Ms. Upperthigh🍄 retweeted
while the circulation of certain graphic images from the trial exhibits is a devastating reminder of her death, let’s also remember Sandra Birchmore in her life
may she rest in peace and may justice be served 🕊️
Ms. Upperthigh🍄 retweeted
Exactly. Crucially, investigation into the investigation into the death of Officer John O’Keefe does not mean the murder of Officer John O’Keefe is closed.
The antis apparently does not understand what cold case means or the fact that there is no limitations to arrest and charge people for murder.
Considering how Diller appears to be working in tandem with Mattie et al, what I found insane is that the real suspects and their PR machine have the temerity to subpoena Adam Deitch. And defaming Adam Deitch and ARCAA? Wowww.
But with the explosive testimonies coming from the Farwell case? I can almost bet anyone that the DA, the Governor, the real suspects and their corrupt cops friends are NOT sleeping.
The defamation case brought against Karen Read by these colluding elements has apparently served as a curse to them.
In that, the Farwell case has shed more light on how evidences are destroyed and the operations these corrupt cops engaged in to protect their own.
The semblance, players in the Sandra Birchmore and Karen Read framing can no longer be overlooked when the FBI rounds up these elements.
Bookmark this!!!
Ms. Upperthigh🍄 retweeted
10-4--#FUBJ
Gypsy & Ken: Things get more Bizarre by the day!
- She spends about 13:00–37:00 on greetings, membership thanks, nails, “Reality,” and a Cornell 7 preview before the Gypsy/Ken segment she said was the topic.
- She repeatedly asks for Kick viewers and says they need 75. At about 35:50 she says they only have 66 and calls herself “anal” about the partnership push.
- At 37:50 she says she is not alleging anyone is responsible for Ken’s death, and at 38:04 she says police do not believe it is foul play. She then treats changing stories and a prison call as character evidence.
- Around 2:13:17 she says that if Gypsy “genuinely cared” or “had any moral shred,” she would have broken down and been inconsolable reading the mock letter. At 2:14:09 she calls Gypsy “a dangerous person,” and at 2:15:48 “demonic.”
- At 2:19:17 she says Gypsy treated the letter as something that had to “seem genuine” for class. That is Brittney’s characterization of the call, not a transcript of Gypsy’s exact words in this caption.
- At 2:53:32 she says she is ending it because she is getting sleepy and does not want to fall asleep on stream. Earlier, at 18:55–19:18, she denies the rehab claim and says it is only that she will not go to sleep.
Brittney, the unfinished sentences, abandoned thoughts and constant distractions made this stream exhausting to follow. You’d start making a point, lose the thread, offer another excuse - and somehow still remember to ask everyone to keep Kick running. Apparently the argument can disappear, but the partnership reminder has perfect attendance.
If streaming is your job, treat it like one. Show up prepared, finish a thought and make an argument people can actually understand. Your audience shouldn’t have to assemble your sentences like furniture that arrived without instructions.
Imagine paying for a stream where the host repeatedly abandons sentences, loses the point and serves up another excuse - but somehow remembers the next request for support. The argument apparently needs a nap. The donation pitch remains fully operational.
And the supporters applauding this? What exactly are you rewarding? You’re paying for unfinished thoughts and then defending the performance like you personally invested in the sentence reaching its destination.
If streaming is a job, expect some damn effort. Preparation. Coherent commentary. Accountability. These are basic expectations, not premium membership perks.
Stop calling every concern “hate” so you can avoid admitting how poor this broadcast was. Financial support doesn’t become kindness just because you attach a heart emoji. When you reward this performance and attack anyone who questions it, you’re helping the behavior continue.
Brittney, finish a thought, deliver something worth watching, or log off. Your audience shouldn’t need a search party to locate your point.
I don't care what anyone says this is opiate addiction I've been there i'd spot it a mile away and anyone giving these bums money is enabling it and putting them kids in danger.
This father isn't allowed to say her name, so I will say his name FOR him. Anne Marie McInnis struck and killed 6 year old Eddie. Eddie has YET to see #justice.
