I am asking that you share this post every where and tag everyone you know! Help stop the ActBlue fraud. Seniors are the #1 targets of identity theft—and ActBlue has been using their names. Thousands of small-dollar “donations” show up in public FEC records under the names of elderly Americans who say they never gave a dime. These are straw contributions funneled to candidates, PACs, and aligned nonprofits. Identities were stolen and used without the victims’ knowledge. This is not a glitch. This is not an accident. This is corruption that exploited the most vulnerable to move money and hide its true source. Go to fec.gov right now. Search your name and the names of your parents or grandparents. If you find contributions you or they never made, email [email protected]. Attorneys are reviewing these cases and want to hear from you. Check today. Don’t let them hide behind seniors’ names. @realDonaldTrump @RealMarkFinchem @Jim_Jordan @RepBryanSteil @RepJamesComer @jsolomonReports @bennyjohnson @LawEnforceToday @bluelivesmtr @VP @nickshirleyy @ninoboxer @realtinapeters @EagleEdMartin @RapidResponse47 @RealAmVoice @stinchfield1776 @ReporterMcCabe @PPN1776 @Bannons_WarRoom @annvandersteel @GenFlynn @AGToddBlanche @CFWBers @JuanOSavin107 @boonecutler @bennyjohnson @johnrich @Joeoltmann

👁 Trump keeps pointing to Russ Vought, and the magnitude of what he's suggesting becomes clearer when you follow the money... go with me on this... Back in May, Vought moved to restructure the rules governing nearly $1 trillion in federal grants, introducing tighter verification, performance requirements, and accountability into a system where enormous amounts of taxpayer money have historically flowed with fragmented oversight... Change how money flows through a system and you fundamentally change the behavior of everything dependent upon it... Now connect OMB, Treasury, America.gov, and Super Intelligence (SI), bringing financial visibility, fraud detection, and measurable performance into an increasingly integrated architecture where funding follows value rather than perpetuating bureaucracy... Extend that into tariffs, American energy, manufacturing, infrastructure, and strategic investment, and the implications become considerably larger... The sovereign wealth fund, Trump Accounts, and all this recurring talk about dividends begin revealing another dimension... What happens when America starts converting more of its productive capacity into national assets that generate returns, eventually allowing Americans to invest directly in their own country's growth? An American Citizen Investment Fund, with ownership opportunities and DIVIDENDS flowing back to American households... The possibility is extraordinary because it connects financial accountability, productive investment, national wealth creation, and citizen ownership within one evolving economic architecture... Vought's announcement remains undisclosed, but the pieces are increasingly coming into view, suggesting something far beyond reducing government expenditures... a fundamental change in how America retains, reinvests, and ultimately returns the wealth it creates to the American people...

Would you eat a pizza if someone poured lice shampoo on it first? When Moms Across America sent food from the top 20 fast-food chains to an independent laboratory for testing, what we found was alarming. Every single chain tested positive for glyphosate. ALL 20. Across the samples, we detected 27 different pesticides. 🍕 Domino’s pizza crust contained six different pesticide residues, including piperonyl butoxide, a chemical also used in lice treatments. 🍕 Pizza Hut’s veggie pizza contained six pesticide residues. 🍔 Arby’s had the second-highest glyphosate levels in our testing. In additional testing, we also detected monensin in Domino’s pepperoni, an antibiotic used in livestock feed that is not approved for human medical use. Millions of Americans eat fast food every day, often without knowing what pesticide residues may be present in their meals. Parents deserve to know what is in the food they are feeding their children. Thank you, Kash Khan, for sharing our testing results and helping bring attention to what we are finding in America’s food supply!

Political opposition groups have weaponized the X algorithm to maliciously limit the reach of their opponents. Here’s how they manipulate the algorithm to do so: 1. Flood an account with a ton of new bot-controlled followers. In the case of @Babygravy9, they send 50k new followers to a guy who previous had about 250k. 2. Those 50k new followers represent one-sixth of the account’s followers. But when you account for dormant users that still inactively follow accounts, the 50k can very easily represent one-third to even one-half of the account’s active followers. It’s a material percentage. 3a. When you post on X, before the algorithm decides whether to boost your post and show it to a large audience (including “out-of-network” people who don’t follow your account), the algorithm first shows your post to a subset of your followers. If those “in-network” accounts engage positively (like, RT, QT, or—best of all—comment), the algorithm expands distribution, providing exponentially more impressions and giving the post the opportunity to go viral. 3b. On the other hand, if the subset of followers to whom the algorithm showed the post ignore it—or, even worse, if they engage negatively, by hitting the “show less” button or blocking the account entirely—the post’s distribution is quickly throttled. You can probably see where I’m going with this. 4. When our aforementioned bot accounts are shown the post from the target account, they mark it as content they are not interested in. Or they block the account (which is likely why REN mentions losing 100 or so followers per day after his follower count spiked). The algorithm then stops showing the post to *anyone*, since the initial sample group reacted negatively. 5. The target account’s posts gets no traction, they enter into a spiral of ever-decreasing engagement, and they eventually grow discouraged from having a fraction of the reach they used to have and just disengage entirely. It’s incredibly malicious. Diabolical, even. It neuters the reach of quality accounts, effectively censoring them, and it materially harms the ability of X to serve as the true digital town square. The only solution is for X to take a hands-on approach. If an account gains 10k+ followers in a day and there hasn’t been a viral post leading to the growth, they should have Grok review all the new followers and purge any that look like bots. Otherwise, this tactic is only going to become more common.

🚨⚠️I bet you did not the CIA started the Hippie movement. CIA experiments with LSD. MKUltra. College campuses. The rise of psychedelic culture. Musicians with unexpected military-family connections.