Joined March 2025
What if owning a piece of a global company could look completely different from the way we’ve always understood investing? Stocks have lived in traditional financial markets for decades. Blockchain introduced a completely different way of representing and moving digital assets. So what happens when these two worlds meet? In this short documentary, I break down tokenized stocks from the ground up;what they are, how tokenization works, why blockchain matters, and how people can access these assets through platforms like Roqqu. No complicated financial jargon. Just the idea, explained simply. Own a slice of the global economy. roqqu.sng.link/F336c/rb1jy/r… @roqqupay #CreateWithRoqqu
96
3
1
108
10,275
It’s Q4 πŸ”₯ GM πŸ’ͺ🌚
Money moves too slowly. We’re living in a world where information travels instantly, but getting paid can still take days. That’s the problem @Zebec_HQ is tackling. From real-time payroll to stablecoin payments, cards, and payment infrastructure, Zebec is building toward a world where money can move as seamlessly as everything else. This is bigger than just crypto payments. It’s about making blockchain financial infrastructure actually useful in everyday life. PayFi is still early. And I’m bullish on builders pushing it forward. ⚑️ Keep an eye on Zebec. πŸ‘€ @JV_Vink
24
8
61
1,152
gm frens πŸ’š using one account for every strategy can get messy fast. here’s how i use sub accounts on pots market: i keep my main account as the treasury, then create separate accounts for different strategies, testing and copy trading. this keeps my positions and capital organized, while making it easier to see what’s actually working without mixing everything together. i switch between accounts depending on the strategy i’m running, and move or consolidate funds when needed. i walked through the whole process in this video. your main account is the treasury. your sub accounts are the strategy rooms. watch the walkthrough ↓ @POTSmarket
I bet you don’t know what I’m about to tell you. Do you know you can perform multiple tasks on a prediction market platform without mixing everything into one account? Just like I’ve been preaching about one of my favorite prediction market platforms, @pots_market there’s a feature that can completely change how you organize your prediction-market activities. Sub-accounts. And no, they’re not simply extra accounts you create for the sake of having more accounts. They let you structure different strategies, positions, capital allocations and activities into separate environments under your main POTS account. Here’s how it works. 1. Separate your strategies Imagine you’re doing manual trading, testing a new strategy and copy trading at the same time. Putting everything into one account makes it harder to know what is actually working. With POTS sub-accounts, you can give each activity its own environment: β†’ Main account: your primary positions β†’ Sub-account: strategy testing β†’ Sub-account: copy trading β†’ Sub-account: another market or strategy The goal is simple: separate the activities so you can manage them independently. 2. Choose the type of sub-account you need POTS provides Standard and Advanced sub-accounts. Standard β†’ Gas-free trading β†’ Cloud-assisted signing β†’ Maximum deposit of $500 Advanced β†’ KWS-assisted signing β†’ $3/month β†’ Unlimited deposits So if you’re testing a strategy with a smaller allocation, Standard can fit that use case. If you need more capital in a particular sub-account, Advanced gives you more room. 3. Give every account a purpose Don’t create: β€œAccount 1” β€œAccount 2” β€œAccount 3” Give them names that tell you exactly what they’re for. Crypto Testing. Copy Trading. Sports. Experimental. Now you can identify what you’re managing at a glance. 4. Fund them according to the strategy Once you’ve created a sub-account, you can allocate capital to it from your main account. This becomes useful when you don’t want one experiment to have access to the same capital you’re using for your main positions. You can decide how much capital belongs to each strategy and keep the allocation visible. 5. Manage positions separately This is probably one of the biggest advantages. If your manual positions, copy trades and experimental positions all sit together, your overall P&L doesn’t immediately tell you which activity produced the result. With separate sub-accounts, you can look at each environment independently. ->What positions are open? ->How much capital is allocated? -> How is that strategy performing? -> What is actually working? You get a much cleaner picture. 6. Copy trading can have its own space You can dedicate a sub-account to copy trading while keeping your own positions in another account. That means your copied positions don’t have to become mixed with your manual decisions. You can manage the copy-trading activity as its own strategy instead of treating everything as one giant portfolio. 7. You can move funds back when necessary The separation doesn’t mean your capital is trapped there. You can move funds between the relevant accounts and consolidate them back into your main account when needed. So the structure can look like: Main account β†’ Sub-account β†’ Trade β†’ Manage β†’ Consolidate And you can repeat that process whenever your strategy changes. This is why I don’t see POTS sub-accounts as simply β€œmore accounts.” I see them as a way to create structure. Your main account can serve as the capital hub. Your sub-accounts can become dedicated environments for different strategies, markets or activities. Instead of asking yourself, β€œWhere did all these positions come from?” You can look at each account and immediately understand what it is doing. And the best part is that you don’t have to take my word for it. But if you had multiple prediction-market strategies running today, which one would you give its own POTS sub-account first?
