@SmartDropFarmer
Account based inSpain
About this account
- Account based in
- Spain
- Connected via
- Spain Android App
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
DeFi & Perp DEX researcher | Farming strategies, airdrops & onchain data | Creator of the RISEx Farming Analyzer ↓
Joined February 2024
- Tweets13.2K
- Following435
- Followers3.5K
- Likes15.9K
Pinned Tweet
Variational just created massive FOMO.
And I understand why.
→ TGE confirmed for Q4
→ 32% of supply allocated to the Genesis Airdrop
→ 100% unlocked at TGE
→ Unclaimed allocation gets burned
People are now doing the math on what their points could be worth.
But IMO, the biggest lesson from Variational isn't its tokenomics.
It's timing.
The farmers celebrating today didn't discover Variational after the tokenomics announcement.
They positioned before everyone knew what the points were worth.
And that's exactly why I'm still farming @risextrade and @TxFlow_L1 .
Look at the difference in scale:
Hyperliquid → ~$220B 30D volume
Lighter → ~$50B+
Variational → ~$40B+
RISEx → ~$2.8B
TxFlow → ~$2.25B
Variational is already doing 10x+ the volume of either.
That's not necessarily a weakness.
That's the opportunity I'm looking for.
🔹RISEx:
→ ~$2.8B 30D volume
→ ~$27M OI
→ No token
→ Points already live
→ Only ~5.7K accounts receiving weekly points
→ New incentive mechanics are still being introduced
🔹TxFlow:
→ ~$2.25B 30D volume
→ ~$18M OI
→ No token
→ No live points program yet
→ Early activity confirmed to receive future multipliers
And there's another reason I'm interested in both.
Neither thesis is simply “another Perp DEX launches a token.”
RISEx is being built inside the broader RISE L2 ecosystem.
TxFlow is building its own L1 infrastructure.
Of course, none of this guarantees a Variational-like outcome.
Both teams still need to execute, grow liquidity, attract users and keep shipping.
But that's precisely the trade-off.
When CT is calculating point valuations, OTC markets are pricing allocations and everyone agrees an airdrop could be huge, you're no longer early.
I prefer looking one step before that:
- Real product.
- Real volume.
- No token.
- Much less competition.
Variational is showing everyone today why timing matters.
I'm trying to apply that lesson to where we are before the next tokenomics announcement.
Early doesn't mean guaranteed.
It means the potential upside hasn't been fully competed away yet
WEEK 10 RiseX Points are OUT!
Last week I said I was deliberately increasing my @risextrade farming costs to see if pushing harder was actually worth it.
Here’s the result:
→ $1.74M volume
→ $379.82 fees
→ 328.4 RISE Points
→ $1.16 per point
→ Rank #115
So, did the strategy work?
Yes, but with an important caveat.
My efficient weeks have been closer to ~$0.50/point, so paying $1.16 is clearly worse from a pure farming-efficiency perspective.
I basically paid more to accumulate more points and push higher in the ranking.
But I'm comfortable with that trade-off for now.
My personal bearish valuation scenario is around $5 per RISE Point.
That's not official, and there's obviously no guarantee points will ever be worth that.
At that valuation:
$1.16 acquisition cost → ~$5 hypothetical value.
That's still a R:R I'm willing to take.
Especially while RISEx is still distributing points to fewer than 6,000 accounts.
So for now, I'm going to continue testing this more aggressive approach:
- Higher OI.
- Bonus markets.
- More aggressive execution when it makes sense.
- More points.
But there's a limit.
If my $/point starts climbing enough to compress that margin significantly, I'll switch straight back to efficiency mode.
Because this experiment also confirmed something important:
More points doesn't mean better farming.
328 points looks great on a screenshot.
The $1.16 behind each one is the number I'm actually watching.
This is the side of points farming you rarely see on CT.
Yesterday was the weekly @risextrade snapshot.
Tomorrow we'll get the points.
And you'll probably see plenty of screenshots showing:
$X volume → X points
> But there's another side to farming:
What did those points actually cost?
This week I deliberately pushed my RISEx activity harder:
→ $1.74M volume
→ $1.03M market volume (~59%)
→ $710K limit volume
→ $379.82 in fees
This is probably one of my most expensive weeks farming RISEx.
