The modern feminism movement canāt declare victory without making their business model obsolete. So they reject victory, and manufacture a war.
Why are so many women sooo angry? They won. They got everything they wanted. Men have never been doing this badly, and women have never been doing this well. They make more, they have the majority of jobs, they are the majority of college graduates, (UCLA undergrad is 60% female), they make more money, have much lower rates of suicide, addiction, and alcoholism, and live longer. They won: they took over all men-only spaces, they took over the Boy Scouts, they ended menās bathrooms, they can fly fighter planes and be in combat. Marriage is optional, divorce is no-fault, they win 99% of the custody battles, they can control fertility at will, and they canāt get drafted. We are all living in the female future they promised.
1
308
Just wondering.
If Lindsay Clancy had killed one of her supportersā children during her psychosis, would they still be supporting her this hard ?
203
š¢ š
We are saddened and heartbroken to share the news of the passing of Kyle Busch, a two-time Cup champion and one of our sport's greatest and fiercest drivers. He was 41 years old.
We extend our deepest condolences to the Busch family, Richard Childress Racing and the entire motorsports community.
88
That was wild!
Jeff Probst just accidentally spoiled Survivorās fire making elimination before it actually aired during the live finale #Survivor
1
132
The filibuster is a shield for inaction. The level of staggering cowardice displayed by the republican congress is really one of the most pathetic things weāve ever seen.
I am one of the few members of Congress who has actually passed a voter ID law (on a bipartisan basis), which I did asĀ Speaker of the House in North Carolina, and thatās why IĀ proudly co-sponsored the SAVE Act. While I supportĀ strengthening mail-in ballot integrity, many states like Utah, Florida, Alaska, and Montana rely on the use of mail-in ballots to conduct their elections,Ā and we should not beĀ completely upendingĀ how states already securely conduct their elections.Ā Even if this issue is fixed, the SAVE America Act still will not have the 60 votes required to passĀ it.
While the so-called ātalking filibusterā has been floated as an option, there is a reason why previous attempts to utilize it in recent history have failed. A ātalking filibusterā would effectively make Chuck Schumer the new Senate Majority Leader, allowing Democrats to block every single Trump judge and executive branch nominee, and allow them to force endless votes on anything they want. Democrats would control the floor of the U.S. Senate until the end of the year.
There are only two ways out of a ātalking filibuster.ā The first is for Democrats to miraculously give up and allow Republicans to pass the bill with a simple majority. That is never going to happen, and anyone who claims itās even a remote possibility is either completely misinformed or intentionally misleading the American people.
The second way is for Republicans to substantially weaken or eliminate the filibuster altogether. I have made it crystal clear that I will never vote to do this. Eliminating the filibuster is a foolish and lazy idea pushed by politicians seeking short-term gain at the expense of causing irreparable long-term harm to our nation. Succeeding in eliminating the filibuster would significantly weaken the minority party, end the need for bipartisan compromise, and allow erratic swings in policy that would transform America for the worse. Those are just the consequences of a best-case outcome.
During the last Congress, all of my Democratic colleagues currently serving supported nuking the filibuster to try to pass their own partisan election reform bill. Democrats were dead wrong to try to change the filibuster when they controlled the Senate, and Republicans would be dead wrong to try to change the filibuster now that we control the Senate.Ā The only real path to address the American peopleās declining confidence in our elections is for both parties to find common ground on legislation that supports universal adoption of voter ID, proof of citizenship, and other vital election integrity measures.
64

















