
@SharpCircleBeti
iAccount based inUnited States
About this account
- Account based in
- United States
- Connected via
- United States App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Transparent Picks. Proven Tipsters. No Deleted Picks. Real Performance.
Joined June 2025
- Tweets1.5K
- Following409
- Followers1.7K
- Likes3.7K
Pinned Tweet
NFL WEEK 6 SHARP CIRCLE PLAYS🏈
Absolutely love seeing the NFL get some love on @SharpCircleBet!
Two of our cappers are attacking today's NFL slate with 8 plays!
@SmoothManSports
Browns +3.5 (-113) 1.13U
Giants ML (+100) 1U
Falcons ML (+104) 1U
Titans +6.5 (+100) 1U
Jaguars ML (-133) 3.98U
@robgalbets
Cardinals +13 (-125) 1.25U
Patriots -7 (-110) 1.10U
Eagles ML (-115) 1.15U
Love seeing more NFL action on the site! Make sure to Subscribe to them below
sharpcircle.bet/tipsters/Smo…
sharpcircle.bet/tipsters/Rob…
SharpCircle retweeted
IM BACKKKKKK!!!
After 3 days of going back and forth with Twitter Support, I FINALLY got my account back
PLEASE go follow my backup account @UziPlays2 If anything ever happens to this account again, that's where I'll be posting all my shit
🚨 SHARP CIRCLE ATP BRUSSELS CONSENSUS PLAY
🇧🇪 Raphaël Collignon ML is getting some serious love from the Sharp Circle crew!
@SmoothManSports +144 (1U)
@Splashhhbets +122 (2U)
@uzi_plays +144 (1U)
SharpCircle retweeted
🍎 @ktf_kz 🇰🇿 x 🍒 @BNPPFEUOpen 🇧🇪 x 🍇 #ATPLyon 🇫🇷 | ATP 250 Tournament Preview 🎾
Pretty proud of this one, Super Team; it's all coming together:
Every October the tour comes in from the weather. The Asian swing is over, Shanghai has its champion, and almost everything left between here and the end of the season will be played under a roof, with tired legs, ranking points and the last few spots at the Finals all on the line.
And every year it opens with the same lazy take from people who’d rather borrow an opinion than form one. Close the roof, trust the serve, take the over.
It isn’t even wrong, exactly. A roof takes away the wind, the sun, and the heat, all the things that let a returner steal a few cheap points. On the BLENDER scale, where last season’s slowest court is a 1 and its fastest is a 100, indoor courts averaged a 74, fourteen points quicker than outdoor hard. The reputation is fairly earned.
But a roof only removes the weather. It doesn’t remove the altitude, the floor, or the way a player’s style holds up under it, and that’s where the attention has to go this time of year.
Three distinct tournaments, let's ride.
🍎 Almaty is one of the strangest rooms on tour. On paper it projects to a 72, a point off the Shanghai court we just left, but it gets there in a way no other indoor event does.
The floor itself rated a sluggish BLENDER 41 last fall, and it was 810 meters of thin air that added the other 24. The air carries the ball and the floor still grabs it, so the court gives something to almost everyone: enough pace to reward a serve, and enough grip for a patient player to work his way into points.
You can see it in the results. Only about a quarter of sets across Almaty’s two editions have reached a tiebreak, against nearly four in ten in Brussels, and both champions have been Baseline players. Medvedev, a Metronome, won it last year and arrives as the top seed off a semifinal run in Shanghai, though under a roof the market has him figured: 17-12 indoors since 2023, almost exactly the 17.5 wins his prices called for.
A room this open leaves more than one way to win it, and the two players I’d look to come at it from opposite ends.
Bublik is a Shotmaker with a Servebot secondary, which gives him two different ways to beat you. His serve ends a big share of his points before a rally ever starts, and when one does, he’d rather reach for a drop shot, an odd angle or a ball you didn’t see coming than trade from the baseline. Thin air rewards both, and since 2023 he’s 21-12 indoors when closing prices projected about 17 wins.
