
ALT What is included? ▶ How measures like caps or other reductions in airport capacity can be introduced under current EU legislation to inform campaigns for such caps. ▶ Potential legal avenues to challenge new airports andairport expansions. ▶ Provides several case studies from the UK to the Netherlands or Belgium. This toolkit focuses on EU law. drawing out the most promising routes and avenues for legal campaigns and challenges under the framework.

ALT Photo of someone kicking a football with black text highlighted in green that says: Football for the people, not the rich! Exposing the World Cup's climate & social injustice. Webinar! July 9th, 11pm PDT, 12 CST, 8pm CEST. Learn about resistance to this mega-event. Beside is a photo from some resistance to the event of someone spraypainting 'the world cup of dispossession' in Spanish.

ALT Blue background with photo of world cup and text: This year's world cup is predicted to be the most polluting yet. That’s saying something given FIFA’s history of being reckless when it comes to the climate (and everything else!) Their decision to host it across North America's three largest countries - Mexico, Canada, and the USA - means air traffic is predicted to generate 7.7 million tonnes of CO2 (before you even factor in non-CO2!) Second slide has text: 87% of the emissions are due to come from air traffic as teams, fans, and the media rely on flights to get to matches Third slide text: Professor Tim Walters predicts that the astronomical emissions from the World Cup could lead to the premature deaths of around 70,000 people. He has described it as the ‘deadliest sporting event in history’ due to its climate impact. That’s before you even take into account the many other issues, whether it’s the dispossession of local communities or the presence of ICE at the tournament.

ALT 5) Steep cuts in long and medium-haul flights: These flights – for business, tourism or freight – should be drastically reduced in favour of more regional travel and supply of goods.

ALT 6) Ban night flights at airports: takeoffs and landings between 10pm and 7am must be stopped immediately, because they represent a completely unacceptable health hazard for residents. Night flights also have a disproportionate climate impact, since the warming effect of contrails is stronger at night.

ALT 8) Shut down regional airports: Small regional airports, swallowing enormous amounts of taxpayer’s money for a small number of flights, should be shut down immediately. In remote areas, where no other transport alternative is available, air traffic should be drastically reduced and progressively replaced by other clean forms of transport.

ALT 9) Ensure a just transition and public ownership: Airports and airlines should guarantee a rapid and just transition and pay reparations for their role in climate breakdown. Remaining parts of the aviation sector should not serve private interests and profit but should instead be transferred to public ownership.

ALT 10) Set binding carbon limits and distribute flights fairly: Establish a strict carbon cap on airports, fully included in national emission budgets (i.e. the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC’s)). Each airport would then be allocated a fair share of the overall, steadily declining, aviation emission budget. Within this limit, the remaining flights must be distributed through democratic processes based on need, to decide what counts as an essential flight and a justifiable flight – e.g. flights for emergencies, life-saving research or for securing refuge.

ALT Green, grainy background with blue text: 'Flying less is suddenly an option when fossil capitalism is at stake! But flying less is the only option because our shared future is at stake. Of course we welcome any recommendation to reduce flights - this is exactly what we need to be doing. By reducing flights now we can have a managed and just transition - we cannot wait for further catastrophes to take the urgent measures we need.' Beside is a screenshot of a headline saying we need to reduce flights.

ALT BIG WIN for Schiphol residents! The Council of State has struck down the Dutch government’s previous decision on Amsterdam Airport Schiphol. The court ruled that aviation policy relied for years on informal, non-democratic agreements instead of the legally required noise limits meant to protect residents. For the first time in years, noise protection for residents must come first.














