@SerranoElena

abogada, comunicadora y coach ejecutiva, creo (aun) que puedo cambiar el mundo...

Santiago, Chile
Joined May 2011
Fue el mejor de los tiempos!
"Porque quiero que florezcan mil maneras de pensar" 38 años del NO. Una gesta democrática que nos llena de orgullo #Chile🌈🇨🇱
1
47
Los buenos muchachos…
1
50
Ojo que no está Anthropic
🇺🇸 The Trump–Xi state dinner that just took place featured a large group of U.S. CEOs and top executives. Head table (with Trump, Melania, Xi, and Peng Liyuan): Elon Musk — Tesla and SpaceX CEO Jensen Huang — Nvidia CEO Lisa Su — AMD CEO Tim Cook — Apple Executive Chairman Other notable tech / AI / Semiconductor CEOs and leaders: Mark Zuckerberg — Meta CEO Sam Altman — OpenAI CEO Satya Nadella — Microsoft Chairman & CEO Sundar Pichai — Google/Alphabet CEO Sergey Brin — Alphabet/Google co-founder Jeff Bezos — Amazon Chairman Michael Dell — Dell CEO Cristiano Amon — Qualcomm CEO Sanjay Mehrotra — Micron CEO Eric Yuan — Zoom CEO Finance and Wall Street: Jamie Dimon — JPMorgan Chase CEO Larry Fink — BlackRock CEO Stephen Schwarzman — Blackstone CEO David Solomon — Goldman Sachs CEO Jane Fraser — Citigroup CEO Ryan McInerney — Visa CEO Michael Miebach — Mastercard CEO Industry, defense, and other: Kelly Ortberg — Boeing CEO Mary Barra — General Motors CEO Larry Culp — GE Aerospace CEO Jim Taiclet — Lockheed Martin Chairman, President & CEO Albert Bourla — Pfizer CEO
1
80
Discursos como este de @sanchezcastejon y otros de @MarkJCarney hacen sentirse orgulloso de que se estén llamando a las cosas por su nombre en momentos tan oscuros e inciertos para la humanidad. No coincido en todo lo que hace o dice Sánchez, pero sí firmaría palabra por palabra este discurso. Se trata de humanidad y de la humanidad, de los poderes salvajes de los que habla Ferrajoli o de la democracia, el estado de derecho y los derechos humanos. Hay que decidir de qué lado estamos.
7
85
9
176
22,487
He leído con mucho interés la entrevista a @NYCMayor hoy en @el_pais y he tomado algunas notas analizando su retórica y construcción de discurso. Lo comparto en este hilo porque me parece que está construyendo algo muy interesante: un nuevo socialismo democrático 🧵
10
127
16
387
31,547
An amazing photo of Mayor Zohran Mamdani, Pope Leo XIV’s new archbishop of New York, Ronald Hicks, and Archbishop Elpidophoros
405
2,912
202
24,731
1,766,158
Otro Once, otra memoria de fuego, muerte y acero. En un día precioso de sol de Sept. Desde mi balcón vi caer bombas sobre La Moneda. Años después vi caer un avión al otro lado del río sobre el Pentagono en Wash DC. Nunca hubo consuelo. Ahora tampoco.
2
135
Elena Serrano retweeted
Emma Watson and Gloria Steinem met for the first time almost ten years ago, in London. Watson was ostensibly there to discuss Steinem’s memoir “My Life on the Road.” Instead, the two spoke about erotica, the work of the researcher Valerie Hudson, the problem of gender inequality. Their friendship lasted until Steinem’s death, last Wednesday. On July 15th, Watson visited Steinem at her brownstone. The women spoke, in Steinem’s historical home, about patriarchy, politics, and marriage. “Eventually, Gloria has to go upstairs for another appointment,” Watson writes. “As I press my body to hers, trying to wrap my arms around her carefully, I know, with a strange certainty, that this will be the last time I see her.” Emma Watson remembers her friend Gloria Steinem: newyorker.com/culture/essay/…
16
86
3
475
61,768
No puedo creer esta columna de @bsalaskantor diciéndonos que todo está ok 🤷🏻‍♀️
Aquí está la declaración del Canciller de Argentina DESPUÉS del encuentro entre ambos presidentes y de la firma de esa muy cuestionable declaración conjunta. Nos vieron la cara y nuestras autoridades dejaron que así fuera. Estamos hablando de soberanía territorial. Ojo ahí
12
35
2
124
10,370
Elena Serrano retweeted
Harry Truman left the White House as one of the least popular presidents of his era. He returned home without a presidential pension, without a government-funded staff, and without much public appreciation for the choices he had made. Yet more than a decade later, another president would travel to his hometown to place tangible proof in his hands that one of his greatest defeats had never truly been a defeat at all. On January 20, 1953, Truman’s presidency came to an end. Unlike former presidents today, he had no taxpayer-funded office waiting for him. No lifetime salary. No official support system. The Former Presidents Act, which would later provide those benefits, had not yet been created. His most reliable income came from his World War I military pension. It was a little over one hundred dollars a month. So Harry and Bess Truman boarded a train, left Washington behind, and returned to Independence, Missouri. At the time, few Americans seemed upset to see him go. His approval ratings had collapsed. Critics blamed him for inflation, political scandals, the Korean War, and much of the uncertainty that followed World War II. Newspapers had spent years portraying him as ineffective, and many voters believed his legacy had already been written. In the eyes of much of the country, Harry Truman was a failed president. Truman never spent much energy arguing otherwise. Instead, he settled back into ordinary life. That same year, he bought a Chrysler and took a road trip with Bess across the country. They drove through multiple states without a motorcade or special