@SharonCooperGC
Account based inUnited Kingdom
About this account
- Account based in
- United Kingdom
- Connected via
- United Kingdom App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Health worker. Mother. GAA/LGFA. Pronouns No/Thank/You WORIADS Proud MERF 🧙♀️ #XX♀️🇮🇪
Ireland
Joined July 2021
- Tweets53.3K
- Following2.2K
- Followers2.6K
- Likes211K
Pinned Tweet
Hello GC Twitter!
A few weeks ago I bought a Heretic patch from @JessDeWahls. I already owned a copy of #GBLAF by @millihill
Today I set up this Twitter account because I’m tired of all the gender woowoo, the lies, the gaslighting, the bullying.
#NewProfilePic #Adulthumanfemale
Sharon ☘️🤍🤦🏽♀️ retweeted
My DMs are open if you want to understand the mainstream binary view rooted in gametes and why all other models not only fail but are self-refuting.
See my article below.
🔗link.springer.com/article/10…
Sharon ☘️🤍🤦🏽♀️ retweeted
When saying that “sex binary is incredibly overly simplified”, did any of the scientists offer a third or fourth or even fifth sex to prove it? That would have been my follow up question. “Male, female, and…” When the choices are only male & female, that’s binary.
Sharon ☘️🤍🤦🏽♀️ retweeted
Hi Isaac. I've written one of the most-read scholarly articles on the sex binary and my arguments are cited favorably by the most prominent researchers on the evolution and biology of the sexes.
My DMs are open if you want to make sure you accurately understand the mainstream binary view rooted in gametes, and why attempts to root the sexes in something else will always fail.
I've linked to my scholarly article below:
🔗link.springer.com/article/10…
But see also:
🔗onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/…
Sharon ☘️🤍🤦🏽♀️ retweeted
Just as most men aren't rapists, voyeurs or domestic abusers, so there are plenty of trans women who pose no risk to women and girls.
However, some trans-identified men provably are a risk. We know this because it's a matter of public record. Trans women have been convicted of all the crimes listed above, and of femicide.
No study has ever proven that trans-identified men don't have the same pattern of criminality as every other kind of man. All available evidence points the other way: they are just as likely as any other man to be a rapist or a woman-killer. The evidence is plain to see in government statistics and court reports, however much you'd like to pretend none of those exist.
Demanding that women and girls pretend there is no risk to themselves, which you do constantly, is itself abusive. Your insistence that you belong in women-only spaces, and your pretence that the likelihood of harm to females in those spaces doesn't increase with every man who's allowed inside, mark you out as precisely the kind of man who should be nowhere near women's and girls' locker rooms.
Decent men, however they identify, respect women's boundaries. Even if they themselves would never dream of harming a girl or woman, they are under no illusions about what some of their fellow men will do if given access to spaces where women and girls are undressed or otherwise vulnerable.
As for women who commit terrible crimes: I have literally never heard any woman deny that Myra Hindley, Karla Homolka or Joanna Dennehy are female. Nor have I ever seen a woman argue that being a woman entitles them to enter spaces reserved for vulnerable people, without having a professional or family-related reason for being there.
Yet another difference between women and trans-identified men of your type is that the former aren't demanding, en masse, the right to go where they clearly don't belong - for instance, into a nursery where they have neither a child nor a job, or onto an intensive care ward when they know nobody and have no medical qualifications, purely because they consider themselves to be especially kind and nurturing. Even if such an interloper didn't hurt a child or a critically ill person, women as a class understand how inappropriate it would be to push themselves into those spaces and just how much justified disquiet they'd cause by doing so.
The entitlement and disregard you show for the feelings and boundaries of women and girls are of those of an unfortunately all-too-common type of male. You believe you have the right to demand that women sacrifice their own personal safety to validate your feelings about yourself. You're either indifferent to the fact that you might make women and girls uneasy at best, and scared at worst, or you're well aware that you'll have that effect, and the thought gives you a thrill. Nothing about that makes you a woman. On the contrary, you just keep proving, over and over again, that you are a man.
Sharon ☘️🤍🤦🏽♀️ retweeted
The experience of posting this tweet has taught me two things: (1) many men have absolutely no idea that girl's & women's lives are circumscribed at virtually all times and in virtually all places by the need to avoid male violence; (2) blocking sprees are fun
Sharon ☘️🤍🤦🏽♀️ retweeted
If a gay white man like Tom Daley wore blackface he’d lose his sponsorship. So why is Daley’s drag womanface being celebrated by the media? Drag insults women no less than blackface does Blacks.