Khachanov is built the other way. He’s an Architect with a Metronome secondary, and his game is all about building pressure. He keeps his rally tolerance means every exchange becomes one more ball you have to handle, and each shot pushes you a little further back until you find yourself in defense. Even though he can, he doesn’t need to end the point early when he can make you feel it getting away. That takes a floor that grabs the ball and gives him time to build, and the 2024 champion here is 23-11 indoors against roughly 19.
One plays the air and the other plays the floor, and in Almaty either one can be a weapon.
🍒 Brussels is where the reputation holds up. It projects to a 94, right where it sat last year as one of the fastest courts on tour, when nearly four sets in ten went to a tiebreak.
The lazy take walks in looking to back the Servebot, and on a floor like this it’s easy to see why. But a big serve only wins the points that start on your own racket. Once the ball comes back, a Servebot is an ordinary player, and an ordinary player on a quick court is a coin flip waiting for a tiebreak.
Lehecka shows it. He made the final here last year and his game looks built for this room, yet indoors since 2023 he’s 11-12 when his prices expected almost 14 wins.
Defending well isn’t the answer either. Walls, the players who live on running everything down, have been a losing proposition under a roof, 38-64 indoors since 2023 and 2-14 against the Time Thieves who take the ball early and leave them no time to recover.
The attacker who interests me most is Blockx, the home No. 4 seed, and he’s spent this season turning into a real problem. He made the semifinals in Madrid this spring, beating Auger-Aliassime and Ruud along the way, reached a final in July, and went all the way to the quarterfinals of the US Open.
He’s labeled a Servebot, but there’s more rally in his game than the label suggests, with Metronome as his secondary, and his serve has only grown more dangerous as the year has gone on. Over the last six months, half the points he wins have come off quick service points, up from 41%. Now he gets the fastest floor he’ll see all year, in front of his own crowd.
This is where I’ll be backing the attackers. The work is finding the ones who can still win the point after the serve comes back.
🍇 Lyon has no history at all, only a projection built from rooms that resemble it. The nearest match from last season is Marseille, where Humbert beat Medjedovic in the final, and both men are back.
Humbert makes the best case this week that indoor tennis is its own game. He’s 28-9 under a roof since 2023, more than seven wins clear of what his prices implied, and 19-4 when he’s been the favorite. No one in these three draws has beaten the indoor market by more.
What makes him so interesting is how much of that comes from the room. By our numbers, only Shapovalov raises his level more indoors compared with how he plays everywhere else. On paper it’s the same hard court Humbert plays all summer. In practice it’s a different surface, which is exactly why the BLENDER scale rates indoor hard on its own.
Nakashima is the other side of that coin. He’s having the best year of his career, opening with a final in Brisbane and then reaching back-to-back Masters finals in Canada and Cincinnati this summer, beating Jodar, Medvedev and Fritz across those two runs.
His profile might still surprise you. For all that winning, our system can’t find a style to give him. He’s a JAG, Just Another Gunner, and that’s less a knock than a description: he does a lot of things well and leans toward the First Strike side, but no single part of his game sits far enough from the tour to define him.
Indoors, that has cost him. He’s 4-10 under a roof since 2023 when his prices expected about eight wins, and 3-7 as the favorite. Quick indoor courts reward a player with one weapon to lean on, and a game built on doing everything well gets fewer long points to prove it, while the market keeps pricing him off a breakout year built in the sunshine.
Close the roof and give the servers their boost. Just don’t stop where the lazy take does, because everything the roof didn’t touch is where the edge lives this time of year.
Best of luck, Super Team.
🍎 Every play this week goes in on @thetailgateapp, where I keep finding the best prices around, withdrawals land immediately, and the rewards actually make it back to the people using it. Code SMOOTH gets you in and keeps this work going.
🍒 And nothing here runs on the honor system. Every Official Play is independently tracked and verified on @SharpCircleBet, so the card, the record, and every result are there for you to check.
Trust the system; cash the slips.
🍎🍒🍇🍎🍒🍇🍎🍒🍇
SharpCircle retweeted
Anyone can win on X. Screenshot the hot week, delete the cold one, farm the engagement. 🎾
Sustaining it is the hard part.
672 picks. 336 wins, 260 losses. +111.49u at 9.06% ROI, every single bet graded by a third party before it settled.
That's what a real record looks like. Not a straight line. A long one.