And it was intentional.
I wanted to test whether being more aggressive, more market volume, more fees and participation in the new Impact Pool , actually translates into enough additional points to justify the cost.
Tomorrow we'll know.
> And there's another reason I'm willing to experiment now:
RISEx is still distributing its weekly points to fewer than 6,000 accounts.
That's the number I keep coming back to.
And this isn't a farming campaign that's about to end.
RISEx officially says Ignite will run no later than Q2 2027, with 200K points distributed every week. Medium
So yes, there's still plenty of time.
But I don't think all those weeks will offer the same R:R.
Right now RISEx is still far behind the biggest Perp DEXs in volume, OI and overall scale.
That's a risk.
But its metrics have been growing while competition for points remains relatively small.
That's the window I'm trying to exploit.
Because look at where a lot of farming capital is currently sitting:
- Variational.
- Lighter.
- Extended.
- Pacifica.
Those campaigns won't last forever.
I don't know where that capital will rotate when they end, and there's no guarantee it comes to RISEx.
But farmers will look for the next opportunities.
And if RISEx keeps growing while its points program remains live, I find it hard to believe we'll still be competing against ~5.7K accounts deep into 2027.
More farmers competing for the same weekly distribution would mean one thing:
points become harder, and potentially more expensive to acquire.
That's why, despite having months ahead, I'm more interested in pushing now than waiting.
Tomorrow we'll get the missing number from this week's experiment:
$379.82 spent → ? points → ? $/point
If spending more materially improves my allocation while keeping $/point attractive, I'll know there's room to push harder.
If not, I'll go back to optimizing execution and reducing fees.
Because points alone don't tell you whether someone farmed well.
The cost of acquiring them does.
And for me, the best time to accumulate isn't necessarily when the campaign is about to end.
It's when the protocol is growing, the campaign still has a long runway, and the crowd hasn't arrived yet.
What you need to know before the $JUMP presale 🟪
The @jumperapp sale opens TODAY at 13:00 UTC on @legiondotcc.
I've been farming Jumper XP organically for a long time. Now we finally know they can actually matter.
Here's everything I'd know before applying ↓
TL;DR
- Price: $0.075
- FDV: $75M
- $2M target / $3M hard cap
- 4% of supply
- 50% at TGE + 50% over 4 months
- TGE: Q4 2026
-Not FCFS
- XP + Top 500 waitlist get priority
- Team & investors: 0% at TGE
I'm applying.
But there are a few things worth understanding first.
1/ You're not investing in another bridge
Jumper is the consumer layer aggregating infrastructure like Across, Stargate, deBridge, CCTP, etc.
And the vision is getting bigger:
Swap → Bridge → Earn → Perps → RWAs
With $40B+ lifetime volume and 100K+ monthly users, there's already a real product and distribution behind the token.
The bet is whether they can monetize it.
2/ How the sale works
Sep 29 13:00 UTC → Oct 2 13:00 UTC.
You don't buy instantly.
You apply for an allocation, and applying ≠ receiving tokens.
This is where XP finally becomes relevant:
Jumper XP + Top 500 waitlist position can give allocation priority.
So after all these months...
we're finally discovering what our XP can actually get us.
3/ Tokenomics
Community: 33.33%
Investors: 26.07%
Treasury: 21.90%
Team: 14.70%
Public sale: 4%
I like that team and investors have 0% unlocked at TGE.
But my biggest question is the opposite side:
How much of that 33.33% Community allocation will be liquid at TGE?
That could completely change the initial float and sell pressure.
4/ Is $75M FDV attractive?
For context:
Across → ~$45M
Axelar → ~$66M
Jumper → $75M
Wormhole → ~$145M
deBridge → ~$210M
LayerZero → ~$1.5B
They're not perfect comparisons — Jumper is an aggregator/front-end, not a bridge.
But $75M puts the valuation into perspective.
It's not obviously dirt cheap, but there's room if Jumper successfully turns its distribution into a broader onchain super-app.
5/ What does Polymarket think?
