SpaceđŸȘ, Climate 🌏,Nuclear â˜ąïž , Defense đŸ‡«đŸ‡·đŸ‡ȘđŸ‡ș Born 325 ppm.

Planet 🌍
Joined April 2022
Charles A. retweeted
Pendant ce temps, au Salon de l'Auto
37
52
22
941
488,963
C’est cruel
D’un cĂŽtĂ©, on reste tournĂ© vers le passĂ© en ressuscitant de vieux modĂšles sans rĂ©elle valeur ajoutĂ©e et de l’autre on se lance dans les voitures volantes. Reste Ă  voir comment tout ça va se terminer

11
Charles A. retweeted
đŸ€źNi oubli ni pardon pour ceux qui rĂ©activent de la maniĂšre la plus abjecte les vieux tropes antisĂ©mites. « 90% des mĂ©dias appartiennent Ă  9 milliardaires qui perdent de l’argent avec ces mĂ©dias. Pourquoi ces gens acceptent de perdre de l’argent pour possĂ©der des journaux qui ne leur rapportent rien alors que le reste du temps ils vous couperaient les cheveux pour en faire des Ă©dredons s’ils pouvaient »
229
238
90
936
454,667
Accuser Israël de génocide, c'est nazifier l'Etat juif. C'est, à mes yeux, la revanche d'Hitler.
244
161
33
531
37,034
Charles A. retweeted
“The verb ‘to context fuck’ came into common circulation in 2026, when Green Party MP @carla_denyer was so severely context fucked that a new term had to be invented.”
Replying to @carla_denyer
To Jewish members of the party: The motion proposers made clear in the debate that they have no intention for Jewish members to feel targeted for their beliefs or associations. If anyone does try to use it in this way, I will be there for you with my solidarity and support.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Conference rejected an amendment (684-1026) barring use of the motion to discipline members for Zionist synagogue affiliation. Party spokespeople say Jewish members will not be targeted for attending them. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/
 leftfootforward.org/2026/10/green-

357
1,580
83
16,793
836,233
Charles A. retweeted
80% des Français inquiets du niveau de la dette, mais 60% de ces mĂȘmes Français qui s'apprĂȘtent Ă  voter pour des partis dont le programme va creuser la dette et prĂ©cipiter une crise financiĂšre. Vous suivez?
Il faut absolument lire cet article pour prendre la mesure de ce qui nous attend. Le rĂ©sultat de dĂ©cennies d’inconsĂ©quence politique et d’inculture Ă©conomique. Et cela pourrait mĂȘme aller plus vite que prĂ©vu. Winter is coming.
270
566
29
2,152
54,147
Boah c'est has been d'aller chercher des propos antisémites il y a 15 ans, tu prends n'importe quel LFI tu en trouves qui ont 15 jours.
La campagne prĂ©sidentielle de Marine Le Pen percutĂ©e par des propos antisĂ©mites attribuĂ©s Ă  Jordan Bardella Auteur, selon Mediapart, de ces Ă©crits lorsqu'il Ă©tait jeune militant frontiste, le prĂ©sident du RN dĂ©nonce des « opĂ©rations de barbouzerie » âžĄïž l.leparisien.fr/VPIc
275
532
35
8,834
585,872
Charles A. retweeted
Fuite des cerveaux: les ingénieurs français s'expatrient de plus en plus
295
358
195
1,541
1,195,343
Charles A. retweeted
Claude was like "holy fuck"
Claude has discovered a previously unknown enzyme system hidden in the DNA of bacteriophages. Beside the enzyme’s gene sits a long array of repeating DNA—a structure that looks somewhat similar to CRISPR. We don’t yet understand what this system does, but only a handful of known systems share its features, and all of them are able to cut, copy, and paste DNA. Historically, the discovery of such programmable systems has helped revolutionize medicine. CRISPR, for instance, is now the foundation of genetic medicines. But it will take much more work to learn what this system does, and whether it can be put to similar use. Read more: anthropic.com/news/claude-di

93
590
53
16,625
2,062,967
Charles A. retweeted
🔎 Le rempart de la LutĂšce gauloise retrouvĂ© sous l’HĂŽtel-Dieu AP-HP Ă  Paris Les archĂ©ologues de la Ville de @Paris et de l’Inrap ont mis au jour un mur de prĂšs de 20 m, caractĂ©ristique des fortifications gauloises de la fin de l’ñge du Fer. 👉 inrap.fr/decouverte-archeolo