If your tipster is so profitable, ask him for his @sharpcirclebet record. See how quickly he changes the subject. 😆
Faster, faster, faster! 🚀
All tipster/capper picks will now be automatically graded EVERY 5 MINUTES by our bot using live scores pulled from Flashscore!
Any issues / Problems you can dispute it and send us a DM 😁
🚨 Pretty big update to the app:
All Tipster/Capper picks will now be graded automatically every 30 minutes by our bot, using live scores pulled directly from Flashscore.
Going forward, there will be no manual grading — everything will be handled automatically to make grading faster, more consistent, and more reliable.
With that being said, this is still a brand-new system. We ran into two small issues early on, both have already been fixed, and everything has been running perfectly all day.
If you notice any issues with grading, please DM us so we can take a look ASAP.
INDOOR TENNIS SEASON IS IN FULL SWING!
One of our top tennis cappers, @TenvyBets, is wasting NO time getting involved!
He's already attacking the indoor swing with a 2U PLAY on the board!
Subscribe to TenvyBets here:
sharpcircle.bet/tipsters/Ten…
Unfortunately, Uzi got hacked and is now locked out of his account.
If you guys could show some love to @UziPlays2 and help him rebuild while he works on getting his main account back, it would be greatly appreciated.
Any RTs and follows go a long way. 🙏
🚨 My Main Twitter Account Got Hacked.
Tried logging in on my phone and was randomly logged out. When I tried signing back in, my email was no longer recognized. I was literally on the account 50 minutes before this happened.
The account still looks normal, but if anything gets posted from it, IT IS NOT ME.
I'll be posting all my plays here for the next few days while I work on getting my main account back.
Hopefully Twitter support can get this resolved soon. Appreciate everyone who finds their way over here. RTs would be very much appreciated to help spread the word. Even if I can get just 100 followers back on here, I'd be more than happy. 🙏
SharpCircle retweeted
🚨 My Main Twitter Account Got Hacked.
Tried logging in on my phone and was randomly logged out. When I tried signing back in, my email was no longer recognized. I was literally on the account 50 minutes before this happened.
The account still looks normal, but if anything gets posted from it, IT IS NOT ME.
I'll be posting all my plays here for the next few days while I work on getting my main account back.
Hopefully Twitter support can get this resolved soon. Appreciate everyone who finds their way over here. RTs would be very much appreciated to help spread the word. Even if I can get just 100 followers back on here, I'd be more than happy. 🙏
SharpCircle retweeted
🚨BREAKING: The BLENDER Report for the @SH_RolexMasters Final is finally here.
Speed or style? Shanghai is playing 14 faster than its last three editions, and ADF lives on fast courts. But Jodar is 17-4 against the Baseline Family.
What’s the play, Super Team?
SharpCircle retweeted
🍐 #ATPShanghai 🇨🇳 | SF Recap: +9.10U 💰
Well, well, well:
🍐 3U 🇪🇸 Rafael Jodar ML (+170/2.70) ✅
🍐 1U 🇪🇸 Alejandro Davidovich Fokina ML (+300/4.00) ✅
🍐 1U 🇪🇸 Alejandro Davidovich Fokina +1.5 Sets (-122/1.82) ✅
The market priced the players; we priced the matchups, and the matchups paid.
BLENDER >.
On to an all-Spanish final, Super Team.
🍐🍐🍐 Every one of these went in on @thetailgateapp, which is where I keep finding the best pricing, getting paid out immediately, and seeing rewards actually come back to users. Sign up with code SMOOTH and you're directly backing the work I do here.
🍐🍐🍐 Don't take my word for the record, either. @SharpCircleBet independently tracks and verifies every Official Play, so you can follow the card, check the results, and hold me to all of it.
Trust the system; cash the slips. 🍐🍐🍐
🍐 #ATPShanghai 🇨🇳 | Semifinal Write Up 🎾
The O/U on “ballkids yelled at” is 2.5:
🍐 3U 🇪🇸 Rafael Jodar ML (+170/2.70)
Insiders are saying the Over is a lock.
👇 Here's Why 👇
Short memories out there. Rafa Jodar is the Chosen One, and he's one of the hardest-hitting Time Thieves on tour.
