Pinned Tweet
BPI-medlemskap: fra 800 til 210 kr i året.
Bli medlem via lenken under, og du er med i trekningen av tur til Plan ₿ Forum i El Salvador 🇸🇻 (fly, hotell, billett).
Trekningen avgjøres av en blokkhash. Don't trust, verify.
Flere medlemmer = mer gjennomslag hos politikerne. 👇
Håkon retweeted
Forby hva da?
Fra @BPINorge Mining & prof of work seminaret - anbefales 🔥 youtube.com/watch?v=QPXOVJ2c…
Alexander Neumüller kommer til Oslo. Han leder energiforskningen ved Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. Når FN, IEA eller Stortinget sier hvor mye strøm bitcoin bruker, er det hans tall de bruker. Skup!
Litteraturhuset, 14. sept., 12–16. Gratis.
Vi lever i en sci-fi-roman
We’re sharing a solution to the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize Problem, one of the deepest problems at the frontier of mathematics.
The proof was produced by a group of agents, using an OpenAI next-generation model significantly more capable than GPT-6 Astra.
The problem concerns whether the description of smooth three-dimensional fluid motion modeled by the Navier-Stokes equations can break down. It has remained unresolved for roughly 90 years.
Håkon retweeted
Dette er planen 📖
bpinorge.no/arbeidsprogram-f…
Fra å skrive dødsannonse for Bitcoin til dette. Ser ut som trua svinger i takt med prisen ;)
Regimeskifte i Washington:
Nå kan bitcoin stige til $1.000.000
min kommentar:
investornytt.no/kommentar/re…
Ny epiosde av Bitcoinsnakk - Denne gangen med meg som gjest. Spilt inn FØR den siste utviklingen i pris.
Ny episode Bitcoinsnakk! Håkon Sandbakken, nyvalgt leder av BPI snakker bl.a. om vervekampanjen til BPI som er det mest asymmetriske bettet du får, rett etter det å kjøpe Btc i 2008. 210 kr kan sende deg til 🇸🇻 eller kanskje en reporter fra Bitcoinsnakk? open.spotify.com/episode/5BD…
Et bilde på hvordan AI/LLM’er påvirker matematikken. Kan anbefale vibemathed.com for å se fremskrittene i real time.
I have decided to leave math academia.
Not because of burnout, the academic job market, or a loss of love for mathematics. Surprisingly, it is because of how much mathematics I could do with LLMs over the last few months.
For most of my life, pursuing mathematics felt like the obvious choice. It gave me a sense of purpose, rooted in the search for hidden truths in God’s Book.
Over the past few months, that conviction has been shaken. With LLMs, I could get several breakthroughs on problems I care deeply about and had worked on for years during my PhD. This progress might have taken years of my academic life if not for LLMs.
This could have strengthened my conviction that mathematics was my calling. Instead, it undermined it. With each passing week, my role in the discovery loop seemed to grow smaller.
What made mathematics meaningful to me was never just the final answer. It was the struggle: months or years of exploration, failed approaches, and deep thought before a hidden structure finally became visible. That struggle gave me a sense that the result was truly mine. Prompting my way to answers, without the struggle that once defined the process, no longer felt like the same vocation. The answer might be just as beautiful, but it did not feel earned in the same way.
I now believe that we are rapidly approaching a world in which most answers from God’s Book will be only a prompt away. Once I truly internalized that possibility, dedicating much of my life to finding those answers slightly earlier no longer felt as meaningful as it once had.
But one problem kept bothering me: How do we know the oracle is right?
Intelligence (and hence the amount of math papers) is becoming abundant and cheaper by the day. Trust is not.
The proofs produced by these systems can be highly sophisticated, and their errors can be extremely subtle. Determining whether an apparent breakthrough was actually correct sometimes took me days. Until it is verified, a beautiful proof is not different from slop.
That gap drew me toward formal verification and eventually toward formalizing math proofs in Lean, including proofs of several longstanding conjectures and Erdős problems discovered with the help of LLMs. I began to see verification as a central intellectual bottleneck. Intelligence is useful only when its outputs can be trusted.
So I am leaving math academia. I am shifting my attention from discovering answers to building systems that can certify them.
I am very excited to be joining @PramaanaLabs to work on this challenge. Over the next few years, I hope to help build a future in which increasingly powerful systems are not merely intelligent, but provably correct and reliable across problems far beyond mathematics.
AI løser uløste problemer i matematikken til venstre og høyre. Følg med på vibemathed.com/
Håkon retweeted
Akkurat ferdig med Live sending med @torkelrogstad fra @barebitcoin om det pågående angrepet på leverandør av hardware-lommebøker fra Coldcard.
Så langt er over 1200 bitcoin stjålet.
Del 1 + del 2
Håkon retweeted
Om du oppbevarer BTC på en Coldcard-wallet er midlene dine i fare. Du burde umiddelbart flytte midlene dine. Om du ikke allerede har et sikkert sted å sende de burde du sende til @barebitcoin eller en annen vekslingstjeneste, og så ta deg god tid til å sette opp en ny wallet.
«Bitcoinmining har potensial til å bli en samfunnsnyttig tjeneste – forutsatt strenge og tydelige krav.»
Det sa EnergiWatch-redaktør Anders Lie Brenna til NRK. Vi ba ham utdype.
Om fleksibilitet, mobile anlegg og hvorfor forbud er feil svar.
Ny episode ute nå. 🎧
Hør hele samtalen (44 min): open.spotify.com/episode/1j2…
Meld deg inn: bpinorge.no


















