
#BAYC 5927 / 6967 / 7972 #MAYC / 21854 / 23934 / 25944 / 25945 Swinging through the metaverse with @SpaceJane_
Boring Jungle, Metaverse
Joined May 2021
- Tweets4.6K
- Following3.4K
- Followers3.9K
- Likes89.7K
Unfortunately was drained of my favorite Jack Butcher assets (Checks & Opepen) in the exploit last night. It could have been a lot worse, but still not fun to wake up to
I know it’s a long shot, but has anyone been able to recover any of their NFTs that are not in the nfts_are_safu wallet the legend @0xQuit set up?
SpaceTarzan.eth 🍌 retweeted
Very true. Real water appreciator.
@oasishealthapp
SpaceTarzan.eth 🍌 retweeted
$SHX double buy and double confirmation signals…. Full port send lfg
SpaceTarzan.eth 🍌 retweeted
NFA below, just my take on a major opportunity, $NAT:
A high-probability, multi-decade technical structure has emerged on the monthly chart of Nordic American Tankers Ltd. ($NAT), a crude oil shipping name with a history of sharp moves in periods of volatility. The pattern in question—a Bullish Shark—has developed over more than 20 years and is now presenting a potential inflection point.
March 2025 produced a clean reversal candle off established long-term support, followed by an April "checkback" that successfully retested and held the March lows. That type of price action—retest and hold—carries significant technical weight. It not only validates the support zone but also reflects renewed demand at a level previously defended by institutional buyers.
If May and June print higher closes, it would mark two consecutive higher monthly candles off a structural bottom—a classic confirmation signal for multi-month trend shifts. Based on prior pivots, Fibonacci extensions, and historical supply zones, upside targets for this setup range from $3.46 to $10.43.
At current levels (~$2.50), the chart offers a clearly defined stop zone and substantial upside potential. The asymmetric setup, in combination with historical pattern behavior, makes this more than just a technical curiosity—it’s a legitimate accumulation signal for swing and position traders.
The fundamental profile of $NAT reinforces the technical thesis. The company operates a 20-vessel Suezmax fleet and is heavily exposed to spot market fluctuations, making it highly sensitive to swings in crude oil freight rates. That sensitivity works in its favor when volatility and dislocation hit the market—conditions increasingly common in today’s macro backdrop.
-Revenue (2024): $225.1 million
-Net Income: $46.6 million
-Dividend Yield: ~13% (paid consistently for over 110 quarters)
Insider Activity: Bullish—Vice Chairman Alexander Hansson continues to accumulate
Operationally, NAT is disciplined. It avoids overleveraging, maintains vessel flexibility, and prioritizes shareholder returns. The consistent dividend, in a capital-intensive business, reflects both a strong balance sheet and management's confidence in forward cash flows.
There are macro and regulatory headwinds to consider:
-New tariffs on Chinese-built ships could disrupt shipping supply chains and raise maintenance or compliance costs.
-U.S. policies favoring energy independence may temporarily reduce import demand.
-Global crude shipping routes are adjusting, with supply shifting from legacy producers to emerging exporters.
Still, these risks are systemic and not specific to NAT. With its lean operating model and nimble fleet, the company is arguably better positioned than many larger, more rigid competitors to adapt to market shifts.
Several macro themes support a bullish stance on $NAT:
-The U.S. is restructuring its maritime policy and trade alignments, favoring domestically owned vessels and flexible logistics providers.
-Geopolitical tensions in key oil transport zones continue to threaten global shipping reliability, which often drives up spot charter rates.
-Crude supply shifts and tighter tanker supply create favorable conditions for rate spikes.
-The broader market underappreciates the leverage tanker stocks have to both volatility and oil price dislocations.
Investment Outlook:
When rare technical structures align with solid fundamentals and a favorable macro regime, you pay attention. $NAT checks all three boxes.
With a defined base at $2.47–$2.56 and confirmation likely in the coming months, this name offers low risk with compelling upside targets at $3.46, $4.40, $6.36, and $10.43.
My Rating: STRONG BUY
Position sizing should reflect the time horizon—this is a setup that may take months to years to play out, but the early signals are aligning. And you earn a ~13% dividend for holding. I view $NAT as a structurally undervalued equity in a cyclical upturn with technical tailwinds at its back.
NAT isn’t a trade. It’s a thesis.
SpaceTarzan.eth 🍌 retweeted
I still find it crazy that @BorednHungry made it to an Apple iPhone ad AND a Samsung S25 ad 🤯
Apes made it happen while your favorite NFT brands & memecoins could only dream of this
And yes, you’re probably reading this from an iPhone / Samsung phone
Let that fckng sink in 🦍
SpaceTarzan.eth 🍌 retweeted
💵 "Not QE, QE" will commence within the next 14 days
The US Government will soon begin a drawdown of the Treasury General Account (TGA).
This could mean a liquidity injection totaling up to $830bn.
Functionally, this is similar to Quantitative Easing.
Here's what will happen...
🤔 So what's going on?
The US Government hit its self-imposed "debt ceiling" of $36 trillion in late January.