Prediction markets are currently pricing roughly:
~84% probability that $JUMP's FDV is above $75M one day after TGE
~40–50% probability that it exceeds $200M, around 2.7x the presale valuation
So these percentages represent the market-implied probability of $JUMP reaching those valuations, not expected returns.
One BIG caveat:
The FDV market has less than ~$2K in volume.
So I see this as an interesting sentiment indicator, not reliable price discovery.
6/ My plan
I'll apply.
Then I'll see:
How much allocation do my XP get me?
At $75M FDV, I'm interested enough to participate if the allocation makes sense.
But $JUMP isn't equity, value capture still needs to prove itself, and the Community unlock remains a big unknown.
After months of farming XP and speculating about what Jumper was cooking...
today we finally start getting some answers.
One minute today could put you early for tomorrow's perp opportunity.
@TitanExchange_ just opened its waitlist:
- Less than 1 minute
- Completely free
- No transaction, no gas
- Claim your waitlist position
Referrals move you through the ranks: Bronze → Metal → Gold → Platinum → Diamond
Titan is an upcoming privacy-first perp DEX built on Canton, using a dark-pool CLOB designed to keep trading activity private between counterparties.
The idea is to eventually bring both retail and institutional traders onto the same rails.
If you want to secure a spot, this is my referral:
waitlist.titanx.cc/?ref=4A8C…
And that's basically all I'm doing for now.
No token announced.
No airdrop confirmed.
Trading isn't live yet.
When mainnet arrives, we'll look again:
Is the product good?
Is Canton still gaining traction?
Are there incentives?
Is it actually worth farming?
We'll decide then.
For now, I'm spending one minute to keep that option open.
This is the side of points farming you rarely see on CT.
Yesterday was the weekly @risextrade snapshot.
Tomorrow we'll get the points.
And you'll probably see plenty of screenshots showing:
$X volume → X points
> But there's another side to farming:
What did those points actually cost?
This week I deliberately pushed my RISEx activity harder:
→ $1.74M volume
→ $1.03M market volume (~59%)
→ $710K limit volume
→ $379.82 in fees
This is probably one of my most expensive weeks farming RISEx.
And it was intentional.
I wanted to test whether being more aggressive, more market volume, more fees and participation in the new Impact Pool , actually translates into enough additional points to justify the cost.
Tomorrow we'll know.
> And there's another reason I'm willing to experiment now:
RISEx is still distributing its weekly points to fewer than 6,000 accounts.
That's the number I keep coming back to.
And this isn't a farming campaign that's about to end.
RISEx officially says Ignite will run no later than Q2 2027, with 200K points distributed every week. Medium
So yes, there's still plenty of time.
But I don't think all those weeks will offer the same R:R.
Right now RISEx is still far behind the biggest Perp DEXs in volume, OI and overall scale.
That's a risk.
But its metrics have been growing while competition for points remains relatively small.
That's the window I'm trying to exploit.
Because look at where a lot of farming capital is currently sitting:
- Variational.
- Lighter.
- Extended.
- Pacifica.
Those campaigns won't last forever.
I don't know where that capital will rotate when they end, and there's no guarantee it comes to RISEx.
But farmers will look for the next opportunities.
And if RISEx keeps growing while its points program remains live, I find it hard to believe we'll still be competing against ~5.7K accounts deep into 2027.
More farmers competing for the same weekly distribution would mean one thing:
points become harder, and potentially more expensive to acquire.
That's why, despite having months ahead, I'm more interested in pushing now than waiting.
Tomorrow we'll get the missing number from this week's experiment:
$379.82 spent → ? points → ? $/point
If spending more materially improves my allocation while keeping $/point attractive, I'll know there's room to push harder.
If not, I'll go back to optimizing execution and reducing fees.
Because points alone don't tell you whether someone farmed well.
The cost of acquiring them does.
And for me, the best time to accumulate isn't necessarily when the campaign is about to end.
It's when the protocol is growing, the campaign still has a long runway, and the crowd hasn't arrived yet.
And if you’re still watching RISEx from the sidelines, you can farm through my referral:
+12.5% boost on your points
rise.trade/en/invite/smart
If my thesis is right, I’d rather use that boost while competition is still <6K accounts than after the crowd rotates in.