Sharon ☘️🤍🤦🏽♀️ retweeted
because she held a protected belief in the integrity of evidence-based medicine. The respondent defends all claims and specifically the latter claim by pleading that evidence-based medicine is just an opinion, not cogent or coherent and not relevant to a weighty or substantial aspect of human life and behaviour
Sharon ☘️🤍🤦🏽♀️ retweeted
Let that sink in. An NHS Integrated Care Board was willing to argue that evidence-based medicine is "just an opinion" and also not cogent or coherent.
because she held a protected belief in the integrity of evidence-based medicine. The respondent defends all claims and specifically the latter claim by pleading that evidence-based medicine is just an opinion, not cogent or coherent and not relevant to a weighty or substantial aspect of human life and behaviour
Sharon ☘️🤍🤦🏽♀️ retweeted
To have a group of men attempt to shut down a lawful women's event on the basis that it offends them, can be described in many ways and I think 'invasion' one of the nicer.
How about this. A disgraceful, unlawful, authoritarian, coercive and abusive attempt to prevent women meeting lawfully to discuss issues of concern to women. The men responsible should be suspended from the Green Party pending investigation, and then I hope expelled.
Of course that won't happen. Primarily it seems because these men are very well protected; most shamefully and frighteningly, by women.
Sharon ☘️🤍🤦🏽♀️ retweeted
I am suing my doctors for transitioning me starting as a minor in the state of North Carolina.
Sharon ☘️🤍🤦🏽♀️ retweeted
A New York jury just awarded $2 MILLION to a young woman who underwent a double mastectomy at 16 and later detransitioned.
The jury found her psychologist and surgeon liable for malpractice.
Her case alleged that serious mental-health issues, including depression, body dysmorphia, anorexia and autism-spectrum traits, were not adequately addressed before an irreversible procedure was performed on a minor.
Now watch what happens when someone like her speaks publicly.
For years we were told regret was exceedingly rare. We were told these procedures were necessary care. We were told questioning the process itself was dangerous.
But when a detransitioner stands up and says, “This happened to me,” suddenly she becomes the problem.
That is the epistemic tell.
When evidence supports the narrative, it is celebrated.
When evidence contradicts the narrative, the person carrying the evidence gets attacked.
A jury heard the testimony. A jury examined the evidence. A jury found malpractice. And a jury put the damages at $2 million.
You don’t protect vulnerable young people by demanding silence from the ones who came back and said, “I wish someone had slowed this down.”
You protect them by listening.
#AStoneGroove #SilentMajoritySpeaks
Sharon ☘️🤍🤦🏽♀️ retweeted
This happened because Planet Fitness allows men to use women's changing rooms. They changed their policies to allow this because trans activists convinced them that it's bigoted not to let men in. As ever, the victims of this corporate decision weren't born with penises. I sincerely hope they sue.
Sharon ☘️🤍🤦🏽♀️ retweeted
What on earth does “Safeguarding must work in both directions“ mean?
Child #safeguarding must be absolutely paramount. People with no understanding of it need to stop inadvertently undermining it.
We are still waiting for @KemiBadenoch & @Conservatives to tell us exactly what they think is covered by the ‘+’, why they think it should be protected & how they think it intersects with child protection.
The so called ban on ‘conversion therapies’ is a Trojan horse for the biggest attack on child safeguarding since @UKLabour passed the #GRA2004 last time they were in office.
#RestoreSafeguarding #RepealTheGRA
Sharon ☘️🤍🤦🏽♀️ retweeted
“Two-spirit” is not some ancient third sex.
The term was adopted in 1990 at a Native American/First Nations gay & lesbian conference near Winnipeg, to replace the word “berdache.”
A pseudoscientific “identity” is no basis for Irish law.
Coppinger’s Bill would amend the Gender Recognition Act, the Interpretation Act and the Civil Registration Act so that any resident could record themselves as “non-binary,” and that status would become their gender for all purposes. An X could also be entered on birth, adoption and death registers.
That is not an insignificant change. “For all purposes” undermines Single-sex spaces, sport, prisons, refuges, crime statistics and healthcare.
