Explorer⚡Web3🌱 retweeted
🐙 PUBLIC MINT 🐙
is now LIVE on @OOX_Marketplace
Up to 100 pieces for ERD
1 $EGLD / Octos.
oox.art/marketplace/collecti…
Explorer⚡Web3🌱 retweeted
PREORDER is LIVE!!
oox.art/marketplace/collecti…
Explorer⚡Web3🌱 retweeted
🚨 THIS IS BEYOND ANYTHING CRYPTO HAS SEEN BEFORE.
Binance has been hacked, with estimated stolen assets reaching as high as $6.3 BILLION, making this the largest crypto hack in history.
And now the entire crypto market is crashing.
Bitcoin has crashed below $77,000, dropping more than 6% as panic spreads across the market.
Here's how massive the damage is:
• $6.3 BILLION: Latest reported estimate of assets stolen from Binance across multiple blockchains.
• $170 BILLION: Wiped out from the total crypto market capitalization following the news.
• $1.39 BILLION: Worth of leveraged crypto positions liquidated in just 12 hours.
For perspective, look at the biggest crypto hacks ever recorded:
• Binance (2026): Up to $6.3 BILLION.
• Bybit (2025): $1.5 BILLION.
• Ronin Network (2022): $625 MILLION.
• Poly Network (2021): $611 MILLION.
• BNB Bridge (2022): $570 MILLION.
• Coincheck (2018): $534 MILLION.
• Mt. Gox (2014): Approximately $450 MILLION at the time.
At the highest estimate, Binance's hack is more than FOUR TIMES bigger than Bybit and TEN TIMES bigger than Ronin.
It's also bigger than all SIX of the other major hacks listed above COMBINED.
And this happened at one of the world's largest crypto exchanges.
1. BILLIONS DRAINED FROM MULTIPLE BINANCE WALLETS
On October 29, hackers gained control of several Binance hot wallets and transferred billions of dollars.
• Around $3.3–$3.5 BILLION was drained from Ethereum wallets alone.
• Binance 14 lost approximately $2.5 BILLION in a single transaction.
• That included 167,464 ETH, 1.615 BILLION USDT and dozens of other tokens.
• Binance 16 lost another 28,006 ETH alongside other assets.
• Hot Wallet 34 was also compromised, with approximately $823 MILLION in USDC affected.
• Additional funds were moved from wallets on Arbitrum, Avalanche, Optimism, Bitcoin, Tron and other networks.
The hackers didn't stop after the first transfers.
They continued draining compromised wallets when new deposits arrived.
2. THE HACKERS HAD PREPARED THE ATTACK
The attack began with preparations on October 28–29.
• The hackers funded their operational wallet through Tornado Cash.
• They deployed a malicious contract designed to drain assets.
• They tested the attack on separate wallets before targeting Binance.
• Around 20:20 UTC on October 29, the hackers began transferring billions from Binance wallets.
After the theft, they split the stolen funds across different addresses, swapped stablecoins into ETH and moved assets between blockchains.
3. BINANCE'S WALLET SECURITY WAS COMPROMISED
The hackers gained access to the private keys or signing authority of multiple Binance hot wallets.
They used Ethereum's EIP-7702 feature to give a malicious contract control over Binance 14.
The hackers submitted 50 signed authorizations covering consecutive wallet nonces.
Once the delegation succeeded, they could repeatedly drain assets from that wallet.
Other Binance wallets were drained through normal transactions signed using compromised keys.
This wasn't some network hack.
The hackers gained access to the systems controlling Binance's own wallets.
The exact method used to obtain that access has not been confirmed.
4. AROUND $3 BILLION IN STOLEN ASSETS FROZEN
• Tether froze more than $1.56 BILLION in USDT linked to the hack.
• Circle froze approximately $823 MILLION in USDC.
• Ripple reportedly froze another $200 MILLION.
• Arbitrum's Security Council secured approximately $30.5 MILLION.
• Other projects also froze assets connected to the hackers.
Total frozen funds were estimated at roughly $2.5–$3 BILLION.
However, a large amount of ETH, BTC and other assets remained outside those freezes.
