Me_not_you (@TBoiles) profile picture

Dad, Husband, Skier, Sports Lover, Outdoorsy, and working on being better everyday

Englewood
Joined May 2010
Photo by Me_not_you (@TBoiles)Photo by Me_not_you (@TBoiles)Photo by Me_not_you (@TBoiles)Photo by Me_not_you (@TBoiles)Photo by Me_not_you (@TBoiles)Photo by Me_not_you (@TBoiles)Photo by Me_not_you (@TBoiles)Photo by Me_not_you (@TBoiles)Photo by Me_not_you (@TBoiles)Photo by Me_not_you (@TBoiles)
Me_not_you retweeted
Replying to @dr_brisket
That’s what THEY’RE saying
1
12
1,086
BREAKING: President Trump says he is immediately taking steps to ban large institutional investors from buying single-family homes. "People live in homes, not corporations," Trump says.
1,518
3,822
1,804
43,362
5,132,879
Me_not_you retweeted
Massive. Just imagine when the app launches in the US 😈
Polymarket 🤝 PrizePicks We’re excited to announce a multi-year partnership to bring polymarkets to the #1 daily fantasy sports app.
22
5
202
58,201
Me_not_you retweeted
One Ohio bettor at @BetMGM wagered $8 million on the Oklahoma City Thunder to win the NBA Finals at -700 odds back on June 5 before the series began. Bet wins $1.14M ✅💵
24
9
7
171
56,692
do private golf courses need all this land? i hate golf and we should seize it all to build housing instead
Does the federal government really need all this land? I like beavers and elk, but how much space do they need?
1,008
14,979
499
150,004
3,809,095
🚨 BREAKING: The largest public lands sell-off in modern U.S. history is being buried in the fine print of a Senate budget bill. Over 120 million acres; wilderness, forests, sacred tribal sites, wildlife corridors, all up for grabs. And here’s the kicker: -No hearings -No public input -No guarantee any of it goes to affordable housing Local governments and Tribal Nations aren’t even given first shot. Instead, they’re forced to compete with Wall Street developers and lose. This is not housing policy. It’s a land liquidation scheme dressed up as reform; a Trojan horse for billionaires. They’re selling off your public lands to fund tax cuts and fossil fuel profits. And unless stopped, it sets the precedent that every wild place in America is now for sale.
492
10,347
424
23,455
1,008,303
This plan to sell off public lands is a terrible proposal that doesn’t make any sense under our present circumstances and would be a colossal political blunder, but I will try to be fair to @BasedMikeLee and at least explain where this is all coming from. Selling off public lands in the west is an old idea on the right and became a point of special interest in the late 70s and early 80s. Look up the Sagebrush Rebellion. In short, Orrin Hatch led efforts out of Utah to transfer federal land to states and private holders throughout the western states, mostly for grazing and mining. This was all part of the larger anti-fed, small government for small government’s sake, anti-EPA sentiment that prevailed during the Reagan years. Western ranchers and their Republican states—remember even California was a Republican state then—didn’t like the idea of DC bureaucrats telling them what they could and couldn’t do in their own backyards. Fine. But that was a different time. Much different priorities. Much different demographics. Much different needs. Lee is obviously drafting off his state’s legacy on this issue but this current proposal has badly misread the current lay of the land. You could plausibly defend targeted land swaps or narrow leases for ranchers or even mining in places where it makes sense. It’s a completely different thing to propose selling off our country’s pristine western landscape for… “affordable housing.” What? Affordable housing is a fake and indefensible justification that, if it’s not a cover for more sinister motivations, gives the impression of more sinister motivations. This has all been very poorly messaged and poorly conceived and is a crystal clear example of where older GOP ideas are mismatched with the political desires of young people on the right. Our public lands are one of the last holdouts against the slopification of our country and our lives more broadly. This is not something to toy around with as part of some libertarian/boomer con point-scoring exercise. This needs to be reworked. This is political poison, and even under the most charitable reading provides only marginal short-term benefit. Don’t do this!
