Exploring the physics of quantum matter in Cologne. Also at @SimonTrebst.bsky.social

Cologne, Germany
Joined February 2014
🎬…and cut. We are done recording lectures for my “Computational Many-Body Physics” course. Tune in if you want to break the exponential complexity of many-body systems with polynomial algorithms: Monte Carlo sampling, tensor networks & machine learning vimeo.com/showcase/8290960
3
31
1
154
Simon Trebst retweeted
📢Join our vibrant international research environment to develop new #QuantumComputing and networking architectures! We offer 2-year #fellowships for excellent #postdocs. Visit our website for more details: ml4q.de/ml4q-fellowships/ Don't miss the application deadline on March 12!
1
2
3
6,566
This is how the operation of a transmon gate looks like near the quantum speed limit — the dynamics turn chaotic and the system transitions out of the computational subspace. But does this mean that the gates are no longer operational? Find out here: arxiv.org/abs/2311.14592 – at Cologne, Germany
2
25
2,555
In quantum error correction, stabilizer codes using a set of *commuting* measurements (such as the toric code or surface code) have been the go-to solution for topological quantum memories — despite the need for multi-qubit measurements. 1/7 – at Berlin, Germany
2
22
2
152
20,264
So what’s inbetween the two peaks? A Majorana metal in which the entanglement negativity shows an L ln L scaling. Think of a long-range resonating valence bond state of the emergent Majoranas. Preprint: arxiv.org/abs/2311.08450 6/7 – at Berlin, Germany
1
17
2,023
Thanks to @GuoyiZhu for a fantastic collaboration pushing the limits of the Floquet code and exploring the physics beyond thresholds. – at Berlin, Germany
1
10
822
The Nishimori transition is a staple of stat mech — one of few exact results for the random-bond Ising model famous for its spin glass phase. Moving directly through the transition, however, is an exceedingly fine-tuned manoeuvre balancing thermal fluctuations and disorder. 1/3 – at Cologne, Germany
1
26
2
191
22,155
In contrast, Nishimori physics turns out to be a natural phenomenon in the *quantum* realm, guaranteed by no less than Born’s rule. This is how we could tune an actual 127 qubit device through this transition on the IBM quantum platform. arxiv.org/abs/2309.02863 2/3 – at Cologne, Germany
1
1
16
1,628
We also connect to seminal work by Dennis, Kitaev, Landahl, & @preskill on error thresholds & decoding — they established resilience against incoherent noise, while we discuss stability against coherent errors. Both limits are connected via a line of Nishimori transitions. 3/3 – at Cologne, Germany
1
14
1,523
Current-day quantum processors with 50-100 qubits already operate outside the range of what one can efficiently simulate on classical, silicon-based computers. So how do you design future generations of these processors that have even more qubits? 1/2
1
3
43
7,028
Turn your quantum processor into its classical regime — coupled, non-linear oscillators which might hover dangerously close to destabilizing chaotic resonances — and simulate its many-body physics. But does this really work? Find out here: arxiv.org/abs/2304.14435 2/2
9
987
A new class of *monitored* quantum circuits allows for unprecedented dynamical control of many-body entanglement. But how do you shape entanglement at will? Turns out this still needs a lot of back-and-forth on one of the most traditional devices — the blackboard. 1/3
1
9
2
63
9,074
Notably, one can create long-range, many-qubit entanglement bypassing any unitary evolution and using measurements only. We devise such a measurement-only circuit that gives rise to a *structured* volume-law entangled phase — a state of matter with no thermal counterpart. 2/3
1
3
17
1,312
Thanks @GuoyiZhu and @nat_tanti for plowing through this project over the past few weeks. Looking forward to shaping even more bizarre, non-equilibrium entangled states of matter. arxiv.org/abs/2303.17627 3/3
3
17
1,440
Anyone interested in the power of classical versus quantum computing, should take time reading @MStoudenmire’s take on Grover’s algorithm today. Inspiring work!
In "Grover's Algorithm Offers No Quantum Advantage" we argue there is no a priori quantum speedup of Grover's algorithm over classical algorithms since a problem solvable by Grover's is structured: there must always be the structure of a quantum circuit. arxiv.org/abs/2303.11317
1
9
2,528