Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ (@SelterMosby) header
Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ (@SelterMosby) profile picture

Wait for it... Psychologist. Generalist. Scholar optimist. HxA JHU https://xitter.cf/t.co/1m38qk43un @ABitMorePod Opinions my own. 🟥⬜🟦 🟦⬜ 🟧🟦

Joined March 2009
Photo by Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ (@SelterMosby)Photo by Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ (@SelterMosby)Photo by Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ (@SelterMosby)Photo by Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ (@SelterMosby)Photo by Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ (@SelterMosby)Photo by Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ (@SelterMosby)Photo by Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ (@SelterMosby)Photo by Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ (@SelterMosby)Photo by Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ (@SelterMosby)Photo by Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ (@SelterMosby)
Let's share our brains together.
1
1
90
Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ retweeted
This should be pushed far and wide. Watched in every college class in the U.S. Thank you @billmaher The moral confusion is gross. "It is not a genocide, it is a counterattack in a war...Gaza equals genocide is a lie, an easily provable lie (as I have argued from first hand observations in Gaza). The fact that so many democrats go along with it is to me the party's worse moment since they undid reconstruction after the civil war...words have meaning...genocide, kill or try to kill an entire people, you can't just change the definition of genocide to mean counterattack in a war where people including civilians die, that's every war..."
376
4,114
211
16,627
1,030,777
"To achieve this, Gaza needs to be reimagined so it is no longer sustained by an NGO complex or a refugee framework. Gaza will need deep deradicalization across schools, mosques, media and public language to cultivate and produce builders and creators."
In an op-ed for The New York Times, I argue that saving Gaza & its Palestinian people requires resisting Hamas, weaving in personal themes, addressing issues with the Left & "pro-Palestine" movement & proposing a vision for Gaza's future Transformation. nytimes.com/2026/09/04/opini…
2
75
Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ retweeted
In an interview with The Chronicle, Johns Hopkins President Ronald Daniels says conservative scholarship is underrepresented in the humanities and social sciences. His remedy? Institutional self-criticism, departmental hiring and scholarly debate — not outside intervention. chroni.cl/4guyoz8
6
6
11
32
24,511
Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ retweeted
Define irony. My friend Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib @afalkhatib and I walked into a Palestine shop at «Arendalsuka» in Arendal, Norway this afternoon to talk to the people working there, and hear their views with an open mind. 
Ahmed buys some soap, a bit of tea and a few handmade products, and tells the shop owner that he believes Palestinians and Israelis must live in peace with each other. Ahmed says he does not want any war with Israel, and that Hamas is terrible for the Palestinian people. The shopkeeper replies that he, on the contrary, supports the terrorist group Hamas, and that Israel must be destroyed. We say goodbye and leave the shop. Right afterwards we are approached by several undercover police officers who stop both me, Ahmed, and several of our friends at the same time for “suspicious behaviour.” We are required to show identification, say who we are and what business we have in the town of Arendal. Isn’t it ironic that a guy has just stood there openly, in front of both us and customers, saying that he supports the terrorist organization Hamas, and that the entire democratic country og Israel must be wiped off the map — and the police are completely fine with that? Meanwhile we, who visited the shop and tried to encourage peace, are the ones stopped by the police for “suspicious behaviour”? It’s good that the norwegian police are active in their jobs and attentive, but something tells me they are missing the mark a bit on where they ought to be directing their attention.
115
642
42
3,525
94,330
Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ retweeted
I refused to defend or support anyone with an SS Totenkampf tattoo, simply because they had a "D" next to their name. I won't defend or support anyone who is too cowardly to stand up to extremists who think the mother of my best friend, who jumped from 95 stories because the alternative was worse, deserved what happened to her. Her only crime was showing up to work that morning. The Democrat running for the U.S. Senate in Michigan won't or can't stand up to the guy who says she "deserved" what she got that morning she showed up for work.
745
2,137
116
13,981
631,410
Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ retweeted
"One of the greatest leaders in history" is certainly... one way to describe Mao. #viral #politics #debate
22
61
5
1,362
42,984
Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ retweeted
It's beyond obvious: some elements who proclaim to be part of the so-called "pro-Palestine" & "anti-Zionist" movements are antisemitic, pro fascist, pro-Nazi, pro-Jihadi, agents of hatred and sabotage who will invert history & reality to support their vile hatred and extremism.🤮
29
228
4
1,165
28,605
Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ retweeted
I guess one reason Republicans think immigration is an invasion is that they're paranoid, but another reason is that some people in Europe are like: "Yes, this is an invasion".