That matters against Medvedev, because the Octopus—the Tour’s premiere Metronome—wins by being patient. He stands miles behind the baseline, sends everything back, and waits for you to get bored and miss.
Jodar doesn't get bored, and he has the forehand to make sure of it. He averages 80 mph off that wing to Medvedev's 75, and in the five-to-eight shot rallies where Daniil usually takes over, Jodar wins 55.5% of the points to Medvedev's 50.9%. Medvedev needs the rally to settle into his rhythm, and Jodar keeps hitting through it before it can.
The court only makes his job easier. Shanghai is playing quick at a BLENDER 73, and quick courts tilt every match a little toward the server: across the tour, break rates dip from 19% to 17%.
For these two, the tilt is a lot steeper. Jodar's hold rate jumps from 81% to 87% on courts like this, nearly three times the normal boost, and he's holding 90% this week.
Medvedev's return, among he best in the world and the shot that usually sets him apart, takes nearly three times the normal hit. The ball gets to him faster, he has less time to set up from back there, and his break rate falls from 28% to 22%. Still well-above average, but a lot more human.
Fast court, big forehand, a returner who suddenly looks ordinary. Everyone else can forget about the Chosen One.
I won't.
Best of luck, Super Team.
🍐🍐🍐 This one's in on @thetailgateapp, where I keep getting the best pricing I can find, immediate withdrawals, and rewards that actually flow back to users. Code SMOOTH gets you in and really does support the work I'm doing here.
🍐🍐🍐 And if you want the receipts, every Official Play is independently tracked and verified on @SharpCircleBet, so you can follow the card, track the record, and hold me to every result.
Trust the system; cash the slips. 🍐🍐🍐
Huge shoutout to our newest Sharp Circle capper @robgalbets
Got an incredible price on Medvedev ML at -158, with the line eventually closing around -210.
That's some serious CLV and exactly the kind of value we love to see.
Subscribe Below
sharpcircle.bet/tipsters/Rob…
Great read from @SmoothManSports!
Jodar ML✅
Now faces either Daniil Medvedev or Tommy Paul in the next round.
Really cool write-up from Smooth here. Make sure to check out his page and the Blender content he's been putting together. Some seriously good stuff!
This media is unavailable
🍐 #ATPShanghai 🇨🇳 | QF Card 🎾
Styles make matches:
🍐 2U 🇪🇸 Rafael Jodar ML (-113/1.88)
I hope he yells at 3 ball kids.
👇 Here's Why 👇
Ruud builds. Jodar shows up with a wrecking ball.
That's the whole match.
One guy needs the rally to get long and heavy so his forehand can start doing architecture. The other guy's entire personality is making sure that never happens. He takes the ball early, hits it flat, and the point is over before Ruud has finished laying the foundation.
The market has been wrong about this exact collision for seven years.
Ruud has played 33 priced matches against Time Thieves since 2019. The closing lines expected him to win about 16. He won 14.
When he's the dog in those matches he's 4-13, which is not a slump, it's a résumé.
It gets worse. Jodar also grades out as a Return Raider, the kind of guy who looks at your second serve the way a golden retriever looks at a tennis ball. He stands on the baseline like he's paying rent there, takes the return on the rise, and that flat, blistering contact makes him one of the best in the world at it. This week his first-serve return is coming back ten miles an hour faster than Ruud's.
Ruud against Return Raiders? 31-29 when the book expected 34 wins. Ten points under his own baseline. Against everyone else he's roughly fair-priced. Against these guys the price just doesn't hold.
Let's be clear about who we're fading here. Ruud is really good. Three-time Slam finalist, one of the heaviest forehands on tour, barely donates an error, and once the rally reaches shot six he's winning it against almost anyone. None of that is in question. What's in question is whether he gets to shot six. His game is a beautiful machine that needs a few seconds to warm up. Jodar's whole job is to unplug it at the wall.
What does that tell us? The market sees a top-25 player with a top-10 forehand and prices the résumé. We see a fish out of water, a builder with no time to build, and a kid whose game is potentially at its most dangerous in these conditions. The book is pricing the player. We're pricing the matchup.
That gap is the edge, and it's the kind of edge that doesn't show up in your standard box score.
