Dear President Trump, @realDonaldTrump I write regarding today’s announcement of the Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program (WHIP) and the associated rewards for tips and citizen-journalist findings that lead to fraud convictions or significant federal enforcement actions. For more than a decade, Tore Maras and the organization and community surrounding her work have produced detailed investigations, source material, filings, and reports on fraud, institutional abuse, election-related irregularities, funding pipelines, and related matters. Much of this work was developed through primary documents, public records, and sustained research made available inside that community. It is a matter of public record within these circles that a large number of self-described “citizen journalists,” influencers, and independent reporters have taken that material—investigations, source documents, filings, and reports—without attribution. They have repackaged it under their own names, used it to build personal platforms and audiences, and monetized it through donations, subscriptions, and media appearances. The same pattern is now poised to repeat under the new commission structure: individuals who did not originate the underlying work will present long-standing findings as their own recent discoveries in order to claim rewards and official recognition. This is not a minor credit issue. It is the theft of investigative labor and primary source work, followed by the public presentation of that stolen work as original. Americans who support independent inquiry are being asked to fund the same recycled claims again, while the original researchers and the community that produced the material receive neither recognition nor protection. The result is a market in which the incentive is to repackage and grift rather than to investigate. I respectfully request that the administration and the Department of Justice, in administering the Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program, require clear documentation of originality for any tip or citizen-journalist submission. Tips and findings should be cross-checked against existing public records, prior filings, and known investigative archives—including the body of work associated with Tore Maras and her community—so that rewards are directed to those who actually produced the underlying evidence rather than those who simply rebranded it. Without such safeguards, the program risks subsidizing the very pattern of appropriation and self-promotion that has already distorted public understanding of these issues for years. Thank you for your attention to this matter and for the broader effort to address fraud against American taxpayers. Respectfully, Jake Armstrong