Binance temporarily suspended deposits and withdrawals following the hack.
The exchange confirmed it was investigating the security breach and said all customer funds were safe.
The estimated $6.3 billion theft is equivalent to nearly 4.4% of Binance's $144 billion in assets under custody.
Even the lower estimate of $3.3 billion would make this more than TWICE the size of the Bybit hack.
The final losses are still being calculated because billions of dollars have been frozen.
But the consequences are already extending far beyond Binance.
This is one of the most devastating security failures in crypto history.
Explorer⚡Web3🌱 retweeted
1,456x faster: MultiversX vs Bitcoin
Max TPS ever recorded by Chainspect, side by side. One is a flood, the other is a drip.
Who should we compare next? 👇
📊 chainspect.app/dashboard
Explorer⚡Web3🌱 retweeted
Octos are coming on @OOX_Marketplace
Mint page is ready.
Preorders starts on 30th October.
Up to 1000 pieces on preorder for anyone.
Preorder price: 25000 $ONX
PUBLIC MINT start on 2nd November
Final price: 1 elrond-erd-2:native
Explorer⚡Web3🌱 retweeted
$EGLD : Review 📜
What if a blockchain solved the scaling problem years before its rivals, and then broke the one promise its holders cared about most?
Meet MultiversX, the first network to implement all three types of sharding in production, and as of today running 600-millisecond blocks after its Supernova activation.
The engineering has been ahead of the field for six years, approved almost unanimously by its own community. In October 2025, that same community voted to remove the hard supply cap the project had promoted since launch.
Let's explore the sharpest split between technology and trust in the series. 👇
⚪ MultiversX at a Glance
Marketplace Insight: MultiversX has one of the strongest technical records in crypto and one of the most damaged token narratives. It shipped adaptive state sharding in 2020 while Ethereum's sharding roadmap was repeatedly redesigned, and Supernova now delivers a tenfold speed increase on identical validator hardware, approved by governance with 99.64% support.
The clean contrast is what the community will and will not unite behind. The same holders who backed the technical roadmap almost unanimously were sharply divided by the October 2025 vote that removed the supply cap the project had promoted for years. The engineering keeps its promises. The monetary policy did not.
⚪ Mission
MultiversX exists to make blockchain scale without fragmenting the user experience. The founding argument was that scaling through layers and bridges forces users to manage assets across competing environments, and that the better answer is a single network that splits itself internally instead. Adaptive State Sharding does that by partitioning state, transactions, and network communication simultaneously, with shards merging or dividing automatically as demand changes, so throughput scales without users ever choosing a chain or bridging an asset.
🔵 A Brief History
MultiversX was founded in late 2017 by brothers Beniamin and Lucian Mincu alongside Lucian Todea, with Beniamin having previously served as Head of Product and Business at NEM Core and both brothers having founded MetaChain Capital. Development began in earnest in August 2019 and mainnet launched in July 2020 as Elrond, with EGLD trading around $13.
The token's own history involved a dramatic restructuring. Originally issued as ERD on Binance Chain with a 20 billion supply, 500 million were burned in November 2019, and a September 2020 swap converted holdings at 1,000 ERD to 1 EGLD, collapsing supply from 20 billion to 20 million and establishing the scarcity model the project would promote for years.
November 2021 brought the peak at $542.58, followed by a rebrand from Elrond to MultiversX in November 2022, repositioning around the metaverse, a narrative that did not age well. The technology kept advancing regardless, with the Andromeda upgrade halving required confirmation blocks and pushing toward near-instant finality.
October 2025 was the turning point for the token. A governance proposal from within the Foundation moved EGLD from its fixed roughly 31.4 million supply to a model with approximately 9.47% annual tail inflation, burning 10% of validator fees. It passed despite public opposition from Justin Bons of CyberCapital, who argued the inflation was too high and the burn too low. Further pressure followed, with Binance delisting EGLD/ETH and EGLD/BTC pairs in June 2026 over low liquidity, and the token reaching an all-time low of $2.77 that month.
