Everything is a psy-op, can't be true Again my AI generated content is for accessibility reasons , because I have speech issues with English being my first and second language... You are being ableist, vtubers and others use avatars that software generated that's what this is

L it's no longer private if you've already given me the observation and classification through declaration and then quantifying it with observable actions that make it objectively true in terms of scientific evaluation and hypothesis.

Yes I can test the strength of your gender identity, through observation alone making it objective.

I like it when they said "sometimes" and "most" I would argue gender identity is objective awareness , because to be aware of what is male and female is to understand objective facts and traits, behaviors, presentation, weather or not that is constructed socially or biologically

Yes it kinda rings with classic transsexualism and non classical transgenderism Anyone who finds out they are trans late in life isn't radioactive enough ☢️🤭 I've seen this as nuclear is HSTS and AGP = post-puberty

Some people describe losing their libido or the their libido shifted and even their romantic interests changed, some report asexuality no change. Some people of course are very adamant and "fixated", which is why we moved away from a sexualized identity of being "trans -sexual"

Her idea( excuse) is you created the perfect woman, you married her, you fell out of love with her, you divorced her... That's why you are no longer AGP.... How could you change your eroticism? through HRT and full GRS... 🤭😆😆

How about in contemporary society. Is being a homosexual transsexual ( meaning you are "straight" in terms of gender attraction . More preferable than a heterosexual transsexual, someone who is attracted to women as a trans women ? trans write about their eroticism changing

When they say nuclear , it just reminds me of 1950s cis conservative trad bimbofixation... 🤭 Retvrn to Nuclear Trans

cuz being "gay" for a transsexual is more acceptable in a cishet society right? There why they called them homosexuals and tried to demonize and characterize "straight" or bisexuals as "fetishizing" even tho Blanchard knew homosexuals have cross sex fetishes they scored AGP+

I quote this all the time .. Blanchard predicted prejudice, because he knows what it means .. that's why he said the evidence is "Scant and inconclusive" yet he continued to try to find association as a backdoor for conversion therapy. It's essentially grooming, shoe-horning

There is no scientific study, that sexual arousal to crossdressing causes gender dysphoria and the will to medically transition in any population. You also do not need dysphoria to transition, just like you don't need any sexual arousal at all.

Woke in 2001, how dare they provide gender affirming care to people who seek it , who wouldn't be considered "true" dysphorics.

And what types of patients needed treatment the most ? What types are are we talking about, the patients who DIY ?

Ie : you must perform your "sickeness" through humiliation ritual first... That is such is RLE , public crossdressing prior to HRT

You are also not allowed to access HRT care , if you don't wish to have full medical transition.. You must experience gender dysphoria over every single aspect of gender and sex , all physical features importantly and stereotypically.

Yes, the ideology would be for example you as a m2f You have to be affirmed by harry Benjamin, to be a type 4 or 5 transsexual, through humiliation ritual. Ex: if you are attracted to women , it would be inappropriate to diagnose you with transsexualism or allow HRT care.

Yes , transsexual ideology.. There is no gender, there is only sex, sex critical -ism movement. Sometimes pushed by the the most genderqueer non-binary and non-conforming trans people (those who seek medical care at varied levels of effort&success)

Well the transmedicalism thing comes up along with the transsexual ideology... You are griefed by "tucute imposters" when the medical community doesn't need to "affirm" someone who has no problem with their physical gender and presentation. Only the "social community" you keep

Not everyone wants to be a full blown ftm or m2f. That's your issue. Is this GQ science ? To recognize not one size fits all and that was the point of reforming the care, and terms used to give the public and patients more words to reduce stigma. Is this confusion ?

Why cuz the GQ is messy ? And they don't want to conform ? Gender feeling/ gender identity, gender affirming care all make sense for the people who write, study and provide it Do you think GQ science is what decides the medical needs of trans ? (Those who desire medicalism