h

Joined December 2020
Moist Critikal talked about his call with Skibidi Toilet creator, DaFuqBoom on stream today. "I don't think there's really anything I can share about that call I had him with him outside of what's already publicly available. I don't want him to get in trouble".
7
43
333
7,566
Just wanted to mention that there’s more ways of helping BBB then simply making tweets too. I’ve noticed there’s a lack of BringBoomBack content now on YouTube and other platforms particularly as big YouTubers like Ibio, iron and Zac have stepped away or become inactive, there’s a gap in commentary style or general news style content creators surrounding BBB. I think in general there isnt many analysis style channels left but there are what I would call a “new generation” of creators but most of these creators focus on dramas or other skibidi toilet related content and not on sharing news and regular updates. There is demand here but not enough supply. I know there’s demand as I can use my own channel to illustrate this. My recent videos on BBB with one being a short on boom voice acting on Doorclozer and one on steaks message to inviz have garnered 10s of thousands of views. They both technically report on new news surrounding skibidi toilet/doorclozer. A short named “DaFuqboom is back” which is a technically correct title as he did voice act on Doorclozer, though I admit it’s exaggerated, is getting 250k views in less then a month proving high demand still for BBB especially as my channel is not particularly large. YouTube has more reach then even twitter and the largest faction of the audience with that being the casuals reside there. More BBB/news posters there would satisfy this demand for content. I use CapCut and that’s all it really takes. It doesnt need to be sophisticated editing or quality. So if anyone does want to support BBB in more ways, then posting BBB content on YouTube or other platforms is another way you can help that not many people mention. It can also be Instagram,TikTok and more too, not only YouTube - short form videos perform really well nowadays.
3
12
1
63
2,366
(1/2) To be completely honest, this is pretty obvious, and I'm going to speak frankly about it. Skibidi Toilet's success has always depended on the quality and how things are presented. Take Skibidi Toilet season 25, for example, which has excellent content with its bonus scenes: - Dave and Cathy's backstory (Plunger and Camerawoman) - Humans rescued inside the Camera Base - The formal union between Skibidi Toilets and the alliance, thanks to the diplomat - The remake of Skibidi Toilet 75 - The conversation between Juggernaut and G-Toilet In contrast, season 26 only offered us: - A continuation of Cathy's story in Alpha Hills (It doesn't reveal anything) - A poorly executed remake of Skibidi Toilet 79 (Instead of revitalizing everything, they rushed it all out) - Overseer announcing to the Duchess the arrival of more Astros - A redesign of the Specialist Astro Toilet. The difference in quality is noticeable, and that also applies to Skibidi Toilet 80 and 81. If a product fails to meet the needs of its consumers, eventually a large portion of them will leave and look for other ways to satisfy those needs. This is what happened here. Alexey managed to meet the expectations of his audience (consumer needs) with a story that unfolded gradually at a pace that everyone could understand, with character interactions and dynamic fights that were clearly enjoyable. Alexey managed to maintain the quality of his product, even improving it. One of the reasons Skibidi Toilet 78 was such a success was because people were expecting to see the Speaker Army fully upgraded and ready to fight the Astro Toilets. Dafuqboom delivered on that promise, and the Executor's entrance only fueled the hype, with people even mistaking the semi-titan for the Speakerman titan. And the scene where they're all reunited was simply a delight. On the other hand, Skibidi Toilet 80 didn't achieve that even with Titan Speakerman 3.0. The plot of Skibidi Toilet 78 was taken and turned into a "What If" scenario with good animation. Strider has an incredible mind for storytelling, considering the work he's done on his channel, and seeing how he didn't apply that to Skibidi Toilet 80 was one of the last straws. Your product can look beautiful, but if it doesn't satisfy your audience, then it's useless. The writing in Skibidi Toilet 80 was practically nonexistent and contributed nothing to the story, unlike Alexey's work.