This means the Treasury can no longer take on additional debt until a new debt ceiling agreement is reached (this has historically involved raising or suspending the ceiling).
The Treasury has since been deploying "emergency measures" - a total of roughly $338bn in what are essentially accounting gimmicks and financial maneuvers.
On Friday February 7, the Government had used up more than 60% of these measures, with only $133bn left.
That means, probably this coming week or the week after, the Treasury will be forced into drawing down the TGA to fund spending, until a new debt ceiling agreement is reached.
🤔 So what does a TGA drawdown mean?
The TGA can be thought of as the Government's bank account at the Federal Reserve.
It currently has a sizable balance of $830bn.
This money is currently sat idle at the Fed - so it is "removed from markets".
If the Government begins to draw down the TGA, this is an injection of "new" liquidity into markets.
A TGA drawdown and Quantitative Easing (QE) are functionally similar in that both inject liquidity into the financial system by increasing bank reserves.
While not strictly "QE" - it looks like QE, sounds like QE and smells like QE, which is why it has been dubbed "not QE, QE".
And the impact of debt ceiling-induced TGA drawdowns on financial markets can be similar to QE, on a temporary basis.
In the past, significant TGA drawdowns have generally coincided with asset price appreciation.
The TGA drawdown in 2022/2023 started halfway through a bear market, and was arguably one the main factors in halting that bear market.
🤔 So what's the TGA path?
Analyzing all the components of the TGA, Treasury spending, borrowing and expected tax intakes, my rough estimated path for any potential coming TGA drawdown is below:
Any potential prolonged TGA drawdown will straddle two tax intake periods (April and June), so it will be punctuated by two short-term TGA balance increases (liquidity drains).
The first "portion" will take place between roughly mid-February and early April and I estimate it will total about $600bn in liquidity additions.
The estimated path in the chart above won't be perfect, but it is a guide to what is likely to happen.
It could vary as time passes.
How far along this path we will get depends entirely on how quickly lawmakers come to a new debt ceiling agreement.
What is known as the "X-date", the day that the US Government officially runs out of money, is currently looking like it will probably be some point in August.
This TGA drawdown is practically set in stone, and is essentially non-negotiable if the US Government wants to keep functioning.
If lawmakers follow a similar "debt ceiling discussion path" to previously, they will leave things late and finally come to a new agreement at some point in July/early August.
This will allow for a significant TGA drawdown.
🤔 Other considerations
However, there are a number of nuances and considerations to take into account, and I set these out in a more detailed post quoted below.
If you are interested in this debt ceiling/TGA drawdown dynamic, I would urge you to also read that post.
To determine the total "net" liquidity injection from the Federal Reserve over any potential Treasury General Account drawdown period, all aspects of the Fed's balance sheet should be taken into account (both liquidity adding and liquidity draining).
This total "net" injection will be reflected in the below Net Federal Reserve Liquidity chart.
This chart has already increased by roughly $240bn since January 1 2025.
I will continue posting updates of this chart here on X.
🌊 Is a huge wave of liquidity coming?
The US will officially hit the debt ceiling on Tuesday.
And the Treasury may be forced to drain the Treasury General Account.
This could mean a big liquidity injection into markets - but it's not that simple.
Here's everything I'm thinking about (WARNING - long post)...
🍽️ Let's set the table
The US Government will hit its self-imposed "debt ceiling" of $36 trillion on Tuesday January 21.
This means the Treasury can no longer take on additional debt until a new debt ceiling agreement is reached (this has historically involved raising or suspending the ceiling).
But this doesn't mean imminent default.
The Treasury has "extraordinary measures" that it can use, until lawmakers eventually agree to a new debt ceiling deal.
One of those measures is to dip into the Treasury General Account (TGA) - the Government's bank account at the Federal Reserve.
The TGA balance is currently a sizeable $650bn.
When the Government uses cash from the TGA to fund spending, this is effectively an injection of liquidity into markets.
This is because, when money is sat idle in the TGA at the Fed, it is "removed" from markets.
But when it is spent down, it is released back into markets - an injection of "new" liquidity.
In the past, significant TGA drawdowns have generally coincided with asset price appreciation.
The TGA drawdown in 2022/2023 started halfway through a bear market, and was arguably one the main factors in halting that bear market.
Some people even argue that debt ceiling episodes and TGA drawdowns have an even greater impact on asset prices than Quantitative Easing, because there is also no new net debt issuance for the duration of the debt ceiling talks.
In recent years, debt ceiling episodes have always led to extensive and protracted discussions among lawmakers about what to do next - meaning the TGA has been drained close to zero, before a new deal is finally reached at the last minute.
So, the short and dirty explanation of what might happen in the current situation is:
1. Debt ceiling debates are always protracted
2. Which means Treasury will be forced to draw down the TGA imminently
3. Which means an imminent and significant liquidity injection
But it's not as simple as that.
There are a number of nuances and considerations to be aware of:
1⃣ Will debt ceiling talks be protracted?
