“It is not time to dream: It is time to wake up" Photographer and LUFC fan

Leeds
Joined February 2009
Former bricklayer here. Most working class people (like most middle-class people) are disgusted by the comments coming from Reform UK figures caught on camera by ITV. Bigoted privately educated multimillionaire far-right wanker Nigel Farage doesn't give a solitary shit about working class people. Nor does bigoted privately educated multimillionaire far-right wanker Rupert Lowe.
Posh-boy millionaire Nigel Farage’s latest excuse is that most working-class men are racist and misogynistic, sniff women’s chairs, would sexually assault female colleagues and make disgusting remarks about their own daughters, such as: “Fuck me, if she was my daughter, it would still be bath night on a Thursday. I’ll wash you properly this time.” The white working-class friends I grew up with, from primary and secondary school to college and university, are not nonces or bigots. Farage doesn’t get to smear an entire class of people to excuse the disgusting behaviour of Reform councillors and activists.
1
45
1
194
2,388
She leads the party that froze tax allowances costing taxpayers over £40bn a year by now!
Britain has been taxed too much for too long. Andy Burnham’s answer? More tax. Conservatives will cut taxes, so you can keep more of what you earn.
36
153
4
371
5,852
Stuart retweeted
'The best Matt Hancock could hope for was a plateful of kangaroo testicles on I'm a Celebrity.' James O'Brien rails against the Ministers responsible for the Tory government's Covid response.
23
25
2
114
6,799
Stuart retweeted
Sally Rooney is a writer, not a terrorist
OPEN LETTER: Sally Rooney is a writer, not a terrorist. Her books must be available to the public. Their withdrawal from sale, on the basis of ill-conceived and draconian anti terror legislation, is an affront to basic principles of free speech and expression so long taken for granted in this country. We categorically reject censorship - whether direct or indirect - and urge the government to change course, amending the legislation which has led us to this point of repressive absurdity.
61
26
6
358
14,537
If someone earns £100,000 working 30 hours a week, they’re successful. If someone earns £25,000 working 50 hours a week, they’re told to work harder. When did the amount of money you earn become a measure of how hard you work?
28
44
3
199
3,128
Replying to @sharrond62
Oh FFS - not this again🙄 Why? Why do you fall for this Culture War BS every single time?
Well, that Express headline was always going to raise a few eyebrows!😳 Starmer is responsible for embracing polygamy to appease Muslims, and so he's increasing their benefits?? That's the implication. After all, this "started in April", right? Wrong! 🧵1/25
5
15
57
1,016
Stuart retweeted
This guy’s a legend. He perfectly captures the absolute state of ‘Raise the Colours’.👏🏼👏🏼
80
848
11
4,835
88,566
Piers Morgan - Is it true that 4000 people have died in care homes, yes or no?... why are you laughing?.. what's the matter with you? Helen Whately(care minister) - I'm not laughing Piers Morgan - I just asked you if 4000 elderly people have died & all you can do is laugh #GMB
227
1,000
219
1,845
It was all lies. The "millionaire exodus" story started with one study which now admits it has no evidence!! And guess what- MSM ran with it ' by the billionaires who own the press. But look LOOK over there - immigrants!
39
36
3
100
3,598
Not an ounce of contrition. No apology, no guilt, no remorse. Covid inquiry? Tens of thousands of needless deaths? Water off a duck's back. It was only the little people anyway. @KemiBadenoch @Conservatives @griffitha @alexburghart @Jeremy_Hunt @michaelgove @BorisJohnson
84
957
45
1,893
14,010
After the #Covid report, you cannot fail to conclude that the poor are expendable #poverty
1
19
Stuart retweeted
The UK ‘wealth exodus’ was manufactured by the press. The press complaints body IPSO must investigate or step aside. The story started with one study which now admits it has no evidence. Media owned by corporations and the super rich lapped it up. taxjustice.net/2026/10/19/th…
28
419
9
639
7,460
Hey guys. This is normal right? RIGHT???