The engineering did not slow. Stripe's Machine Payments Protocol integrated in March 2026 for agent-to-agent settlement, followed by Google UCP. Supernova, the largest protocol change in the network's history, passed governance in January 2026 with 99.64% approval, ran on devnet from late August, and reached mainnet node software v2.0.6.0 on 4 September.
By 6 September roughly 84% of nodes had migrated to the new client, up from 4% five days earlier. Activation is set for 10 September at epoch 2233, with a planned 22 to 24 minute drain window so no transaction is caught between the old six-second clock and the new 600-millisecond one. The token rallied roughly 80% to 100% into the event.
🔵 Ecosystem Narrative
The organizing idea is that a single network should scale internally rather than pushing complexity onto users.
➛ Adaptive State Sharding. The network splits state, transactions, and network communication across shards that merge or divide automatically with demand, the first production implementation of all three sharding types, live since 2020 while competitors deferred their own designs.
➛ Supernova. Consensus decoupled from execution so validators vote without re-executing blocks, cutting block times from six seconds to 600 milliseconds on unchanged hardware, with intra-shard finality targeted below 250ms and cross-shard settlement near 2.4 seconds. Validator requirements stay at 4 cores, 8GB RAM, and 2,500 EGLD, so the tenfold gain costs operators nothing.
➛ Machine payment rails. Stripe's Machine Payments Protocol and Google's UCP both integrate MultiversX for agent-to-agent settlement, use cases where sub-second finality is a hard requirement rather than a convenience.
➛ Developer economics. Developers receive 30% of the gas fees generated by their own smart contracts, a direct revenue share that few networks offer and a genuine structural incentive to build, supported by a Cookbook now at 61 complete projects.
➛ Consumer and payments surface. xPortal has surpassed 3 million users with over 100,000 staking EGLD, xMoney handles SmartBill invoice payments and card funding, and Guardians extends 2FA-style protection to wrapped BTC and to agents rather than only humans.
➛ Unified user experience. One wallet covers the entire network natively, with no bridging between shards or managing assets across competing layer twos, which is the practical payoff of sharding over rollups.
⚪ Token Utilities
$EGLD secures and powers the network.
➛ Gas: pays for transactions, smart contract deployment, and all network operations, with 30% of contract gas routed to the developer.
➛ Staking: validators stake EGLD under Secure Proof-of-Stake with rating-based selection, securing the network across a record 3,259 nodes with roughly 14.5M EGLD staked.
➛ Governance: holders vote on protocol decisions, including both the Supernova approval and the 2025 vote that removed the supply cap.
➛ Fee burn: 10% of validator fees are burned, the partial offset against tail inflation.
⚪ Key Features
➛ Adaptive State Sharding across state, transactions, and network, live since 2020.
➛ Supernova delivering 600ms blocks and sub-250ms intra-shard finality on unchanged hardware.
➛ Secure Proof-of-Stake with validator rating scores across 3,259 nodes.
➛ 30% of smart contract gas fees paid directly to developers.
➛ Stripe Machine Payments and Google UCP integrations for AI agent settlement.
➛ Protocol development using Runtime Verification's formal methods framework.
🔵 Meet the Team
MultiversX has one of the more stable and technically credentialed founding teams in the sector, with all three co-founders still in place nine years on.
▶️ Core Members:
➛ Beniamin Mincu [ @beniaminmincu ] - Co-Founder and CEO | Previously Head of Product and Business at NEM Core, and an early investor in Binance, Brave, and Tezos. He co-founded MetaChain Capital and ICO Market Data before starting Elrond, and remains the project's principal public voice.
➛ Lucian Mincu [ @lucianmincu ] - Co-Founder and CTO | Brings IT engineering and security experience from Uhrenwerk 24, Cetto, and Liebl Systems, and co-founded MetaChain Capital alongside his brother. He owns the technical architecture behind the sharding design.
➛ Lucian Todea [ @luciantodea ] - Co-Founder and COO | The third founder from 2017, running operations across the organization through the Elrond era and the MultiversX rebrand.
➛ Adrian Dobrita [ @AdrianDobrita ] - Head of Engineering | Built software for Samsung, Intel, and Continental before joining, anchoring the engineering discipline behind a network that has shipped major upgrades on schedule for six years.
