Londoner. Supporter of the public sector. Tired of explaining things to idiots.

London, England
Joined November 2024
Think it’s time for a Dummy’s Guide To The Difference Between “Illegal migrants”, “Asylum-seekers” and “Refugees” because some people are badly mixing up those terms. Basically, just because you came via an “illegal” route doesn’t make you an illegal migrant - or vice-versa.
21
5
2
30
6,759
Sam Wolf retweeted
Replying to @darrengrimes
Can't see the full @HeracleanVision article in which he included these fake stats. But this bit is hilarious. He suggests the press only thought Ben Delo was corrupt because he works with crypto. No - it's coz the dude pled GUILTY to helping MONEY-LAUNDERERS for fuck's sake.🤣
1
32
All the Sadiq Khan haters really can do one.
The ULEZ and the electrification of public transport has transformed London from “the Big Smog” to one of the cleanest major cities on the planet. This has saved thousands of lives. And to think, the right-wing campaigned vigorously against this.
33
The ULEZ and the electrification of public transport has transformed London from “the Big Smog” to one of the cleanest major cities on the planet. This has saved thousands of lives. And to think, the right-wing campaigned vigorously against this.
27
258
8
2,391
26,107
"Brexit's not about isolationism! It's about the UK opening itself up to the wider world!" Brexit in practice....
GB News is launching GB Music Radio, a 24-hour digital station only playing artists from Great Britain and Northern Ireland, on 2 November. Chief revenue officer Ross Sergeant said this "gives advertisers something genuinely new". radiotoday.co.uk/2026/10/gb-…
1
31
Tommy Robinson trial day Russell brand trial ongoing Danny tommo in prison Tate brothers in prison Joey Barton in prison Winning
216
370
10
3,537
33,259
News: The French are rioting over high cost of living and under-resourced high schools. The rioters: Yes, that's what we are rioting over. The French government: Yupp, they're rioting over that. Everyone: Yepp, that's whats happening. The far right: Da Blacks! Da Muzlims!
878
6,705
198
43,719
586,860
I can’t reply because the fReE sPeECh champion who started the thread has blocked me. But go on - after The Times exposés WHO, precisely, said the rapes were a “myth”. Name the names. Go on.
I’m confused. Did the publication of that article mean rape gangs were no longer a myth perpetrated by the supposed far-right? And did anyone who continued to talk about them, after the publication of that article, continued to get tarred as a ‘far-fight’ racist conspirator?
2
1
55
Same question for this guy. Name who, precisely.
Yeah except you cretins were calling it a conspiracy theory for a decade after that
1
1
21
He was *very, very famously* ridiculed for dimly talking about “Muslamic ray guns”. They remixed it because thar was funny. He wasn’t some kind of whistleblower you dolt.
So that would make it all the more baffling that he was ridiculed
2
1
59
And here’s another pearl-clutcher (who I can’t reply to because the OP blocks like a pussy). The “ray gun” guy was mocked because he was clearly wankered, then spilled out half-remembered phrases.
You're actually so stupid you think he was talking about ray guns? You don't get that they were mocking his accent when he was talking about young girls being raped? Or you agree with the journalists that his lack of sophistication is more important than young girls being raped?
2
1
20
This was the start of a fascinating discussion with a Restore fan YouTuber who definitely didn’t embarrass himself by insisting on his made-up figures about Muslim crimes. 😀
Replying to @GavinRamonShow
Cool. And your source for this is…?
1
26
Remember that time Channel 4 went undercover in Momentum, and all they came up with was a possible breach of the Data Protection Act which turned out not to be one? Or the BBC's relentless attacks and "reporting", including that atrocious Panorama programme? Or the time the Beeb was investigating Labour in Brighton? Or the time - that one was hilarious actually - when they thought Labour were going to bomb the 2017 GE and followed Corbyn-loathing MPs about during the campaign then were obliged to make the decision to either trash their programme altogether or show the world how ridiculous those MPs were (thankfully they did the latter, but that programme has disappeared into a deep dark vault never to be seen again now). All these awful people trying to defend the indefensible, pretending they are the only political party that has ever been targetted in this way, seem to have a complete amnesia about the years 2015-2019 and the media attacks on Corbyn and Labour which they very likely participated in themselves. Your boys were caught behaving exactly how anyone who has ever met them knows they behave in real life. We despise them for their 1970's "Carry On, Be Sexist and Racist" behaviour. They are the result of too much time spent in the toilet with a Nuts magazine when they were younger. Cry more. What goes around comes around.
