#Science and #humanities, and their intersection with #society and #governance. @DennisEckmeier
Germany
Joined August 2017
- Tweets11.3K
- Following1.2K
- Followers2.8K
- Likes7K
Pinned Tweet
I talked with @fromphdtolife about deciding to leave academia, finding out what you want from life, and choosing the next career.
scienceforprogress.eu/57-rea…
#AcademicTwitter #phdlife #academia #Career #careeradvice
Precarious work conditions in research, Portugal edition:
A precariedade dos investigadores em Portugal: da excelência à dependência abrilabril.pt/nacional/preca…
Science for Progress - Science Advocacy retweeted
In short, the status quo in science publishing is fast becoming unsustainable... nature.com/articles/d41586-0…
"The academic system, the way it's set up: You have to play The Game"
youtube.com/watch?v=XAOs-frR…
Climate scientist gets fired from climate science institute for asking climate scientists at a climate science conference to 'wake the public up to a dying planet'.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Report of the first Postdoc survey at the German Leibniz institutes.
leibniz-postdoc.de/report-of…
Science for Progress - Science Advocacy retweeted
Animal use in research & the #3Rs. This is the 1st session of an online training course consisting of 4 #OnDemand sessions. Complete all 4 sessions to earn 6 LASA CPD points.
responsibleresearchinpractic…
#animalwelfare
#animalresearch
#invivo
The misleading headlines go back to a misleading press release...
There are misleading headlines claiming „Greenland melting 100x faster“. But the study only concerns melt rates at vertical ice cliffs in contact with sea water. It has nothing to do with overall ice loss from Greenland, mostly via surface melt & calving. agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.…
Special Issue: Mental Health in Academia - When the academic dream turns into a nightmare | Marie Curie Alumni Association buff.ly/3PUg6Kb
bUt We pRoViDE PeeR rEvIEw
More than one-third of the highest impact scientific journals do not offer to publish outsiders’ critiques of the papers they publish, a study has found. scim.ag/Uj
Science for Progress - Science Advocacy retweeted
People think peer review has been with us for centuries. Not really! Scientific publishing was always a hodgepodge and most outlets were nothing like our current system. Pre-publication peer review only became common in the 1960s. lps.library.cmu.edu/ETHOS/ar…
Science for Progress - Science Advocacy retweeted
Are you an #ECR looking to engage in science policy? We want to hear from you!
The Global Science Policy Network is conducting a survey to gauge the science policy priorities and interests of early-career researchers from around the globe.
forms.gle/1Jd9kWsoDayhcbrY7
Science for Progress - Science Advocacy retweeted
Here is a comparison of take home pay. Under pressure from ECRs and allies, @royalsocietynz raised the stipends for those starting in 2022. They did not tie it to cost of living, so by the time it came in, it was still less than minimum wage.🧐 Thanks @lcsnz for the graph!
ALT Take home pay comparison showing that post grads make less than minimum wage when on the stipend provided by The Royal Society's Marsden fund grant (often considered the most grant in the country).
Science for Progress - Science Advocacy retweeted
to elaborate a bit. If you post on Pubpeer
1 concerns are immediately public in permanent , searchable record
2 author notified and can reply
3 others may join debate
4 doesn’t stop you notifying journal or tweeting
Science for Progress - Science Advocacy retweeted
"This is our story of the arduous journey to improve the medical and scientific literature."
@BastianFromm, @Marc_Halushka, and Arun Patil write at @RetractionWatch
xitter.cf/RetractionWatch/status…
Catch and kill: What it’s like to try to get a NEJM paper corrected, by @Marc_Halushka @BastianFromm and Arun Patil retractionwatch.com/2022/10/…
Science for Progress - Science Advocacy retweeted
Nature podcast: mid-career scientists' advice to their younger selves go.nature.com/3SdeR8x
asli telli on Twitter xitter.cf/aslitelli/status/15810…
The global state of #academicfreedom as of 2021 and many more discussions on the index as well as the latest update to the report: pol.phil.fau.de/files/2022/0… Follow the thread🍀✌️and join us on 20/10/2022 at 6 pm (CET)
Science for Progress - Science Advocacy retweeted
"Paying people to review articles introduces significant bias.
It's for science"
@DGlaucomflecken
1/2