A short time ago, I asked a straightforward question: “Are you for or against small modular nuclear reactors being built south of Macoun?” The results show 54% in favour, 42% opposed, and 2% uncertain.
SaskPower is organizing community discussions to raise awareness and address any questions. These will take place in Macoun on Wednesday, October 28, 2026, from 4:30 PM to 7:30 PM at the Happy Gang Centre.
Additional drop-in sessions include:
Tuesday, Oct. 27: Bienfait Legion (12:00 PM – 3:00 PM)
Estevan Days Inn (5:00 PM – 8:00 PM)
Wednesday, Oct. 28: Estevan Days Inn (8:00 AM – 10:30 AM)
Torquay Community Centre (12:00 PM – 2:00 PM)
Macoun Happy Gang Centre (4:30 PM – 7:30 PM)
Thursday, Oct. 29: Midale Civic Centre (10:30 AM – 1:30 PM)
Weyburn Legion (3:00 PM – 7:00 PM)
The following passage is detailed yet useful. These are the reasons I have concerns about nuclear power stations. My questions appear at the end of the article.
Nuclear Accidents in North America
Radioactive tritium and cooling water leaks have been recorded at roughly 43 to 48 commercial nuclear power plant sites (about 75% of facilities) in the United States, along with fewer documented coolant line leaks or tube ruptures in Canada.
Overview of Leaks in North AmericaUnited States: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Associated Press reports indicate that 48 of 65 commercial U.S. nuclear sites (75%) have shown radioactive tritium or contaminated cooling water leaks, largely from corroded underground pipes, valves, or spent fuel pools. Among these, 37 facilities noted levels above federal drinking water standards on-site, yet regulators suggest most were contained or diluted rapidly without affecting public supplies.
Canada: Notable historical coolant tube ruptures took place at Ontario’s Pickering plant (1974 and 1983), a partial coolant loss occurred at Chalk River (1952), and a minor internal leak appeared at New Brunswick’s Point Lepreau station (2022). In these Canadian instances, coolant was mostly contained or recovered within the sites, avoiding major external releases.
Opinions on these figures differ: mainstream regulators highlight that minor system leaks are typical, strongly diluted, and safely held within plant limits, whereas environmental watchdogs cite aging infrastructure as a continuing and unacceptable threat to local groundwater.
Major Canadian Nuclear IncidentsChalk River (1952 – NRX Reactor): Canada faced the world’s first major reactor partial meltdown on December 12, 1952. Human error and a power surge damaged the core, releasing 4.5 million litres of radioactive water into the basement. Future U.S. President Jimmy Carter belonged to the engineering team that assisted with the cleanup.
Chalk River (1958 – NRU Reactor): A fuel rod jammed and caught fire on May 24, 1958, spreading radioactive smoke and dust through the building. Hundreds of military personnel and civilian staff were deployed for the response.
Cosmos 954 (1978): A Soviet nuclear-powered satellite crashed into the Northwest Territories, scattering radioactive debris across the Arctic tundra. A joint Canadian-American military operation (Operation Morning Light) recovered the fragments.
Pickering (1974 & 1983): Pressure tubes holding fuel rods ruptured at the Pickering plant east of Toronto. Coolant escaped in both events, but containment structures prevented uncontrolled environmental radiation releases.
Darlington (2009): A heavy water and tritium release occurred at the Darlington station into Lake Ontario, though authorities reported no harm to the public or environment.
What are KI pills? (Stable Iodine Tablets)
Potassium iodide (KI) is a salt of stable iodine and is not harmful when taken as directed by a medical or public health official. KI pills are used to protect the thyroid gland from radioactive iodine that may be released into the air and environment during an unlikely nuclear emergency.
KI pills reduce the risk of thyroid cancer for individuals who might inhale or ingest radioactive iodine during a nuclear emergency. While KI pills protect the thyroid gland from radioactive iodine, they are ineffective against other radioactive substances.These pills act as a protective measure during certain emergencies. KI pills may be used alone or alongside other steps, such as evacuation or sheltering in place.