Outrage in France after the LFI politician Yazid Arifi holds a speech in which he says it's time to: - Realize the West is finished - De-Westernize France - Destroy Western strongholds from within - Strengthen Islam in France - Decolonize France's security forces
98
194
21
2,808
211,069
Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ retweeted
A May 2026 Pew survey found that 44% of American Muslims expressed favorable views of Hamas, the terrorist organization that controls Gaza and carried out the October 7 attack, along with decades of violence against Israelis and Palestinians. Many reacted with shock at what they saw as a disturbing indicator of radicalization in American Muslim communities. For me, it was neither shocking nor remotely reflective of the full picture. Based on countless interactions, trends, and observations since October 7, this number is almost certainly an undercount, capturing only those willing to admit their support, much like 2016 polls that underestimated Donald Trump’s backing because many voters hesitated to disclose support for a then‑controversial figure. This support reflects a multi‑layered failure that begins in the home. Many parents import rigid political narratives from their countries of origin and pass them to their children, leaving first‑ and second‑generation Muslim Americans trapped between inherited dogma and their own attempts to think more broadly. The near-absence of healthy institutional infrastructure then reinforces that foundation. National organizations like CAIR, AMP, SJP, and MSA have filled the vacuum with grievance‑based politics, enforced conformity, and a culture where dissent is punished as betrayal. Consider Senate candidate Abdul Sayed, who could not even acknowledge Ayatollah Khamenei’s death because some Michigan Muslims were “mourning” the leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Layer onto this the intellectual environment of many universities, where post‑colonial frameworks, social‑justice rhetoric, and certain DEI orthodoxies elevate minority identity while treating criticism of harmful cultural or religious ideas as taboo. In that climate, support for a jihadist terrorist organization is reframed as legitimate “resistance.” Endorsing Hamas has been normalized as a “pro‑Palestine” stance, bundled with a set of ideological positions and social behaviors that reward extremism and punish nuance. The real challenge is not the 44% who openly support Hamas. Their position reflects profound ignorance of Hamas’s catastrophic impact on the Palestinian national project and on the people of Gaza. The urgent work lies with the roughly half of American Muslims who did not say “yes.” They need space, support, and protection to challenge extremist narratives in their communities and to separate Palestinian identity and Muslim identity from a fascistic terrorist organization that violates every religious, humanitarian, and moral norm. Many of these Muslims tell me privately that opposing Hamas has become a litmus test for whether they are considered “real Muslims,” even though they see themselves as proud Americans and integral members of this country. They describe being threatened, ostracized, and smeared for speaking out. They also express deep gratitude for anyone willing to say publicly what they feel unable to voice. These are the people who deserve our focus, solidarity, and allyship. Supporting them is essential to ensuring that American Muslim identity is not defined by a foreign conflict or by allegiance to a terrorist group. And it is entirely possible, and morally necessary, to criticize Israeli government actions without embracing Hamas.
18
142
22
459
23,237
Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ retweeted
Hamas is a genocidal cult: Recently uncovered documents from slain Hamas leader and October 7 mastermind Yahya Sinwar reveal the depth of his depravity and the extent to which he knowingly steered Gaza toward catastrophe. Handwritten notes drafted a year before the attack show Sinwar anticipated a ferocious Israeli counter‑offensive, even speculating, in his own words, about the possibility of an Israeli nuclear retaliation on Gaza. Despite uncertainty over whether Iran or Hezbollah would join the fight, he outlined a plan to deploy up to ten thousand fighters from Gaza to seize Israeli towns, expel civilians, hold hostages, and wage what he described as a life‑or‑death battle. These notes align with earlier documents from Sinwar’s archive detailing his intent to use extreme brutality to maximize terror, fear, and psychological trauma among Israelis. The implications are stark. Hamas’s crimes against humanity were not only committed against Israelis but also against the Palestinian people. The fascist organization employed ISIS‑grade tactics, fully aware that the attack went far beyond any military objective and could provoke overwhelming Israeli retaliation. Sinwar’s delusions were matched only by his ignorance: Israel does not need nuclear weapons to inflict devastating harm on Gaza. Yet Hamas deliberately launched an intentionally genocidal assault, predicting, and banking on, an Israeli survival response that would devastate Gaza and then be weaponized for global sympathy. In doing so, Hamas sacrificed 2.3 million Palestinians for a propaganda strategy. This alone should compel the immediate, unconditional, and unequivocal rejection of Hamas by anyone claiming to support Palestinian rights. It should erase any doubt that Islamist extremists pose an existential threat to Palestinian survival, freedom, and the possibility of building a society not dragged into wars its rulers knowingly design to be catastrophic. When you are the weaker party facing the most far‑right government in Israel’s history, your obligation is to safeguard your people, not gamble their lives on apocalyptic fantasies. Hamas’s failure to do so is a betrayal worthy of absolute condemnation. It forfeits any Hamas claim to political relevance and demands that those responsible for October 7 be treated as traitors and murderers of their own people.