🔵 Ratings
➛ Use Case: ★★★★ (4/5). MultiversX has a genuine and rare technical claim: it shipped all three types of sharding in production in 2020, years before competitors delivered comparable designs, and Supernova now delivers a tenfold speed increase on identical validator hardware with sub-250ms intra-shard finality. Stripe's Machine Payments Protocol and Google's UCP integrating it for agent settlement are real validation of that speed, the 30% developer gas share is a structural incentive few networks match, and a record 3,259 nodes give it meaningful decentralization. The 1-point deduction is adoption relative to capability. Ecosystem TVL sits in the low millions against Solana, Sui, and Aptos, the 2022 metaverse repositioning was a narrative misstep that cost momentum, and the network's throughput has consistently exceeded the demand for it.
➛ Tokenomics: ★★★ (3/5). The structure has real positives: supply is effectively fully circulating with no unlock overhang or vesting cliff, staking utility is genuine with roughly 14.5 million EGLD staked across a record validator set, and 10% of validator fees are burned. The 2-point deduction is a broken commitment, and it is specific rather than general. The project promoted a hard cap of roughly 31.4 million EGLD for years, with its own website stating only 30 million could ever exist and positioning the asset explicitly against currencies that can be printed endlessly. The October 2025 vote removed that cap and introduced roughly 9.47% annual tail inflation, drawing public objection from a serious institutional fund manager on the grounds that the inflation was too high and the burn too low. Whatever the technical merits, a project that reverses its central scarcity promise carries that on its record.
➛ Audits: ★★★★ (4/5). MultiversX's security foundation is stronger than most and rests on formal methods rather than periodic review. The project has worked with Runtime Verification, a specialist firm applying a framework pioneered at NASA, since inception, using it across the protocol, core components, and applications, and Runtime Verification later became a staking provider on the network. Secure Proof-of-Stake with validator rating scores adds an operational security layer, and the network has run since July 2020 through multiple major upgrades without a protocol-level exploit. The staged Supernova rollout across devnet, testnet, and mainnet with a planned drain window reflects genuine operational discipline. The 1-point deduction is that no verified top-tier security score or specific published formal verification report is available for review, and Supernova introduces substantial new consensus surface that is hours old at time of writing.
➛ Community: ★★★★ (4/5). The distinction between what this community unites behind and what divides it is the most informative thing about it. Supernova passed governance with 99.64% approval and validators migrated to the new client at pace, reaching 84% within five days of release, while validator count hit an all-time high of 3,259 nodes during a period when the token was near its lows, which is real operational conviction rather than sentiment. xPortal has over 3 million users with 100,000-plus staking, the developer Cookbook has reached 61 complete projects, and the network was cited among the top six in Web3 by commit volume. The 1-point deduction is the trust damage from the supply cap reversal, which divided the same community that backs the roadmap almost unanimously, compounded by exchange delistings at Binance, Bitfinex, and KuCoin narrowing access.
🔵 Conclusion
MultiversX is a case study in how far excellent engineering can carry a project, and where it stops. The network shipped adaptive state sharding in 2020 while Ethereum's own plans were deferred, and as of today Supernova delivers a tenfold speed increase on the same validator hardware, approved by 99.64% of governance and migrated to by 84% of nodes within five days. Stripe and Google both route machine payments through it. Validator count sits at an all-time high. The founding team is intact after nine years.
The risks are real and largely self-inflicted. The project spent years telling holders that only 30 million EGLD could ever exist, then voted to remove that cap in favour of roughly 9.47% annual inflation. Exchange access has narrowed through delistings at three major venues, the token trades far below its 2021 high, and adoption has never matched the throughput the network provides.
But the bull case is arriving in real time. If machine-to-machine payments become a genuine category, sub-second finality stops being a specification and becomes a requirement, and as of today MultiversX has it live with Stripe and Google already integrated.