Now add the court speed. Shanghai is playing a 73 on our speed scale this week, eight points faster than its last three editions, and it's serve-driven: holds are running three points above the norm. On a court like this most points are over before the rally becomes a rally. For a first-strike player that's the first strike for free. For a builder it's a clock that's always running.
So what's the market doing? Moving toward Ruud. Near pick'em. The same mispricing that's cost him two wins against the close in this matchup is being handed to us at a better number than it was this morning.
The style that beats him, the court that speeds it up, and a line moving against the data.
It's time to strike.
Best of luck, Super Team.
🍐🍐🍐 This one's in on @thetailgateapp, where I keep getting the best pricing I can find, immediate withdrawals, and rewards that actually flow back to users. Code SMOOTH gets you in and really does support the work I'm doing here.
🍐🍐🍐 If you want the receipts, every Official Play is independently tracked and verified on @SharpCircleBet, so you can follow the card, track the record, and hold me to every result.
Trust the system; cash the slips. 🍐🍐🍐
SharpCircle retweeted
🍐 #ATPShanghai 🇨🇳 | R16 Recap: +4.88U 💰
Bublik had four set points in the first, a break lead in the third, and closed well shorter than the +300 we grabbed:
🍐 3U 🇪🇸 Alejandro Davidovich Fokina ML (+104/2.04) ✅
🍐 2U 🇳🇴 Casper Ruud ML (+138/2.38) ✅
🍐 1U 🇰🇿 Alexander Bublik ML (+300/4.00) ❌
Fall down 7, stand up 8.
On to the quarters, Super Team.
🍐🍐🍐 Every play I make goes in on @thetailgateapp, where I keep finding the best pricing, withdrawals hit immediately, and the rewards actually flow back to users. Code SMOOTH gets you in and directly supports the work I'm doing here.
🍐🍐🍐 And the receipts are public. Every Official Play is independently tracked and verified on @SharpCircleBet, so you can follow the card, check the record, and hold me to every result.
Trust the system; cash the slips. 🍐🍐🍐
🍐 #ATPShanghai 🇨🇳 | R16 Card 🎾
3... 2... 1...:
🍐 3U 🇪🇸 Alejandro Davidovich Fokina ML (+104/2.04)
🍐 2U 🇳🇴 Casper Ruud ML (+138/2.38)
🍐 1U 🇰🇿 Alexander Bublik ML (+300/4.00)
Release the hounds 🐶. Baja Men on repeat. Iykyk.
Best of luck, Super Team--also plz give me feedback on the new slips 👀.
🍐🍐🍐 All three are in on @thetailgateapp, where I keep getting the best pricing I can find, immediate withdrawals, and rewards that actually flow back to users. Code SMOOTH gets you in and really does support the work I'm doing here.
🍐🍐🍐 And if you want the receipts, every Official Play is independently tracked and verified on @SharpCircleBet, so you can follow the card, track the record, and hold me to every result.
Trust the system; cash the slips. 🍐🍐🍐
Unfortunately, our cappers don’t have *~*iNsIdE InFoRmAtIon*~*.
Just real, cold hard data.
You can follow @SmoothManSports—and dozens of other tracked and verified tipsters—on @SharpCircleBet (and Smooth’s case? Absolutely free).
✍️ ANALYSIS: What kind of tennis player is Arthur Gea? ✍️
Blender says “Just Another Guy,” a JAG, and after a Masters quarterfinal on his first try that needs explaining, because the label is more interesting than it sounds.
Quick primer. Every tracked player gets one of seven archetypes, and the archetype answers one question: how does he win points?
Not how well.
Nobody votes on it. With thanks to @TennisViz, every point he’s played over the last two years gets scored against the tour, each archetype is a bundle of those scores, and a player has to clear a bar before he qualifies for one (e.g., a Servebot can’t just win a lot of quick service points, he also can’t be a better player in rallies than he is overall).
The descriptions are just the narrative version of the math:
🤖 Does the serve end the point before a rally starts? Servebot. Shelton.
🔫 Does he just hit through you? Gunslinger. Fils.
🪄 Does he have more answers than you have questions? Shotmaker. Alcaraz.
👷 Does he build the point and never hand you a free one? Architect. Musetti.
