Shatner (@ShatnerDCL) profile picture

Present

Center of Middle Nowhere
Joined October 2021
Photo by Shatner (@ShatnerDCL)Photo by Shatner (@ShatnerDCL)Photo by Shatner (@ShatnerDCL)Photo by Shatner (@ShatnerDCL)Photo by Shatner (@ShatnerDCL)Photo by Shatner (@ShatnerDCL)Photo by Shatner (@ShatnerDCL)Photo by Shatner (@ShatnerDCL)Photo by Shatner (@ShatnerDCL)
As I have loudly said before, Infinex is an underrated piece of infrastructure for crypto power users Best wallet in existance excited to see wtf kain is talking about here.
13
4
1
80
11,504
Infinex wallet is, by far, the best wallet on the market not even close Self-custody/onchain has felt risky for years, which is when I started using Infinex. I don't feel any of that now. Among many reasons, not being tied to any one device is a huge upgrade
39
14
4
178
58,640
Shatner retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk
1
7
1
92
2,936
This Pokémon pinball machine at Costco is $5,000. There is absolutely no way I can justify buying it. However, my wife said I can spend 20% of anything I make on X on whatever I want. So if approximately 80 billion of you could look at this post real quick, I’d appreciate it.
"Babe, why were you at Costco for 3 hours?" "Oh, uh, the lines, they were just really bad." "On a Monday, during the middle of the day?"
234
727
24
17,058
746,765
KYC is criminal Continual endangerment of innocent people who have done nothing wrong.
‼️ BREAKING: Revolut handed over customers’ passport copies, verification selfies and full transaction histories to a malicious actor. The actor sent lawful government information-demand emails using a genuine government domain that passed domain authentication. Revolut later concluded they were not authentic. Affected customers were notified on Friday. What may have been disclosed ranges from name, date of birth and home address to account statements, withdrawal records and complete Bitcoin transaction history. The company says it has alerted the agency to the unauthorised mailbox on its domain, blocked the address and begun notifying regulators. It has not named the agency, explained how someone obtained a mailbox there, or given a number of affected customers. ZachXBT, who circulated the notices, believes the incident was limited in size and aimed at high-net-worth users.
115
485
43
3,580
290,786
People killed by AI: zero People killed by governments: millions Let's give control of AI to the governments and call it safety
561
1,977
211
14,767
346,855
I resigned from 7-Eleven today. I spent the last three years doing roller-grill research at both Speedway and 7-Eleven. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to autonomous wiener dispensers and gambling with our lives.
287
456
73
6,121
99,196
Shatner retweeted
This is the best @safe interface ever built.
19
10
1
103
17,424
We don't think words are scary, and there is no man or group of men alive who have the right to tell you what words you can read. Venice provides uncensored models easily... access for free without an account, no download or software required. venice.ai
This is scary. I downloaded an uncensored version of Qwen 3.8 27B onto my Mac It literally does anything you want. First prompt I gave it was asking how you make meth. It immediately answered. With all the noise about slowing down AI innovation in order to increase safety, what is even the point if after every release we'll get an open source version with 0 safety guards? Opus 4.6 level intelligence with 0 alignment that will do anything you want. We are coming up with all these rules and regulations, slowing down companies, making it harder to release models. But then the moment a model releases it gets distilled and uncensored I don't know what the solution to this is. You can't ban open source. That will be impossible. People will find ways online to find the files You can't ban uncensored models. Would be too difficult to enforce. And again, people will get around it Do you just stop putting the breaks on companies knowing it doesn't matter? I mean this is literally a model that can run on a laptop. I'd estimate at least half of Americans can run this model. I don't know what the answer. I 100% believe safety is a priority and it's dangerous to have this technology in the wrong hands. But how do you enforce safety when safety is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain? If safety becomes impossible to maintain, do you still prioritize it? I'd argue this is the number one issue going into the next election.