42
3
60
2,116
Update for the day πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ @kindworldlabs just launched their ambassador program with amazing rewards πŸ”₯ Do well to check them out and let’s gooo πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ πŸ”— nitter.cf/kindworldlabs/status/2…
Looking to explore stocks without making the process complicated? Here’s a quick walkthrough of how to find stocks on @roqqupay πŸ‘‡ You can access different assets from one platform, and Roqqu currently supports 140+ tradable assets across its ecosystem. Let’s get into it 🧡
12
5
30
920
I bet you don’t know what I’m about to tell you. Do you know you can perform multiple tasks on a prediction market platform without mixing everything into one account? Just like I’ve been preaching about one of my favorite prediction market platforms, @pots_market there’s a feature that can completely change how you organize your prediction-market activities. Sub-accounts. And no, they’re not simply extra accounts you create for the sake of having more accounts. They let you structure different strategies, positions, capital allocations and activities into separate environments under your main POTS account. Here’s how it works. 1. Separate your strategies Imagine you’re doing manual trading, testing a new strategy and copy trading at the same time. Putting everything into one account makes it harder to know what is actually working. With POTS sub-accounts, you can give each activity its own environment: β†’ Main account: your primary positions β†’ Sub-account: strategy testing β†’ Sub-account: copy trading β†’ Sub-account: another market or strategy The goal is simple: separate the activities so you can manage them independently. 2. Choose the type of sub-account you need POTS provides Standard and Advanced sub-accounts. Standard β†’ Gas-free trading β†’ Cloud-assisted signing β†’ Maximum deposit of $500 Advanced β†’ KWS-assisted signing β†’ $3/month β†’ Unlimited deposits So if you’re testing a strategy with a smaller allocation, Standard can fit that use case. If you need more capital in a particular sub-account, Advanced gives you more room. 3. Give every account a purpose Don’t create: β€œAccount 1” β€œAccount 2” β€œAccount 3” Give them names that tell you exactly what they’re for. Crypto Testing. Copy Trading. Sports. Experimental. Now you can identify what you’re managing at a glance. 4. Fund them according to the strategy Once you’ve created a sub-account, you can allocate capital to it from your main account. This becomes useful when you don’t want one experiment to have access to the same capital you’re using for your main positions. You can decide how much capital belongs to each strategy and keep the allocation visible. 5. Manage positions separately This is probably one of the biggest advantages. If your manual positions, copy trades and experimental positions all sit together, your overall P&L doesn’t immediately tell you which activity produced the result. With separate sub-accounts, you can look at each environment independently. ->What positions are open? ->How much capital is allocated? -> How is that strategy performing? -> What is actually working? You get a much cleaner picture. 6. Copy trading can have its own space You can dedicate a sub-account to copy trading while keeping your own positions in another account. That means your copied positions don’t have to become mixed with your manual decisions. You can manage the copy-trading activity as its own strategy instead of treating everything as one giant portfolio. 7. You can move funds back when necessary The separation doesn’t mean your capital is trapped there. You can move funds between the relevant accounts and consolidate them back into your main account when needed. So the structure can look like: Main account β†’ Sub-account β†’ Trade β†’ Manage β†’ Consolidate And you can repeat that process whenever your strategy changes. This is why I don’t see POTS sub-accounts as simply β€œmore accounts.” I see them as a way to create structure. Your main account can serve as the capital hub. Your sub-accounts can become dedicated environments for different strategies, markets or activities. Instead of asking yourself, β€œWhere did all these positions come from?” You can look at each account and immediately understand what it is doing. And the best part is that you don’t have to take my word for it. But if you had multiple prediction-market strategies running today, which one would you give its own POTS sub-account first?
