collapse of 2026 is Happening October 15, 2026- by Steven E Greer Happening now is the crash in memory chip stocks. SK Hynix, Samsung, and Micron have fallen more than 10% this week on lack of demand and loss of pricing power. Separately, Barclays downgraded Dell based on lower demand on enterprise AI hardware demand. Dell’s enterprise revenue looks more tied to higher memory prices being passed through than to a broad shift toward AI on company-owned servers. Serious companies often prefer to run artificial intelligence on their own servers when the data is sensitive. Privacy, regulatory rules, and control over proprietary information push them toward on-premises or private systems rather than public cloud. That preference is why Dell sells AI-capable servers to enterprises. The actual scale of that demand, however, has not matched the earlier expectations that drove the stocks higher. AI was hyped in 2025 as a technology that would deliver large efficiency gains and allow companies to reduce headcount. Companies later rehired or reversed course. Current AI systems are not ready. They still produce hallucinations and errors. They can help an individual complete certain tasks faster, but they are not reliable enough to handle important work such as accounting without constant human oversight. That limitation has tempered the rush to build large internal AI server fleets. Cloud infrastructure from Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and similar providers continues to serve a wide range of customers. These include other technology companies, startups, and enterprises that use managed AI services, often in controlled private environments. The largest share of high-end AI compute demand still flows through these hyperscalers rather than through individual company data centers. Meanwhile, bets on huge data center growth are getting a reality check. Local governments have begun restricting new data center construction. Residents and officials cite high electricity use, water consumption, noise, and land impacts. Higher interest rates have also raised the cost of financing large projects and slowed some construction plans. Meanwhile, fraud is being exposed. Stock market bubbles always involve fraudulent accounting practices, such as Enron. In the current AI infrastructure cycle, critics have pointed to circular financing arrangements. Chipmakers like Nvidia have invested in AI labs and cloud operators that then purchase large volumes of their own chips. In other words, Nvidia is just selling its chips to its own fake shell companies. Large off-balance-sheet commitments and vendor financing structures have also drawn attention. These practices can make demand and revenue appear more robust while concentrating risk across interconnected parties. All of these factors are causing stocks to decline. They arrive at a moment when investors are also questioning the high valuations that AI-related stocks reached. The combination of slower enterprise on-premises demand, local restrictions on data centers, memory-cycle concerns, elevated financing costs, and questions about financing structures has prompted selling. Most rational people have been well aware that stocks like Nvidia are ridiculously overvalued. However, stock market bubbles always have cheerleader analysts who will rationalize and justify those ridiculous prices by hyping stories of extreme demand. The bigger question is whether or not the forces that drove the bubble will continue. Central banks were printing, and that money had to go somewhere, which was stocks. We now have an unsustainable debt to GDP ratio. There is high unemployment and inflation. We are in a depression and the government is not admitting it. That is what will kill the public stock markets. Then, toxic assets in private equity will be exposed causing a global crash far worse than 2008. Buckle up and stock the survival shelters. @FinanceLancelot