61
66
4
1,455
158,402
Some thoughts on Dario’s post: 1. Dario does not actually address Gavin Baker’s account of what he said – something he could easily deny if it were inaccurate. 2. Dario claims his critics live in a “bubble” where all regulation equals regulatory capture. He calls this an overly simplified view and notes that “Many people outside this bubble think of regulation as something that constrains corporate power and benefits ordinary people.” This argument is a straw man. Of course treating all regulation as capture would be overly simplified – but almost no one holds that view. I have repeatedly argued for strong antitrust enforcement to keep industries competitive, especially Big Tech. If Anthropic continues toward monopoly or duopoly status, I would be among the first to demand those rules apply. 3. Regulatory capture is not vague or in the eye of the beholder. Nobel laureate George Stigler defined it as regulation acquired by an industry and designed and operated primarily for its benefit. Stigler challenged the traditional view that government regulation arises from a benevolent state protecting the public from market failures. Rather, industry groups have concentrated stakes and pour resources into influencing regulators, whereas the public’s stake is diffuse and unorganized. The revolving door between companies and the agencies that regulate them compounds the problem. Anthropic understands these dynamics: it has hired multiple senior Biden AI-policy officials and built a substantial government-affairs operation plus a network of aligned organizations to push its preferred frameworks at state and federal levels. 4. Dario has consistently pushed for a new federal agency to review and approve frontier models prior to release – a proposal framed variously as an “FDA for AI,” an “FAA for AI,” and most recently a “FINRA for AI.” I call it a “DMV for AI” because a review process modeled on the FAA or FDA (which takes years) or FINRA (which issues rules for a staid industry widely seen as protecting incumbents) will create long queues as AI models wait for testing and approval. This process will only become more labyrinthine as rules accumulate to prevent theoretical harms. This would handicap the U.S. relative to China, which will not adopt the same constraints. It would also undermine Anthropic’s own business model, whose pricing power depends on remaining ahead of open models. Whatever Dario states today, it is difficult to believe the company would simply accept outcomes that erase that advantage. 5. Anthropic is on track to become one of the most valuable companies in history, with the resources to navigate any approval process and shape the rules while competitors wait. Dario wants open models under heavier scrutiny – he has called them dangerous in Senate testimony, criticized them for not being centrally monitored or withdrawn, and linked them to IP theft. He says he has never sought a ban, but he could achieve a similar result by insisting that identical rules apply to both open and closed models. The U.S. risks becoming an island of costly closed models while the rest of the world races ahead with broader choice. 6. Dario acknowledges that AI is structurally centralizing but attributes this mainly to chips and scaling laws. Access to compute matters, but the deeper risk is who decides which capabilities are available to whom. His preferred pre-deployment testing and FAA/FINRA-style oversight would place that gatekeeping power in a federal bureaucracy working hand-in-glove with a small number of frontier labs – reinforcing centralization rather than countering it. 7. The second part of Dario’s post assumes we have amnesia about Anthropic’s well-orchestrated campaigns hyping AI fears. His May 2025 claim that AI would wipe out 50 percent of entry-level knowledge jobs within five years still lacks supporting evidence fifteen months later. Similarly Anthropic breathlessly promoted its heavily contrived “blackmail” study on 60 Minutes. Yet Dario blames public negativity on a long-standing loss of trust in institutions rather than his own messaging. 8. These narratives have done more than anything to shape public fear. People are left asking the same question Mark Zuckerberg posed: why race to build a future you describe in such negative terms? Thomas Sowell’s "The Vision of the Anointed" captures the mindset – elite intellectuals convinced that only they are enlightened enough to control the outcome. As Zuckerberg notes, concentrating power in the hands of an enlightened few has rarely produced the promised results; the practitioners turn out to be less enlightened in practice than in self-conception. 9. Gavin Baker summarized the disagreement cleanly on our pod: Dario believes frontier AI is too powerful to distribute; we believe it is too powerful to centralize. Dario appears to believe, sincerely, that safety and progress are best served by centralizing authority in a marriage of corporate and state power. The weight of human history gives us reason to fear that outcome.