Evidence against “longer wait times means less views on episodes”. Some people use the “10 month wait time” excuse to say that episode 80 not getting as much views is fair and justified. Other people say views were always declining even before episode 80 and well into the Astro arc etc. But I found that this isn’t exactly the truth. Overall channel views only declined due to less episodes but views per episode were not just constantly declining and in fact the episodes between 79 part 3 and 79 part 1 in fact got just as much as if not more views then other older episodes. For these measurements I looked at some 6 episode periods from before. Many of them were still on level, lower or slightly above these episodes in views but you also have to consider that 77 part 3 to 79 part 1 are significantly newer episodes and the ones I’m comparing against are older then it and even still tbe newer episodes effectively equal the views. I took the mean view counts of several 6 episode periods. Here is the averages I managed to collate. 77 Part 3 to 79 Part 1 (8 and a half months) = average of 54.17 million views 75 to 77 part 2 (2 months and 6 days) = average of 36 million views 71 to 73 part 1 (1 month and 24 days) = 54.83 million views 67 Part 3 to 68 (full episode) (2 months) = 57.83 million views You can notice I put a month counter on each one. This is the months between the upload of the first given episode of each given period and the last episode of each given periods upload date. You will notice all of these are 6 upload periods and yet 77 part 3 to 79 part 1 took 3x as much as the rest for it to all come out and are also newer and yet it has significantly higher views then the 6 uploads before it (75-77 part 2) despite it taking 2x as long to upload. It even compared literally identically with 71 to 73 part 1 which took less then 2 months for that 6 upload period to come out. In fact I even compared it to basically some long form episodes in the prime of the series. Granted most episodes in this period do get significantly more views with some over 100 million but even in this period between 67 part 3 - 68 (full episode), the view average is only 3 million higher then the recent episodes. Of course this doesn’t include short views which were higher back then but it is still insane that years later after the hype died down many episodes still reached more views then some of the episodes in prime skibidi toilet. What does this show? It shows the times between each upload does NOT necessarily mean less views. In fact 78 had the second longest wait time between uploads and that got the 2nd most views out of any episode in the Astro arc only behind 74. Season 25 took close to 2 months from 77 full episode to come out and was taken down for months right at the start of it being uploaded and still its at 55 million views which is about the average of 71-73 part 1 in views. Episode 77 ( full episode ) was also down for about 2-3 months and despite the algorithmic hit that would cause it’s at 61 million views now beating out many older episodes. More in the thread below ⬇️
4
24
1
78
2,292
marso80 retweeted
would like to add the 10 month argument is invalid 1) IPs like TADC Alan Becker CoCoMelon STILL get tens of millions of views to this day 2) Initial 80 view momentum flatlined when viewers left, causing the algorithm to bury it. The red line below the gray expected area proves it
Evidence against “longer wait times means less views on episodes”. Some people use the “10 month wait time” excuse to say that episode 80 not getting as much views is fair and justified. Other people say views were always declining even before episode 80 and well into the Astro arc etc. But I found that this isn’t exactly the truth. Overall channel views only declined due to less episodes but views per episode were not just constantly declining and in fact the episodes between 79 part 3 and 79 part 1 in fact got just as much as if not more views then other older episodes. For these measurements I looked at some 6 episode periods from before. Many of them were still on level, lower or slightly above these episodes in views but you also have to consider that 77 part 3 to 79 part 1 are significantly newer episodes and the ones I’m comparing against are older then it and even still tbe newer episodes effectively equal the views. I took the mean view counts of several 6 episode periods. Here is the averages I managed to collate. 77 Part 3 to 79 Part 1 (8 and a half months) = average of 54.17 million views 75 to 77 part 2 (2 months and 6 days) = average of 36 million views 71 to 73 part 1 (1 month and 24 days) = 54.83 million views 67 Part 3 to 68 (full episode) (2 months) = 57.83 million views You can notice I put a month counter on each one. This is the months between the upload of the first given episode of each given period and the last episode of each given periods upload date. You will notice all of these are 6 upload periods and yet 77 part 3 to 79 part 1 took 3x as much as the rest for it to all come out and are also newer and yet it has significantly higher views then the 6 uploads before it (75-77 part 2) despite it taking 2x as long to upload. It even compared literally identically with 71 to 73 part 1 which took less then 2 months for that 6 upload period to come out. In fact I even compared it to basically some long form episodes in the prime of the series. Granted most episodes in this period do get significantly more views with some over 100 million but even in this period between 67 part 3 - 68 (full episode), the view average is only 3 million higher then the recent episodes. Of course this doesn’t