The debt ceiling debate has previously been used as a political tool, with lawmakers making a stand on raising or suspending the ceiling, either for ideological reasons, or as a bargaining tactic to get something else that they want.
This typically means disruptive lawmakers will hold out until the last minute, before ultimately agreeing to a new deal.
In recent years, it has been used as a weapon by a Republican Congress against Democratic presidents.
But this time, following the red sweep in November, any potential dispute is likely to be Republican vs Republican.
This could potentially make protracted debt ceiling wrangling less likely than previously.
However, there is a cohort of Republicans that have very strong feelings about the ballooning US debt situation, and it is a topical issue currently - they might want to puff their chests out and grandstand on the topic (before inevitably ultimately agreeing to a new deal).
A super "tin-foil hat theory" is that Republicans may want to purposely drag out debt ceiling negotiations to achieve a full TGA drain in an attempt to start the new administration with a strong stock market.
But I don't really buy that theory.
2⃣ So what in the world does "extraordinary measures" mean?
"Extraordinary measures" are a set of tools, essentially financial maneuvers, available to the Treasury when the debt ceiling has been hit.
One of those tools is draining the TGA, but it is one of many.
It is currently looking likely that the Treasury will attempt to use some other measures, such as suspending investments in certain government accounts, before eventually turning to drawing down the TGA.
In the latest letter penned by outgoing Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, she writes that the Treasury’s extraordinary measures should begin by redeeming a portion of, and suspending full investments in, the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund.
It is also planned to suspend additional investments of amounts credited to the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund.
If the Treasury uses all other extraordinary measures available to it before drawing down the TGA, this might mean any potential TGA drawdown is delayed by between one and two months.
3⃣ Overall liquidity effects may not be so simple
If a TGA drawdown occurs, there will simultaneously be a "negative net issuance" of Treasury bills.
This may incentivize Money Market Funds, starved of new T-bills, to park cash in the Fed's Reverse Repo facility, which is effectively a liquidity drain.
So it might be the case that there could be a sort of "push and pull" dynamic between a TGA drawdown (liquidity injection) and Reverse Repo usage increasing (liquidity drain).
I don't know to what extent increased Reverse Repo usage may blunt the effects of any potential TGA drawdown from a liquidity perspective.
However, if you are following along with the Net Fed Liquidity chart that I often post on X, this push and pull dynamic will be reflected in that chart, showing the total "net" liquidity injection (or drain).
4⃣ If drawn down, the TGA will eventually have to be refilled
The final point is that, should the TGA be drawn down in any meaningful way, it will then need to be refilled once a new agreement is reached.
This has the opposite effect, sucking liquidity out of markets (liquidity drain).
TGA drawdowns are a big liquidity injection - but only temporary.
🔮 Let's look into the crystal ball
Here's a very, very sketchy prediction of what might happen (likely to be wrong):
Let's assume that debt ceiling wrangling among is lawmakers is protracted, despite the Republican vs Republican dynamic.
1⃣ The TGA balance will increase to a high of around $750bn to $800bn by the end of January due to seasonal factors (liquidity drain).
2⃣ A TGA drawdown of up to $800bn will then begin between roughly the middle of February and the middle of March (liquidity injection), after other "extraordinary measures" are exhausted.
3⃣ This TGA drawdown will then be "halted" temporarily by a big tax payment season in April, filling the TGA back up (liquidity drain).
4⃣ Then the drawdown will continue again (liquidity injection) and the TGA balance will continue to dwindle towards zero until some point in the summer, when a new deal will eventually be reached (at the last minute, as usual).
5⃣ During this roughly six month period, Reverse Repo usage might increase (liquidity drain), but not enough to fully mitigate the TGA drain (liquidity injection).
SpaceTarzan.eth 🍌 retweeted
Hey @CryptoGarga @LucaNetz @Zagabond @burnttoast - this is one time when you guys have to get together and address this issue. No one else can. Please, for the sake of people who continue to believe in NFTs - don't let this fiasco happen again.
Yo I’m just gonna say this, thank goodness I’m in the @BoredApeYC
Yo I’m just gonna say this, thank goodness I’m in the @BoredApeYC
SpaceTarzan.eth 🍌 retweeted
mog coded 🫵😹
OS2 open beta is now live:
• A fully reimagined product built entirely from the ground up, for collectors and pros
• NFTs 🤝 tokens, brought together in one place
• Brand new, beautiful ways to explore — beyond just the floor
• 14 chains (welcome @flow_blockchain, ApeChain by @apecoin, @soneium by @Sony BSL, and @berachain) with more on the way
• Native cross-chain purchasing
• 0.5% marketplace fees and 0% swap fees on the platform for launch
• Rewards for all user types
And yes, $SEA is coming.
Try the open beta at opensea.io/os2
SpaceTarzan.eth 🍌 retweeted
(Pop)o(cat)epetl foreshadowing the upcoming $popcat eruption
(Pop)o(cat)epetl foreshadowing the upcoming $popcat eruption
When is @GordonGoner chugging the m2 serum???













































