Everyone, regardless of political leanings, had some preconceived notions when they heard that an ICE agent had shot and killed a woman. The difference is, the right immediately wanted to see video in order to determine if it was justified. The left couldn't have cared less about video, evidence or anything that didn't confirm their preconceived notion. All that mattered was whether or not it was useful for their narrative. That is the extent of their curiosity. It always is. Which is why their analysis and moral ramblings mean nothing to me. When no amount of evidence can convince you that your preconceived notion was incorrect or at the very least incomplete, then you are not a reasonable person. You are at best a useful idiot and at worst a deliberate and nefarious manipulator. But either way, there is no use trying to have a conversation.