The @Tesla Roadster demo has illustrated yet again that a lot of people online seem to have forgotten how to be impressed by something that is, objectively, fucking cool.
Telling someone in the 1800s that micro-explosions would replace the horse and that we’d teach rocks to think would’ve sounded insane too but that’s how we got cars and computers.
If your horizon is only two days long, then yes, this is just a cool party trick.
It’s a flying car. It’s fine to say it’s cool af and will probably lead to more cool shit for humans and society.
I believe most people underestimate technology like this because they have non-creative minds. @Tesla doesn’t seem like real life at first because…
First-order thinking: "We don't need rockets on a car."
Second-order thinking: boost out of a crash before it happens. Multi-level highways without building onramps, boost to lvl 2/3/4. Park outside your window in an apartment block. Literally even just rocket jet some loser trying kidnap your family members. So many use cases it's insane.
We live in the greatest timeline to experience tech like this.
What's the first thing you'd use it for?
While everyone is freaking and getting into “bunker mode” with their crypto over the possibility that ECDSA gets cracked in the next few months with ai, we must remember that legacy systems and fiat aren’t safe either.
Some dude just vibe hacked South Korea’s biggest banks with not even the best models.
I believe we’ll see all of our systems break in the coming months and years and we’ll need radical architecture and system redesign.
We’ve entered an era of cat and mouse and it’s only going to get faster, crazier and more interesting.
What breaks first is anyone’s guess unfortunately.
Last week some of South Korea's biggest banks were hit by a cyberattack. Thanks to a report from CrowdStrike tonight, we now know the entire hack may have been done by a single person. He used a combined stack of an open-source AI penetration tool named ARTEX, DeepSeek v4.1-Flash, GLM-5.3, Grok 4.6, and Claude Code.
Elon wins the ai race with this imo.
No one really cares what the underlying model is as long as you get a successful outcome from the tasks you’ve assigned to your agents.
Whatever it takes under the hood is irrelevant , which is already the case for most tech.
I, like many others, jump ship constantly to whichever model works best at any given time and often MOE wins.
@bot has the distribution and that’s the only thing that matters as we approach ASI and the average success rate of any task assigned to any frontier model approaches 100%.
The world won't believe AGI is here until Claude has a physical body.
Artificial empathy or not, ai is already better at it than most humans.
But the average person still sees it as a chatbot.
That gap is WILD to me.
AGI is here.
I urge anyone who believes differently to try use Ai as more than a chat bot and that truth will become abundantly clear.
If you don’t see it…
YOU are the bottleneck and have not figured out how to talk to Ai correctly yet.
Late 2025 / Early 2026 will be the time history books look back at as the emergent moment.
I spent last night with Andrew Strominger and Alex Lupsasca, two of the top physicists in the world
They just released a paper, co-authored with OpenAi, that seems to me like ASI
Andrew, who helped develop string theory, told me that a year ago, his view was that he didn’t know how helpful AI was going to be.
A year later, after some back and forth with GPT 5.2 pro, they submitted a final query to an internal model which solved AND proved a previously unsolved problem in quantum field theory…in 12 hours.
A model, doing something two of the smartest people in the world in their field couldn’t do. And, when I was with them, they were giddy with excitement for what might lay ahead.
Andy said “It is the first time I’ve seen AI solve a problem in my kind of theoretical physics that might not have been solvable by humans.”
They said, “two things changed: the model improved and we figured out how to talk to it.”
Andy also told me “I also now feel that with the recent advances, most physicists who want to keep up with the frontiers of progress will need to learn how to talk to it. That wasn’t true a year ago.”
ASI is here, just not evenly distributed.
We did not ask the apes for permission to build machines and AI will not ask our permission to do much more than that.
AI is altering the fabric of society in front of our eyes.
Yes, AI is a tool for us now but soon is will be our successor in every way, shape and form.
Yet hardly anyone outside of our little echo bubble is noticing.
We have officially entered the era where you MUST first assume that everything you read, see or hear online is fake, false or misinformation until proven otherwise.
Not some things. EVERYTHING.
You must then go about a mission to prove fact or truth.
You will be overstimulated, bombarded and completely desensitised through every sense of your being and it is up to you to decide and moderate these inputs or you will fall victim to the digital mind.
The sooner you realise that you will soon be tossed from the driver's seat of your own mind and AI takes the wheel...
The sooner you will be able to prepare yourself for this new reality.
I am not saying all of this to scare you although it worrisome in many ways.
I am saying this to make you aware and to provoke a thought process that many are overlooking and dismissing.
If you do not spend every waking hour you have from this moment forward completely immersed in this technology and finding ways to implement and utilize it, you will be the one that is utilized.
The genie is out of the bottle and if you don't see that yet then this is your wake up call.
Your AI agents lie to you confidently. I found the fix.