How do KI pills work?
The thyroid gland naturally takes iodine from the blood. It cannot tell radioactive iodine apart from stable iodine. If radioactive iodine enters the body, the thyroid absorbs it easily.
KI pills saturate the thyroid with stable iodine. Once full, the thyroid has no space for radioactive iodine in the blood.
This limits radioactive iodine entering the thyroid and protects it. The process is known as iodine thyroid blocking.
It is important to know that KI pills are not an antidote for radiation. Their protection applies only to the thyroid and only against radioactive iodine. Any radioactive iodine not absorbed will leave the body, mainly through urine, as it decays.
When to take KI pills
KI pills should be used only when medical or public health officials advise it. Follow the label or official instructions.
Note that KI pills help only when significant radioactive iodine is present. Not all nuclear emergencies release radioactive iodine.
Low risk of health effects
The risk of health effects is very low for most people with normal thyroid function. Some people may face higher side effects, including those with thyroid conditions such as Graves’ disease, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, or iodine deficiency or sensitivity.
When side effects occur, they are usually mild and temporary, such as:
nausea, vomiting, or stomach ache
diarrhea
skin rash
headacheIndividuals with certain conditions should consult a doctor before taking KI pills if possible:
a known thyroid disorder
an allergy to iodine
a pre-existing medical condition
People over 40 are less likely to gain benefit from KI pills. They face a much lower risk of thyroid cancer and may have other health issues.
The advantages of KI pills during a nuclear emergency outweigh potential side effects for these groups:
people under 40
women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
individuals exposed to higher doses
Neonates (birth to 1 month), pregnant and breastfeeding women, and older adults (over 60) should receive only one dose of KI pills.
KI pills in Canada
Licensees of nuclear power plants must ensure KI pills are pre-distributed to people living or working near a plant.
Two provincial organizations have created a plan to meet this requirement:
Emergency Management Ontario (EMO)
New Brunswick Emergency Measures Organization
These groups collaborate with plant operators, local municipalities, and public health units to keep KI pills accessible to those who may need them.
Personal property and home insurance is unavailable.
Strict Exclusions: Standard home, auto, and business policies include a “nuclear exclusion clause,” which denies coverage for nuclear explosions, radiation leaks, or radioactive contamination.
No Retail Options: Individual consumers cannot purchase private rider policies for household nuclear damage because the risk exceeds standard actuarial pools.
Commercial and industrial nuclear coverage exists.Specialized Pools: Commercial nuclear power plants and industrial supply chains rely on dedicated insurance groups. In Canada, the Nuclear Insurance Association of Canada (NIAC) manages property and liability pooling for licensed operators, while American Nuclear Insurers offers comparable coverage in the United States.
Government Backing: Because a catastrophic nuclear meltdown surpasses private market limits, national laws intervene. Canada applies the Nuclear Liability and Compensation Act, which sets absolute operator liability up to $1 billion with government supplementation, whereas the U.S. uses the Price-Anderson Act.
Summary:
With 75% of nuclear facilities in North America reporting radioactive leaks, omitting these details during public consultation is misleading.
Previous consultations make it clear that the proposed SMRs are extremely safe—a point other nuclear project managers likely shared with their groups.
Question 1: Stable iodine tablets are provided for emergencies to protect the thyroid, yet they are only safely effective for people with healthy thyroid glands. The radius from the plant receiving these pills remains unclear. Is Macoun within it? What about Hitchcock, Midale, or Estevan?
Question 2: A nuclear disaster would leave your homeowners policy unable to protect you or your property. If nuclear power is now so safe, why has this not changed? Why do providers receive property and liability insurance while consumers do not? Although the Federal Government offers up to $1 billion in tax dollars for compensation, who determines coverage and amounts? Why is the general public not informed?