Trump engaged in a thoughtful, extended conversation with—nothingness. He suddenly stopped, waved, saluted, offered greetings, and chatted for a bit with the empty space. 😁🤭 The cameraman deliberately zoomed out to show that there was absolutely no one to be seen for hundreds of meters in any direction. Apparently, Trump received a visit from the very same "invisible person"—the kind of encounter he had previously mocked Joe Biden for supposedly having. t.me/MirovichMedia/15645
489
2,228
74
12,845
269,901
So the pandemic preparedness exercise in 2016 recognised the unique vulnerability of the care sector. And the Tory Party did nothing about it. These clowns think they should be in government! They must never be in power again. @KemiBadenoch @Conservatives @alexburghart @griffitha
17
253
13
528
3,319
“The poor die defending the rules that keep them poor. Because they mistake obedience for belonging." - Ursula K. Le Guin
7
337
2
1,284
11,821
Stuart retweeted
Tim Stanley (Telegraph) on the French riots: “People can go away & see, very obviously, migrants rioting” Marie Billon (RTL): “What do you call migrants? People who are not white? That doesn’t mean they’re not French. It’s not a big issue at the moment” #Newsnight
29
111
8
415
27,907
🧵 What, like riots in Liverpool and Cardiff in 1919? Nottingham and Notting Hill in 1958? Brixton, Toxteth, Moss Side and Handsworth in 1981? Brixton and Broadwater Farm in 1985? Brixton again in 1995? Oldham, Burnley and Bradford in 2001? Tottenham, Birmingham, Manchester, Salford and Liverpool in 2011? Knowsley in 2023? Southport, Rotherham and Tamworth in 2024? Ballymena in 2025? Kemi Badenoch has warned that Britain risks French-style civil unrest unless immigration controls are tightened, a message the Telegraph boiled down to “cut migration or risk France-style riots”. But Britain doesn’t need to look across the Channel. It has its own long, well-documented history of rioting, most of it investigated at the time, and very little of it supports the idea that migration is what sets the country alight. Start with the most recent. In the summer of 2024, after three young girls were murdered at a dance class in Southport, false claims spread online that the killer was a Muslim asylum seeker. He was born in Britain. Within a day the town’s mosque had been pelted with bricks. Disorder spread across England, and on 4 August crowds attacked hotels housing asylum seekers in Tamworth and in Rotherham, not far from where I live. South Yorkshire Police said the Rotherham hotel was full of terrified residents and staff. The year before, in Knowsley, a protest outside a hotel housing asylum seekers ended with a police van attacked with hammers and set alight, after rumours and misinformation had circulated on social media. In June 2025 it was Ballymena. After two local 14-year-old boys were arrested over an alleged sexual assault, masked crowds spent several nights attacking police and the homes of migrant families. Filipino families fled. A leisure centre in Larne that had briefly sheltered some of them was set on fire. The police called it racist thuggery. The pattern is a century old. In 1919, white mobs in Britain’s port cities turned on Black, Arab and Chinese seafarers and their communities. In Liverpool a Black ship’s fireman, Charles Wootton, was chased into the docks and drowned. In 1958 white crowds in Nottingham and then Notting Hill attacked West Indian residents and petrol-bombed their homes, egged on by Mosley’s Union Movement and the White Defence League. Notting Hill Carnival grew out of the response. In each of these riots, migrants and minorities were the targets of the violence. The second great strand in Britain’s riot history is policing. In April 1981 Brixton erupted after a heavy stop and search operation. Lord Scarman’s inquiry found the disorder was a spontaneous outburst of built-up resentment, rooted in social and economic disadvantage and a collapse of trust in the police. Toxteth, Moss Side and Handsworth followed that summer. In 1985 police shot and paralysed Cherry Groce during a raid on her Brixton home, and Brixton rioted again. A week later Cynthia Jarrett died during a police search of her Tottenham home, and the Broadwater Farm estate exploded. PC Keith Blakelock was killed. In 1995 Brixton rioted once more after Wayne Douglas died in police custody. Then came 2011. Mark Duggan, who grew up on Broadwater Farm, was shot dead by police in Tottenham, and over five nights rioting and looting spread across English cities. Five people died. The LSE and the Guardian interviewed 270 rioters and found anger at the police, especially humiliating stop and search, was a major factor. The government’s own panel found that 70 per cent of suspected rioters came from the 30 per cent most deprived areas, and pointed to youth unemployment, consumerism and parenting. Neither said anything about cutting migration. These are the real British parallels to France, where the big outbreaks of 2005 and 2023 followed deaths involving police, and where the current unrest began as protests over teacher shortages and crumbling classrooms....
