Joined May 2014
The new CABAL don’t play games!🤬🥶
2
7
25
1,703
sammyb 🔺 🧪 retweeted
Being a West Ham Fan is more stressful than trading Crypto #WHUFC #FACup
3
1
11
731
sammyb 🔺 🧪 retweeted
The atmosphere was 100x better without the plastics btw
UNBELIEVABLE 😲 Two stoppage time goals and West Ham find themselves level 🔥 📺 Watch live on TNT Sports and HBO Max
19
26
1
769
59,163
sammyb 🔺 🧪 retweeted
Bidds is is centralized and corrupt!
1
2
101
sammyb 🔺 🧪 retweeted
$tx community just look at this little 🪱 squirm! The "bug" that Kaj is referring to is nothing more than his incompetence. He won't admit he was slow and didn't think of buying his own domain off his own marketplace but he will certainly play the victim and be sheisty af! 💩
you got the domain somehow due to a bug on our end, you know you weren’t supposed to be able claim this domain even tho you know our funding situation is zero to none, you wanted to upsell this straight back to us at a massive premium now you are surprised you dont get the new version for free? apart from the fact we never promised to do this migration completely free, somehow you still feel entitled to owning a domain with our own brand? we have built all this stuff for the eco at our own expense, yet claiming our own brand name and not giving it away for free is supposedly wrong? we’d be happy to offer you a refund for buying lendore.core if you send it back to us regardless to answer your question: this is right. we work hard for the ecosystem. we have the right of owning our own name. you know you were not supposed to get it. trying to profit of a situation like this like you’ve done is not right additionally, putting some people in the eco now against us due to this is also not right. everything we’ve done on Coreum and TX has been for the eco it wouldve been nice if you would’ve supported us after this technical hiccup, instead of trying to profit from it
6
1
18
2,491
Ummm not sure you understand how much they charged communities to launch NFTs. How much $$ teams have lost …. Money that should’ve gone to our holders . Why do you think we launched @encorenfts 🤦🏼‍♀️ Why do you think, besides us, there is more than one other team building different versions of NFT marketplace? Anywho… Prop 35 isn’t supposed to be about Bidds financial runway to survive as a project. It’s about continuing to build Lendore, KOLs 😅, Rebranding of Bidds domains, and airdrops. While I feel for the team..community pool system is broken. The foundation is influencing votes. And the community just passed a 120k ask which is now worth what? Less than 60k 😭😭 and that was a week ago and he said he’d come back for more? Personally, multiple rounds of funding thru the community pool by foundation backed projects should be supported by the foundation. Also… We NEED GRANTS. 🫶 we also need…Accountability, transparency on funding use and a better system then staking the funds and watching them go to zero with the current market conditions resulting in multiple proposals by the same projects. Hopefully people recognize the system is broken. We need ALL builders on @txEcosystem and the @txDevHub will hopefully provide the support everyone needs so we can continue to grow as a chain. There are plenty of teams and good people trying to build here. While, I don’t support this round of funding, I am very much looking forward to using Lendore and getting my Airdrop from the team for participating in their eco. 🫶 I even bought a bunch of Unicorns… 🦄
6
18
383
Its @onAVAX all over again 🤣
1
2
59
Did you buy the 30mil for your validator or was it given to you after the foundation removed delegations from community validators?
4
3
2
16
1,503
me opening X and reading the timeline about validator vote "coaching" good morning I guess.
5
6
11
251
Waiting for the sheep to follow the same person who the rest of the community hate 🐏
1
1
1
4
169
Why are people abstaining from prop 35? Is it to not rattle cages? Or do they not have an opinion on one team getting a total of 400k in funding
4
2
1
8
2,317
sammyb 🔺 🧪 retweeted
🎭 The Critics Are Panicked... But the Show Must Go On! While some critics cruise into the cheap seats screaming FUD, En-Core is center stage delivering the performance of a lifetime. They’re trying to lend their opinions to anyone who will listen, but they’re just bidding on a losing hand. If they think we provide "0 value," they clearly haven't stayed for the standing ovation. 👏 🌟 NOW PLAYING AT EN-CORE We don’t just put on a show; we provide the utility that keeps the industry moving. From NFT's to Multi-chart asset tracking, there is a performance for everyone 🎟️ GRAB YOUR FRONT ROW SEAT Don’t let the hecklers distract you from the real utility. Experience the value for yourself. 👉 en-core.xyz/
1
5
1
11
398
Actions speak louder then words. A random post hyping up (again) and no actual action is insanity to be saying well done too.
1
6
129
sammyb 🔺 🧪 retweeted
Replying to @MikeMcC1uskey
Being here from the beginning as well and getting RINSED beyond what I would have ever dreamed- respectfully, I have questions and would like a clear explanation and insight on next steps. The real burn is NASDAQ announces its Kraken/ Payward bringing tokenized stocks ON Kraken, your partner! TX was beat to the punch- wasn’t this what you wanted to prevent- I remember on a call, your last explanation was “you didn’t want to reveal your gameplay and plans as someone would copy it” That’s why Coreum and Sologenic were silent. 🙄 Well- you were beat to the punch- a partner is hosting your competition! In your lane, with your 7 year business plan, executing like a boss. How much time do you need before the project is dead and you bleed out every TX holder? What is the plan? Your constituents deserve to be addressed with transparency and honestly. Being a business man myself, I had to think about this from my professional experience Where was the launch playbook??? For a merged ecosystem token like TX, I would think a launch playbook would be a surgical tool with precise executable timeline to build anticipation, hype and project awareness to the masses. What was TXs launch playbook? Here’s what I was hoping for: 4–6 weeks before launch •major exchange teasers •media interviews •tokenomics breakdown •influencer push 2 weeks before •exchange listings announced •liquidity partners revealed •market maker names Launch day •coordinated trading across exchanges •high liquidity •strong volume However we got none of it, Sooooo 1️⃣ retail confusion 2️⃣ low liquidity 3️⃣ panic selling I believe further liquidating TX holders or worse case freezing us into submission by further liquidating us….pigeon holing us into a severely discounted staking option as our pathetic lifeline to keep us plugged in. Ha!….and at the same time giving whales 85-95% discount entries to go along with the charcuterie board, wine and dancers. Was this part of the plan? It looks that way to me. Please arrange a community round table and allow a question and answer time for explanation of the above and what the plans are moving forward. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
5
14
2
92
4,264
So yeah… it finally happened. With the merger of Coreum and Sologenic now complete, the network enters a new phase under one unified token: $TX Moments like this deserve more spotlight across the timeline so more people can understand what’s being built here. New ticker. New chapter. Welcome to the $TX era. Excited to see what the next phase brings.
2
7
32
1,015
sammyb 🔺 🧪 retweeted
GM weekend.
5
4
16
274
Just pump my bags and shut the fuck up with the arse licking already
2
8
143
sammyb 🔺 🧪 retweeted
MATE LOOK AT A⚒️EL DISASI
62
144
45
4,882
287,231
They call us the “scammers” whilst snaking behind each others backs. Live footage from canada
7
1
11
319
If you're still looking to sell Bidds, still willing to keep my offer on the table, i know you was asking us to pay $250k which i think is the amount you received as a grant, but even helwan said he wouldn't of approved for being too expensive! This is why we started the journey as there wasn't much run way left for bidds and the price the platform was charging for a project launched outside of bidds as you need to make up on the missed revenue!
1
3
5
402
Replying to @alinetskyi
The main functionality is within the smart contract , and of course as there's options to make collection and Nft offers, the authz would still be required if we aren't holding users funds right? Same with needing Auth for access to nfts as seen with other audited platforms
1
2
107