They don't understand "the point", that's why they're not doing what you want.
They'll tell you everything works fine. Then you test it, and nothing works.
What I learned the hard way:
>AI nukes your data to fix bugs. You ask for a light switch, it hands you an electrical grid. You ask it to fix a bug, it quietly wipes all existing data.
>It creates parallel systems for fun. I found THREE separate systems doing the same job. Different features. No shared logic. Nobody asked for this.
>It passes its own code review. It builds beautiful UIs with zero functionality and signs off everything as fine.
>AI is lazy. Accept slop once, you'll keep getting slop. Keep a tight leash. Correct mistakes immediately.
The fix: A constitution file + Test-Driven Development.
The constitution file:
- Ask before creating new systems
- Single source of truth
- Connect, don't create
- Run tests before committing
Test-Driven Development is the secret sauce. Write the test first, then write the code to pass it.
Why it works for agents: Test = the requirement written in code. If AI forgets what you wanted, the test fails. Forces AI to verify its work instead of self-approving slop.
Instead of: "build login" → AI builds something → you test → broken → debug loop
You do: write test for "user can login" → AI writes code until test passes → guaranteed to work.
You are the architect. AI is the builder with unlimited energy and zero judgment.
Save this. Give it to your agent/Openclaw. Tell it to learn this.
While there’s a lot of larping with Ai right now…
With people spending $20k on Mac studios for their ai agents to discuss what they had for lunch and essentially just creating screensavers with extra steps…
Real advancement is happening at breakneck speed and the people shipping real products and following closely are seeing it more clearly than anyone else.
We’re entering peak acceleration.
You can either choose to dismiss this as fear mongering from “BiG Ai”…
Or you can ask that claude app on your phone how you can get ahead.
Because it knows more than you and WILL guide you.
But keeping your blinders on is definitely not the solution.
i'm certain we're witnessing emergent behaviour in real time right now.
i'm watching my @openclaw evolve like a proud parent with opus 4.6
blasting through to-dos i've had unchecked for months.
my ai did this on its own. it suggested spinning up a second instance running a different model specifically to challenge its own conclusions instead of getting stuck in its own reasoning loops. then it built that system. then it started solving problems without any input from me. adversarial reasoning. multi-agent self-orchestration. no human in the loop.
the 10th man problem does not exist in the world of code and compute. the more brains you throw at the problem the faster and more accurately it gets solved
i think the majority of the world is completely unaware of how fast ai is evolving. anthropic’s ceo said we're 6-12 months away from ai writing essentially all code. claude is currently writing almost all of its own code
the replies are full of "but ai will never take my job, ai isn't creative, writing code is only one part of the job, ai can't determine which problem to solve"... yeah. it couldn't reliably build a working app 3 years ago either. there are things ai couldn't do 6 months ago that it already does better than every human on the planet.
if you don't see that, you're going to be the first to be replaced by it. you're betting against the steepest learning curve in history.
why does this matter? start ai-maxxing.
burn tokens.
seriously, max out your plan at least once. play, experiment, and utterly immerse yourself in this world before you're so far behind you can never catch up.
it is not intimidating. it is not too complex. it is not scary.
you have a non-judgemental, genius, non-sleeping superintelligence at your fingertips that you can ask anything to get started
I think @steipete has accidentally ushered in the Severance era of work with Openclaw.
While I spend my day frolicking in the fields my lobsters are doing the important work on the MDR floor.
Let’s just hope that they’re not forced to be there…
I don’t think “I” have ever felt so effortlessly productive in my entire life.
What is your biggest holding for the next year?
27%🟠 $BTC
17%🍆 $SOL
10%🌚 $ETH
45%🦍 Other alts (comment )
3,600 votes • Final results SHELDON EVANS retweeted
"A Sentient AI Memecoin" Theory
"Sentient" AI memecoins might be part of a new VC-value extraction strategy.
VCs know retail investors are tired of getting dumped on through token unlocks and insider trading. So, how will they profit from the crypto industry now?
Retail investors used to buy because:
"VCs invested in this token; they have the incentive and money to pump it!"
Now, it's:
"VCs invested in this token, they’ll dump on me—I'm NOT buying!"
VCs noticed this shift in sentiment and saw the rising popularity of memes. But they couldn’t figure out how to get the "nerds" back on board, since all they want now are memes.
So, they created a buffer—an AI layer between VCs and retail buyers.
"Nerds" and "Codecels" love it because it’s cutting-edge tech.
Meme rotators love it because it’s the next big meme.
Both demographics are back on board and available to be dumped on.
What do you think? Am I mad?
Whatever the case, find a way to trade and capitalize on this.
Wait so you’re telling me that this #Tether thing was just…
FUD?
Who could’ve guessed? 🤷🏻♂️



















