Turning curiosity into content || Building for the future of the internet
Web3
Joined July 2024
- Tweets47.2K
- Following982
- Followers1.9K
- Likes44.1K
SIMI retweeted
mbappé vs yamal. camp nou. tonight.
barca beat madrid 3-2 in the supercopa final in january. they won 2-0 in may to clinch the title.
madrid has not forgotten either one
mourinho is back on the madrid bench
he knows this fixture better than anyone, he has had years to think about how to beat this barca side
yamal and pedri run the show for the home side, madrid answers with mbappé, bellingham and vinícius.
i'm backing madrid, mbappé is the best finisher on the pitch.
barca is the favorite, so the odds pay more on madrid. that is why i like it.
build your parlay on dope.xyz. win any parlay and you qualify for the $25,000 weekly cash prize. best odds on every champions league and premier league game too.
who is your bet on?
🤝 Paid partnership
Yamal vs Mbappé. Who wins El Clásico?
Win any parlay at dope.xyz and qualify for the $25,000 Weekly Cash Prize!
SIMI retweeted
there’s a DEX running on Minima Core right now, built by a community developer
and i think it’s worth understanding why that matters
so while going through @Minima_Global community updates, i came across something that deserves more attention
eurobuddha has built a DEX on Minima Core, and it’s live at eurobuddha.com
but the interesting part isn’t just that someone built an exchange
it’s the infrastructure underneath it
most blockchains rely on validators running hardware and infrastructure to keep the network operating
depending on the network, that can come with significant costs
Minima takes a different approach
it’s designed to run across everyday devices, including phones and low powered hardware, rather than relying on a small number of powerful servers
now think about what that means for applications built on top of it
a DEX running on Minima Core can operate within an ecosystem designed around accessible, lightweight infrastructure.
the exchange lets users swap tokens, and there’s also a liquidity pool for providing assets that facilitate trades
these are things you can explore, not just features on a roadmap
and that’s the part i find interesting
Minima Core is available to install, and community developers are already using it to build applications that people can interact with
i wouldn’t pretend this DEX is competing with established exchanges on liquidity, trading volume or user experience
those are things that need to be evaluated independently, and community built applications on emerging infrastructure still have a lot to prove
but you don’t have to wait for a massive ecosystem to see whether developers can actually build on a network
sometimes, the first meaningful signal is seeing someone build something useful with the infrastructure that’s already available
that’s what makes this worth checking out
if you’re curious, the DEX and other community-built apps are available at eurobuddha.com
SIMI retweeted
gm chat.
Launchpads usually ask you to buy first and hope second.
@RebateLaunch is flipping the order on Robinhood Chain:
» You see the bonus tokens before you confirm the buy
» Holders get automatic USDG payouts, with no staking and no claim buttons
» Supply is fixed, and launch fees go to buying and burning $REBATE
The payouts are funded by real platform activity, not new emissions. That makes volume the thing to watch, because rewards depend on people actually using the launchpad.
Still pre-launch. I'm following for the contract, the exact rates and the launch date.
DYOR.
🤝 Paid partnership
SIMI retweeted
A launchpad that rewards you for buying and for holding.
That's the pitch behind @RebateLaunch, and it's coming to Robinhood Chain.
Here's how it's meant to work:
> Bonus on every buy. When you buy a token, extra bonus tokens are added in the same transaction, and the rate is shown before you confirm. Nothing to claim afterward.
> Automatic USDG payouts. Holders are said to be paid in USDG several times a day, with no staking, no lockups and no claim buttons.
> Fixed supply. No minting. The bonuses and payouts are meant to be funded by real platform activity instead of printing new tokens, and launch fees go toward buying back and burning $REBATE.
> Why Robinhood Chain. It's an Arbitrum Orbit L2 built around tokenized assets, with ETH for gas and USDG as a major stablecoin, which suits a product that pays out in dollars.
> Where things stand: it's pre-launch. The contract address, exact bonus rates, launch date and full docs haven't been published.
Payouts depend on platform volume, so they aren't guaranteed.
Follow @RebateLaunch for updates.
Rebate Pad (@RebateLaunch): a launchpad that pays you to buy and hold
Most launchpads put buyers on the back foot from the first transaction, with fees, slippage and early sellers. Rebate Pad, coming to Robinhood Chain, is built around the opposite idea: "Nobody starts from zero."
Buy bonus. Every purchase is meant to include extra bonus tokens in the same transaction, with the rate shown before you confirm. Community posts mention about 3%, and the teaser video shows selectable options like +5% and +7%.
Hold rewards. Holders are said to receive automatic USDG payouts several times a day, with no staking, no claim buttons and no manual steps.
Tokenomics. Supply is fixed with no minting. Bonuses and payouts are said to be funded by real platform activity rather than endless emissions, and launch fees go toward buying back and burning $REBATE.
The chain. Robinhood Chain is an Arbitrum Orbit L2 focused on tokenized assets, using ETH for gas, with USDG as a major stablecoin.