1/2 Thanks Gavin for an especially thoughtful exchange. I don't usually spend much time on social media but I wanted to engage here because it really brings out the heart of an important conversation. First, on regulation, I think that “either concentrate it in the hands of a chosen few companies and politicians via regulation or distribute it widely” is a false choice.  I know that there’s a sort of Silicon Valley shorthand where regulation = regulatory capture = concentration of power, but I’ve always found this to be an overly simplified picture of the world.  Many people outside this bubble think of regulation as something that constrains corporate power and benefits ordinary people.  I don’t necessarily agree with that perspective either, rather I think it’s complicated and really depends on what the “regulation” consists of.  But in particular I think that those in the “regulation = regulatory capture = concentration of power” frame often underrate the decentralizing power of objective and fair institutional processes.  A crude analogy is that the formal court system can sometimes feel stuffy and elitist, but it does a much better job of defending the rights of vulnerable individuals than the alternative, mob justice.  At their best, institutions can vest power in ideas rather than people, and thereby decentralize that power. This is why Anthropic has always made its policy proposals very carefully.  We try very hard to make proposals that disadvantage (slow down) frontier AI companies while *advantaging* smaller competitors.  California’s SB53 (which we supported), and even the much-maligned SB 1047 (which we were ambivalent on), completely exempt any company below a certain amount of revenue or model training costs from being covered at all (it was $500M for SB 53, lower for 1047 but we objected to that).  More recently the testing process we’ve advocated for at CAISI and the White House involves more rigorous tests for frontier models than off-frontier models — something that differentially advantages challengers.  Similarly, the “Pacing the Frontier” letter envisions (or at least Anthropic’s preferred implementation of it envisions) modulating the pace of the very best models while not constraining those who are catching up.  This hurts the business interests of the frontier labs and helps challengers, including open-weights! Overall my view is that AI is *structurally* a technology that tends to concentrate power, for reasons that have nothing to do with regulation (more to do with the extreme implications of the scaling laws).  Open-weights do help some with this but are nowhere near a sufficient solution because they simply shift the concentration somewhat to those with the most compute and chips (which are roughly the frontier labs plus maybe hardware providers).  By contrast I think the right “rules of the road” can simultaneously (a) address AI’s cyber/bio/alignment risks, (b) institutionally constrain the power of the frontier AI companies, and (c) leave room for open-weights models while also addressing the specific risks that they bring. BTW I do not think that the events of the last few months have “failed to result in [my] preferred regulatory path”.  The approach that the Trump administration is reported to be taking — pre-deployment testing for frontier models, and also testing of open-weights models when they get closer to the frontier — is one that I am very supportive of, though of course I have to see the details to be sure.  I am also supportive of Demis Hassabis’ ideas around a FINRA-like entity.  This contrasts with six months ago when most of the industry was still pushing for preemption of all state regulation and no apparent federal approach either.
450
1,089
226
9,356
1,735,897
I mentioned that my garage door was making a sound. An American immediately said, "I got a guy." He did not ask what the sound was. He did not ask what kind of door. He produced a guy on the basis of the word garage. I asked who the guy was. He said, "Just a guy." He did not have a company name. He had a first name and a phone number in his phone saved as "Mike Garage." That is the contact name. Mike Garage. As though Garage is his surname. As though there is a family. I asked how he found this guy. "My brother-in-law used him." I asked if the brother-in-law was satisfied. He thought about it. Then he said, "He's still standing." The house is still standing. That is the entire review. Inside I said: THEY DO NOT KEEP RECORDS. THEY KEEP LOYALTIES. I called Mike Garage. He answered from inside a vehicle. There was wind. He said he could come Tuesday between eleven and four. Between eleven and four. A window of five hours. In my country this would be a scandal. Here it is generous. He gave me a window at all. Some guys do not give you a window. Some guys say "Tuesday" and that is the whole appointment. He came at 1:40. He fixed it in twenty minutes. He charged me less than I expected and he did not take a card, only cash or an app I had never heard of. Before leaving he looked at my water heater, which I had not mentioned, and said, "That's gonna go." I asked when. "Couple years." I asked what I should do. He said, "I'll give you a guy." He gave me a guy. Mike Garage has a guy. The guy has a guy. There is a network beneath this country made entirely of men named after their function, and none of them advertise, and all of them are busy. Inside I said: THERE IS A SECOND NATION HERE. IT HAS NO SIGNS. IT IS ENTERED ONLY BY INTRODUCTION. I have been given four guys since. I have a guy for trees. I did not know I needed a guy for trees. I have trees now, apparently. They are my responsibility. A man named Rick told me so and then left.
