Alhamdulillah try to be an Ahmadi.
Joined December 2023
- Tweets9.5K
- Following192
- Followers1.4K
- Likes18.4K
SpreadHaqq retweeted
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as) said the Qur'aan states to stone the adulterer?
Huzoor aa was sent a quote from the Promised Messiah as wherein he states, “There is a clear injunction in the Holy Quran to amputate the hand of a thief and to stone the adulterer”.
Huzoor aa was then asked that while the former was mentioned in the Holy Quran, there was no mention of stoning an adulterer in any of the verses. Huzoor aa was asked for guidance on the matter.
Huzoor aa, in a letter dated 15 October 2018, gave the following reply:
“There are generally two aspects to Islamic punishments: a severe punishment and a comparatively moderate punishment. The main purpose of these punishments is to prevent evil and to serve as an admonition for others.
“Therefore, we see that during the time of the Holy Prophet sa and the Khulafa-e-Rashideen, not all kinds of thieves were punished with amputation of their hands. This punishment was, for example, never applied for the theft of food and drink. However, if a thief, while snatching a woman’s jewellery, injures her hand or ear or causes injury to any part of her body in such a way that she becomes disabled, then such a thief is punished according to the crime. This also includes the punishment of the amputation of the hands.
“Likewise, if adultery or fornication is committed by mutual consent and it is proven by the Islamic method of witnessing, then the concerning parties are sentenced to a hundred lashes. However, in the case of rape, which is of extremely barbaric nature, or if a rapist has committed this heinous act by abusing young children, then the punishment for such a person cannot be merely a hundred floggings. Such an adulterer or rapist can then be given the extreme punishment such as killing and stoning according to the teachings mentioned in Surah al-Maidah [chapter 5], verse 34 and Surah al-Ahzab [chapter 33], verses 61-63 of the Holy Quran. However, the right of meting out this punishment is given to the ruling government of the time. This teaching has merely given them an option in general.
“Therefore, it is in light of these Quranic verses that the Promised Messiah as has also stated that the punishment mentioned in the Holy Quran for such an adulterer or rapist was stoning.”
alhakam.org/what-is-the-phil…
SpreadHaqq retweeted
Question @grok:
Is male disgust for women who have slept with many men (high body count) an instinct based in human biology?
Or is it purely a social construction with no natural basis?
Start with the words "human biology" or "social construction" first.
People are complaining about saudi executing those people byt on what basis does anyone object to the execution?
SpreadHaqq retweeted
Salafis,
What does it mean when 2 people are arguing and I say to them,
"You are BIGGER than this" or
"You are ABOVE this?"
The "salafiyyah" is leaking from their mouths.
Do they speak like this to Atheists or Christians or Jews?
Frightened and hostile, the dogs group together against the lion, for they acknowledge his superiority.
Al kufru millatan waahidah.
SpreadHaqq retweeted
Neither was Ahmadi. Sir Syed held Jesus died a natural death, not raised bodily to heaven; Quranic "tawaffa" means death and "rafa" means rank elevation. He rejected literal miracles as against natural law, so no physical return.
Iqbal rejected the traditional physical return of Jesus and Mahdi as non-Quranic Iranian ideas, writing to abandon such hopes. He later opposed Ahmadi prophethood claims as violating finality.
Other modernists like Abduh also viewed Jesus as having died naturally.
Salafis,
What does it mean when 2 people are arguing and I say to them,
"You are BIGGER than this" or
"You are ABOVE this?"
This is one of the possible results of giving immature people too much unrestricted Internet access and too many "rights".
SubhanAllah!
There is no one after Muhammad Afzal now 🥀
SpreadHaqq retweeted
Have some shame and fear Allah 😂
We believe he is GHULAAM of Ahmad ﷺ. Not that he is literally Muhammad ﷺ. He only has his cloak on.
Even the Kaafir Adnan can be used for this argument in favour of Imam Mahdi Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Al Qadiani (as).
Sanaullah Amritsari was one of the greatest opponents of the Promised Messiah, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (AS).
In the introduction to his book, he proved the truthfulness of the Promised Messiah (AS) according to the Quranic criterion in verse 10:16.
He stated:
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani’s life can be divided into two halves. The first half
before his proclamation of divine messiahship and the second half being after.
These two halves are starkly antithetical to one another. In the first half, he
appears as an adept writer he and was praised by the majority of the scholars of Islam.
The second half was full of criticism, refutations, and very harsh opposition; all from the very same set of scholars.
SubhanAll. Remember same happened with Muhammad SAW (Bukhari 4770).
SpreadHaqq retweeted
Was the Mi'raj Spiritual or Physical?
Did the Prophet Muhammad (sa) ascend to the heavens physically, or was the Mi'raj a spiritual experience?
The Isra and Mi'raj is one of the most significant events in Islamic tradition. According to the mainstream classical understanding, the Prophet Muhammad (sa) experienced the journey physically and spiritually—not merely as a dream or vision. The Qur'an describes the night journey from Masjid al-Haram to Masjid al-Aqsa, while numerous hadith narrations describe his ascent through the heavens and his encounters with the prophets.
The event remains a profound part of Islamic belief, raising important questions about revelation, miracles, and the nature of the unseen.
#MTAi #InsideAhmadiyya #Islam
When we people see it's anti Ahmadis who are being treated in a way they find disrespectful then they tend to have no problem..
He deleted his comment.
Hasbunallāh wa ni'mal wakeel.
@Khalid_SA4 right? Or do you have the misconception of No Salaam to Kuffaar (even though we are true muslims but that's another debate)?