What to keep in mind. It's pre-launch. The contract address, exact rates, launch date and full documentation aren't published yet, and payouts depend on platform volume, so nothing here is guaranteed. Before putting any money in, I'll check the contract, the holder distribution and whether there's an audit. Do your own research.
Follow @RebateLaunch for updates.
SIMI retweeted
Every memecoin launchpad has the same flaw, and almost nobody talks about it: your wallet is the creator, in public.
When you launch on a normal launchpad, the creator address is visible to everyone. That causes real problems:
» Sniping: bots watch for your launch and buy before regular people can
» Tracking: anyone can follow every other wallet and coin tied to you
» Reputation baggage: one old flop follows all your future launches
» Copying: your strategy is visible and easy to clone
@burrowpad is a launchpad on Robinhood Chain built around fixing this. It calls itself the first "dark web" launchpad on the chain.
In plain terms:
» Ghost launches: you pay a one-time deposit from any wallet, even a brand-new one.
Burrowpad creates the coin through Pons, the chain's main memecoin launchpad. On-chain, the listed creator is burrowpad, not you.
» Tor routing: every launch goes through Tor, whichever way you access the site.
No free coins: nobody gets early or free tokens, including the launcher.
Fees that burn: half of the fees on every trade buy $BURROW and send it to the dead address.
Early project, so DYOR. Breakdown below.
A thread 🪡
🤝 Paid partnership
SIMI retweeted
some web3 projects think posting updates is the same as creating good content.
it’s not.
you can post about new features, partnerships and launches every day and still struggle to get people interested.
the difference is making people understand why any of it matters.
because people need a reason to connect with your message
not just another update about your product.
that’s how you get people interested in what you’re building
web3 projects have bad socials and don’t even realize it.
here’s an example :
bad socials :
“exciting things coming soon. stay tuned 🚀”
you’re telling people nothing and giving them no reason to care.
good socials :
“everyone’s waiting for the next big narrative. the smart ones are already positioning.”
now there’s a story people can relate to, discuss, and quote.
the strategy?
make people feel like they understand something others don’t.
the difference isn’t posting more. it’s having one clear narrative and making your content support it.
most projects miss this.
SIMI retweeted
𝗖𝗮𝘀𝗵 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗲.
Nobody could see your bank balance by walking past you on the street. Nobody could track every payment you made just by watching a public ledger. Privacy wasn't a feature of money. It was the default.
Blockchains changed that default for the first time in history. Suddenly every balance, every transfer, every holding became permanently visible to anyone who wanted to look.
Crypto called this progress. Institutions called it disqualifying.
Nobody builds a trillion-dollar financial system by removing the one property money has always had. Public blockchains didn't improve on cash. They quietly broke something that worked for centuries, and called it transparency.
@primus_labs isn't adding a new feature to crypto. It's restoring the default that got lost when finance went onchain, privacy as the baseline, with verification available only where it's actually needed.
This isn't crypto catching up to institutions. It's crypto catching up to money itself.
s.kaito.ai/wymcao5
🤝 Paid partnership
Transparency is treated like a virtue in crypto. For institutions, it's a liability
Every "fully onchain" pitch assumes visibility is always good. Nobody asks what it costs the people actually expected to use it.
A treasury that reveals every payment in real time isn't being transparent. It's handing its playbook to anyone willing to look.
A fund that shows its full position isn't building trust. It's inviting front-running before the trade even settles.
This is why institutions never showed up in the numbers crypto expected. Not slow adoption. Not missing education. A product built for an audience that was never going to use it this way.
@primus_labs starts from a different assumption: visibility isn't the goal, trust is. Confidentiality where it protects the user, verification where it protects everyone else.
Institutions were never waiting for more transparency. They were waiting for someone to ask what they actually needed.
SIMI retweeted
every creator who has done campaigns knows this feeling
you post for 2 weeks
you watch the leaderboard
you sit at rank 7 and feel good
then the terms change and rank 7 is now rank 31
nobody explains why
this is the part of @0xhazels i keep coming back to
after reading their docs, what stood out wasn't the NFTs or the AI
it was the boring part
a campaign brief is supposed to publish the objective, the audience, the submission window, how work is scored, the number of winners and the reward tiers before anyone commits time
if something changes, there should be a visible amendment record
a reward pool can't quietly shrink behind a recalculated leaderboard
then this line:
a provisional rank is not a settled entitlement
submissions close
integrity flags get reviewed
appeals can be raised
the final winner record gets versioned
only then does the leaderboard mean anything
tl;dr: hazels is trying to make a campaign feel like a contract and not a vibe
to be fair, Pulse and Drops aren't open on Studio yet
so this is the stated model, not a track record
the proof is the first settlement
what's the worst thing a campaign did to you after you had already posted?
SIMI retweeted
Who's Active?
A leaderboard that ranks traders by profit alone will always leave out part of the story.
Someone turning $500 into $1,000 has doubled their capital. Someone making $10,000 from a $100,000 account has earned more in absolute terms, but the two results tell very different stories about performance.
That's why trader evaluation needs more context than a single number. Capital size, consistency, risk management and actual trading behavior all matter when assessing someone's ability.