Ms. Upperthigh🍄 retweeted
You don't "find" human beings you believe are alive. You find easter eggs and other things that don't have a pulse and can't find you. If you think someone is alive you would leave the kind of messages Karen Read - WHERE THE F*** ARE YOU? "We need to find you" is something you say when you know the person you are texting is incapable of returning on his own. It's what I ask myself when I can't find my wallet. It's something you'd say in your head, not text to the person you can't find.
Ms. Upperthigh🍄 retweeted
Emily See isn't on the stage at the Shubert Theatre next month because the house defendants decided that a friendly, fact-driven former kindergarten teacher was too big of a threat to their narrative.
They threw out baseless subpoenas, invented payroll conspiracies with Karen Read and Turtleboy, and weaponized the legal process just to keep her off the microphone.
But targeting independent creators doesn't alter the call logs, the snow in the yard, or what happened to John O'Keefe. Emily might not be in the room on stage, but everyone in those seats knows why & we are carrying her voice forward.
You can subpoena a creator. You cannot subpoena a community.
#StandWithEmilySee #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #Turtleboy #AuntieDeb #ShubertTheatre #KarenRead #FreeSpeech #NorfolkCounty #FreeTB
@TheEmilySee @DoctorTurtleboy @auntiedebbb
@AllegedlyBrittneyJ @Allegedlyopinion
GIRL! You have GOT to be kidding?!?! WTF?! Are you just used to having insects crawl all over you?! TURN SOME LIGHTS ON!! CLEAN YOUR DAMN HOUSE!!! A hornet can cause some serious damage to a person unable to run away from it
Just a man looking for a pay day. This is why lawyers are looked at as shady ppl
I watched the YouTube interview with this attorney who represents the “Lone Juror” so you don’t have to.
They laughed about the trial — a case in which 3 children were killed and a woman could lose her civil rights. What is funny about ANY of this?
He called Lindsay Clancy a demon who deserves to be executed and says she should not be fed 3 meals a day in prison. Please note, whatever you think about Lindsay Clancy, she has NOT been convicted of a crime. Would you like to not be fed if you were arrested?
He claims Kevin Reddington is attacking the US Constitution and the 6th Amendment — all while he calls for a defendant to be executed!
He stopped short of claiming that Kevin Reddington has violated his ethics as an officer of the court — although he danced around it for those who don’t understand attorney ethics. Whatever you think of Kevin Reddington or his client, he is rigorously representing his client — which is his job. If you were accused of a crime in MA, you’d want his phone number.
Meanwhile, this attorney is running a fundraiser for his client, a juror, to raise half a million dollars for “holding out” on a verdict per social media desires. But he doesn’t comment on how *that* will affect defendants’ 6th Amendment rights under the US Constitution! What if all jurors decide based on social media payouts going forward? What if that’s YOU in the seat of the accused?
I’m using my 1st Amendment right to call this lawyer, a public figure, a truly nasty piece of work! I’m thoroughly disgusted.
#lindsayclancy
BJ, you ABSOLUTE POS. The idea was that you WORK FOR THE MONEY. Unblock everyone on YT, .and have a bash4cash. Let ppl pay you to tell you about yourself, cause bitch you need it. But you sitting back and growing your channel WHILE YOU DO NOTHING?! Bitch, sit down.
Ms. Upperthigh🍄 retweeted
Let me spell this out. It wasn’t the former juror’s wife that called the police. It was his 13 year old nephew. A child. A very very courageous child.
The phone was hung up on after that child said “Please come...my auntie!" 911 operators called back and heard a woman screaming but couldn’t understand what she said.
When the police arrived, the former juror was outside holding his 6 month old baby and he told them “we don't need any help, we are all set” The officer asked him again and he said the same. The wife said “oh, are you sure we don't need help.”
But the police wanted to see the child who called. When they spoke to him, he told them what the former juror did and how he hit his auntie.
They had to get a translator on the phone to understand what was being said in Haitian Creole.
They asked the wife and she told them, through a translator: “ The suspect had the infant in his hand, and the infant would not stop crying. The victim attempted to physically take the infant from the suspect to help stop the crying. After attempting such, a verbal argument began which then the suspect grabbed the victim by the throat
and threw her into a dresser in their bedroom.”