126
4
1
121
5,093
Ser-JetπŸ’œπŸ‘‘ retweeted
Timon doesn’t need to feel more global. It needs to feel more local. I’ve been studying @usetimon, and I think there’s a growth layer worth exploring. I call it USETIMON LOCAL ➀ Campus Local Spending ➀ Language Content Lets explore below ↓ ↓
4
4
1
17
325
Ser-JetπŸ’œπŸ‘‘ retweeted
My entry for the $GARRI MEME CONTEST LESGOOO😎πŸ”₯ help tag @degenBRO__ in the comments My addy: 0x88206B45115cc0bBD4d22CA92AeDa2AF82caE8eB
Meme contest 5 winners $500 reward pool Include $GARRI & tag me Every one must earn
16
7
2
25
2,005
We’ve spent decades putting financial assets into traditional systems. Now we’re learning how to put those same assets onchain. And tokenized stocks might be one of the clearest examples of what that actually means. When you buy a stock, you're buying a small piece of a company. Think of it like a pizza: you don't need the whole pizza to own a slice. Tokenization takes that familiar idea and creates a digital representation of an asset that can exist on a blockchain. So a tokenized stock isn't simply β€œApple, but now it's crypto.” The important question is what the token actually represents and what rights the specific product gives you. That's because the blockchain doesn't magically create the underlying company share. Depending on how the product is structured, the traditional financial asset, custody, ownership structure and regulatory framework can still sit behind the digital token. The interesting part is the bridge. Traditional finance β†’ digital representation β†’ blockchain Now financial assets can potentially become digital building blocks that interact with blockchain-based infrastructure. That's why tokenization is bigger than putting a stock ticker on a blockchain. It's about taking assets people already understand and creating new ways to represent, access and interact with them digitally. And platforms like @roqqupay are making this conversation more accessible by giving users access to supported tokenized assets through a familiar digital platform. The technology might sound complicated. The idea doesn't have to be. Traditional assets. Digital representations. Blockchain infrastructure. That's the bigger picture behind tokenized stocks. Own a slice of the global economy. 🌍 Join the next big shift here roqqu.sng.link/F336c/rb1jy/r… #CreateWithRoqqu
81
2
93
7,853
I agree to the motion that says… you can comfortably make $500 to $1000 monthly and a creator or as an ambassador….. but now I just say this particular ambassador program and I got pissed …. I think some project should sit down and work on your reward structure πŸ˜’. nitter.cf/zbit_official/status/2… @zBit_Official review your structure, including Africa would help a lot in marketing
Blockchain data is public. But that doesn’t mean it’s easy to understand. Thousands of transactions happen every second, creating massive amounts of on-chain data. The real challenge is turning that raw data into information you can actually use. Here’s where @sleuthintel comes in. 🧡
13
5
1
36
1,271
Blockchain data is public. But that doesn’t mean it’s easy to understand. Thousands of transactions happen every second, creating massive amounts of on-chain data. The real challenge is turning that raw data into information you can actually use. Here’s where @sleuthintel comes in. 🧡
🀝 Paid partnership
24
14
1
61
2,810
Ser-JetπŸ’œπŸ‘‘ retweeted
Following up on yesterday’s $ETH call. Yesterday, I said $2,750 and $2,800 were the key checkpoints before the higher targets could open up. β†’ $ETH pushed to $2,788 before rejection and closed at $2,684.67, down roughly 2.5%. β†’ Today, ETH has traded between roughly $2,630 and $2,700, with leveraged longs being flushed as the market digests last week’s rally. This is the bear case from yesterday playing out, but the broader breakout structure has not been invalidated yet. β†’ $2,626 to $2,672: immediate support zone β†’ $2,550: deeper structural support β†’ $2,800: major resistance A clean daily close above $2,800 would strengthen the case for a move toward the $2,900 to $3,000 area. But if $2,626 breaks decisively, the next downside zones become much more important. So I’m not changing the thesis. The market is testing it. $2,800 above. $2,626 below. Yesterday was the breakout. Today is the test. Watch the video for more @pots_market @pots_money app.pots.market/markets
57
12
65
2,496
πŸ””BREAKING The CodeHathon is officially happening and the energy is already unmatched! My fren @Cryptokid990 with his team are currently on fire. Come see what’s going on, catch the action, and experience the challenge as it unfolds. They are not just writing code, they are making history. Instagram β€”> instagram.com/reel/Ddsx-JpOh… TikTok β€”> vt.tiktok.com/ZSb8w55at/
16
7
45
1,457
Ser-JetπŸ’œπŸ‘‘ retweeted
While other cards may fail, you can always count on the Roqqu Go Card for successful payments. Create your card today, and start spending crypto just like cash.