🔁 Does the same ball, again and again, make you crack first? Metronome. Medvedev.
🧱 Does he make you win the point twice? Wall. de Minaur.
⏳ Does he take your time away without paying for it in errors? Time Thief. Sinner.
The seven sort themselves into two families. The First Strike Family is Servebot, Gunslinger, Shotmaker and Time Thief: decide it early, on my terms. The Baseline Family is Architect, Metronome and Wall: make it long, and make you solve me. The two barely overlap.
Gea is as clean a Baseline Family player as the data has. Positive on all three Baseline archetypes, negative on all four First Strike ones. Better the longer the rally runs. Barely misses. Steals 36% of the points he’s defending. No ambiguity about which house he lives in.
The problem is the room itself. He leans Wall, then Metronome, then Architect, and none is far enough ahead to name him. JAG means the model can see the family and can’t pick the member yet.
Part of that is the build. Gea hits a flat backhand, about 1,480 rpm against a tour average near 1,800, and a forehand with almost 3,000 rpm on it. Flat on one side, heavy on the other. That’s Cam Norrie’s build too, but Norrie turned it into a style, lefty angles and point construction that drag you where he wants you.
Gea, so far, seems content to not miss and to hit the short ball when you give him one. He converts 72% of his attacks, well above the tour, and that’s about as much ambition as the profile shows.
He’s 21, and the year says the profile is nowhere near finished. He started it ranked 241st. He was 127th in August when he won Los Cabos, made the second week of the US Open as a lucky loser, and he’ll be inside the top 50 on Monday after Shanghai. Three months, 185 spots. Where the game goes from here is the fascinating part, because the pieces he has could become three different players.
Since July his defence is already a different animal: points won once a rally hits nine shots went from 52% to 60%, and his hold rate at tour level from 62% to 81%. He’s 12-2 in that stretch.
Then he went to Shanghai and the First Strike kit is showing up. Through Faria, Humbert and Shelton he held 87%, won 60% behind his second serve, and saved 10 of 15 break points. Then he out-aced Mensik 11 to 6. That’s a First Strike week from a Baseline Family player, and the first week the serve carried him as much as--if not more than--the legs.
The court helped, and not the way you’d think. Shanghai is a 73 on the BLENDER scale, a First Strike court where seven points in ten are over inside four shots. That should punish a player whose return does no damage. It doesn’t, because on a court that fast nobody builds much off a return anyway, and everything ends up in tiebreaks, where the guy who misses least is looking to be the favorite no matter whose serve is bigger.
Which also tells you what flusters him. His losses this year that weren’t tiebreak coin flips came on slow courts against heavy-ball Baseline Family players. Slow the court down, get the ball up above that flat backhand, and refuse to give him the free errors he feeds on, and the formula stalls. That’s where I’d fade him. A big server on a fast court, it turns out, is the matchup he’s fine with.
The system’s nearest comp is Flavio Cobolli, and that’s a useful one, because Cobolli has been a JAG in this data through a breakout year of his own. Same family, similar scores, same habit of winning without one loud mechanism.
The label didn’t stop him and it won’t stop Gea. Cobolli’s version hurts you on the return, though, and Gea’s doesn’t yet, which is the first thing I’d want to see him add. I’d bet Wall for Gea once this week is digested. But the Wall version of him doesn’t hold 87% on a quick court, and this one did.
So, what kind of tennis player is Arthur Gea? A Baseline Family player with a Norrie build and none of Norrie’s tricks yet, legs that got better in July and a serve that showed up in October.
The BLENDER calls that a JAG because it reads two years of points and he’s only been this guy for three months. JAG isn’t the verdict. It’s the model saying wait.
What do YOU see in him? How would YOU refine?
Rob Gallagher Bets 🤝SharpCircle
Beyond excited to see Robs results 🔥
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
🚨 SHARP CIRCLE CAPPER CONSENSUS
🇪🇸 Alejandro Davidovich Fokina ML
@SmoothManSports — 3U (+104)
@TennisProTrader — 1.5U (-103)
Two cappers backing Fokina to get it done 👊
































