@SublimeBraid04
Joined May 2013
The Most Destructive Intellectual Project of the Twentieth Century. The Frankfurt School. You should know what it was, what it built, and why you are still living inside it. 1. The Institute for Social Research was founded in Frankfurt in 1923 and relocated to Columbia University in 1934 when Hitler came to power. The civilization they had decided to dismantle gave them refuge when another tried to kill them. They spent the next five decades producing the theoretical infrastructure for that dismantling. Western civilization itself was the problem: reason, the Enlightenment, the family, tradition, authority. Not reformed. Dismantled. 2. They called it Critical Theory – and the name is the program. Everything is to be criticized; nothing is to be built. In The Dialectic of Enlightenment (1944), Adorno and Horkheimer argued that Western reason — the reason that produced Newton and the rule of law — contained the seeds of Auschwitz. Not that reason had been misused, but that reason itself, taken to its conclusion, produces the death camp. This was not a critique of institutions. It was an indictment of the civilization itself. 3. Adorno gave them the psychological weapon. The Authoritarian Personality (1950) classified conservatism, religious faith, patriotism, and the traditional family not as political positions but as symptoms of a proto-fascist personality. If you believe in the nation or the father’s authority, you are pre-fascist. The opponent was no longer wrong – he was sick. You don’t argue with a pathology. You treat it. This made dialogue impossible. You don’t persuade someone who is wrong; you diagnose someone who is sick. Politics becomes therapy, and disagreement becomes pathology. 4. Marcuse gave them the political weapon. Repressive Tolerance (1965) argued that tolerating wrong ideas is itself oppression. True tolerance therefore requires suppressing intolerant ideas. The left decides which ideas are intolerant. Everyone else is silenced – not despite tolerance, but "in its name." Censorship dressed in the vocabulary of liberation. 5. The generation that read Marcuse at Columbia, Berkeley, and Yale went on to run universities, media, foundations, NGOs, content moderation departments, and the EU regulatory apparatus. They implemented the argument sincerely because they had been taught it as philosophy. This was the Frankfurt School’s greatest achievement: it produced true believers. 6. French Theory picked up the tools and made them aesthetic. Foucault made the critique of power literary. Derrida made the critique of meaning philosophical. Deleuze made the critique of identity elegant. A political program became a cultural sensibility. You can argue with a program. A sensibility is in the air you breathe. By the time these ideas reached the American campus through the French conduit, they were no longer ideology. They were the water. The fish did not know they were wet. 7. A civilization stands on three pillars: truth exists and is accessible to reason; good is distinguishable from evil; and there is an inheritance worth transmitting. The Frankfurt School attacked all three – systematically and with considerable intellectual sophistication. It produced a generation that knows how to deconstruct and has forgotten how to build. That sees power everywhere and beauty nowhere. The ultimate achievement was to make destruction feel like progress. Every inherited institution became suspect; every constraint became oppression; every act of preservation became reactionary. Deconstruction became the default, while construction became something that needed to justify itself. The answer is not another theory. It is the thing the Frankfurt School most feared: the builder who simply builds, the scientist who follows the evidence, the father who transmits what was transmitted to him. The deconstruction machine runs on the assumption that nothing is worth building. Prove it wrong. Tell the truth, have courage, and build.
The word tolerance has been weaponized against you. The weapon was forged in 1965. You should know who forged it and why. Before there was the French Theory — before Foucault, Derrida, and Deleuze made deconstruction elegant and exportable — there was the Frankfurt School. And the Frankfurt School was worse, because it was deliberate. Foucault played with ideas he never expected to have consequences. Herbert Marcuse knew exactly what he was building. These were not fringe academics. The Institute for Social Research relocated from Frankfurt to Columbia University in 1934 when Hitler came to power. Funded, positioned, and deliberate, they spent the next decades producing the theoretical infrastructure for the dismantling of the civilization that had given them refuge. This is not ingratitude – it is the logic of the project. It was universal – it applied to every Western civilization equally. Marcuse — godfather of the New Left — published Repressive Tolerance in 1965. The most influential political document most people have never read. Its argument: tolerating wrong ideas is itself oppression. True tolerance requires the suppression of intolerant ideas. Tolerating everything is repressive. Suppressing the wrong things is liberating. The argument is circular by design – it puts the conclusion inside the premise and dares you to find the exit. The practical implication was stated explicitly: withdrawal of tolerance from movements that are regressive, from speech that reinforces existing hierarchies. The left decides which movements are regressive. Everyone else is silenced – not despite tolerance but in its name. The most sophisticated justification for censorship ever produced, dressed in the vocabulary of liberation. The French Theory picked up the tools and made them elegant. Foucault made the Frankfurt critique of power literary. Derrida made the critique of meaning philosophical. Deleuze made the critique of identity aesthetic. What had been a political program became a cultural sensibility – which is why it spread further and faster than the original. You can argue with a political program. A cultural sensibility is in the air you breathe. The generation that read Marcuse went on to run the universities, the media, the foundations, the NGOs, the content moderation departments, and the EU regulatory apparatus. They did not implement his argument cynically – they implemented it sincerely, because they had been taught it as philosophy. This is why cancel culture does not feel like censorship to the people practicing it. The journalist who demands a speaker be deplatformed genuinely believes she is defending free speech. The HR department that fires the employee for the wrong opinion genuinely believes it is creating an inclusive environment. They have been taught that this is what tolerance means. Marcuse taught them. Musk has been fighting Marcuse’s argument for four years probably even without knowing Marcuse’s name. Every content moderation policy, every advertiser boycott, every regulatory assault – these are Repressive Tolerance, institutionalized. The DSA is Repressive Tolerance with a legal budget. The fact-checking organization is Repressive Tolerance. The good news: the argument fails on contact with a free platform – because the suppression becomes visible, the mechanism becomes nameable, and a named mechanism loses half its power. This is why the Counter-Reformation moves so fast against X. Not because X is dangerous. Because X is where Repressive Tolerance gets named. You are reading this now – which is precisely what Repressive Tolerance was designed to prevent.
