We're seeing this type of thing more and more... 8mm and 16mm home movies and historic films showing up "enhanced" through the use of AI software. Removing dust, dirt, scratches is one thing, but using software to intuitively add detail to shots, and get rid of the texture and grain of the original film stock too -- really bothers us. It's taking something authentic and rendering it — inauthentic. Why rely on the real Apollo image on the left, with its original limited depth of field and detail, when you could have the one on the right which looks like it was shot with a modern 4k video camera or just entirely rendered by an AI? (Simple answer silly: because it's real!) Why process the 8mm Kodachrome home movie circa 1955 so that the woman's complexion and teeth are so sharp, that they look like plastic? We don't get it -- you may as well have asked an AI to generate a completely synthetic version, it would probably look very similar? Look, we know AI enhanced content is here to stay — and there may be legit reasons to use it for personal projects (such as: the woman in the shot if your grandma and you're going to show it to her on her 96th birthday). But when Hollywood and the content creators start doing this -- what gets enhanced, and how much it gets enhanced, is a legit conversation and something that should get plenty of scrutiny and push back. What say you?