Well, that escalated quickly.
This morning we found @TxFlow_L1 Points, Coming Soon on testnet.
A few hours later, TxFlow dropped a date:
12 October 2026.
No details yet, but the message is pretty clear:
The pre-points era is entering its final stretch.
I've been farming for months for exactly this window.
Time for one last push before we finally get to put numbers on the points.
app.txflow.com/r/TXSMART
🤖 Made with AI
TxFlow Points are coming.
And this is probably the clearest signal we've had so far.
A new page is already visible on @TxFlow_L1 testnet:
"Points" - Coming Soon.
That's it.
- No official announcement yet.
- No points balances.
- No confirmed launch date.
But Season 1 is now starting to appear in the infrastructure.
My personal estimate?
Testnet → Mainnet could happen within ~1 week.
Actually seeing Season 1 activated and points being distributed could still take 2–3 weeks.
That's purely my estimate, not an official timeline.
But for me, this changes the farming stage we're in.
We've gone from:
“Will TxFlow have points?”
to:
“When will TxFlow Points go live?”
And I think we're entering the final stretch of pre-points farming.
If early activity ends up being rewarded retroactively , still NOT confirmed , this is exactly the window I've been positioning for.
I'm going to keep pushing volume before Season 1 goes live.
Once points become visible, we'll finally be able to analyze:
→ Points earned
→ Points / volume
→ Cost per point
→ Competition
→ Potential point valuations
And then I'll decide whether it makes sense to push harder or slow down.
But right now?
The R/R of these final pre-points weeks still looks very interesting to me.
We're getting close.
Who is farming Txflow preseason??
Official tweet: nitter.cf/TxFlow_L1/status/21045…
This quoted post is unavailable.
WEEKLY CLOSE: CONSTRUCTIVE, NOT EUPHORIC
The market closed the week better than it may look at first glance.
🟠 BITCOIN
BTC closed +4.06% and finished in the upper half of its weekly range.
That matters. The move did not fade into the weekly close. Price held strength through the end of the week.
BTC is also up +8.74% over four weeks, so this is not an isolated green candle.
Binance BTCUSDT volume came in 50.5% above its 20-week median. Higher volume combined with a firm close usually points to real participation, rather than an empty bounce.
🔵 ETHEREUM
ETH closed +1.64%, but underperformed BTC by 2.42 percentage points.
The market preferred Bitcoin this week.
ETH is still green and not showing a breakdown, but it was not leading. This often happens when BTC sets the direction first. If the move continues, rotation into ETH and alts can follow later.
🟢 ALTS
29 of the 38 non-BTC/ETH assets in our tracked basket closed positive.
This is a defined sample, not the whole altcoin market. It means participation was broad inside the group we follow: 29 green, 9 red.
That is healthier than a BTC-only week, though it is not a full risk-on rally across the market.
⚠️ WHAT TO WATCH NEXT WEEK
A weekly BTC close above this week’s high would strengthen the bullish case.
A weekly close below this week’s low would weaken it and suggest this was a bounce rather than continuation.
For now, the picture is constructive: Bitcoin leads, participation is present, and short-term momentum improved. The market has not confirmed a decisive breakout yet.
TxFlow Points are coming.
And this is probably the clearest signal we've had so far.
A new page is already visible on @TxFlow_L1 testnet:
"Points" - Coming Soon.
That's it.
- No official announcement yet.
- No points balances.
- No confirmed launch date.
But Season 1 is now starting to appear in the infrastructure.
My personal estimate?
Testnet → Mainnet could happen within ~1 week.
Actually seeing Season 1 activated and points being distributed could still take 2–3 weeks.
That's purely my estimate, not an official timeline.
But for me, this changes the farming stage we're in.
We've gone from:
“Will TxFlow have points?”
to:
“When will TxFlow Points go live?”
And I think we're entering the final stretch of pre-points farming.
If early activity ends up being rewarded retroactively , still NOT confirmed , this is exactly the window I've been positioning for.
I'm going to keep pushing volume before Season 1 goes live.
Once points become visible, we'll finally be able to analyze:
→ Points earned
→ Points / volume
→ Cost per point
→ Competition
→ Potential point valuations
And then I'll decide whether it makes sense to push harder or slow down.