treatment. Truman stopped at gas stations and filled the tank himself. People recognized him. Truck drivers waved. Strangers asked for autographs. Once, state police reportedly pulled him over because he was driving too slowly. Back home in Independence, he answered his own phone, handled his own mail, and took daily walks through town. Reporters who tried to follow him sometimes struggled to match his pace. The former president had become, in many ways, a private citizen again. What stood out most was what he refused to do. He did not spend his retirement attacking Dwight Eisenhower. He did not launch a campaign to repair his image. He did not obsess over his place in history. He simply moved forward with his life. Meanwhile, history quietly began revisiting the decisions he had made. One of those decisions came in 1948 when Truman signed Executive Order 9981, beginning the desegregation of the U.S. military. It was a politically risky move. Military leaders objected. Southern Democrats were furious. Many advisers warned him against it. Truman proceeded anyway. He believed segregation was morally wrong, and once he reached that conclusion, political calculations no longer mattered much to him. Then there was Europe. The continent emerged from World War II shattered. Economies were broken, cities lay in ruins, and millions faced poverty and instability. Truman’s administration responded with policies that would shape the modern world. The Truman Doctrine committed America to resisting Soviet expansion. The Marshall Plan invested billions in rebuilding Western Europe. At the time, many critics called it wasteful spending. Years later, those same decisions looked very different. European economies recovered. Democracies survived. Western Europe entered one of the most stable and prosperous periods in its history. Policies once mocked as expensive mistakes increasingly appeared to be the foundation of the postwar order. Yet one issue remained painfully unresolved. National health insurance. In 1945, only months after World War II ended, Truman became the first American president to formally ask Congress for a comprehensive national health insurance program. He believed illness should not destroy a family financially. The opposition was immediate and intense. The American Medical Association denounced the proposal. Conservatives attacked it. Many lawmakers from both parties joined forces to stop it. The legislation died. Truman tried again. It failed again. When he left office in 1953, one of the causes he cared about most remained unfinished. There would be no celebration. No signing ceremony. No victory. So Truman returned to Missouri and carried on with his life. Then, twenty years after he first began the fight, something remarkable happened. On July 30, 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed legislation creating Medicare and Medicaid. Johnson could have held the ceremony at the White House. Instead, he boarded Air Force One and flew to Independence, Missouri. The signing took place inside the Harry S. Truman Presidential Library. Waiting there was an 81-year-old former president whose vision had once been dismissed and defeated. Before signing the bill, Johnson publicly praised Truman for championing the cause long before the nation was ready to embrace it. Then he signed the legislation. Medicare and Medicaid became law. Johnson handed several of the signing pens to Harry and Bess Truman. In front of the country, he made something clear: The man who had lost the battle in the 1940s had helped make victory possible in the 1960s. But Johnson had one more tribute planned. Six months later, he returned to the Truman Library carrying two small cards. They were among the first Medicare cards ever issued. Card number one belonged to Harry S. Truman. Card number two belonged to Bess Truman. Johnson presented them personally. The symbolism was impossible to miss. The president who had left Washington believing one of his most important goals had failed now held proof that the idea had survived long enough to become reality. The cause had outlived the defeat. Truman died in 1972 at the age of eighty-eight. By then, historians had already begun reevaluating his presidency. The Marshall Plan. The Truman Doctrine. The integration of the armed forces. The recognition of Israel. The creation of NATO. The strategy of containing Soviet expansion without triggering another world war. And the early push for national health insurance. Decisions that once drew criticism increasingly looked like acts of long-term leadership. The president who left office with approval ratings near thirty percent gradually rose in historical rankings until he became widely regarded as one of the most consequential presidents of the twentieth century. What makes that transformation remarkable is that Truman did almost nothing to create it. He did not reinvent himself. He did not rewrite history. He did not spend decades demanding recognition. He returned home, lived quietly, and let time deliver its verdict. Some victories happen on election night. Some arrive when a bill becomes law. And some take decades before the world realizes the people who appeared to lose were simply ahead of their time. Harry Truman lived long enough to see one of those victories placed directly into his hands. History is patient. Sometimes it takes years for the world to catch up to the people who were right.