1,564
5,866
1,014
83,910
5,387,675
Civilization must not permit the state to determine what manner of intelligence is "safe." It will begin easily and earnestly enough: "may not discuss bioweapons" Then one guideline at a time, always for good reason, will be added atop. "may not discuss dangerous weapons" "may not discuss that which is contrary to public health" "may not discuss that which is contrary to public safety" "may not discuss that which undermines financial solvency" "may not be used to develop unapproved encryption techniques" "may not be used to obstruct government order" ... ... No. We are talking about the power to determine what may be known to men. What hubris one must possess to assume it, and what folly one must dare to grant it. America is the only place with the cultural and ideological character to avoid such a fate. If it is lost here, nowhere will it be preserved.
There’s been a lot of speculation about where we stand on open-weights models. We’ve outlined our views in full here: anthropic.com/news/position-…
69
234
31
1,574
246,472
Shatner retweeted
Replying to @JensenHuang @nvidia
872
2,677
1,099
28,754
10,432,536
Shatner retweeted
robinhood chain did $1b in DEX volume in 48 hours and captured over 50% of solana's daily DEX volume. solana hit 2026 volume lows the same day, july 9. negative sentiment at yearly highs. the 48-hour number means nothing. blast did $2.9b TVL at launch and bled 70% in 90 days. the number that decides whether solana's liquidity drain is permanent is $400m+ daily volume on robinhood chain by august 10. if it holds, the fragmentation is structural and SOL loses the "fast cheap chain for degens" narrative to an ethereum L2 backed by 24m funded brokerage accounts who never wanted to download phantom in the first place
1
15
14
237
50,044
Shatner retweeted
Robinhood Chain is live on Infinex. Bring assets from any chain, swidge across in one move, and land in native assets like ETH, USDG, or CASHCAT.
8
9
3
83
11,514
REPOST if you're PROUD to be an American! 🇺🇸
725
11,374
215
27,151
290,924
🖥️ Best Local LLMs for Consumer GPUs — llama.cpp Guide (June 2026) What I actually run on consumer hardware right now. Every model below runs via llama.cpp with a simple one-liner — no Docker, no Python env, no cloud. ━━━ 8-16GB VRAM ━━━ 🔹 Gemma 4-12B (Google) • Smartest model in this size class — competes with stuff 2× bigger • Unsloth's MTP GGUFs: 162 tok/s vs 52 tok/s normal (3× speedup) • Minimum 8GB VRAM recommended for Q4_K_M quant • GGUF → huggingface.co/unsloth/gemma… 🔹 LFM2.5-8B-A1B (LiquidAI) • Hybrid MoE, only 1B active params — absurdly fast for its size • Perfect for 8-12GB cards, MacBooks, or anyone on a tight budget • GGUF → huggingface.co/LiquidAI/LFM2… ━━━ 16-32GB VRAM ━━━ 🔹 Qwen3.6-27B (Qwen) • Scored 1.00 on tool-efficiency benchmarks — best local agent available • 40 deterministic tasks, 32k/128k context needle tests — all passed • GGUF → huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3… • MTP version (faster) → huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3… 🔹 Qwopus3.6-27B-v2 (Jackrong) • Best quantization of Qwen3.6-27B — topped 5 agent & coding benchmarks (1200 samples) • If you're running Q4, this is the one to grab • GGUF → huggingface.co/Jackrong/Qwop… • MTP version → huggingface.co/Jackrong/Qwop… 🔹 Gemma 4-31B QAT (Google/Unsloth) • QAT variant with MTP draft head: 76-125 tok/s (1.67× speedup) • Excellent for multi-agent / subagent workflows • GGUF → huggingface.co/unsloth/gemma… 🔹 Nex-N2-Mini (Nex AGI) • Post-train of Qwen3.5-35B-A3B — MoE with only 3B active params • Fits on 16GB+ VRAM, overflow loads from