None of the places depicted would be eligible for sale under our bill. The legislation specifically exempts National Parks, National Monuments, Wilderness Areas, National Recreation Areas, and eleven other categories of federally protected land from sales to build much-needed housing for American families.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The senator is incorrect, these areas are listed on the site for sale: arcgis.com/apps/instant/b…
144
405
42
3,088
284,163
Me_not_you retweeted
I am the biggest Texas homer (y’all know that) but one of the biggest flaws about Texas is her lack of public land. 99% of her beauty is privately held. Take it from me – Public land is a gift and you don’t realize how important it is until you don’t have it. Cherish it.
263
2,468
113
18,626
281,586
You like maps? Left: public land potentially up for sale with the proposed budget, courtesy of @BasedMikeLee Right: a heat map featuring my photography of the American West. Leave public lands in public hands!!!!!
66
901
40
5,137
75,607
The federal government is trying to sell the public land where I proposed to my wife, where I first went rock climbing & rappelling, where I would play capture the flag with my Boy Scout troop. I am sick to my stomach.
65
321
31
3,177
102,834
The road to this area is closed 7 months out of the year. If you think this is about housing you’re a fool
Replying to @TownsUsa
Medicine Bow Peak, there is no price high enough for this land...
80
2,670
30
29,476
1,257,638
Me_not_you retweeted
I have camped and hunted in my truck tent all over the American West. Selling off public lands in the west gives the government a one time, small amount of income, and then a negligible amount of tax, while taking away the right to roam in the Wild West, the foundation of America. Call your Senator and let them know this is not acceptable.
78
1,331
31
7,125
154,868
Me_not_you retweeted
Selling off our federal lands should be a no-go. We haven’t even done mass deportations. Men better than any of us died exploring these areas. They are the birthright of Americans. Selling them off for a bowl of stew would be heresy.
238
1,122
49
10,821
290,156
Senate Republicans are proposing we sell up to 3 Million acres of BLM and USFS land to help pay off debt and allow for low income housing to be built. These pictures are located in the proposed USFS land to be put up for sale in Wyoming. “Scrubland” - Senator @BasedMikeLee
159
553
55
2,156
61,183
Here’s the link we were reviewing wilderness.maps.arcgis.com/a…
My brother has been digging into this more now. It appears the full plan is coming clearer and shows that its actually planned for a total of 120 million acres… The first phase already exposes the real intent, as most is in and around highly desirable areas of the Tetons, Bighorns and Yellowstone which would be perfect for high roller developers mostly, not solely affording housing areas. Also, the vast majority is far far away from any town and is in the heart of steep and knarly mountains areas, which is the complete opposite of where housing would be needed or even possible. It’s a giant ploy. It won’t be for affordable housing and won’t even dent the deficit. Groups beyond just sportsmen and hikers need to band together to fight this. Make anyone and everyone you know aware of it before they sneak it in and push it through and sell off public lands that’ll never be available to the public again.
17
76
7
300
162,834
Mike Lee responds to my tweet with a blatant lie. The areas I posted pictures of are SPECIFICALLY for sale. Other Republicans Senators cannot let this man ruin our legacy on conservation.
None of the places depicted would be eligible for sale under our bill. The legislation specifically exempts National Parks, National Monuments, Wilderness Areas, National Recreation Areas, and eleven other categories of federally protected land from sales to build much-needed housing for American families.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The senator is incorrect, these areas are listed on the site for sale: arcgis.com/apps/instant/b…
45
1,147
18
7,295
138,693
I would rather burn the Republican Party to the ground than let Mike Lee sell off National Forests for condos. It’s hard not to despise libertarians because they seem to only value money.
120
1,467
42
14,683
219,860
A top staffer to Sen. Tina Smith emailed Sen. Mike Lee’s top staffers on Monday about “how much additional pain you’ve caused on an unspeakably horrific weekend” Full email below
766
8,511
777
46,611
4,836,126
There is NOTHING “conservative” or “American” about selling a massive chunk of our nation’s most beautiful landscapes to developers. This should transcend partisan politics…always.
219
5,257
92
38,318
843,846
.@BasedMikeLee is secretly trying to sell 3 MILLION acres of America’s public land for development. And it includes some of my favorite places, specifically ones in the pictures below. Americans across the political spectrum are **overwhelmingly** against the sale of our beauty
630
6,344
416
26,378
2,231,036