Question 3: Will there be specialized training and equipment provided to local EMS? Who will be responsible for those costs?
Dave Grass retweeted
This week, we will be in Court on a challenge brought by several First Nations in relation to the independence petition.
Our position is straightforward: the matter is non-justiciable, premature, and fundamentally political, not legal. It is not a matter for the Court and should be dismissed outright. It is unfortunate that emotion and misinformation have become part of this campaign, which has caused division and confusion.
At this stage of the process, a private Albertan has collected signatures from fellow citizens and has already communicated that outcome to elected representatives. Did anything life-shattering or legally consequential occur? No.
So we already know the answer to this week of court challenges: nothing changes legally, because nothing has happened beyond citizens communicating with each other and with their elected officials.
This is civic engagement. It is a core feature of a functioning democracy and it should be encouraged, not discouraged and obstructed.
Importantly, no one requires permission to speak with fellow citizens or to convey collective views to elected officials. Mr. Mitch Sylvestre chose to use the framework set out in the Citizen Initiative Act, legislation designed to structure and facilitate precisely this kind of participation, with oversight by Elections Alberta.
Because that statutory framework exists, it opens the door to legal challenges directed at both the legislation and the actions of Elections Alberta. That is how we arrived here.
But at its core, this case reflects something much broader: organized interests seeking to challenge administrative decisions that are intended to enable citizen participation, not restrict it.
And when lawful civic engagement is met with attempts to control or suppress it, the result should not be surprising.
The more participation is constrained, the more people will push back and seek other avenues to be heard.
So we must ask ourselves:
Do we want a system that encourages citizens to engage or one that discourages them from participating?
And if participation is discouraged, who actually benefits?
Dave Grass retweeted
When our PM only tells you what he wants you to hear - and then misleads the media about meetings with a foreign government accused of election interference - it's time to put your trust elsewhere.
Dave Grass retweeted
Come join us in Moosomin to talk on Saskatchewan Independence, February. 28 at 2PM!
Dave Grass retweeted
View the Arcola Town Hall! Thank you to everyone who came in to our event. Arcola, your questions were fantastic and appreciated!
youtu.be/AhWf493WuDg?si=Wcov…
Dave Grass retweeted
Half the pundit class is suddenly clutching pearls and shouting “treason” because Alberta Prosperity Project talked to Americans.
Interesting.🤔
When #Ottawa courts Beijing, Davos, Brussels or Washington for trade, climate frameworks and security arrangements, that’s called diplomacy.
When citizens talk across a border about their own political future, it’s suddenly treason?
You cannot scream “foreign interference” only when it is politically inconvenient!
If the standard is sovereignty, apply it evenly.
If the standard is law, charge it properly.
But spare Canadians the selective outrage theatre.
👇
nbcnews.com/politics/trump-a…
#Saskatchewan #SKpoli #cdnpoli #PrairieRising 🇨🇦
Dave Grass retweeted
We held the Prairie Rising Forum, and now we are hitting the road with Town Hall events. One thing is for sure, those attending have many questions! To help with that we have put together a few PDF's filled with good information explaining some of the issues Saskatchewan faces with asserting our independence.
You can get your copy here!
prairierisingforum.ca/inform…
While you're on our website, check out the Events page for upcoming town halls, and sign up for news letters and calls to action!
Dave Grass retweeted
Hey friends! I'm reposting this 'cause the last one vanished into the ether – let's crank it up, make it spread like wildfire, and get even more eyes on this! 😂 If life doesn't throw me a curveball, count me in – I'll be there soaking it all up.
So many of us in #Alberta and #Saskatchewan have been yelling for real talk on governance, representation, and our provinces' future, and boom – it's here, wrapped in a massive bow of straight-up common sense! With all these grassroots vibes popping off and leaving folks scratching their heads, this is the clarity bomb we need.