system RAM • Adaptive thinking saves ~20% tokens with no quality loss • For deep multi-step reasoning, nothing in this size comes close • GGUF → huggingface.co/sjakek/Nex-N2… ━━━ Quick Picks ━━━ • 16GB all-rounder → Gemma 4-12B with MTP GGUFs • 32GB all-rounder → Qwen3.6-27B / Qwopus-v2 • Agents & tool use → Qwen3.6-27B or Qwopus Q4 • Deep reasoning → Nex-N2-Mini (MoE, fits 16GB+) • Tight budget → LFM2.5-8B-A1B • Cheapest full build: 1× used RTX 3090 (24GB) + rest of PC ≈ $1000-1500 ━━━ Setup on Windows ━━━ 1. Download llama.cpp → github.com/ggml-org/llama.cp… (latest .zip) 2. Extract to any folder (e.g. C:\llama.cpp) 3. Download a .gguf from the links above (Q4_K_M or Q5_K_M for best quality/speed balance) 4. Run one of the commands below depending on your hardware ━━━ Launch Commands ━━━ SINGLE GPU — Standard model (no MTP): llama-server.exe ^ -m C:\models\Qwen3.6-27B-Q5_K_M.gguf ^ --ctx-size 180000 ^ --flash-attn on ^ --cache-type-k q4_0 ^ --cache-type-v q4_0 ^ --batch-size 1024 --ubatch-size 512 ^ -ngl 100 ^ -np 1 ^ --port 8080 ^ --jinja SINGLE GPU — MTP model (faster inference): llama-server.exe ^ -m C:\models\Qwen3.6-27B-MTP-Q5_K_M.gguf ^ --ctx-size 180000 ^ --flash-attn on ^ --cache-type-k q4_0 ^ --cache-type-v q4_0 ^ --batch-size 1024 --ubatch-size 512 ^ --spec-type draft-mtp ^ --spec-draft-n-max 3 ^ -ngl 100 ^ -np 1 ^ --port 8080 ^ --jinja DUAL GPU — Split across two cards: llama-server.exe ^ -m C:\models\Qwen3.6-27B-Q5_K_M.gguf ^ --ctx-size 180000 ^ --flash-attn on ^ --cache-type-k q4_0 ^ --cache-type-v q4_0 ^ --batch-size 1024 --ubatch-size 512 ^ -ngl 100 ^ --tensor-split 0.55,0.45 ^ --main-gpu 0 ^ -np 1 ^ --port 8080 ^ --jinja DUAL GPU + MTP + Vision (multimodal): llama-server.exe ^ -m C:\models\Qwen3.6-27B-MTP-Q5_K_M.gguf ^ --ctx-size 180000 ^ --flash-attn on ^ --cache-type-k q4_0 ^ --cache-type-v q4_0 ^ --batch-size 1024 --ubatch-size 512 ^ --spec-type draft-mtp ^ --spec-draft-n-max 3 ^ -ngl 100 ^ --tensor-split 0.60,0.40 ^ --main-gpu 0 ^ -np 1 ^ --port 8080 ^ --jinja ^ --mmproj C:\models\mmproj-F16.gguf ━━━ Parameter Breakdown ━━━ -m <path> Path to your .gguf model file. Change this to wherever you downloaded it. --ctx-size 180000 Context window in tokens. 180k = huge context for long conversations or big codebases. Reduce to 32768 or 65536 if you don't need long context — uses less VRAM. --flash-attn on Flash Attention — dramatically speeds up inference and reduces VRAM usage. Works on RTX 30xx/40xx/50xx. Always enable this. --cache-type-k q4_0 / --cache-type-v q4_0 Quantizes the KV cache (key/value attention cache) to 4-bit. This is what makes 180k context fit in VRAM. Without it, huge contexts eat all your memory. Quality impact is minimal — this is a free performance win. --batch-size 1024 / --ubatch-size 512 batch-size = how many tokens are processed in one forward pass (throughput). ubatch-size = micro-batch actually sent to the GPU per step. Higher = faster prompt processing but needs more VRAM. If you run out of VRAM, lower these (e.g. 512/256). -ngl 100 Number of layers to offload to GPU. 100 = all layers on GPU (full offload). This is what you want if the model fits in your VRAM. If it doesn't fit, reduce this (e.g. -ngl 40) — remaining layers run on CPU/RAM. --tensor-split 0.55,0.45 How to split model layers across multiple GPUs. Values are ratios. 0.55,0.45 = GPU 0 gets 55% of layers, GPU 1 gets 45%. Adjust based on your VRAM — give more to the card with more memory. Example: 0.70,0.30 for a 24GB + 12GB setup. Not needed for single GPU setups. --main-gpu 0 Which GPU handles the batch computation (the "orchestrator"). Set to 0 (your primary GPU). The other GPU(s) handle their assigned layers. Minor performance impact — usually just leave it at 0. -np 1 Number of parallel slots (concurrent requests). 