Random thought I had: 1. Women are more "ubiquitously sexual" due to being sexual-receptive. I.e. for mating to occur, both male and female must be 'on'. As it occurred, the female is the one who is 'always on', and can be turned on more with proper male advances. 2. Thus the female is actually always in a state of mild 'coom-brain', or always 'mildly drunk'. There is no state of pure desexualization like males have when obsessed with a task. 3. Female sexuality, like male sexuality, is female-centered. I.e. the female is the "noun", while the male is the "verb". 4. The phenomena of females taking a picture of an object, but always including themselves in the picture or in the narrative somehow, is a reflection of these two facts of females being 'always on' and 'self-focused' due to being a sexual receptive and the "noun" or "object" of the narrative sex act itself. Another phenomenon is how female 'content creators' will seek to have themselves in their videos, while males will often see no point in showing themselves. Noun vs. Verb focus. 5. This also results in a radical difference in how they approach just about everything. For example, a male may obsess over a model train set, because he is interested in the model train set. The female would not, since being into trains doesn't signal her own value in any way, and doesn't center herself. We can say in an objective sense that females are less *interesting* because they are less *interested*; everything is tangled up in nonsense social metaphysics. 6. This should also make one deeply suspicious of any feminine "de-centering" politics, since it runs counter to female biology. It's more likely the opposite; it puts a spotlight on white females being 'empathetic'. "De-centering" is really "look at me! Look at how much I care about not-me! Aren't I so nice!?". Males are far more predisposed to de-center themselves. Ironically, this critique of the "white savior complex" is actually an indirect critique of feminine "politics". 7. This is also why females and feminine males shouldn't have the vote, make hiring decisions or serve on juries. As they are more likely to evaluate on the basis of social metaphysics, and penalize a candidate who "gives them the ick", when most innovation comes from males who give females "the ick", the kinds of males who - if lacking opportunity due to a hyper-socialized guild system (such as universities) - end up doing some variation of "building a model trainset in the basement". 8. Regarding exceptional females who overcome their entanglement in social metaphysics: there is no reason to play the exception-game regarding the vote, juries or hiring decision, as these can be done by males, and including exceptional females in these tasks offers no benefit to the system - but requires exceptional overhead in identifying such exceptional females, and creates a hazardous 'camel's nose in the tent' situation. Thus a blanket demographic ban is warranted, and any exceptional female would support such a ban anyway.