But right now?
The R/R of these final pre-points weeks still looks very interesting to me.
We're getting close.
Who is farming Txflow preseason??
Join here to get a 5% trading fee discount with my referral
app.txflow.com/r/TXSMART
..
Smart Drop - Adri retweeted
Week 6 - @Lighter_xyz × Robinhood points
Best week so far.
→ 45.5 pts this week
→ $905.7K volume
→ +58% points vs last week
→ Previous week: 28.8 pts
Halfway through the week I started changing my strategy: less focus on generating raw volume and more on maintaining OI, mainly through the SPY / QQQ strategy I explained below.
And the first results look promising.
The important part: this wasn't even a full week running the new strategy.
Next week I'll try to maintain around $50K OI throughout the entire period and keep rotating positions roughly every 24h.
That should give us a much cleaner comparison.
Still too early to draw conclusions, but OI is becoming increasingly interesting to me vs simply chasing volume.
If you want to track your own weekly activity/points, the tool I built is in the quoted tweet below.
Let's see what W7 brings.
Today is POINTS DAY on @Lighter_xyz × Robinhood.
Before the drop, here's what I've been doing and what I'm changing for the next weeks 👇
First, an important reminder:
Points are calculated from Wednesday → Tuesday.
So anything you did yesterday or today DOES NOT count towards today's distribution.
After several weeks tracking my activity, my current thesis is becoming pretty clear:
Volume isn't everything. OI seems to matter much more.
And potentially, the lower the overall OI of the market you're trading, the better.
For organic traders, that could make low-OI markets very interesting.
But I'm farming delta-neutral, so my approach is slightly different.
> My current strategy:
→ LONG SPY on Lighter
→ SHORT QQQ on Lighter
→ Hedge the exposure on RISEx
SPY and QQQ are highly correlated, so keeping both sides inside my Lighter account also helps me avoid having all the directional exposure on one side.
> The biggest change?
I'm increasing the OI I keep open to around **$50K**.
I leave it for ~24h → close → reopen.
This naturally generates volume while keeping OI deployed for a decent amount of time.
I'll still do some additional trades, but I'm no longer trying to optimize purely for volume.
Today's drop will give us the first indication of whether this works.
But I only increased the size halfway through the farming week, so today's points won't show the full effect yet.
Next week should be a much cleaner test.
And if you want to track your own activity, I built a free tool for exactly this:
> Lighter Weekly
→ Weekly volume
→ Markets traded
→ Activity by market
→ Weekly points history
→ Estimated value of your points / potential airdrop
This week's market breakdown still reflects my previous strategy quite heavily.
Over the next few weeks, I expect SPY + QQQ to start taking a much bigger share.
Now let's see what today's drop brings.
Link to the dapp, in the first comment
Crypto Prop Firms are heating up.
And I think this could become one of the most interesting sectors to watch.
Right now, two names stand out to me:
@ProprXYZ vs @Icebergdotcash
- Both are crypto-native.
- Both are built around Hyperliquid.
- Both want to bring prop trading on-chain.
But their approach is completely different.
—————————————
PROPR - PROVE YOURSELF FIRST
The more established approach.
Buy a challenge → Hit the targets → Get funded.
There’s a barrier before accessing the capital, but Propr already has something a new prop firm can’t build overnight:
Track record.
They recently crossed $2M paid to traders.
And right now they’re celebrating it with 20% OFF challenges using code:
2MPAID
—————————————
ICEBERG - GET FUNDED FIRST
The opposite approach.
Pay the access fee → Get funded → Start trading.
No challenge.
No evaluation.
No profit target to unlock funding.
No KYC.
Instead of proving yourself before accessing capital, you prove yourself while already trading the funded account.
The trade-off?
Iceberg is much newer, so it doesn’t have Propr’s operating history or payout track record yet.
—————————————
TWO DIFFERENT BETS
> PROPR
Prove yourself → Get funded
More established.
Challenge-based.
$2M+ already paid to traders.
> ICEBERG
Get funded → Prove yourself
Instant funding.
No evaluation.
Much newer model.