include short views which were higher back then but it is still insane that years later after the hype died down many episodes still reached more views then some of the episodes in prime skibidi toilet. What does this show? It shows the times between each upload does NOT necessarily mean less views. In fact 78 had the second longest wait time between uploads and that got the 2nd most views out of any episode in the Astro arc only behind 74. Season 25 took close to 2 months from 77 full episode to come out and was taken down for months right at the start of it being uploaded and still its at 55 million views which is about the average of 71-73 part 1 in views. Episode 77 ( full episode ) was also down for about 2-3 months and despite the algorithmic hit that would cause it’s at 61 million views now beating out many older episodes. More in the thread below ⬇️
3
2
23
974
would like to add the 10 month argument is invalid 1) IPs like TADC Alan Becker CoCoMelon STILL get tens of millions of views to this day 2) Initial 80 view momentum flatlined when viewers left, causing the algorithm to bury it. The red line below the gray expected area proves it
Evidence against “longer wait times means less views on episodes”. Some people use the “10 month wait time” excuse to say that episode 80 not getting as much views is fair and justified. Other people say views were always declining even before episode 80 and well into the Astro arc etc. But I found that this isn’t exactly the truth. Overall channel views only declined due to less episodes but views per episode were not just constantly declining and in fact the episodes between 79 part 3 and 79 part 1 in fact got just as much as if not more views then other older episodes. For these measurements I looked at some 6 episode periods from before. Many of them were still on level, lower or slightly above these episodes in views but you also have to consider that 77 part 3 to 79 part 1 are significantly newer episodes and the ones I’m comparing against are older then it and even still tbe newer episodes effectively equal the views. I took the mean view counts of several 6 episode periods. Here is the averages I managed to collate. 77 Part 3 to 79 Part 1 (8 and a half months) = average of 54.17 million views 75 to 77 part 2 (2 months and 6 days) = average of 36 million views 71 to 73 part 1 (1 month and 24 days) = 54.83 million views 67 Part 3 to 68 (full episode) (2 months) = 57.83 million views You can notice I put a month counter on each one. This is the months between the upload of the first given episode of each given period and the last episode of each given periods upload date. You will notice all of these are 6 upload periods and yet 77 part 3 to 79 part 1 took 3x as much as the rest for it to all come out and are also newer and yet it has significantly higher views then the 6 uploads before it (75-77 part 2) despite it taking 2x as long to upload. It even compared literally identically with 71 to 73 part 1 which took less then 2 months for that 6 upload period to come out. In fact I even compared it to basically some long form episodes in the prime of the series. Granted most episodes in this period do get significantly more views with some over 100 million but even in this period between 67 part 3 - 68 (full episode), the view average is only 3 million higher then the recent episodes. Of course this doesn’t include short views which were higher back then but it is still insane that years later after the hype died down many episodes still reached more views then some of the episodes in prime skibidi toilet. What does this show? It shows the times between each upload does NOT necessarily mean less views. In fact 78 had the second longest wait time between uploads and that got the 2nd most views out of any episode in the Astro arc only behind 74. Season 25 took close to 2 months from 77 full episode to come out and was taken down for months right at the start of it being uploaded and still its at 55 million views which is about the average of 71-73 part 1 in views. Episode 77 ( full episode ) was also down for about 2-3 months and despite the algorithmic hit that would cause it’s at 61 million views now beating out many older episodes. More in the thread below ⬇️
3
2
23
974
1- they were pouplar for this much years Tadc 2.5 Alan 20 years Coco 9 years Yet continuously made hits even in 2026 2- The image shows strong initial momentum, but it flatlined within hours due to - heavy viewer drop offs - the algorithm pulling back impressions Proving tdv
2
113
Evidence against “longer wait times means less views on episodes”. Some people use the “10 month wait time” excuse to say that episode 80 not getting as much views is fair and justified. Other people say views were always declining even before episode 80 and well into the Astro arc etc. But I found that this isn’t exactly the truth. Overall channel views only declined due to less episodes but views per episode were not just constantly declining and in fact the episodes between 79 part 3 and 79 part 1 in fact got just as much as if not more views then other older episodes. For these measurements I looked at some 6 episode periods from before. Many of them were still on level, lower or slightly above these episodes in views but you also have to consider that 77 part 3 to 79 part 1 are significantly newer episodes and the ones I’m comparing against are older then it and even still tbe newer episodes effectively equal the views. I took the mean view counts of several 6 episode periods. Here is the averages I managed to collate. 