5
9
1
25
2,991
🚨 THE CODEHATHON IS LIVE! πŸ”₯ 96 hours. One challenge. Countless possibilities. The BuggyBillions CodeHathon is officially underway, and we’re taking you behind the scenes as developers push their creativity, skills, and teamwork to the limit. πŸ’» Build. πŸ”₯ Collaborate. πŸš€ Push boundaries. Join us LIVE on TikTok & Instagram to watch the journey unfold, support the participants, and experience the challenge in real time. Don’t just hear about it. Be there LIVE. πŸ‘‡ vt.tiktok.com/ZS9AxHvQ5tK1a-… instagram.com/buggybillions_… #CodeHathon #BuggyBillions #96Hours #TechChallenge
6
9
35
682
Ser-JetπŸ’œπŸ‘‘ retweeted
Most founders worry about price. The real risk is whether the early supporters stick around. @selectfdn gets this right. On token.select Contributors keep earning trading fees for as long as the token trades. If you're launching a token, this is the kind of thing that actually keeps a community around.
Week 2 competition is live. In under 30 seconds, convince a team to launch on token.select Video only. Any format, any style, any language.
15
12
1
34
571
πŸ”΄ WE’RE GOING LIVE ON TIKTOK! The countdown to the BuggyBillions 96 Hour CodeHathon is officially getting real. πŸ’»πŸ”₯ Before the challenge begins, we’re taking you behind the scenes for an exclusive pre-CodeHathon LIVE session. Expect: ⚑ What’s coming πŸ’» What to expect from the 96-hour challenge πŸ”₯ The energy behind the build πŸš€ And a closer look at what’s about to go down πŸ“ TikTok LIVE: @BuggyBillions πŸ—“οΈ Today The CodeHathon starts 24th September. 96 HOURS. ONE CHALLENGE. ONE SHOT TO MAKE HISTORY. We’re not just writing code. We’re building, pushing limits, and making history. πŸ†πŸ”₯ Join the LIVE πŸ‘‡ tiktok.com/live/event/768875… #BuggyBillions #CodeHathon #96HourCodeHathon #TechChallenge #guinessworldrecord
27
16
1
94
2,301
Ethereum ethereum:native was going up. So why did the probability of ETH reaching $3,500 suddenly start going down? That was the part that made me stop scrolling. I was looking through @pots_market when I noticed the $3,500 ETH market behaving strangely. At first, everything looked normal. The probability of Ethereum reaching $3,500 before the end of 2026 had been sitting around 40–43%. Then it climbed toward roughly 43%. ETH itself was moving higher too. So naturally, you’d expect the probability to follow. But around midday on September 23rd, something changed. The probability slipped back toward 38–39%. Nothing catastrophic happened. There was no massive ETH crash. Just a few percentage points disappearing from the market. And that’s when the question became much more interesting: Why would confidence in ETH reaching $3,500 fall while ETH itself was still climbing? So I started pulling the thread. ETH had moved from the mid-$2,400s toward the $2,700–$2,800 area. The broader crypto market was also showing strength. U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs had recorded roughly $270M in inflows in a single day. Ethereum had also broken above the $2,661 resistance level, with technical analysis pointing toward roughly $3,050 as a potential next target and a higher zone around $3,395–$3,445 if momentum continued. On the surface, the pieces seemed bullish. Then I noticed another interesting development. Roughly 27,372 ETH, worth around $75M, moved from FTX-linked wallets to Wintermute. And this is where it’s very easy to jump to the wrong conclusion. You could look at that transfer and immediately say: β€œFTX is dumping ETH.” But we don’t actually have confirmation that the ETH was sold. The transfer happened. The sale wasn’t confirmed. Those are two very different things. So I wouldn’t use that transaction as proof of why the POTS probability dropped. It could have affected sentiment. Traders could have become more cautious around the $2,750–$2,800 area. The probability could simply have been experiencing normal prediction-market volatility. Or there could have been another catalyst that wasn’t immediately obvious. And honestly, that’s what made the market worth investigating. Because this is the fascinating part about prediction markets: They aren’t simply showing you where an asset is. They’re showing you what participants think could happen next. And sometimes those two things don’t move together. ETH can be going up… while confidence that it reaches a specific price target goes down. That’s exactly what caught my attention here. The probability had pushed toward roughly 43%. Then it fell toward 38–39%. A few percentage points. But behind those few points was a much bigger question: What changed in the market’s expectations? That’s the story I wanted to investigate. Not whether ETH will hit $3,500. Not whether I think it will. But what the market was saying when its confidence suddenly changed. Β» One chart. Β» One price target. Β» One unexpected probability move. And a whole lot of questions hiding behind a few percentage points. I broke the full story down in the video. Watch it and tell me: What do you think caused the probability to move? #POTSMarket
101
3
105
4,370