162
1,295
123
4,069
652,503
Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ retweeted
When Brunson had Wemby fighting for his life
POST A PHOTO YOU NEVER GET TIRED OF
12
194
5
2,710
71,380
Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ retweeted
The Nazi tattoo should have been enough.
249
427
37
5,419
112,078
Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ retweeted
I prefer the political candidates who do not wish to eradicate Western civilisation
NY-13 nominee Daraliza Avila Chevalier is a founder of CUAD. The org's stated goal? "Eradication of Western civilization"
25
210
2
1,902
38,892
Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ retweeted
Oxford debate is done! Kudos to the amazing team of @emilykschrader @HenMazzig @AviMayer More impressions later, but for now - here is the text of my talk in opposition to the proposition "This House Believes Israel Never Truly Wanted Peace with Palestine": Israel wanted peace. Truly. Repeatedly. And yet, from the minute the United Nations voted for the Partition Plan in 1947, we have been under attack. The Arabs threatened to use force to prevent the establishment of a Jewish state on any part of our homeland, and they proceeded to make good on that threat. And what did that Partition Plan call for anyway? Was it some grave injustice to the Arabs? No. Most of the fertile land was to go to what would have become the Palestinian Arab state, while the Jewish state would be relegated to three pieces of barely contiguous, mostly arid non-arable territory. And yet, the Jews said yes. But the Arabs said no. First the Palestinian Arab militias attacked and then in May 1948, every Arab nation surrounding us and beyond invaded. And this is the only reason why there were ever any refugees from that war. The only reason. Israel managed to survive the 1948 Arab war, and we would have been happy to just live in peace. Remember, at the end of the 1948 war, Jordan annexed the West Bank and Egypt administered Gaza. There was nothing – absolutely nothing - to prevent them from creating one more Arab state on these territories for the Palestinians. They did not. Instead, they chose to continue the war against Israel, which is how Israel came to control the West Bank and Gaza. It was not in some aggressive land grab. It was after multiple Arab armies surrounded us - again - and in May 1967, announced: “This is our chance Arabs, to deal Israel a mortal blow of annihilation . . .” Israel won that war in six days, but even then, we offered peace, making it, as Abba Eban (of Cambridge, much better I believe, I went there too…) wryly observed “the first war in history that on the morrow the victors sued for peace and the vanquished called for unconditional surrender." And, what was the Arab and Palestinian response to Israel offering peace? "No to peace with Israel, no to recognition of Israel, no to negotiations". But we still hoped for peace. So, we entered the Oslo Peace process in 1993. And in September 2000, just when many Israelis, including me, truly believed that a two-state solution was close, Palestinians launched the Second Intifada escalating into a brutal campaign of suicide bombings that left over 1000 Israelis shred to bloody pieces with thousands more maimed for life. Yet, through all that, when in December 2000, President Bill Clinton put a peace deal on the table that would have given the Palestinians all of Gaza, 96% of the West Bank with comparable land swaps from within Israel, no settlements, safe passage between the two territories, most of the Old City, Arab East Jerusalem for a capital and an international force replacing the IDF on the West Bank - it was Israel that said yes. There was no excuse for the Palestinians not to take this deal. None. But the Palestinians, led by Yasser Arafat, walked away, choosing instead to continue blowing us up through suicide bombings. Ultimately this led to the construction of the security barrier, checkpoints, roadblocks in the West Bank which thankfully brought, for a while, an end to this reign of bloody terror. You would think we would get the message, but in 2008 it was Israel, through Prime Minister Olmert, who made yet another peace offer, A near-total Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank, with close to 100% land swaps; No settlements, A link to the Gaza Strip; Arab East Jerusalem as capital of Palestine. Israel would have given up sovereignty over all of the Old City – including the single holiest site to the Jewish people, The Temple Mount, which would be overseen by an