Differences of sex development are variations within male and female. Identifying as “non-binary” is undefinable. Just ask anyone who claim to be such.
The integrity of biological sex must be maintained in Irish law.
Chaos lies without it.
@OCallaghanJim
Coppinger cites native "two-spirit" identity in gender debate:
gript.ie/coppinger-cites-nat…
Sharon ☘️🤍🤦🏽♀️ retweeted
Men shouldn't be in women's and girls' changing rooms, period. There is no test in existence to determine whether a man is or is not a threat to women before he's committed an assault. Innumerable men who claim to be women have sexually assaulted women. A simple Google search will give you the names and histories.
Men as a group pose a threat to women, as a group. The statistics don't change when the men identify as women. On the contrary, there are currently more trans-identified men in jail in the UK for sexual offences than there are among the general male prison population.
The reason this man was able to access unclothed women is that Planet Fitness thought it was progressive to let men into women's single-sex spaces. Women have been warning for years that women and girls would be harmed if corporations and institutions decided to placate the trans lobby and admit men to changing rooms and public bathrooms. These sexual assaults were entirely preventable. I repeat: I hope the women who've been assaulted sue.
Sharon ☘️🤍🤦🏽♀️ retweeted
Full statement
Reem Alsalem UN special rapporteur on violence against women and girls
Concerning the criminal conviction of Dora Moutot
GENEVA – The Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls, Reem Alsalem, expressed serious concern about the criminal conviction of French journalist, author and feminist commentator, Dora Moutot.
“Moutot is also facing other legal proceedings in connection with her public statements on sex and gender,” Alsalem said.
On 20 May 2026, the Paris Judicial Court convicted Moutot of public insult against a person or group on the grounds of sex, sexual orientation or gender identity, requiring her to pay a total of €4,754. Moutot has reportedly appealed the conviction.
The Special Rapporteur is particularly concerned by the reasoning set out in the judgment. Although initially prosecuted as incitement to hatred, violence or discrimination, the conduct was reclassified as public insult. The court found that the statements did “not call, implicitly or explicitly, on the public to engage in violence, discrimination or hatred” against transgender women, and considered that the statements constituted a “form of expression that spreads hatred based on intolerance” and warranted a criminal sanction.
“As women, saying that we need to exercise caution around men, particularly where there are reasons to fear for our safety, does not in itself constitute hate speech. Such expression can be reasonable and legitimate in the context of women’s safety and the debate on women-only spaces. Women should not be sanctioned for expressing concerns about their own safety or that of other women and girls,” Alsalem said.
“Protecting people from discrimination and violence is an important human rights obligation. It must, however, remain compatible with freedom of opinion and expression, the equal participation of women in public debate and the right of all women to live free from violence and intimidation. Simply expressing views on sex, gender or the specific needs of women based on their sex should not constitute grounds for harassment, intimidation or sanction.”
The Special Rapporteur raised concern about death threats and calls for physical violence reportedly directed against Moutot, as well as several complaints reportedly closed without the perpetrators being identified. The information received includes threats made during demonstrations, online harassment campaigns, doxxing and other acts of intimidation.
“If confirmed, the apparent contrast between the use of criminal proceedings in response to Moutot’s public statements and the lack of effective outcomes in investigations into the threats against her raises concerns regarding equality before the law, due diligence and the right to an effective remedy,” Alsalem said.
The Special Rapporteur has requested information from the French Government concerning the conviction and its appeal, the other legal proceedings, investigations into the threats and measures taken to ensure Moutot’s safety, and to guarantee that women can participate in public debate on sex and gender without violence, intimidation or disproportionate restrictions on their freedom of expression.
She urged French authorities to take appropriate measures to protect Moutot from threats and reprisals, whilst respecting the independence of ongoing judicial proceedings.
ohchr.org/en/press-releases/…
@CAMARAMlissa2 @stop_homophobie @SOShomophobie @EDeshoulieres @RemyBonny @doramoutot @hadjalahbib
Sharon ☘️🤍🤦🏽♀️ retweeted
Hearing reports that @GreenPartyWomen meeting with the brilliant @GussieGrips at the Green Party conference has been invaded by TQ+ waving trans flags.
Because discussing women's pelvic floor problems is apparently transphobic?