They heard a woman screaming in the house. They wanted to speak to her to ensure she was okay. She was having an anxiety attack When they had what she said translated, she was saying her son — the former juror — was evil.
His wife and mother declined medical treatment. But they arrested the former juror.
Now why do you think a 13 year old child would call the police? Do you really think a child made this up?
Where do I get this information? From the police report. I’m not going to post it because I do not believe in doxxing real names. But it’s been posted by others.
His wife and mother didn’t allow him back into the home. He filed for divorce against his wife. In her response, she stated that he controlled and abused her and the worst incident involved his arrest. The former juror did not deny what she claimed in his pleadings.
He tried to reduce his court ordered child support. The court denied.
The wife was awarded physical custody of the child. Do you know how rare that is in MA?
Yes the wife was afraid to testify at the trial set for 3 months after the arrest. Do you have any idea how common that is in domestic violence cases? Yes the case was then nolle prossed by the prosecution. Without the complaining witness willing to testify, it could not go forward.
Where do I get all this? From the court records. They’re public.
Almost 3 years after his arrest, the former juror beat up the nephew who was then 15. He told the nephew he ruined his life by calling the police and that he had the beating coming for a long time.
That child hand wrote the petition for a restraining order. It’s heartbreaking to see his childish handwriting about his fear.
A police officer testified at the hearing for the permanent restraining order. Yes, it’s civil in MA. But police officers rarely attend. That officer did. He described injuries to the nephew’s eye and his clothes being torn.
There’s a recording of that hearing. The former juror did not challenge the restraining order.
If you’ve seen the former juror’s name on here, you can look all this up yourself. I will not give you his name. But you can find it easily.
I spent 10+ years as a domestic violence advocate working with 800+ survivors. I’m a survivor myself. Hands on a throat is THE biggest predictor of future murder. A child calling the police is intense and means he sensed incredible danger.
Raise money for that child. He’s VERY courageous and the retaliation he suffered is a disgrace.
Ms. Upperthigh🍄 retweeted
I need people to stop it with the postpartum psychosis think pieces. No one, I repeat, no one knows how they will respond to psychosis until it is happening to you.
Stop making incredibly ignorant comments about how you’d ’never kill a kid’ &
Ms. Upperthigh🍄 retweeted
the public is torn over Clancy because her conduct was so horrific. There is nothing wrong with a juror failing to agree with 11 others. That is the system. But it must be based on law and due process when considering the fate of the accused. To those "celebrating" a holdout juror who wanted to convict as a hero, have you considered the serious allegation that the juro "reverse nullified" in favor of the prosecution and may have refused to support an NGRI verdict while acknowledging the DA failed to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt? Certainly we all agree that it would violate due process to convict a person where jurors find reasonable doubt. Be careful celebrating that simply because you understandably despise one defendant. There are larger issues to consider. Next time it could be you or someone you care about facing a jury.
Ms. Upperthigh🍄 retweeted
—
One big difference in how some of us view the Clancy case vs others:
I believe a horrible tragedy occurred to those children AND to Lindsay. Mental illness was the evil here.
Some of you believe the evil was Lindsay herself and can’t get it through your head that this was not a Casey Anthony situation.
Ms. Upperthigh🍄 retweeted
DA Tim Cruz yelling at everyone about the online treatment the prosecutors received kind of feels like Regina George complaining about being bullied.
👏👏👏👏
"And It’s so infuriating that not only do they not get care. But lets just talk about the names that they label women that are either depressed or have hormonal imbalances.
They call them baby blues. Do you think for a second If a man had erectile dysfunction they'd call it penis blues? No! Because it minimizes what you're suffering from! & we're here to change that on behalf of Lindsay!"
Rosemary Scapicchio
Shoddy police work&the CW’s vendetta-like handling should scare us all
Imagine waking up accused of something you don’t remember. You’d want police to test ALL physical&digital evidence, NOT pick a suspect first & make evidence fit
THIS IS A VERY DANGEROUS ROAD
#LindsayClancy
Ms. Upperthigh🍄 retweeted
I don’t know why you ppl are so mad that a woman is getting due process.
Without that, all of your rapist sons would be in prison based off accusations alone. 🫶





























