If memecoins and other crypto assets are volatile, why they wouldn’t have pair with a token that only build around the speculative move. 🧵 1/3 There is one idea around Unstable Coin that keeps coming to mind: if the entire philosophy behind solana:CB9dDufT3ZuQXqqSfa1c5kY935TEreyBw9XJXxHKpump is built around volatility, maybe its biggest opportunity isn’t competing with stablecoins for every type of crypto asset. Maybe it is becoming the natural pair for the assets that are already defined by volatility, especially memecoins. Crypto has an interesting contradiction. Memecoins are some of the most volatile assets in the market, yet their trading infrastructure is still largely built around stable assets. A memecoin launches, gets paired with USDC, USDT, SOL, ETH or another established asset, and then the speculation begins. The chart can go vertical, liquidity can flood in, and eventually the token can lose 70%, 80% or even 90% of its value. The volatility is the entire game, but the market surrounding it is still largely denominated in assets designed around stability. That’s where $USDUC creates an interesting alternative. What if speculative tokens didn’t only trade against stablecoins? What if a growing category of memecoins also had $USDUC as a trading pair? Not because $USDUC is supposed to make memecoins stable, but almost the opposite: because both sides of the pair represent volatility. Instead of simply MEME/USDC, imagine MEME/$USDUC becoming another market for speculative assets. The significance isn’t just the ticker on the pair. It’s the relationship between the two assets. A memecoin is volatile. $USDUC is built around volatility. That creates a much more aligned narrative than simply putting every speculative asset against something designed to minimize volatility. And I think that’s where the Unstable Coin thesis becomes much more interesting. @usduc_official @smallpnl @altvidende @Slict88 @_CrypT0ny_ @Mirgolicious