The technology was never the question. What MultiversX has to rebuild is the belief that the people running it will not change the rules again.
crypto top-ups are temporarily disabled ...why?? @xPortal 🤔This has been happening for over two months 🫣 @MultiversX
2
173
Explorer⚡Web3🌱 retweeted
✅ Secure Proof of Stake
✅ Meritocratic validator selection
✅ ~3,200 active validators
✅ Zero equivocation
✅ Formally verified VM
✅ Fully sharded, horizontally scalable
✅ Parallel cross-shard execution
✅ ~$0.0002 per transfer
✅ Unconsumed gas refunded
✅ Gas abstraction
✅ Onchain 2FA
✅ Protocol-native tokens
✅ Fungible tokens
✅ Non-fungible tokens
✅ Semi-fungible tokens
✅ Multi-token transfer
✅ WASM smart contracts
✅ Custom-built Virtual Machine
✅ Native VM elliptic curve operations
✅ Multi-VM customizable chains (Lightspeed SDK)
✅ Reproducible smart contract builds
✅ Upgradeable contracts
✅ Chain Simulator
✅ Millisecond-precision smart contract timestamps
✅ Mature onchain governance
✅ KPI-gated emissions
✅ Developer royalties
✅ MCP integration
✅ Agentic Commerce Stack (x402, UCP, ACP, AP2)
✅ MX-8004 agent identity standard
✅ Agent Builder Hub
✅ Carbon negative
✅ Validators run on 4 cores and 8 GB RAM
🔜 <250ms finality
🔜 600ms blocks
🔜 Rebuilt consensus engine
⏳ Protocol-native Zero Knowledge proof
⏳ Instant delegation migration
⏳ Guardian activation at wallet creation
Built different.
Explorer⚡Web3🌱 retweeted
⚡️JUST IN: MultiversX’s Supernova upgrade is producing 600-millisecond blocks on testnet by decoupling consensus from transaction execution, with mainnet activation expected Sept. 10.
cointelegraph.com/ecosystem/…
Explorer⚡Web3🌱 retweeted
I could spill the beans or let you wait until Tuesday 🤭
I’ll choose the latter.
challenge.xportal.com
Explorer⚡Web3🌱 retweeted
Prediction markets are officially live inside xPortal 🤩
Tech, finance, culture, global events, and many more. You can trade on real-world outcomes directly within our app.
How to find it:
1️⃣ Open xPortal 📱
2️⃣ Go to the Investment section
3️⃣ Tap Invest
4️⃣ Select Outcomes and choose your market!
What’s your first prediction going to be? Let us know in the replies! 👇
Explorer⚡Web3🌱 retweeted
🚨 BUILDERS: MultiversX says its upcoming Supernova upgrade will bring sub-second finality to its blockchain.
Explorer⚡Web3🌱 retweeted
A clarification, because you deserve precision.
Yesterday’s post drew fair challenges that I want to address directly.
Removing a pair does not remove a correlation. That is correct. Delisting EGLD/BTC does not, on its own, break the link to Bitcoin. Correlation is broken by what an asset earns on its own merits, not by which pairs sit on an order book.
So let me be exact about what this decision is, and what it is not.
It is not us pretending we can command a market.
It is not us hiding behind “the exchange decided.”
Pairs do not stay alive on their own. They are sustained by liquidity, depth on the book, tight spreads, and that is a shared commitment between a project and an exchange. Maintaining a pair is an active cost and an active choice. We have a say in it. We are not passing blame. We made a call, and we will own it in full.
And the call was this: in current conditions, holding up the EGLD/BTC book ties EGLD's price discovery to Bitcoin's volatility while returning nothing to holders. We would rather direct that effort toward where value is actually created.
This is one deliberate step, not the whole strategy. The strategy is the network. The focus is the network.
I will take a hard question in public before I give you a comfortable half-truth. That is the standard I hold myself to, and the one you should hold me to.
───
We move on our own terms: throughput, finality, adoption, utility.
Still here. Still building.
Decouple, minimizing correlation, standing on our own terms
For most of its history, this market has moved as one body. When Bitcoin rose, everything rose with it. When Bitcoin fell, even the strongest networks fell too, regardless of what their teams had built, shipped, or proven. That gravitational pull made it easy to forget a simple truth: not all crypto is the same, and not all of it should be priced as though it were.