THE comments made by certain Reform councillors in ITV's expose are horrendous. However, if dozens of undercover reporters spent a year desperately trying to record awful stuff said by people from other political parties, they would be able to find plenty of idiots, racists, misogynists and even extremists. Sad but true.
4
129
2
380
7,195
Sam Wolf retweeted
For those who don't understand statistical inference, let me help out: If ITV gets meaningful access to 10 Reform representatives and 7 of them turn out to be utter scumbags, Reform can’t reasonably defend itself by saying, ‘There are thousands of representatives and only 7 are bad.’ The relevant figure is 7 out of the 10 representatives ITV actually investigated: 70%. The size of the wider organisation doesn’t change the result of the sample.
123
322
8
2,091
198,008
Called it. When the UK right was rubbing their trousers in excitement at Trump suing the BBC it was clear to the rest of his case was bollocks. Well done to the BBC for keeping their nerve in the face of that bullying creep.
Replying to @Inevitablewest
The BBC may choose to apologise for editing those two clips together. But, no, Trump hasn’t a fucking chance because the broader point - that he encouraged his supporters instead of calling off the Jan 6 insurrection- is entirely TRUE. He was impeached for it, dipshit.
1
37
Sam Wolf retweeted
I like her
125
1,186
48
7,544
297,701
OK, here's a chart to show any numpty repeating the misleading bollocks about how "4 out of 5 new jobs went to foreigners". As you can see, the vast majority of jobs in the UK are still done by British people. And the majority of new jobs have also gone to British people.
3
1
2
103
There's 3.65m more jobs net than in 2014 (so probably far more "new" jobs in reality, as other jobs will have gone). But these new roles that have been created are still each about 80% likely to have gone to a White British person (as opposed to 88% 10 years ago).
1
15
The CSJ misrepresentation of these stats deserves mockery. As does every single journalist who has stupidly repeated the 4 out of 5 claim without properly explaining what it actually means.
11
Sam Wolf retweeted
Here is the simplest way to understand how the populist politics of the likes of Reform and Restore work: Imagine 200 people are waiting for NHS treatment. One is an illegal migrant. You convince the other 199 that the reason they cannot get better access to the NHS is that one person. Suddenly, you don’t need to propose policies addressing decades of underinvestment, workforce shortages, capacity problems and inefficiencies. You just announce a policy to deport that one migrant and present it as the solution. Now apply the same logic to crime. Constantly highlight crimes involving migrants until people start to believe that migrants are responsible for crime generally. Then, when people ask how you will solve crime, the answer is simple: deport the migrants. Housing? Blame migrants. Public services? Blame migrants. Pressure on infrastructure? Blame migrants. The appeal is obvious. Complex problems that require complicated, expensive and sometimes uncomfortable solutions are reduced to a single identifiable group that can be blamed. But then you add another part to the strategy. You relentlessly attack the government that is actually trying to deal with those underlying problems. First, you claim they are doing nothing about migration, even when the available statistics show that migration & asylum numbers are falling. When that same government makes difficult decisions to address the wider structural problems, such as raising taxes to fund public services, you present those decisions as an attack on ordinary British people. So you create a perfect political trap. Blame the migrant for the problem. Blame the government for not removing the migrant. Blame the government again when it takes the difficult decisions necessary to address the real underlying issues. By the time the population have voted you into power, it's too late for them to realise you didn't actually have any viable policies. You now have all the power and you can start delivering on all the promises you made to your wealthy donors, and those who voted you in are left scratching their heads, wondering why everything got even worse.
148
289
20
817
28,562