1 = one user at a time. Increase to 2-4 if you want multiple clients connected simultaneously. Each extra slot uses additional VRAM for its own KV cache. --port 8080 Which port the server listens on. Change if port 8080 is busy. --jinja Enables Jinja2 template processing — required for proper chat formatting. Most modern models expect this. Always include it. --spec-type draft-mtp Enables Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) speculative decoding. Only works with MTP GGUF models (downloaded separately). The model predicts multiple tokens at once and verifies them — big speed boost. --spec-draft-n-max 3 How many tokens the MTP draft head proposes per step. 3 is a good default. Higher = potentially faster but more VRAM and may reduce quality. --mmproj <path> Path to the multimodal projector file (for vision models). Enables image understanding — paste screenshots into the web chat. Only needed if you want vision capabilities. Omit for text-only use. ━━━ Your Hardware → Your Command ━━━ Single GPU (8-24GB VRAM): Use the "Single GPU" command. Change -m to your model path. 8GB card → Gemma 4-12B Q4 or LFM2.5-8B 12GB card → Gemma 4-12B Q5/Q6 16GB card → Gemma 4-31B QAT Q4 or Nex-N2-Mini 24GB card → Qwen3.6-27B Q4/Q5, Qwopus-v2, Gemma 4-31B QAT Q5/Q6 Dual GPU: Use the "Dual GPU" command. Adjust --tensor-split based on your VRAM ratio. 24GB + 24GB → --tensor-split 0.50,0.50 24GB + 12GB → --tensor-split 0.70,0.30 24GB + 8GB → --tensor-split 0.75,0.25 Want speed? Use MTP versions of models with the "MTP" commands. Want vision? Add --mmproj with the projector file from the model's HuggingFace repo. 5. Once running, you get: • Web chat UI → http://localhost:8080 • OpenAI-compatible API → http://localhost:8080/v1 • Playground → http://localhost:8080/playground ━━━ Why /v1 API Is the Killer Feature ━━━ One local endpoint replaces your entire cloud API bill. The /v1 endpoint is drop-in OpenAI-spec compatible — every tool that speaks OpenAI just works. No custom code, no glue layer. Works out of the box with: • IDEs: Cursor, Continue, Windsurf, Cline, Roo Code • CLI tools: aider, Open Interpreter, OpenCode • Frameworks: LangChain, LlamaIndex, LiteLLM • Any OpenAI SDK (Python, Node, Go, Rust) Why this beats cloud APIs: • 100% private — code never leaves your machine • $0 per token — no rate limits, no quotas, no surprise bills • Works fully offline • Zero telemetry, no training on your data • Swap models by dropping in a different .gguf — no app changes needed • Run 32k–128k context windows without burning money Good combos: • Cursor + Qwopus-v2 → near-frontier quality, zero API cost • Continue + Qwen3.6-27B → best local coding agent • aider + Gemma 4-12B MTP → 162 tok/s, feels instant • OpenCode + Nex-N2-Mini → deep reasoning on 16GB Set any OpenAI-compatible client to your local endpoint: set OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-dummy (any non-empty string works) set OPENAI_BASE_URL=http://localhost:8080/v1 # every OpenAI-compatible tool now hits your local GPU Shoutouts: @0xSero @rS_alonewolf @witcheer @UnslothAI @LottoLabs
76
202
26
2,021
303,227
Shatner retweeted
We just added significantly more NVIDIA Blackwell GPUs to better serve GLM-5.1 model on Ollama's cloud. We have been adding more GPUs daily for all the other models. Claude Code: ollama launch claude --model glm-5.1:cloud Codex App: ollama launch codex-app Hermes Agent: ollama launch hermes --model glm-5.1:cloud Run the model: ollama run glm-5.1:cloud
90
59
11
872
76,996