This is where @zerufinance has an interesting role to play. By turning onchain activity into a more useful trader profile, ZeruAI can help make wallet history relevant beyond individual transactions. Zaps adds another layer by connecting trading activity to rankings, campaigns and onchain reputation.
The goal shouldn't be to reward whoever can produce the biggest number. It should be to build a clearer picture of the trader behind it.
Your wallet already contains a trading history. Connect it to Zaps and start building your onchain track record.
app.zaps.wtf/?invite=CP464fD…
some web3 projects think posting updates is the same as creating good content.
it’s not.
you can post about new features, partnerships and launches every day and still struggle to get people interested.
the difference is making people understand why any of it matters.
because people need a reason to connect with your message
not just another update about your product.
that’s how you get people interested in what you’re building
web3 projects have bad socials and don’t even realize it.
here’s an example :
bad socials :
“exciting things coming soon. stay tuned 🚀”
you’re telling people nothing and giving them no reason to care.
good socials :
“everyone’s waiting for the next big narrative. the smart ones are already positioning.”
now there’s a story people can relate to, discuss, and quote.
the strategy?
make people feel like they understand something others don’t.
the difference isn’t posting more. it’s having one clear narrative and making your content support it.
most projects miss this.
SIMI retweeted
moving money shouldn’t be this stressful
i made a little video showing how Spenda 2.0 makes switching between naira and crypto easier
here’s my entry for the @MySpenda ₦15M contest, hope you enjoy it
#MySpenda
₦15,000,000 up for grabs! 💰
For 150 creators across X, Instagram, and TikTok (50 winners per platform).
To win:
- Make a video talking about your favorite Spenda 2.0 feature(s)
- Post on X, Instagram, or TikTok
- Tag and follow @myspenda ( @ spenda_app on IG) and use the hashtag #MySpenda
P.S: Your video could be funny, educational, creative, a day-in-the-life, a feature demo, a skit, a hot take — anything goes!
Submission ends: 20th October
SIMI retweeted
Imagine taking a perfect 3D capture of a bridge today
Great
Now you know what it looks like today
The more useful question starts tomorrow
What changed?
This is why repeated observation is more interesting to me than one-time mapping for critical infrastructure
@vangrid_io includes critical infrastructure among the areas where spatial data can become useful
And the deeper value may come from capturing the same location across time
Capture the location
Establish its provenance
Return later and capture it again
Now the dataset contains something more valuable than geometry
It contains change
- A barrier disappeared
- Vegetation increased
- Construction material appeared
- Access changed
- A surface looks different
- Something that should be there is missing
Not every difference means something serious
And smartphone captures do not replace professional engineering inspections or specialised sensors
But repeated spatial observations can become another layer of situational awareness
The network does not have to replace engineers
It can help answer
“Where should somebody look more closely?”
That is where ground truth becomes more operational
The value is no longer simply having a digital representation of an asset
It is understanding when reality starts moving away from the version of that asset already stored in your system
SIMI retweeted
if you're new to writing about web3, read the project's docs before you read what influencers are saying about it
ngl, half of what you see on the timeline is people repeating each other
a proper research will tell you what the project actually does, and that alone puts you ahead of a lot of people
SIMI retweeted
Good morning CT
happy taco Tuesday
A robot can spend millions of simulated steps learning inside a perfectly controlled environment
Then reality gives it something nobody planned for
A wet floor
A moved chair
An unexpected box
A different doorway
A human standing exactly where they should not be
That sim-to-real gap is one of the hardest problems in embodied AI
Because the physical world refuses to stay identical to the environment a model trained inside
This is where I think @vangrid_io becomes interesting
A world model can know what a warehouse could look like
But a machine operating today may need evidence of what this specific warehouse looks like now
Fresh physical observations can become the bridge between simulation and reality
Capture the real environment
Reconstruct it
Use that environment inside training or evaluation
Then capture it again when things change
Now the digital environment can evolve with the physical one
That creates a useful feedback loop
Simulation provides scale
Reality provides correction
Failures expose missing environments
New captures bring those environments back into training
Physical AI may not have a one-time data collection stage
It may require continuous reality refresh
And the more capable autonomous systems become, the more valuable that connection between simulation and fresh ground truth could become
SIMI retweeted
this space will now be hosted today by 7:30pm instead
brought to you by @meetyoshai , @Lordvibez and myself.
and mind you, this is just episode 1👀
we’ll be reviewing web3 products, discussing memecoin trends, launchpad tech, creator fees
and exploring opportunities across the space.
there’s a lot you’d miss if you come late
set your reminders here👇
xitter.cf/i/spaces/1wGWjlL…
SIMI retweeted
collab officially opens for @ChibiRealm
kindly apply below 👇🏽
We’re opening the doors to chibi realm collaborations.
We’re looking to connect with communities that share our vision and want to grow alongside us.
Whether it’s a whitelist exchange, community event, or something more creative, we’re open to exploring ideas that bring value to both sides.
Interested in collaborating with chibi realm? fill out our interest form below.
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F…
Let’s build something worth being part of. 🤝
Applications will be reviewed by our collab managers @0xAmiii_ and @ooreoluwaa_