—————————————
And that’s exactly what makes this interesting.
I don’t think the question is simply:
“Which one is better?”
The real question is which model makes more sense for crypto traders:
Earn access to capital first?
or
Access capital immediately and manage the risk from Day 1?
I expect we’ll see many more crypto-native prop firms experimenting with these models.
I’ll be testing the ones that look interesting and, whenever possible, trying to bring better conditions, discounts, giveaways or funded accounts so you can test them too.
Crypto Prop Firms are officially on my watchlist.
If you want to try either of them:
> PROPR
20% OFF all challenges with code:
2MPAID
app.propr.xyz/r/SMARTDROP
> ICEBERG
Instant funding. No challenge. No KYC.
5% OFF through my referral:
iceberg.cash/?ref=SMART
Pick the model that fits you best and, as always, manage your risk.
Week 6 - @Lighter_xyz × Robinhood points
Best week so far.
→ 45.5 pts this week
→ $905.7K volume
→ +58% points vs last week
→ Previous week: 28.8 pts
Halfway through the week I started changing my strategy: less focus on generating raw volume and more on maintaining OI, mainly through the SPY / QQQ strategy I explained below.
And the first results look promising.
The important part: this wasn't even a full week running the new strategy.
Next week I'll try to maintain around $50K OI throughout the entire period and keep rotating positions roughly every 24h.
That should give us a much cleaner comparison.
Still too early to draw conclusions, but OI is becoming increasingly interesting to me vs simply chasing volume.
If you want to track your own weekly activity/points, the tool I built is in the quoted tweet below.
Let's see what W7 brings.
Today is POINTS DAY on @Lighter_xyz × Robinhood.
Before the drop, here's what I've been doing and what I'm changing for the next weeks 👇
First, an important reminder:
Points are calculated from Wednesday → Tuesday.
So anything you did yesterday or today DOES NOT count towards today's distribution.
After several weeks tracking my activity, my current thesis is becoming pretty clear:
Volume isn't everything. OI seems to matter much more.
And potentially, the lower the overall OI of the market you're trading, the better.
For organic traders, that could make low-OI markets very interesting.
But I'm farming delta-neutral, so my approach is slightly different.
> My current strategy:
→ LONG SPY on Lighter
→ SHORT QQQ on Lighter
→ Hedge the exposure on RISEx
SPY and QQQ are highly correlated, so keeping both sides inside my Lighter account also helps me avoid having all the directional exposure on one side.
> The biggest change?
I'm increasing the OI I keep open to around **$50K**.
I leave it for ~24h → close → reopen.
This naturally generates volume while keeping OI deployed for a decent amount of time.
I'll still do some additional trades, but I'm no longer trying to optimize purely for volume.
Today's drop will give us the first indication of whether this works.
But I only increased the size halfway through the farming week, so today's points won't show the full effect yet.
Next week should be a much cleaner test.
And if you want to track your own activity, I built a free tool for exactly this:
> Lighter Weekly
→ Weekly volume
→ Markets traded
→ Activity by market
→ Weekly points history
→ Estimated value of your points / potential airdrop
This week's market breakdown still reflects my previous strategy quite heavily.
Over the next few weeks, I expect SPY + QQQ to start taking a much bigger share.
Now let's see what today's drop brings.
Link to the dapp, in the first comment
Today is POINTS DAY on @Lighter_xyz × Robinhood.
Before the drop, here's what I've been doing and what I'm changing for the next weeks 👇
First, an important reminder:
Points are calculated from Wednesday → Tuesday.
So anything you did yesterday or today DOES NOT count towards today's distribution.
After several weeks tracking my activity, my current thesis is becoming pretty clear:
Volume isn't everything. OI seems to matter much more.
And potentially, the lower the overall OI of the market you're trading, the better.
For organic traders, that could make low-OI markets very interesting.
But I'm farming delta-neutral, so my approach is slightly different.
> My current strategy:
→ LONG SPY on Lighter
→ SHORT QQQ on Lighter
→ Hedge the exposure on RISEx
SPY and QQQ are highly correlated, so keeping both sides inside my Lighter account also helps me avoid having all the directional exposure on one side.
> The biggest change?