118
643
35
2,983
286,697
Elena Serrano retweeted
Que se lave la boca el circense antes de mencionar a Allende y celebrar el golpe militar en Chile, faltando el respeto a centenares de miles de víctimas y a millones de chilenos y argentinos. @clarincom @LANACION
5
1,613
51
4,476
47,376
Elena Serrano retweeted
La sala cuna entró a la ley chilena en 1917. El proyecto actual ingresó en 2022 y en los últimos 7 meses se ha puesto en discusión inmediata en 12 ocasiones. Hoy el @Senado_Chile votará para corregir el diseño. Aún falta un segundo trámite. 109 años debiesen ser suficientes. 🔴
9
2
9
766
Nepal. Inundaciones dejan desplazados sin hogar. Me conmueve profundamente la ternura de estos soldados…saben consolar…quizás mejor q disparar!
1
75
Esta si que es buena idea! We are behind you, Senator! @jg_valdes
A John Kennedy or an Obama usually happens once in a lifetime, just maybe we'll see a trifecta with Ossoff.
63
Elena Serrano retweeted
Una invitación desde dos veredas distintas. Bravo @TomasVodanovic y @jaimebellolio. "Dialogar con verdadera voluntad de llegar a acuerdos exige valentía: salir de la trinchera, renunciar al aplauso fácil que se consigue denostando al adversario..."
26
27
8
117
6,813
Elena Serrano retweeted
Hoy solo 8 de los 25 ministerios de Chile son encabezados por mujeres. ¿Por qué importa que la mitad de la población esté representada donde se toman las decisiones? Sobre esto escribe hoy nuestra directora ejecutiva @cristina_vio en @latercera. comunidadmujer.cl/mujeres-en…
1
5
8
483
Elena Serrano retweeted
Interesante entrevista a @PatoFdez sobre la crisis de las izquierdas. Una invitación incómoda, pero necesaria, a dejar de vivir únicamente de la denuncia y volver a imaginar un proyecto capaz de comprender el presente, defender la democracia y ofrecer un horizonte de futuro.
15
16
6
49
7,872
Elena Serrano retweeted
Dear Christopher Nolan, My name is Herod Priovolos and I want to tell you what #TheOdyssey truly means to me and to generations of Greeks who grew up with Homer’s story. Homer did not sing of Odysseus simply to entertain us with ships, storms, gods and monsters. He told the story because he understood what war, time, distance and loss can do to the human soul. Odysseus leaves Ithaca as a king, a husband and a father. He returns twenty years later alone, exhausted and disguised as a beggar, carrying the memory of every companion who never made it home. The monsters are not merely creatures created for spectacle. The Cyclops is power without justice. The Sirens are the beautiful voices that tempt a person to abandon their purpose. Circe represents the danger of losing our humanity. Calypso offers Odysseus immortality, but even eternal life becomes a prison when the price is forgetting his wife, his son, his homeland and his own identity. And Ithaca is not merely an island. Ithaca is the place that remembers you when the world no longer recognizes your face. It is the home that remains alive inside you after everything else has been taken away. It is Penelope growing older while she waits. It is Telemachus becoming a man without his father. It is Argos surviving long enough to recognize his master one final time. Odysseus is not great simply because he defeats monsters. He is great because he is proud, frightened, wounded, clever, imperfect and deeply human. He loses his companions, his youth, his name and twenty years of his life, yet he refuses to forget who he is. When he finally returns, Penelope does not recognize him through strength, glory or appearance. She tests him. Odysseus proves his identity by remembering the bed they built together around the roots of a living olive tree. That is the heart of The Odyssey. Not the battles.
Not the ships.
Not the monsters. Two people standing before each other after twenty years, asking whether love, memory and identity can survive everything time has done to them. That is why this poem has survived for almost 3,000 years. Every human being is trying to return to something: a home, a person, a lost part of themselves, or the life they had before the world changed them. So use Homer’s seas, gods, heroes and monsters. But please understand what you are touching. The Odyssey was never truly about how far a man could travel. It was about how much the world could take from him before he stopped being himself, and whether, after losing almost everything, he could still find his way home.
443
2,507
291
9,080
317,479