You ABSOLUTELY gotta hit up The Prairie Rising Forum in Regina on October 18! This is HUGE – raw, no-BS convos on where Alberta and Sask are headed, packed with fire from absolute legends like @ChrisBarber1975, @TruthSeek01011, and @TomMarazzo lighting up the stage. And... Shaun Newman's hosting (you know, the @SNewmanPodcast King), so expect it to be unfiltered, inspiring AF, and zero fluff. Plus, there's a KILLER trade show loaded with fresh exhibitors dropping game-changing products and solutions to tackle our biggest headaches – perfect for networking, idea-sparking, and pushing for that brighter tomorrow together.
Who's interested? Let's get fired up, and shape the future we deserve! Grab your tickets NOW at prairierisingforum.ca
(booths too if you're exhibiting) – don't sleep on this one!
If you have specific questions, hit up key organiser @SaskGrass on social or through the website🤗
#PrairieRising #cdnpoli #abpoli #skpoli @jasminlaine @Swiftie01 @CoryBMorgan @dsimieritsch @the3_Ss @prettypatriotCA @SaskLass @SassygalYEG @MarcNixon24 @ryangerritsen @unscrewthenews @RealAndyLeeShow @PissedAlbertan @mario4thenorth @GasPriceWizard @westernstandard @TheRealKeean @RebelNewsOnline
You still have time to get your tickets at early bird prices! Go to: simpli.events/e/prairie-risi…
Dave Grass retweeted
Exclusive: Docs reveal Carney to blow $4.2 billion
'decarbonizing' the military While the Department of National Defence dumps billions into fighting the weather, Canadian soldiers are struggling to fight at all.
FULL REPORT: rebelne.ws/45sLZS3
Dave Grass retweeted
Canada’s crushing Alberta. They drain our wealth while we beg to use it. Time to break free! Support Alberta’s independence NOW!
Dave Grass retweeted
Replying to @cnm5000
I disagree. And note, I'm saying this as someone who was quite involved with Maverick Party and Buffalo Party so I can well sympathize with the frustrations and heartbreak you felt with WIPA.
I think there is a place for separatist parties in both Alberta and Saskatchewan on the landscape. And not only that, but I think its necessary, because it backs up a petition with the promise of action, which makes it more difficult to refuse. However, there are a few caveats:
Such a party should only run in 1/3 of constituencies in the province--rural ones where there is almost zero chance of voteplitting enabling the NDP to win the seat. The aim should not be to form government but rather to hold the balance of power in a UCP or Sask Party minority government. Plus. threatening those party's bases is the way to get them concerned. Another aim is to get MLAs in those ridings to declare support for separation out of fear of losing their seat. The new parties don't even necessarily have to run candidates. They can become registered parties and name candidates in those 1/3 of ridings but promise that if a sitting MLA declares support for separation that they will not run against them. Perhaps just the threat of real competition for power is enough to influence the provincial government. I don't trust them to actually take the steps to separate even if a petition gets enough names, so we need to employ the stick as much as the carrot even if it makes one uncomfortable to consider it.
Dave Grass retweeted
I’m from Hamilton.
Covered politics for near 25 years.
I’ve never seen a crowd this big come out for any politician in The Hammer, never mind a Conservative one.
The scene at Pierre Poilievre’s rally in Stoney Creek awaiting the Conservative leader. Organizers estimate 4,500 people are here. #cdnpoli
Dave Grass retweeted
Estevan area has rallied around young Knox York and his family
sasktoday.ca/southeast/estev…
Dave Grass retweeted
We broke the story! Our Sask WCB investigation is live at buffalopartybpsk.ca/wcb_is_b…
Dave Grass retweeted
It's really this simple. Carbon tax is a joke. Thoughts? Buffalo has passed policy to eliminate this redundant tax forever. Check it out buffalopartybpsk.ca join-donate and check out our policy. Great for Saskatchewan. We are Ready to Lead!





