international trusteeship. Again, there was no excuse for the Palestinians not to accept it. None. But under President Abbas, the Palestinians walked away from that, too. Israel even disengaged from Gaza in 2005, removing all settlements, allowing ourselves to believe that the elected government of Hamas wanted to focus on improving their people’s lives, instead of destroying ours. We were so desperate to believe this that we ignored all the red flags, allowing numerous Gazans to enter Israel to work, study and get specialized medical care. But all this emphasis on economic development and work permits was part of a carefully built deception, as Hamas leaders later boasted, to lull Israelis into thinking they really were going to mind their own business and live calmly next to us – while they were planning something very very different. On Oct 7, 2023 3000 trained and armed Palestinians invaded Israel from Gaza. Much of the intelligence they relied on came from the very Palestinians we allowed into Israel on work and study and medical permits. They massacred. They pillaged. They engaged in acts of gleeful sadistic brutality which I still lack the heart or the stomach to describe. They took 251 hostages – elderly men and women, mothers, fathers, children, babies. And it was not just trained militants, thousands of so-called “Ordinary ‘innocent’ civilian Palestinians” joined enthusiastically in the frenzy of manic violence, committing horrific acts of brutality. And when the IDF went into Gaza, as they had to, to ensure that the Palestinians could never again do this to us, they found a completely weaponized landscape: Tunnels running under and opening into every house, mosque, hospital, and school. A land filled with booby traps making it impossible for us to fight without doing enormous damage to Gaza. And Hamas, who remained hidden in tunnels and in civilian clothing, designed it this way. This is what we were facing. So do not dare look at us and propose that “Israel Never Truly Wanted Peace with Palestine”. If anything, we wanted it too much. We made offer after offer of peace. We absorbed endless aggression. But we are not going to let ourselves be annihilated to convince you that we want peace. And we will certainly not accept peace on any terms. Some of you demand a one state solution and pretend that two peoples, connected to the same land but with distinct religions, values, cultures, languages and histories, who have never lived in peace, will magically exist in peace and harmony if only they live in one state. And frankly, far too often this call for a one state solution is not naive or delusional but a carefully calculated attempt to rob Jews of their right to self-determination to be a free people in our own land. In this, we are no fools. We have a millennia long history of being persecuted and subjugated by one people after another, and we are not about to give up our one and only state to go back to being at the mercy of others. We do want peace and we are willing to go far to make it happen, but we will not give up our state for it. So now, it is your turn, Palestinians, to answer the question that somehow no university seems to debate – When did you ever truly want peace with the one Jewish state?
183
580
61
2,426
118,380
Dylan Selterman 🧠🐢👨‍🏫✍️🎙️ retweeted
If the left wants to maintain an authentic commitment to human rights, “it must oppose the movement that seeks the elimination of Israel and the purging from civil society of those marked as Zionists,” @adam_louis52328 argues. theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0…
27
30
1
98
16,981
"Discussions of whether anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism obscure the fact that anti-Zionism, as it actually exists, remains genocidal in intent, demanding the erasure of a national group that is protected under international law."
I'm pleased to share an essay I wrote for @TheAtlantic. As a left-wing Jew who supports universal human rights, I argue that opposition to antizionism flows from those values. For more than a century, antizionism has justified the erasure of Jewish life, the expulsion of Jews, and violence and discrimination against those marked as "Zionists." The Democratic Party—and all people of conscience—should condemn it. theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0…
1
2
207
"The Genocide Convention protects all national groups, including those based on shared citizenship. Discrimination against Israelis qua Israelis—and the “Zionists” who appear as their proxies—is a moral wrong."
2
51