542
4,894
539
14,081
2,764,386
SublimeBraid retweeted
The most influential book to establish the civic vs ethnic distinction was written by a Jew. The idea of a melting pot is Jewish. Marxism and Bolshevism are Jewish. Most of the leftist movements in the West since WW2 have been disproportionately Jewish. The Frankfurt School was Jewish. The 1950 UNESCO Statement on Race had Jewish authors. The Hart-Celler Act 1965: Jewish. Tony Blair’s immigration tzar was Jewish. Many of the NGOs and charities helping to bring migrants to the West are Jewish. George Soros who funds all of the pro-migrant organisations is Jewish. Many of anti-White professors that teach students about ‘destroying Whiteness’ are Jewish. We have videos of rabbis and Jewish leaders openly talk about wanting to destroy the West through mass migration- not secret recordings, they release the videos themselves! So this gaslighting that none of these things are true or that they’re somehow insignificant will not wash in this age of information. It is time to address these facts or at least, stop lying about them, if you’re going to claim that you care about saving the West. The British people are the ethnic groups that are native to Britain. This is our ancestral homeland. It belongs to us and to us alone. We will decide which guests, if any, get to stay.
This is very muddled. British identity is civic and not ethnic. It is totally different from Jewish identity, which is ethnic, religious and cutural. Judaism is the unique fusion of a people, a faith and a land. That's why the Jewish people, as *a* people, is entitled to live in its ancestral homeland. This is different again from Israeli identlty. Arabs, Druze and others are also Israeli citizens with equal civic and religious rights. But (unless they convert to Judaism) they can't be Jews with their unique claim to self-determination in the land and their unique political right to a state of their own. Because of the unique and multi-faceted nature of Judaism, there's no crossover with British identity. But as I have written for decades, the British are not only entitled to but should promote and defend their historic nation, identity and its culture. There's no conflict between those two positions, and the suggestion that Jews want to deny to the British the self-determination that the Jews have fulfilled in the State of Israel is false and disgraceful. @AllisterHeath
32
332
18
1,882
31,177
SublimeBraid retweeted
If you understood Talmudic Judaism, you’d understand that “their wrath” isn’t something so easily given up for sportsmanship or geopolitical partnership. Wrath is ingrained in their religious identity. In their “Passover Meal” (the one Rabbis invented after 70AD), their most sacred ritual of worship, they literally drink to the damnation of Rome (symbolic of Europe and Christianity) between the third and fourth cup of the Seder. They’ve replaced the imprecations towards Egypt and Pharoah in their liturgy with whatever nation they’re angry at, at the moment, praying upon them divine curses in the synagogues. Their daily Aleinu prayer, specifically the second paragraph, prays for the damnation of the goy - and that’s us. It’s prayed thrice daily (Shacharit, Mincha, Maariv). Their Birkat HaMinim prayer, also prayed three times daily, embedded inside the Amidah, prays damnation on Jews who become Christians. When Jews pray for the invocation and inauguration of the Messianic age, they’re asking for all the goyim of the world to perish. The Jewish god is one who proves His love for the Jews by literally killing everyone else on earth, except for those who will be spared for slave labor, 2800 goyim servants for every Jew. This is why the Israelis wrath can’t take a break for a peace process to commence. For them, war is worship. Bloodshed in war has taken the atoning role of bloodshed on the altar, which is long removed. The blood of bulls and goats is replaced with that of goyim nations. War is sacred. Every battle, every bomb, every missile is incense.
Replying to @LostMyHats
If you think about it if things didn't go exactly as they did. Israel's management problem wouldn't be so clear to the world. I am on their side, but how can they be on our side if they don't act like team players and let their wrath get the better of them.
86
663
61
2,602
124,447
We hit the trending. Let's get it to 20k. Please quote tweet the post below. Juice juice juice
Nikita Bier ruined X. Pass it on.
22
288
36
1,052
36,325
If you’ve got a pair of balls, repost this
4,910
82,796
4,470
137,134
6,857,963