đŸ€– Made with AI
23
407
27
1,120
51,072
đŸ€š
$10.2 million in Iowa vs $10.9 million in Palo Alto
1
43
Non, rien.
We’re sharing a solution to the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize Problem, one of the deepest problems at the frontier of mathematics. The proof was produced by a group of agents, using an OpenAI next-generation model significantly more capable than GPT-6 Astra. The problem concerns whether the description of smooth three-dimensional fluid motion modeled by the Navier-Stokes equations can break down. It has remained unresolved for roughly 90 years.
18
Ah quand mĂȘme
📊 MathĂ©matiques : les Ă©lĂšves de CM1 en France ont le pire score de l'UE, d'aprĂšs l'enquĂȘte TIMSS sortie fin 2024. 🔮 La sortie du classement PISA, rĂ©alisĂ© sur des Ă©lĂšves de 15 ans, sera publiĂ©e ce mardi par l'OCDE.
11
Si cette personne ne comprend pas le problùme, c’est qu’il fait partie du problùme .
L haĂŻssable politique israĂ©lienne nourrit l haĂŻssable antisĂ©mitisme. Non? Vraiment ?â€ąđŸ€”đŸ€š
1
41
Crypto fasciste, populiste et antisĂ©mite c’est assez bien rĂ©sumĂ© .
This quoted post is unavailable.
36
Charles A. retweeted
From Paris with love Why is France being so nice to the UK? economist.com/britain/2026/0

34
27
17
257
235,429
Les J-16 ont peut-ĂȘtre pas fait le carnage annoncĂ©...
5
8
1
215
14,495
Charles A. retweeted
magic is real; we call it engineerin.
18
297
13
3,213
1,073,487
VoilĂ  voilĂ 
âšĄïž La sĂ©quence qui fait rĂ©agir : MĂ©lenchon et Le Pen, trĂšs complices loin des micros
42
One of my favorite versions
Jolene: When Miley Cyrus Found the Rock in Dolly Parton’s Song The most interesting thing about Miley Cyrus’s 2012 Backyard Sessions performance of “Jolene” isn’t that a young star covered Dolly Parton. It’s the way Miley reveals another side of the song itself. Dolly wrote “Jolene” as a restrained plea. Miley sings it with a sharper kind of helplessness—one that edges closer to rock. Same fear of being replaced. Two voices give it two different temperatures. The official video strips away almost everything that could distract. Miley stands outdoors. Only Jamie Arentzen and Jaco Caraco on guitars. The vocal sits dead center. In Dolly’s version, the pain lives in the smallness of the narrator. She doesn’t confront Jolene. She acknowledges her rival’s beauty and begs her not to take the man she loves. Dolly’s slightly trembling, soft, bright delivery keeps the jealousy from turning into anger. It feels like someone trying to stay composed while knowing she has almost no control over the situation. That lack of certainty is what makes the song hurt more than any accusation would. Miley is different. The rasp in her voice adds weight to every line. The harder attacks make the plea sound closer to held-back anger. She doesn’t turn the narrator into someone aggressive. The feeling is still helplessness—but a helplessness pushed right up against its limit. For me, that’s the strongest part of the cover: Miley doesn’t change the story. She changes the psychology inside the story. Dolly seems to be trying to persuade Jolene. Miley sounds like she’s trying to keep herself from breaking. The Backyard Sessions setting makes the difference clearer. The series was built so Miley could sing songs she loved with a band, without the full machinery of a polished pop performance. In 2012 she was still standing between two worlds: the face of Hannah Montana, and an artist trying to be taken seriously outside the Disney image. “Jolene” becomes a quiet musical statement. Before she needed a new image, Miley already had a voice strong enough to stand on its own. This is even more interesting because Dolly was never a distant influence. She is Miley’s godmother, appeared on Hannah Montana, and the two have shared an artistic relationship for years. But I don’t think the value of this performance rests on the “goddaughter sings godmother’s song” story. If it only relied on that relationship, “Jolene” would be a beautiful family gift—but not necessarily a cover worth returning to. What makes it lasting is that Miley actually has her own reading of the song. Dolly gave “Jolene” its fragility. Miley gave it scratches. And those scratches are what make a 1973 song still feel like it’s happening right in front of you.
35