The last six to twelve months brought the cost of that into focus. Growth stalled. Headwinds settled across the ecosystems. And too often, the value of real work was decided by forces no builder could influence. We do not believe that is the future MultiversX is building toward, and we are no longer willing to leave EGLD's story to be written by Bitcoin.
As we approach the Supernova genesis moment, we are taking deliberate steps to decouple EGLD from its direct correlation to BTC. We are clear-eyed about what this means: no team commands a market by decree. What we can do, and what we intend to do, is build, communicate, and position EGLD so that it is judged on its own terms, not on what Bitcoin happens to be doing on any given day. This means taking steps to delist some EGLD/BTC direct pairs, and give more proactive signal space to EGLD itself.
We believe EGLD's value belongs where its contribution is greatest: in the throughput, the finality, the adoption, and the real-world utility of the network itself. Those are the things we control. Those are the things we are pouring ourselves into. And those are the things that, over time, earn an asset the right to stand on its own.
Supernova is more than a launch. It is the moment we stop being treated as a passenger in someone else's story, and begin being weighted on our own merits. We are choosing decoupling, independence because we believe it is where MultiversX and EGLD have always belonged. To Supernova, and beyond.
Explorer⚡Web3🌱 retweeted
Decouple, minimizing correlation, standing on our own terms
For most of its history, this market has moved as one body. When Bitcoin rose, everything rose with it. When Bitcoin fell, even the strongest networks fell too, regardless of what their teams had built, shipped, or proven. That gravitational pull made it easy to forget a simple truth: not all crypto is the same, and not all of it should be priced as though it were.
The last six to twelve months brought the cost of that into focus. Growth stalled. Headwinds settled across the ecosystems. And too often, the value of real work was decided by forces no builder could influence. We do not believe that is the future MultiversX is building toward, and we are no longer willing to leave EGLD's story to be written by Bitcoin.
As we approach the Supernova genesis moment, we are taking deliberate steps to decouple EGLD from its direct correlation to BTC. We are clear-eyed about what this means: no team commands a market by decree. What we can do, and what we intend to do, is build, communicate, and position EGLD so that it is judged on its own terms, not on what Bitcoin happens to be doing on any given day. This means taking steps to delist some EGLD/BTC direct pairs, and give more proactive signal space to EGLD itself.
We believe EGLD's value belongs where its contribution is greatest: in the throughput, the finality, the adoption, and the real-world utility of the network itself. Those are the things we control. Those are the things we are pouring ourselves into. And those are the things that, over time, earn an asset the right to stand on its own.
Supernova is more than a launch. It is the moment we stop being treated as a passenger in someone else's story, and begin being weighted on our own merits. We are choosing decoupling, independence because we believe it is where MultiversX and EGLD have always belonged. To Supernova, and beyond.
Explorer⚡Web3🌱 retweeted
Last week in MultiversX 🌍
🚀 SpaceCraft SDK v0.66.0 shipped
🤖 Tools, Not Tutorials Article
🧩 @CodeMultiversX's Meet the Tech: The Tx Syntax + Payable Endpoints
📲 xPortal: stake $EGLD straight from the dashboard
🔒 Supernova security marathon
🧪 API team seeks developer feedback
🛠 Weekly #multiversxtech
🙌 Ecosystem highlights: @ThePalmTreeNW • @Veroc_Daniel • @alanrog3 • @stakenest_io • @FalkoGraupner • @ansschweiger • @GreenSmokeAI
🌎 MultiversX
9.20M accounts • 606M transactions • 14.5M staked
📲 @xPortalApp
2.6M+ users • 100k+ users stake $EGLD
⚡️ @xExchangeApp
$4.17M TVL • 1.1M USD 7d Volume
Explorer⚡Web3🌱 retweeted
We put @MultiversX on our new chart to see how big the gap is
Next-gen applications demand Internet-scale speed, and MultiversX transactions settle exactly that fast
📈 chainspect.app/chart/time?ch…



