Britain will face riots like France unless migration is cut, Kemi Badenoch has warned. 🔗:telegraph.co.uk/politics/202…
7
49
6
102
3,884
2020, UK care minister Helen Whately laughs when asked if 4,000 people have died, as Minister for care home's Report out today on the failures in care home's As she lie's, hate speech, on disabled children, veterans, adults, elderly, and carer's youtu.be/EEePhqG9xMQ?si=nhha… via @YouTube
29
449
24
793
9,947
EXCL: Senior Reform UK official raised questions about whether major donations from two billionaire backers would be legal under proposed new foreign donors cap three months before they gave £72m to the party. James Orr, then Reform UK’s head of policy, discussed potential difficulties around future donations from Christopher Harborne and Ben Delo in undercover footage captured by the investigative reporting group Verbatim. A reporter was posing as a potential donor when Orr talked to him about “filling the war chest in anticipation” of tougher donations rules, describing it as the establishment trying to “kneecap” the party. Story by @rowenamason theguardian.com/politics/202…
33
229
9
458
71,286
Occupy Democrats 2͏h͏ · BREAKING: PANIC! Trump is DESPERATELY trying to stop Jack Smith from testifying in his own $10 billion lawsuit against the BBC. Donald Trump sued the BBC for defamation, asking for a whopping $10 billion in damages. Now, he’s panicking about the one witness who might actually know something about the behavior that led the British broadcaster to publish what it did. According to The New Republic, the BBC subpoenaed former special counsel Jack Smith to testify as part of its defense against Trump’s defamation suit. The suit claims the network defamed him with deceptive editing in a 2024 documentary about the January 6 Capitol attack. Trump’s lawyers filed a motion Friday to block the deposition, arguing that “Smith lacks any personal knowledge regarding the issues in this matter.” Their reasoning: Smith wasn’t at the January 6 speech, didn’t help prepare it, and can’t know what Trump was thinking. They say anything he gathered was “secondhand knowledge” from materials collected from other sources. The BBC’s lawyers weren’t impressed. They wrote that “none of [Trump]’s arguments for blocking the deposition of Mr. Smith can withstand scrutiny.” They noted that Smith himself doesn’t object to testifying, and that Trump still has to prove he “did not foment or incite the January 6 Capitol riot,” which he claims the documentary falsely implied. Then came the line that says it all: “No one forced Plaintiff to file this lawsuit and to dispute that his speech on January 6 incited the violence that followed at the Capitol. But as long as he chooses to maintain the case, he cannot commit the fundamental injustice of preventing the BBC from obtaining the evidence it needs to robustly defend itself.” This isn’t Trump’s only dodge. His attorneys are also fighting efforts to make Trump himself testify, to subpoena his children, and to look into his finances. Trump sued over what the BBC said about January 6, and now he’s fighting every attempt to examine what actually happened. There’s another problem for him. The BBC is funded by British taxpayers, so Trump can’t bully it into a hefty settlement or force it to back off its coverage the way he has with some American media companies. So now he has two choices: drop the case, or actually try to prove his point and live with the consequences. If Trump really believes he did nothing wrong on January 6, a deposition should be no problem. His lawyers’ desperation suggests otherwise. Please like and share if you can’t wait to hear what Jack Smith has to say if the BBC successfully gets him to testify!
118
3,039
62
9,378
259,444