I'm increasing the OI I keep open to around **$50K**.
I leave it for ~24h → close → reopen.
This naturally generates volume while keeping OI deployed for a decent amount of time.
I'll still do some additional trades, but I'm no longer trying to optimize purely for volume.
Today's drop will give us the first indication of whether this works.
But I only increased the size halfway through the farming week, so today's points won't show the full effect yet.
Next week should be a much cleaner test.
And if you want to track your own activity, I built a free tool for exactly this:
> Lighter Weekly
→ Weekly volume
→ Markets traded
→ Activity by market
→ Weekly points history
→ Estimated value of your points / potential airdrop
This week's market breakdown still reflects my previous strategy quite heavily.
Over the next few weeks, I expect SPY + QQQ to start taking a much bigger share.
Now let's see what today's drop brings.
Link to the dapp, in the first comment
RisePunks Update after SOLD OUT
Secondary trading opens today at 14:00 UTC / 16:00 Spain time.
I’m not pretending to know what the floor will do. I’ll be watching, learning and sharing my moves as it happens.
Marketplace link in the first reply.
@RisePunks are the genesis collection around @risextrade and @risechain .
For me, the real question is whether the RiseX protocol finds strong adoption and whether Rise Chain keeps growing.
If both do, this collection could become far more interesting over time.
> My plan is mainly to hold.
I want to keep a core position and stay exposed to the ecosystem.
If the price runs hard, I may sell some to take some risk off the table, but I don’t want to exit the whole position too early.
Everyone’s situation is different. Have a strategy that fits the number you hold and the risk you’re comfortable
🤖 Made with AI
RISEPUNKS SOLD OUT.
The start was slower than I expected during GTD and WL.
But once the public phase opened, everything changed.
The remaining supply disappeared and @RisePunks officially sold out.
Honestly, congrats to the RISEPUNKS and @stage0_ teams.
We've been following this collection since very early, when the Discord had barely a few hundred people and everyone was fighting to get Infected.
Today it became the first NFT collection on RISE and sold out its entire public supply.
Now the fun part begins:
Let's see what happens after the mint.
More than Punks. 🦠
RISEPUNKS SOLD OUT.
The start was slower than I expected during GTD and WL.
But once the public phase opened, everything changed.
The remaining supply disappeared and @RisePunks officially sold out.
Honestly, congrats to the RISEPUNKS and @stage0_ teams.
We've been following this collection since very early, when the Discord had barely a few hundred people and everyone was fighting to get Infected.
Today it became the first NFT collection on RISE and sold out its entire public supply.
Now the fun part begins:
Let's see what happens after the mint.
More than Punks. 🦠
RISEPUNKS MINT DAY.
If you've been following the RISE ecosystem with me, today is the day.
@RisePunks is a 2,000-piece genesis collection built alongside RISE and hosted by @stage0_ .
Here's the simple when, where & how:
MINT - September 24
→ GTD: 12:00–12:45 UTC — Ξ0.008
→ WL: 12:45–13:45 UTC — Ξ0.009
→ Public: 13:45–19:45 UTC — Ξ0.01
Important detail about GTD:
GTD only guarantees 2 RISEPUNKS, despite the overall wallet cap being 4.
That means GTD wallets can't simply take 4 each during their guaranteed window.
So depending on GTD participation, a meaningful part of the 2,000 supply could still reach WL.
Max: 4 per wallet overall.
Before minting:
→ Check whether you're GTD/WL:
risepunks.wtf
→ Bridge ETH to RISE using the official RISE Portal:
portal.risechain.com/bridge
→ Switch your wallet to RISE Mainnet
→ Mint through Stage0:
stage0.xyz/presales/
Use the same wallet that's on the InfectedList and make sure you have enough ETH on RISE for mint + gas.
I've been following RISEPUNKS since very early on.
Today we finally see how much demand there actually is.
GTD → WL → Public.
Good luck, infected. 🦠
Want to position early? You can start farming both here:
RISEx → +12.5% points boost
rise.trade/en/invite/smart
TxFlow → 5% fee discount with code TXSMART
app.txflow.com/r/TXSMART
Farm early. Protect your capital. Optimize your $/point