77 Part 3 to 79 Part 1 (8 and a half months) = average of 54.17 million views 75 to 77 part 2 (2 months and 6 days) = average of 36 million views 71 to 73 part 1 (1 month and 24 days) = 54.83 million views 67 Part 3 to 68 (full episode) (2 months) = 57.83 million views You can notice I put a month counter on each one. This is the months between the upload of the first given episode of each given period and the last episode of each given periods upload date. You will notice all of these are 6 upload periods and yet 77 part 3 to 79 part 1 took 3x as much as the rest for it to all come out and are also newer and yet it has significantly higher views then the 6 uploads before it (75-77 part 2) despite it taking 2x as long to upload. It even compared literally identically with 71 to 73 part 1 which took less then 2 months for that 6 upload period to come out. In fact I even compared it to basically some long form episodes in the prime of the series. Granted most episodes in this period do get significantly more views with some over 100 million but even in this period between 67 part 3 - 68 (full episode), the view average is only 3 million higher then the recent episodes. Of course this doesn’t include short views which were higher back then but it is still insane that years later after the hype died down many episodes still reached more views then some of the episodes in prime skibidi toilet. What does this show? It shows the times between each upload does NOT necessarily mean less views. In fact 78 had the second longest wait time between uploads and that got the 2nd most views out of any episode in the Astro arc only behind 74. Season 25 took close to 2 months from 77 full episode to come out and was taken down for months right at the start of it being uploaded and still its at 55 million views which is about the average of 71-73 part 1 in views. Episode 77 ( full episode ) was also down for about 2-3 months and despite the algorithmic hit that would cause it’s at 61 million views now beating out many older episodes. More in the thread below ⬇️
8
39
5
186
10,627
Answer the questions. Stop avoiding them. Your entire support is backed up by the fact your fans are brainless children who don't do research. Maybe your a child too for not doing ur research on inviz
u keep replying to everything i take part in with these exact words and the same sound effect 💀 If I'm a kid does that mean you're stalking and harassing a kid on purpose?)
2
10
44
862
Most people felt episode 60 implies a more complex arrangement between the G-Toilet and the Astro Toilets on earth.
What did episode 60 imply to you? (poll in replies) Did G-Toilet have an arrangement with the Astros on Earth, and failed them, or did G-Toilet have no arrangement with the Astros, and it was simply an attack due to prior betrayal.
6
19
1
149
4,544
One year ago DaFuq!?Boom! hosted a broadcast for NTS Radio "Don't Assume Day" charity event, sharing music that had inspired him, and some personal thoughts between tracks. This came just days after the release of his final Skibidi Toilet episode, and shortly before the concerns surrounding his departure became concrete. Looking back, this was also one of the last times we heard him talk at length. Here's all of his sections. With everything that's happened, some of his words feel particularly poignant. #LetBoomSpeak
19
137
7
713
20,779
marso80 retweeted
don't fall for 81 n 82 those numbers are fake! YouTube's view updated back August 24 public numbers are overstated by 49% through passive auto plays True engaged views literally cut in half than what you see, probably 5m n 4m engaged views( share.google/2Qxj8uGaDg3aP7z… )(2/3)
1
1
14
693
marso80 retweeted
To put preceptive how much skibidi toilet lost, here what 1 week views look like for the channel uploads, Keep defending inviz because look how much skibidi toilet lost thanks to inviz, downfall already started when they interfered with 79 onwards
1
1
5
349
marso80 retweeted
Here is proof boom did better without using current today views numbers, 22m true engaged views in 1 week even late in astro arc not early eps on 78
1
1
12
448
Remember when Inviz defenders told us to "wait" give some time for Invisible Narratives and their new team to turn things around? Not needing boom?,It’s been two months since August 15, and they are doing way worse than when they started. The metrics don't lie after 1 week. (1/3)
7
18
1
101
6,158
To put preceptive how much skibidi toilet lost, here what 1 week views look like for the channel uploads, Keep defending inviz because look how much skibidi toilet lost thanks to inviz, downfall already started when they interfered with 79 onwards
1
1
5
349
Here is proof boom did better without using current today views numbers, 22m true engaged views in 1 week even late in astro arc not early eps on 78
1
1
12
448
marso80 retweeted
Remember when Inviz defenders told us to "wait" give some time for Invisible Narratives and their new team to turn things around? Not needing boom?,It’s been two months since August 15, and they are doing way worse than when they started. The metrics don't lie after 1 week. (1/3)
7
18
1
101
6,158
don't fall for 81 n 82 those numbers are fake! YouTube's view updated back August 24 public numbers are overstated by 49% through passive auto plays True engaged views literally cut in half than what you see, probably 5m n 4m engaged views( share.google/2Qxj8uGaDg3aP7z… )(2/3)
1
1
14
693
And at the raw data: Episode 80 pulled massive true engagement 9-10m before the new views update dropped unlike 81 82. The team and cooperates think they can do same thing without boom, they can't, skibidi toilet will die if inviz doesn't stop what they doing (3/3)
13
518